Final Flashcards
Introducing Legislation
women more likely to initiate leg on women’s interests etc.
shaping party agenda
when the amount of women increase the amount of attention to social justice issues etc also inso increase, more left leaning agenda, more issues in general
voting on leg.
gender effects conditioned on party cohesion as a result of psych factors and party discipline. In leg where cohesion is high, no voting difference between men/women. women rely on parties more and less likely to rebel so women cohesion is stronger
differences between men and women affect behavior in office
have different life experiences, distinct perspectives of same event, women share experience with other women, women spend more time with other women
differences in men/women politicians
different governing styles, distinct issue preferences and priorities, different resources
DR make a difference in politics
can be problematic (actors who work against group they represent), creates high bar and asks for them to do work on behalf of minority group
Jill Robinson effect
women leg bring more $ back to district. women outperform men bc of barriers to power women are overqualified etc.
differences in selections/incentives/expectations of female leg
in LA as women’s presence increases they are more likely to be placed on less powerful committees, men want to defend scarce resource, men push women out of economic issues so women leg on social issues
substantive representation
congruence between reps actions and the interests of represented. reps “act for” represented, consideration of a specific group in decision making arenas, women SR considered when women’s interests are considered
what are women’s issues
3 ways of defining: 1) issues the pertain to women normally private sphere and traditional view of gender, issues disproportionally affect women. 2.) women’s policy preferences, gender gap in prioritization (climate, guns) 3) gender is deeply engrained in society all issues can be gendered, one just makes a claim about any issue on behalf of women
how do you know if a group is SR
outcomes: adoption of policy for group vs process: effort to rep group interests in political process. Argentina study # of women increase # of women’s rights bills increase but don’t pass. SR affect process but not outcomes
mandate effects
descriptive rep feel obligated to rep group interests, seen in places with quotas (also in argentina study)
marginalized/label effects
minority reps relegated to working on unimportant policy issues.
linking SR and DR women change mens behavior
men look to women as leaders on women’s issues, male judges turn to female colleagues on women’s issues etc.
symbolic representation
feelings of being fairly and effectively represented. not about who reps or what they do but how they are perceived and evaluated
how symbolic rep is measured
citizen’s confidence or trust in politicians/institutions, feelings of political efficacy, levels of political engagement
symbolic rep of women=more women’s policy
women politicians offer powerful symbolic cues, however women are overall engaged less in politics and citizens where women are well represented but NOT more engaged. maybe institutions elect more women bc they are trustworthy
substantive legitimacy
belief that substantive representation has occurred (there is the right outcome)
procedural legitimacy
belief that institutions work properly/fairly
legitimacy experiment
regardless of outcome, women’s pressence legitimizes decision and increases trust in institution, women’s pressence= SL even if outcome is anti-woman