final Flashcards
what is Hubbell’s Unified Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography
that all species are functionally equivalent and have an equal chance of colonizing an open space
niches are functionally equivalent
offspring and immigrants all compete for open spaces
what is point mutation (v)
per capita speciation rate
how does the absence and presence of niche differences affect a species growth rate
when niche differences are present: growth rate declines with increased abundance
when absent: species abundance has no effect on growth rate
what is a metacommunity
set of communities linked by dispersal pf one or more of their constituent species
what is a regional species pool
set of species found in a region
what is a local species pool
sunset of regional pool found in local community
what are the results of neutral theory in a community
dominance increases are rarer species goes extinct
species diversity in a local community is maintained by immigration
regionally abundant species tend to be locally abundant
what is island biogeography theory
how big an island (or isolated part of mainland) and how far away it is determines the species richness there
what is facilitation (positive interactions)
encounters between organisms that benefit at least one of the individuals and harms neither
can be direct or indirect
what is mutualism
facilitative interaction where both species benefit
how does facilitation change the view of the niche
makes realized niche bigger than fundamental niche
when are positive interactions most common
under harsh environmental conditions
or extreme stress
what is the stress gradient hypothesis
about relative importance of competitive or facilitative interactions changes along a gradient of environmental harshness
competitive interactions should dominate in benign environments
facilitative interactions should become more important in stressful environments
how does relative neighbour effect change with changing environmental effects
increased environmental severity: positive (facilitation)
decreased environmental severity : negative (competitive)
what is the Hairston smith slobidkin hypothesis (HSS)
top down approach
carnivores, having no predators, are limited by food
herbivores are held below carrying capacity by by predators
plants aren’t controlled by herbivores and are abundant
what did Oksanen propose about atrophic levels
biomass at each trophic level should change as potential productivity increases
as potential primary productivity increases the number of possible trophic levels increases
biomass at each trophic level changed depending on number of trophic levels
bottom up approach
what does oksanen predict in a 3 trophic level community
As potential primary productivity increases :
producer biomass increase
herbivore biomass remains constant
carnivore biomass increases
what is a trophic cascade
indirect/direct effects a predator has on the density or behaviour of species in lower trophic levels
how do cascades differ in terrestrial and aquatic systems
weak in terrestrial
variable in aquatic systems
when do cascades only occur
- cascades/top down effects occur only when :
- direct effects are strong
- producer densities are not limited from bottom up
what make strength of predator-prey interactions vary
predator functional response
body size
energetic requirements
herbivore vulnerability
primary producer palatability
what do food chains represent
transfer of energy between trophic levels in a community
what is a trophic level
identifies a species position in the food chain
what trophic level is the base of the food chain
primary producers
how can food chains be described
number of trophic levels
level of connectance
link density
what is connectance
fraction of all possible links that are realized
what is link density
mean distance between all nodes in a web
how many trophic levels is rare in a community
when does it occur
3 (producer, herbivore, carnivore)
occurs when productivity is low (ex: dessert, Arctic)
how many trophic levels is common
4, 5, 6
what are the hypothesis of food chain length
- energy limitation / productivity hypothesis : since energy is lost at each level, length is limited by available energy
- ecosystem site hypothesis: larger ecosystems can support more species, which results in more links, leading to longer food chains
- productive space hypothesis : productivity and size work together to determine length
- dynamic stability / disturbance hypothesis: since longer chains are less stable, food chain length will be an outcome of what is feasible and and the frequency of disturbance
what is the 10% law
only 10% of energy is transferred to next trophic level
what determines the amount of energy reaching each trophic level
NPP and efficiencies
who are most efficient at assimilation
least efficient
animals are most effect
plants and bacteria mid
detritus are least
why do carnivores have higher assimilation efficiency than herbivores
food easier to digest and higher in energy
what direction do arrows in web point
towards consumer
what is resistance
measure of the ability of a community to avoid change
what is ecological resilience
how far a community can be disturbed and return to its original state
what is engineering resilience
time it takes a community to recover
what is a community / Jacobean matrix
matrix describing interaction strengths in a food web
what are the beliefs of relationship between diversity/complexity and stability
diversity = stability
- simple communities show greater fluctuations in species abundance and are more vulnerable to invasion (Elton)
- more complex communities buffered from species loss (MacArthur)
- complexity, weak interactions, and type 3 (adaptive foraging behaviour) stabilizes food-webs (McCann)
diversity = less stable
- communities with more species and links are less stable (May)
- increased diversity, trophic levels and connectance reduced stability (Primmer and Lawton)
how can diversity both benefit and harm stability
depends how you look at stability
if looking at ecosystem level: since if species vary in their response to environmental fluctuations, so increased abundance of one species can compensate for decreased abundance of another
If you are looking at the species level: since there is a max number of individuals that can live in a community, the more species richness there is the less of each species there can be. The smaller population size can then make that species more likely to go extinct
what did primm and lawton predict about resilience and already stable food webs
adding trophic levels decreased resilience
increasing connectance increased resilience
what is a bipartite network
illustrate connections between 2 trophic levels or between mutualists
what is persistence
proportion of initial species that remain in the system
what is nestedness
degree to which generalists associate with all species
specialists associated with generalists
what is modularity
the degree to which species associate with species within their group more than in other groups
how do trophic networks differ from modular networks
trophic networks are less connected and more modular
mutualistic networks are more nested
how does modularity effect persistence and resilience in mutualistic networks
both reduce
how does nestedness effect persistence in trophic networks
reduces persistence
how does connectance effect persistence and resilience in both mutualistic and trophic networks
mutualistic: promotes both
trophic: reduces both
why doesn’t productivity have an alternating effects on the biomass of adjacent trophic levels
trophic levels aren’t homogenous
a shift in potential productivity can shift from better resource competitor to more predator-tolerant species