Final Flashcards

(59 cards)

1
Q

theory

A

organization or framework of concepts that permits prediction of data
- organize data, generate prediction, suggest directions for future research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

interrater reliability

A

Is there consistency from rater to rater
- cohen’s kappa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Alternative (parallel form) reliability

A

Is there consistency between forms of the test?
- correlation coefficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Inter-item (internal consistency) reliability

A

Consistency between individual items and the total score?
- cronbach’s alpha

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Test-retest reliability

A

Consistency between scores on tests given in two separate occasions?
- correlation coefficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Representative reliability

A

Is the measure consistent across sub populations or groups of people?
- no stat test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Face validity

A

do the items on the scale appear to measure what you say they do?
panel of experts establish it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Content validity

A

Is the full content covered?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Criterion validity

A

How does the measure relate to an already known standard?
- Concurrent: correlate with existing measure of the construct
- Predictive: correlate with other traits that would be associated with what you are trying to measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Construct validity

A

How well does the operational definition assess the underlying theoretical construct?
- Discriminative: does the measure differentiate between groups we’d expect to score differently?
- Convergent: do multiple measures of the same construct hang together or operate in consistent ways?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

internal validity

A

can confidently attribute results to the IV (no lurking/confounding variables)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

external validity

A

can confidently generalize results to other people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

threats to internal validity - selection bias

A

other things in common in sample

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

threats to internal validity - history

A

Other confounding factors occurring simultaneously

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

threats to internal validity - maturation

A

People change over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

threats to internal validity - testing

A

People get better when tests are repeated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

threats to internal validity - instrumentation

A

Changes to scoring method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

threats to internal validity - mortality

A

attrition, people leaving studies who have similar attributes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

threats to internal validity - statistical regression

A

regression toward the mean, bias only includes the most extreme results (ceiling/floor)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

threats to internal validity - diffusion of treatment/contamination

A

participants in groups communicate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

threats to internal and external validity - experimenter expectancy

A

expectancy affect, experimenter behavior leads subject behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

threats to external validity - multiple treatment interference

A

Participants receive additional treatments not part of the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

threats to external validity - Reactive Arrangements (Hawthorne Effect)

A

Subjects are aware they are being studied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

threats to external validity - pretest sensitization

A

Pretest changes the nature of the treatment, influences performance on posttest

24
systematic sample
every Kth element, random starting point
25
stratified sample
population put into subgroups and then randomly selected from each group
26
cluster sample
researcher obtains a list of clusters not individuals, clusters are randomly sampled
27
convenience sample
whoever is willing to
28
purposive sampling
sample is selected from predetermined criteria
29
snowball sample
ask for referrals
30
quota sample
try and get a sample that resembles the population (you just go convenience until you meet that criteria)
31
form of confirmability: triangulation
using multiple methods, sources, and investigators to obtain the same results
32
3 types of interviews
- informal conversation: discuss a given question, no set topics - interview guide approach: pre-set topics, no pre-set questions (BEST FOR KIDS) - standardized open-ended interview: pre-set topics and questions
33
form of confirmability: persistent observation
observe participants various times
34
form of confirmability: prolonged engagement
continue to gather data until you're absolutely sure you know what's going on
35
form of confirmability: thick, rich, in-depth description
really tell the story with all the details
36
form of confirmability: negative case analysis
search for and explain phenomena that do not fit until hypotheses account for all known cases
37
form of confirmability: audit trail
theoretical memos with detailed descriptions of how you got from data to conclusions
38
form of confirmability: conceptual saturation
collect data until no new categories are generate
39
form of confirmability: member checks
present analysis to participants for their confirmation or revision
40
form of confirmability: peer debriefing
present analyses to other researches (explore inquirer bias)
41
form of confirmability: explicit documentation
data methods, analysis, and field decisions are all outlined clearly so someone other than you can understand it all
42
3 aspects of the belmont report
1. Respect for persons (autonomy, protection) 2. Beneficence (harms minimized, benefits maximized) 3. Justice (benefits distributed to participants)
43
Credibility in qualitative research
Does the data and interpretation actually represent correctly the participants and their reality
44
Qualitative data analysis: open coding
initial pass through the data, locate initial themes and name them
45
Qualitative data analysis: axial coding
second and additional passes through the data, focusing on themes more than the data
46
Qualitative data analysis: selective coding
look selectively for cases that illustrate each theme
47
sampling in qualitative research
non-probability, produces theory, but usually isn't generalizable to the population
48
key informants in qualitative research
someone who has access to the population you want to research
49
main instrument in qualitative research
YOU
50
level of significance for p-value
alpha, usually < 0.05
51
when to use t-test
compare the means of two groups to determine whether the corresponding population means are different - unpaired: groups are independent - paired: groups are dependent on or related ot each other in some way
52
when to use ANOVA (analysis of variance)
compares the average scores of two or more groups
53
when to use correlation coefficient
assess relationship between 2 variables (no specified IV and DV)
54
when to use bivariate regression
to measure effect of one control variable
55
when to use multivariate regression
to measure effect of more than one control variable that also affect each other
56
type 1 error
false positive, significant stats when in reality the relationship is not significant
57
type 2 error
false negative, insignificant stats when in reality the relationship is significant
58
types of qualitative studies
case studies, interviews, ethnography