Final Flashcards
Strategy
a comprehensive, goal-oriented plan a firm takes to gain and sustain superior performance relative to competitors
Purpose of strategy
sustainable competitive advantage - a firm that is able to outperform competitors or the industry average over a prolonged period has a sustainable competitive advantage
Why Strategy?
Entrepreneur - how can you develop a valuable competitive position within an industry dominated by other firms?
Executive - how can you leverage the firms unique resources and capabilities?
Analyst - how can you understand how some firms generate greater economic profit than others?
Consultant - how can you help clients develop low-costs?
strategic management
the integrative field that combines analysis, formulation and implementation in the quest for competitive advantage
competitive disadvantage
a firm that underperforms its rivals or the industry average
competitive parity
when two or more firms perform at the same level
strategic positioning
steak out a unique position within an industry that allows the firm to provide value to customers, while controlling cost
value creation
occurs because companies with a good strategy are able to provide products or services to consumers at a price point that they can afford while keeping their costs in check
- both producer and consumer capture part of value created leaving society better off
stakeholder
organizations, groups and individuals that can affect or be affected by a firm’s actions
stakeholder strategy
an integrative approach to managing a diverse set of stakeholders effectively to gain and sustain competitive advantage
- stakeholders have a vested claim or interest in the performance and continued survival of the firm
Step 1: Identify stakeholders
- public companies’ key stakeholders: shareholders and other providers of capital
- second group: customers, suppliers and unions
Step 2: Identify Stakeholder Interests
- specify and assess the interest and claims of pertinent stakeholders using power, legitimacy, and urgency criteria
- significant variation in the power a stakeholder may exert on firm
Step 3: Identify Opportunities and Threats
stakeholders have claim on the company, opportunities and threats are two sides of the same coin
- consumer boycotts
Step 4: Identify social responsibilities
corporate social responsibilities. helps form recognize and address the economic, legal, ethical and philanthropic expectations that society has of the business enterprise at a given point in time
Step 5: stakeholder impact analysis
strategic leaders need to decide the appropriate course of action for the firm given the preceding factors
AFI Framework
Analysis
Formulation
Implementation
Analysis
diagnosis of competitive challenge
- vision, mission, values
- external analysis
- internal analysis
Formulation
a guiding policy
- corporate strategy
- business strategy
- functional strategy
Implementation
coherent actions
- structure, culture, control
- corporate governance and business ethics
vision
captures an organizations aspirations and spells out what it ultimately wants to accomplish
- effective vision pervades the organization with a sense of winning and motivates employees at all levels to aim for the same target, while leaving room for individual and team contributions
consumer-oriented vision
defines a business in terms of providing solutions to customer needs
product-oriented vision
defines a business in terms of a good or services provided
mission
describes what an organization actually does – that is, the products and services it plans to provide, and the markets in which it will compete
- what organization does to accomplish vision
values
Core values statement: provides touchstones for employees to understand the company culture, provides moral compass for employees, values support firm ethics
Organization core values: ethical standards and norms that govern the behavior of individuals within a firm or organization, outline vision
- how do we accomplish our goals?
Strategic management process
- lays the foundation for sustainable competitive advantage
- strategic leaders design a process to formulate and implement strategy
- rational and structured
Top-down strategic planning
derived from military strategy, is a rational process through which executives attempt to program future success
- all intel and decision making is concentrated in office of CEO
- three steps are AFI process
- info flows one way, top down
- unforeseen events can make significantly developed and formalized plans obsolete
scenario planning
managers ask what-if questions
- similar to top-down, planning starts with top management envisioning possible scenarios to anticipate plausible futures to derive strategic response
Strategy as planned emergence: top-down and bottom-up
managers engage in a more formalized approach to the strategy process may also fall prey to an illusion of control
- managers overestimate ability to control events
- strategy should be based on an inspiring vision and not hard data alone
firms realized strategy
generally formulated through a combination of its top-down strategic intentions and bottom-up emergent strategy
emergent strategy
describes any unplanned strategic initiative bubbling up from deep within the organization
- if successful, emergent strategy has potential to influence and shape firms overall strategy
autonomous actions
strategic initiatives undertaken by lower-level employees on their volition and often in response to unexpected situations
serendipity
describes random events, pleasant surprises, and accidental happenstance that can have a profound impact on a firms strategic initiatives
Resource allocation process
determines the way a firm allocates its resources and can be critical in shaping allocation process
- combination of top-down strategic intent and bottom-up strategic emergence
theory of bounded rationality
core tenet of which posits that rather than to optimize when faced with decisions, we tend to satisfice
cognitive limitations
lead us to choose the good enough option that satisfies immediate needs, rather than searching for an optimal solution
Two distinct modes of decision making
System 1: the brains default mode, gut reaction and confidence
System 2: logical, analytical and deliberate
cognitive bias
cognitive limitations that lead to systematic errors in our decision-making and interfere with our rational thinking
illusion of control
tendency to overestimate our ability to control events
escalating commitment
when decision-makers continue to support and invest in a project dispute having received feedback that is likely not going to succeed
confirmation bias
tendency of individuals to search for information that confirms their existing beliefs, and ignore contradictory evidence
reason by analogy
tendency to use simple analogies to make sense out of complex problems
representativeness
drawing conclusions based on small samples or even one memorable case or anecdote
groupthink
situation in which opinions coalesce around the leader without individuals critically evaluating and challenging that leader’s opinions and assumptions
devils advocacy
framework team or group or person questioning leaders decisions or ideas
dialect inquiry
two teams generate a detailed course of action, second team alters course of action
- thesis and antithesis are discussed
Pestel Framework
Political
Economic
Sociocultural
Technological
Ecological
Legal
- analyze firms external environment
general environment
external factors strategic leaders have little direct influence over, such as macroeconomic factors
task environment
external factors strategic leaders do have some influence over, such as the composition of their strategic groups
Political factors
result from process and actions of government bodies that can influence the decisions and behaviors of firms
Economic factors
factors in firms external environment that are largely macroeconomic, affecting economy-wide phenomena
Economic factors
growth rates, levels of employment, interest rates, price stability, currency exchange rates