Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Persuasion 1-3 > Final > Flashcards

Final Flashcards

1
Q

Consistency Theories

A

a set of theories that are based on the assumption that humans have a basic need to be psychologically consistent; Includes Balance Theory, Congruity Theory, and Cognitive Dissonance Theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Balance Theory

A

Fritz Heider; P-O-X theory, a person (p), another person (o), and an object (x). Each item is in a triangle together with a positive or negative element to each other; is used to describe interpersonal relationships- if someone you like something, then you now like that thing too. Ex used in product advertising with a famous athlete

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Congruity Theory

A

shows how people evaluate other people or things on a continuum rather then simply positive or negative (Scale); 2 assumptions are that attitudes tend toward maximum simplicity and that two attitude objects are linked by an assertion and differ in evaluation, pressure exists to shift toward a point of equilibrium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Maximum simplicity

A

suggests that our attitudes tend to fall toward the ends of the continuum rather than in the middle; It is easier for us to hold stongly held attitudes than it is to hold neutral attitudes in the middle of the continuum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Congruity Theory Strengths

A
  1. provides a better explanation of consistency by allowing the attitudes to move along a continuum without having to completely change from positive to negative.
  2. Both Attitudes can move as opposed to other theories when only one of the attitudes can change; This offers a stronger explanatory power for the theory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Congruity Theory Limitations

A
  1. Does not explain situations that are more complex than the interaction of only two elements related to the target receiver
  2. Predictive power is limited
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Congitive DIssonance Theory

A

Have cognitions in our brains that are little bits of knowledge that can 3 different relationships with one another; is an aversive motivational state that people attempt to eliminate these uncomfortable congnitions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

CDT 3 different relationships cognitions have with one another

A
  1. Dissonant relationship-Two cognitions that are inconsistent with one another (Buying a laptop is not related to a new power cord for the home computer)
  2. Consonant Relationship-Involves two cognitions that are consistent with one another; Buying a power cord is consistent with the belief of we need a power cord
  3. Irrelevant Relationship-two cognitions that a person perceives as unrelated (ex: I eat cheese is not related to I bought a laptop and two ipads
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Magnitude of Dissonance

A

the amount of dissonance; it varies and affects the pressure for change; effected by 1. the importance of the cognitions, the ratio of dissonant to cognitions and the degree of cognitive overlap

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Cognitive Overlap (CDT)

A

The similarity fo the choices available; the greater the similarity the greater the overlap

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Dissonance Reduction

A

Comes after the magnitude of dissonance; The process a person engages in to reduce cognitive dissonance; carried out in ways change of behavior, change the ratio, change the importance, denial, bolstering, transcendence and differentiation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Change of Importance (Dissonance Reduction)

A

Change of the importance of cognitions; ex deciding elements weren’t that important after all

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Change of Behavior (Dissonance Reduction)

A

Change of Behavior; ex stopping smoking in order to deal with dissonance of a anti smoking commerical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Change the Ratio

A

More reaons or cognitions that are consistent with her behavior to reduce the dissonance; ex individual could decide that smoking also enhances concentration, creating a more consonant situation for the receiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Denial

A

Choosing to disbelieve the information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Bolstering

A

Adding consonant elements to reduce the ratio of dissonant to consonant elements; ex smoker referring to others who use weight control as a positive health benefit, emphasize the pleasure of smoking and focus on smokers rights issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Transcendence

A

values that are more important than the issues causing the dissonance ; ex anti abortion people killing a abortion doctor, which is basically killing a human being to stand up for those who kill human beings; only makes sense under transcendence, when they say that killing the doctor will protect hundreds of unborn children in the future

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Differentiation

A

splitting the attitude object into acceptable and unacceptable parts; ex smioker differentiate between filtered cigarettes and unfiltered cigarettes, filtered is thought of as safer so there is not as much dissonance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Cognitive Dissonance Contexts (4)

A

The situations that dissonance is most likely to occur; are four induced compliance, hypocrisy, decision making and effort justification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

INduced compliance

A

when dissonance results from being induced to perfom a counter-attitudinal behavior (behaving in a manner that goes against their attitudes)
Ex: Going to girlfriends dance recital, were forced to but tell friends that youi actually enjoyed it when you actually didnt dissonace

21
Q

Hypocrisy

A

Say one thing but do another; a persons behavior is not consistent with the attitude they hold; Want to change their behavior instead of attitude; ex kids believe that using condoms reduces changes of getting HIV and sTDs but still do not use condoms during sex

22
Q

Decision Making

A

Causes dissonance; Has four stages;

  1. Conflict-alternatives are being evaluated and info is being gathered
  2. Decision- The decision is made
  3. Cognitive Dissonance-feel dissonance about whether we made the right choice
  4. Dissonance Reduction- seek supporting info to help us feel better about our decision and precieve our choice to be better than we initially did
23
Q

Effort Justification

A

When we expend great effort or enure great discomfort to obtain some desirable outcome dissonance is aroused; attempt to justify the horrible dissonance that you experience; ex frats - tell yourself that the benefits are great and will last a lifetime

24
Q

Necessary Conditions for Cognitive Dissonance

A

self explanatory; The conditions are

  1. Aversive Consequences
  2. Freedom of Choice
  3. Insufficient External Justification
25
Q

Strengths of Cognitive Dissonance Theory

A
  1. It applies in many situations
  2. Has very broad explanatory powers
  3. Strong support from decades of research
26
Q

Limitations of Cognitive Dissonance Theory

A
  1. IS difficult to disprove

2. Lesser predictive ability and control

27
Q

Credibility (Source Factor)

A

is a perception of believability; if credible, you are believable;
2 types:
1. Initial Credibility-referes to the credibility of a source prior to the presenitation of the message
2. Derived Credibility-credibility after the presentation
Ethos-credibility of source
Pathos-emotional appeals
Logos-nature of the argument and structure of the message

28
Q

Dimensions fo Credibility 3

A

Good Character (Type of person), Goodwill (Intent towards the audience), and INtelligence (knowledge of the speaker)

29
Q

Sleeper effect

A

Suggests that high credibility sources have more persuasive impact immediately folling the message than do low cred sources, but over time the credibility wears off

30
Q

Discounting Model

A

assumes that initial attitude change is a result of both source credibility and message content; source credibility eventually wears off

31
Q

Introductions and credbility

A

introductions play a pivitoal role in the credibility. ; can share sources education and experience

32
Q

Message varibales and credibility

A

study what variables of a message cause for the credibility to rise or decline; found that messages that is farther from a persons anchor, higher credible people were more cpersuasive than less credible people but when a message was close to a persons anchor, the more credible people were less persuasive then the less credible people. Factors that play a role-humor, delivery of the message, message incongruity(against persons wants and needs)

33
Q

Reciever factors and credibility

A

Involvement with the topic, Locus of control(outlook on life that a person holds), Authroitartism (how much you accept what people in authority tell you), Stress (how much stress a person is under when receiving the message)

34
Q

Locus of Control

A

outlook on life, external locus of control means you believe that your world is control by things like fate, and circumstances that are uncontrollable; internal locus of control believe that you are in control of your future.

35
Q

Other source factors

A

Normative influence and similarity(are you more likely to be influenced by someone who is similar to you/ more persuaded in a group), Physical attractiveness, Likeablility(do you like the source or person)

36
Q

Topic Saliency

A

how important the topic of persuasive message is to revieveers

37
Q

Logical Appeals vs. Emotional Appeals

A

Logical Appeal-persuasive message that relies on logic and resoning to be persuasive
Emotional Appeal-relies on emotion to be persuasive

38
Q

Humor

A

Is very effective at gaining an audiences attention; enhances liking of the source;but can also be offensive and is bery difficult to study

39
Q

Guilt

A

when you believe that your behavior does not meet your own standards and you experience feelings of guilt; door in the face example (ask for much more than is reasonable, only to get shut down and ask for a amount that is much less and more reasonable

40
Q

Fear

A

emotional appeal that relies on fear to persuade the audience; examples are the parallel response model, fear control response and the danger control response

41
Q

Parallel response Model (Fear)

A

proposed that people have one of two responses to fear

  1. Fear control response(attempt to downplay the fear by focusing on reducing it)
  2. Danger Control response(focus on assessing the therat and how to eliminate it)
42
Q

Extended Parallel Process Model

A

Piggy backs the parallel response model and builds on the concept tha tpeople have either a danger control response or a fear control response and shows the different outcome
Includes four components of effective fear

43
Q

Four components of Effective Fear (Extended Parallel Process Model)

A
  1. Severity
  2. Susceptibility-how probable it is that the threat will affect the audience
  3. Response Efficacy-how effective the recommended response is in elminatiing the threat
  4. Self-Efficacy-extent the audience believes they are capable of performing the recommended response
44
Q

Use of Evidence

A

evidence is the factual statements originating from a source other than the speaker; should you or should you not use evidence depends on the nature of the evidence and if it will help you

45
Q

Language style

A

types of words you choose to present in your message; ex “I have a dream speech” MLK used very highly regarded words which made his speech that much more powerful

46
Q

Language Intensity

A

language characteristics that indicate the extend that source deviates from neutrality; determined by two features

  1. Emotional intensity
  2. Linguistic specificity(words that are narrow in meaning and get to the point)
47
Q

Resistance to persuasion

A

Constructing your argument to resist your opponents message; Inoculation and forewarning show this

48
Q

Inoculation Theory

A

to make an audience resistant to oppostition they could be given a small does of the oppositions argument; giving them a few weak arguments of the opposition in order to allow them to develop counter arguments;

49
Q

Forewarning

A

telling the audience they are about to be persuaded can make an audience resitant to persuasive messages; do it about your oppostition

Persuasion 1-3 (4 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions