final Flashcards
1.
foreign policy
the diplomatic policy of a natoin in its interactions with other states
goals of foreign policy
- protecting our national secuirty
- protect our neighbors and major democatic allies
- protect our economic security
- extend out spehere of influence
models of decision making
- rational model (realists)
- bureaucratic/organizational model (liberals)
- pluralist models
rational model of decision making
most important actor is the state, best outcome least cost problems identification, clarify goals, determing policy alternatives, cost-benefit analysis
* problem identification i.e Iran having nuclear weapons
* claridy goals i.e dont allow Iran to have nuclear weapons
* determine policy alternatives i.e use force or talk
bureaucratic/organizational model of decision making
talk to sub national organizations
* department of defense, treasury, allies, most relevant department/bureau
* relative power or relative organization applicable to the situation makes the decision
pluralist models of decision making
bargaining=decision
* war on terror, public, interest groups, media, very sensitive groups
* very sensitive issues
independent leadership styles
- high in nationalism
- high in perception of control
- high in need for power
- low in conceptual complexity (ability to discuss policies with other people)
- high distrust in others
participatory leadership styles
- low in nationalism
- low in perception of control
- high in need for affiliation
- high in conceptual complexity
- low in distrust of others
when elite control policy
- political instability (authoritarian)
- few institutional constraints (dictators)
- public disinterest
- ambiguous situation criss (cuban missile crisis)
- nuclear information crisis (cuban missile crisis)
international law
rules and norms regulation interactions between actors
functions of international law
- sets expectations
- provides order
- sets the status quo
- protects states from each other
- serves ethical war functions
sources of international law
treaties, UN, international criminal court system
customary international laws
how states view each other and their practices
shortcomings of customary international laws
- can develop slowly
- can become outvoted
- not all states participate
- rejected by nonwestern states
- ambiguity with interpretaton
- european or western countries namely
international court of justice, international criminal court
- genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, crimes of aggression
- major weakness: doesnt hear many cases, lengthy process, jurisdiction limits
human rights
entitlement you have for being a human
features/aspects of human rights
- equal rights, inalienable, universal
- exercise, respect, enjoy, enforcement
- 1945 UN charter, 1948 UDHR
- different values care about different human rights
generations of human rights
first gen, second gen, third gen
first generation human rights
- civil and political, pushed by west (individual comes first)
american bill of rights - right to life and property
- negative rights i.e unlawful imprisonment
- 1948 UDHR article 3-21
- international covenant on civil and political rights
second generation human rights
- social, economic and cultural, communism and marxism
- state has responsibility to provide for the poor
- positive rights i.e the right to food and healthcare
- UDHR articles 22-27
- interdependent with the first generation i.e property + job, right to life + food/healthcare
third generation human rights
- group rights and rights of solidarity of the vulnerable
- pushed by third world countries i.e the right to self determination
- womens eights, rights of labor –> going to be disagreements