Final Flashcards

(39 cards)

1
Q

George Berkeley

A

(sensations make up our world around us), was religious

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Immaterialism

A

to be is to be perceived; there are no things in themselves apart from our experience of them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Theory of Vision

A

seeing based on learning rather than on innate visual capacities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

scope of human knowledgfe

A

nothing beyone what we perceive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

immaterialism and existence as perception

A

Berkley’s proposal that there are no material objects behind our perceptions, but just the perception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Theory of vision

A

language i.e. distance perception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Touch & Vision

A

visual perception of depth and distance only possible with respect to object interactions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Differences between Locke & Berkeley

A

Locke doesn’t specify of a non material soul or material body, but Berkeley says they can’t influence us because they aren’t perceived and must not exist. Locke ideas are subjective effects caused by objective things. Berkeley ideas are things.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Similarity between Locke & Berkeley

A

empiricist emphasize importance of experience and learning as source of knowledge. Ideas are objects of perception.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Enlightenment and how it influenced Kant & Hume

A

Kant: “Dare to know” need space and time to have experience. Hume: “All knowledge must be derived from experience”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

(From Class) Potential problems with the term “enlightenment”

A

Human reason isn’t necessarily more “enlightened”. It’s just different.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

David Hume: Causality

A

a habit does not have sensation or justification to logic ideas and impression linked together by cause and effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

David Hume: Mental content

A

Two sorts: 1) Ideas 2) Impressions (from sensory experience)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

David Hume: Ideas about experience and knowledge

A

ideas derived from perceptual experiences “pictures” of our experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

David Hume: Ideas about the self

A

self is a temporary aggregate of associated sensations rather than permanent and unified entity (mind is experience rather than entity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

David Hume: Skeptical reasoning and natural beliefs

A

natural beliefs can’t justify belief in causality (causal connections)

17
Q

David Hume: Attitude toward reason

A

can’t be the only guide to human activity. Does not believe in reason.

18
Q

David Hume: Meaningful statements

A

Analytic statement–all triangles have three sides, always true. Synthetic–it’s raining outside, based on our perception.

19
Q

Immanuel Kant: similarities and differences between Kant & Hume (Meaningful Statements)

A

Added “synthetic but true (we know without checking” ex: space and time, to analytical and synthetic statements of Positivism.)

20
Q

Noumena

A

Reality was in itself, objective world;

21
Q

phenomena

A

the appearances of reality, our experience of the world, subjective

22
Q

transcendental self

A

one’s real self does the organizing of experience

23
Q

phenomenal self

A

only an appearance that is experienced

24
Q

Perspectives on ethics: categorical imperatives

A

act accordance to reason, act the way all other people should act at all times “do unto others as ye would have others do unto you”

25
Schopenhauer: comparison/contrast with Kant
Influenced by Kant's physiological constitution of the body
26
Schopenhauer: Ideas about reality
structuring principles instantiated in the operations of the brain and the sensory organs
27
Schopenhauer: Ideas about the mind
mind composed of unconscious, irrational, instinctual desires.
28
Nietzsche: Comparison/Contrast with Schopenhauer
similarities--both believed human conduct to have instinctual drives.
29
Nietzsche: Types of instinctual drives
Will to Power--our drives and motivation to increase feeling of power, manifest best in aestheticism.... Sublimation: energy and force associated with an instinct can be channeled into other outlets, use them for good.
30
Nietzsche: Health and ethics
believed Christianity tries to eliminate rather than sublimate sinful desires, didn't like Christianity
31
Spinoza: Philosophy of mind/reality, mind/body
mental and physical are two aspects of the same substance double-aspect theory of the mind-body relation. Pampsychism: thought or mentality is found throughout nature.
32
Fechner
criticized Cartesian dualism
33
Fechner: philosophy of mind/body, mind/reality:
body and mind act together one characterized by quality and the other by quantity
34
Mueller: Reasons why he argued for the experimental, laboratory psychology
mental and physical aspects are part of the same reality (similar to Spinoza)
35
Hermann von Helmholtz: relationship with Mueller
was Mueller's pupil
36
Hermann von Helmholtz: Ideas about perception
We infer that things exist, but we don't actually experience them
37
Hermann von Helmholtz is similar to Kant
j
38
Nietzsche: early evolutionary ideas
evolution was perceived as part of God's plan
39
Herbert Spencer
f