Final Flashcards

1
Q

1st amendment

A

Burstyn v. Wilson: expression via motion pictures is included within the free speech and expression guarantees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Miller test

A

1) work appeals to the prurient interest (average person, contemporary community standards)
2) depicts sexual conduct in a patently offensive way; AND
3) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

CPPA

A

overbroad and unconstitutional; only remote connection between speech encouraging impulses and resulting child abuse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Ferber

A

Miller test does not apply to child pornography; no discussion of artistic/social value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

obscenity

A

words are of such a nature and used in such circumstances as to create clear and present danger that they will bring about substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

broadcasting indecency

A

FCC may regulate indecent broadcasts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

after-the-fact content-based regulation

A

allowed bc of broadcasting’s uniquely pervasive presence and accessibility to children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

video games and the 1st Am

A

Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Ass’n: video games qualify for 1st Am protection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

exceptions to video game protection

A

obscenity, incitement, fighting words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

video game company liability

A

no duty to protect against violence; no foreseeability that player would commit act of violence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

speech and criminal action

A

gov can regulate speech brigaded with action (aiding/abetting) to protect public from criminal and civil wrongs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

defamation

A

1) D published written or verbal;
2) false statement;
3) that was defamatory;
4) concerning P;
5) with actual malice (P = public figure) or negligence (P = private figure); AND
6) damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

libel

A

defamation in a written or other graphic/published form

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

slander

A

spoken defamation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

product libel

A

defamation concerning business or its product

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

publication

A

one person, other than P & D, sees or hears material AND understands statement to be defamatory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

falsity

A

substantial truth: does proven truth leave different impression of P than impression created by defamatory falsehood?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

truth

A

absolute defense to defamation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

opinions

A

cannot imply false statements of objective fact; protected under 1st Am

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

opinion factors

A
  • verifiability
  • precise language
  • context, including cautionary language
  • type of writing or speech
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

defamatory

A
  • harms reputation in community;
  • deters people from associating; OR
  • exposes to public hatred, contempt, or ridicule
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

defamation per se

A

commission of a crime, loathsome disease, professional or sexual misconduct, racism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

defamation per se: remedy

A

P can recover without proof of injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

defamation per quod

A

requires some context to understand its defamatory meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
defamation subject
reputation must be capable of being harmed
26
defamation & fictional characters
would a reader with knowledge of surrounding circumstances reasonably understand the words referred to P?
27
defamation determination
legal issue: whether statement is capable of damaging reputation? factual issue: whether it did?
28
identification
others reasonably understand P is the one referred to
29
actual malice
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth
30
reckless disregard for the truth
D has actual, subjective doubt about truthfulness of statement
31
negligence
anything under that which an ordinary, reasonable person would do under the same circumstances
32
public official
1) elected; OR 2) other gov official if: - substantial responsibility for gov conduct; - public interest in qualifications beyond that of a normal official; AND - statement is about job performance
33
general purpose public figures
those who achieve such pervasive fame or notoriety that they become public figures in all purposes and contexts
34
limited-purpose public figures
those who thrust themselves into the forefront of particular public controversies to influence the resolution
35
limited-purpose public figures: factors
1) voluntary participation in controversy? 2) access to appropriate channels for P to rebut claims? 3) P played prominent role?
36
defamation: general damages
hurt feelings, mental suffering, or anguish
37
defamation: special damages
loss of employment, lost income, loss of earning capacity (always must be supported by evidence of injury)
38
defamation: punitive damages
clear and convincing evidence that D acted with actual malice
39
absolute privilege
cannot libel someone while speaking in a legislative or judicial forum OR through official statements from public officials
40
qualified privilege
may completely, fairly, and accurately report what happens at a government proceeding
41
privacy law
- false light - publication of private information - intrusion on solitude - appropriation of NIL without permission
42
privacy rights
only enjoyed by natural persons, NOT companies or other entities
43
likeness
resemblance or evocation of identity of actual person, even absent actual use of NIL
44
appropriation: parody
NEVER acts as a substitute for the real thing
45
appropriation
one cannot use another's identity for commercial use or trade purposes without consent
46
commercial use?
commercial production is not automatically commercial use; does not apply to works of fiction
47
transformative use defense
product containing likeness is so transformed that it has become primarily D's own expression
48
public interest defense
public has a right to know and press has a right to tell
49
public interest defense: attachment
attaches to people who, through life or accomplishments, creates bona fide attention to activities
50
NOT commercial purpose
- books, plays, films, radio/TV programs - magazine/newspaper articles - material of political or newsworthy value - parodies or social commentary - single and original works of fine art - ads or commercial announcements concerning any of these (incidental use)
51
retraction statutes
laws that give D an opportunity to correct, clarify, or retract story before suit can be filed
52
retractions requirements
- P must request retraction before filing suit - retraction must be as prominent as alleged defamation
53
anti-SLAPP meaning
protection from "Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation"
54
anti-SLAPP suits
attempts by wealthy to silence press or critics through threat of litigation
55
anti-SLAPP case
if statement at issue arises from an issue of public concern, P must show prima facie case before suit can proceed
56
anti-SLAPP remedy
if case is dismissed, D is entitled to attorney's fees
57
anti-SLAPP elements
- applicability - prima facie viability - legal viability
58
anti-SLAPP: applicability
movant shows that cause of action facially falls within the scope of the Act
59
anti-SLAPP: prima facie viability
cause of action states a prima facie case as to each essential element of claim
60
anti-SLAPP: legal viability
movant shows that no cause of action upon which relief may be granted has been stated
61
consent defense: exceptions
dated consent, capacity, substantial alterations from image upon which consent was granted
62
what can be copyrighted?
anything that is "fixed" in a tangible medium of expression
63
copyright: "fixed"
sufficiently permanent to permit it to be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated for more than transitory duration
64
what can't be copyrighted?
- ideas, themes, bare plots - non-creative titles, slogans, words, etc. - methods, systems, formulas, and equations - incidents, characters, and settings indispensable to a given topic/genre (scenes a faire) - facts/new events
65
who owns copyright?
creator of work
66
copyright
intellectual property; can be disposed of as property
67
work made for hire
when one creates a work at the direction of another, they do not own the copyright
68
work made for hire includes:
- works created by employee within the scope of employment; OR - specially commissioned works in 1 of 9 categories AND parties agree that work is made for hire
69
independent contractor works
1) contribution to collective work; 2) part of motion picture/AV work; 3) translation; 4) supplementary work; 5) compilation; 6) instructional text; 7) test; 8) answer materials to test; 9) atlas
70
joint works
one copyright can belong jointly to 2+ authors when they intend them to be inseparable or interdependent parts of a unitary whole
71
joint works: independent contributions
must be independently copyrightable
72
inseparable
parts have little or no independent meaning standing alone
73
interdependent
parts achieve primary significance because of combined effect
74
collective works rights
can reproduce as: - part of collective work - part of revision to original collective work - part of subsequent collective works in the same series as original collective work
75
collective works: individual contribution
author may freely exploit their own individual contribution
76
duration of copyright
1) life of author + 70 years; OR 2) no identifiable author/works made for hire: - 95 years after first publication; OR - 120 years after creation (whichever expires first)
77
copyright test
1) D actually copied (prove through access to) P's work; AND 2) substantial similarity between protected material in P's work & D's work (strict liability)
78
substantial similarity
whether the average lay observer would find that D appropriated the alleged copy from the copyrighted work
79
exclusive rights
- reproduction - derivative works - distribution by sale, rental, lease, or lending - performance of work publicly - digital transmission of sound recordings
80
first sale doctrine
purchaser of lawful copy can listen, watch, sell, lend, or lease that particular copy
81
infringement analysis
1) is the work copyrightable? 2) is the copyright still valid? 3) did D have access to work? 4) are the 2 works the same/substantially similar?
82
infringement: burden of proof
1) ownership of valid copyright; AND 2) copying of constituent, original elements of work
83
indirect proof of copying
- D had access to P's work; AND - D's work is substantially similar to P's protected expression
84
fair use
- purpose and character of use - nature of copyrighted work - amount/substantiality used v. whole - effect on the market
85
fair use: purpose and character of use
more likely to be fair if noncommercial or nonprofit
86
purpose and character of use: OK
transformative use, parody, news/public interest, criticism and comment, teaching, scholarship and research
87
fair use: nature of copyrighted work
- informational or creative? - published or unpublished? - still commercially available?
88
fair use: amount/substantiality used v. whole
what is the heart of the work and relative proportion used?
89
fair use: effect on the market
if challenged use becomes widespread it would adversely affect the potential market for copyrighted work
90
preemption
subject matter of state law claim is governed by copyright law
91
overcoming preemption
state law claim has extra elements that differentiate it from copyright law
92
copyright damages
- injunctive relief - actual damages - statutory damages (if timely registered) - attorney's fees
93
copyright: statutory damages
$750–$30k per work infringed (up to $150k if willfully infringed)
94
protection of ideas
CANNOT be protected by copyright; must be novel and can protect through K law (look at number of works infringed)