Final Flashcards
(137 cards)
-Conquests, exemplified by Russia in Crimea and potential actions by China in the South China Sea, pose significant threats to global stability, requiring the United States to reconsider its historical stance of territorial conflicts non-interference.
-Future conflicts between major powers, particularly China and Russia, may involve territorial conquests, with the annexation of Crimea highlighting the resurgence of such actions in Europe and raising concerns about the next potential target.
The Future of Conquest: Fights over small places could spark the next big war (ALTMAN)
Accomplished fact, seizing a disputed piece of territory before the other side can react
Fait Accompli
Small deployments, not large enough to shift the local balance of forces, but meant to deter future aggression, they “die heroically”
Tripwire forces
-The global community can use sanctions and international courts to impose costs on Russia for its blatant and illegal aggression.
-Such a response will require cooperation and sacrifices, but it is well worth the effort. At stake is one of the bedrock principles of international law: the territorial integrity of states.”
The Return of Conquest Why the Future of Global Order Hinges on Ukraine (Fazal)
Condition of mutual deterrence, in which neither side would contemplate an attack on the other, forcing them to resolve their dispute in other ways.
Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD)?
The action of discouraging an action or event through instilling doubt or fear of the consequences
Deterrence
A standard or pattern, especially of social behavior, that is typical or expected of a group.
Norms
Is when the increase in one state’s security (such as increasing its military strength) leads other states to fear for their own security
Security Dilemma
-I have come to believe that this language both reflects and shapes the nature of the American nuclear strategic project; that it plays a central role in allowing defense intellectuals to think and act as they do.
-Calm, detached language. Sex, God, snappy acronyms, domestic language
-Their languages shapes reality.
Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectuals (COHN)
-There has been no use of nuclear weapons since Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Tannenwald argues that this was not inevitable, but that a tradition of non-use of nuclear weapons has grown up, based on the feeling that nuclear weapons are not a legitimate weapon of war.
-She examines how the nuclear taboo has repeatedly dissuaded US and other world leaders from resorting to these ‘ultimate weapons’
The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-Use (TANNEWALD)
-Regulative Effects
-Constitutive Effects
-Permissive Effects
Normative Effects of Nuclear Weapons
A norm that restricts states from doing something to create a fairer world and governs the behavior of actors in their interactions with other actors
Regulative Effects
The idea that the state can be a state if they just prove that they have the necessary elements, a strong enough demonstration and they exist as a legal person
Constitutive Effects
A premeditated threat or use of violence against noncombatant targets by individuals or subnational groups to obtain a political or social objective through intimidation of a larger audience
Terrorism
Norm that is allowing or characterized by great or excessive freedom of behavior
Permissive Effects
Perpetrators of terrorism can be individuals, groups, or organizations with political, ideological, religious, or social motivations
Who commits terrorism?
Targets and victims of terrorism vary widely and can include civilians, government officials, religious groups, ethnic minorities, and symbolic landmarks. Usually innocent civilians.
Who are the targets and victims?
The purpose of terrorism is often to instill fear, create political or social change, or advance a specific agenda through the use of violence and intimidation.
What is the purpose of terrorism?
Purposive behavior or strategies by which individuals or groups pursue their interests
Rationality
Relative to states
Relative to their own demands
Why are terrorist organizations weak?
Actors whose interests are not widely shared by others; individuals or groups that are politically weak relative to the demands they make.
Extremists
Information (terrorist groups can not show their capabilities in advance, so the attack itself is the communication), commitment (promising not to use violence in the future) and Indivisibility (role of religion?)
What can be the bargaining issues with terrorism?
Signaling capability and resolve
They can’t show capabilities in advance, so the attack itself is the communication.
Information (Terrorism)
Promising not to use violence in the future
Commitment (Terrorism)