final Flashcards
ex parte crouse
In Ex parte Crouse (1838), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, expanded the
doctrine of parens patriae to include the states right to remove children from
homes in which the parents were unable to supervise them properly.
parens patriae
the best interests of the child
- gives the state the power to act as the child’s parent
Juvenile Dependency Court:
Juveniles are declared dependents of the court (social services will monitor those cases).
juvenile delinquency court
Juveniles are adjudicated and declared wards of
the court (probation departments will
monitor those youth).
California is the only state to not for juveniles
youth 15 and under can not be transferred to adult courts
judicial wavier
Hearing is held to determine whether the youth should remain in juvenile court, or if the case
should be transferred to adult criminal
court for processing.
direct file
DA files a juvenile case
directly in adult criminal court.
the number of youth in custody
declines by 50% since 2006
super predator theory
- Experts, politicians and educators wrote and predicted that there was now a new generation of young, cold-blooded street criminals that threatened society. A professor from Princeton
University predicted, in 1996, that there would be an increase of 270,000 juvenile predators on
the street by 2010
-1992 to 1999: legislatures in 48 states revised/rewrote transfer laws by lowering age and offense thresholds making it easier to send juvenile delinquents to adult court, and thus trying them as adults which brings about longer sentences.
juvenile justice due process
- Juvenile court proceedings are not open to the public. Victims may attend the hearing, as may
the parents of the juvenile. There is always a probation officer present in a juvenile court
hearing. - Juvenile’s get the same due process rights as adult defendants, however, juveniles do not get
the right to a trial by jury (except if their case has been transferred to adult court), additionally
there is no bail systemin juvenile court.
adjudication
the juvenile court hearing where the court decides whether a juvenile has
committed a criminal act.
in re Winship
- The Supreme Court held that the burden of proof for juvenile adjudication hearings must be the same burden of proof as required in the adult criminal courts, which is beyond a reasonable doubt.
- 12 year old Samuel arrested and charged with stealing 112.00 from victims purse, during court proceeding, prosecuting attorney was not able to prove Samuels guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, nonetheless he was adjudged of form the crime of larceny
- Prior to this Court decision the burden of proof required in the juvenile courts was that of the
lower standard, by a preponderance of the evidence.
what are the juvenile sentencing options?
- Dispositional Hearing -Youth may be placed on informal
probation (654/725 WIC)- - Youth may be placed on formal probation (602 WIC) with
standard terms and conditions of probation (or specialized
conditions, such as gang terms, sex offender terms). - Youth may be ordered to complete a custody commitment
or Juvenile Court Work Program
in re gault
The Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment applied
equally to juvenile offenders as well as to adult offenders
- 15 year old Gerald Gault made obscene phone call to one of his neighbors. already on probation. Take into police custody and placed in children detentions home. mother was NEVER notified nor formal charges against him. Supreme Court overthrew his 6 years due to due cross being violated
kent v United States
The U.S. Supreme court held that: juveniles must be given a hearing prior to the juvenile court transferring their jurisdiction to the adult court.
- kent arrested for breaking into the apartment o a female and raping her. stole the wallet and fingerprints found at the scene. came clean about the rape however was not given the proper courting according to due process
policing: myths and misconceptions
policing
The maintenance of law and order by a police force which includes the investigation of crime, apprehending of offenders and crime prevention
myths and realities of policing
crime fighting:
Myth: Police officers spend most of their time involved in crime-fighting activities.
Reality: Police work is more about maintaining a preferred social order.
- mundane tasks: patrol officers do a lot of “routine tasks” such as writing reports, directing traffic, citations, disputes, etc
fifth amendment
- No person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be witness against himself, nor deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law
what are policing organizations focus?
- Reducing the number of “serious” crime.
- Clearance rates (arrests, crime solving)
- Response times
- Quantitative measures (number of arrests, citations, and searches).
miranda v arizona
- Informs individuals under arrest that the 5th
Amendment provides protections against self-
incrimination during an interrogation by law
enforcement officers that involves both directed
questions and conversations with the accused
that could elicit incriminating statements.
▪ Spontaneous statements from the
suspect/defendant do not require a Miranda
Advisement
-Ernesto Miranda: interrogated for two hours with written and oral confession
what are the types of force used by the police
VERBAL
PHYSICAL: PHYSICAL RESTRAINT TECHNIQUES,
BODILY FORCE, TAKE DOWNS
CHEMICAL: PEPPER SPRAY, MACE, TEAR GAS
ELECTRONIC: TASERS
IMPACT: BATONS AND OTHER IMPLEMENTS USED TO DELIVER FORCE
FIRARMS: LETHAL FORCE.
THERE IS NO MANDATED ORDER ON WHICH
“TYPE” OF FORCE AN OFFICER MUST USE FIRST
use of force excessive and reasonable
(excessive)
- Using force greater than is necessary to compel compliance from a willing or unwilling subject.
* Tennessee v. Garner (1985): Held that deadly force may be used to prevent the escape of a known offender if the officer’s life or the lives of others around him or her are at imminent risk.
(reasonable)
- An officer must use his/her discretion in determining
what level of force they believe is “reasonable” to stop the threat
policing: stressors of the job
Training: always and constantly emphasis policing as physically demanding, dangerous and stress full.
Additional stressors: Exposure to chemical hazards. Higher rates of cancer and
cardiovascular disease.
Feelings of being underappreciated. Hated by society.
- occupational stress: poor management, inadequate/ broken equipment, excessive overtime, rotating shifts, regular change of duty
myth and reality of equal justice
Gideon v Wainwright
sixth amendment
role of law in society
relationship between the court and the media