Final Flashcards

1
Q

Challenge of Couples Therapy

A
• Stakes are high
• Volatility
• Escalation
• Blaming each other
• Secrets
• Taking sides
Therapists tend to be empathetic, compassionate, calm,
accepting
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Myths about Couples Therapy

A
  1. The goal of couples therapy is to “fix” the other person
  2. If this relationship was “meant to be” we wouldn’t need couples therapy
  3. Couples therapists decide who’s to blame for the problems in this relationship (we take sides)
  4. Couples therapy means it’s too late
  5. Couples therapy means we have to dig up old stuff
  6. Couples therapy will make things worse
  7. Couples therapy always aims to keep the couple together
  8. Couples therapy will take forever
  9. Individual growth (and healing) can only occur in individual therapy, not in couples therapy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Beginner’s mistakes

A

Lack of Structure
Misaligned goals
No plan for change
Giving up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Emergence of Couples Therapy as a unit of treatment

A
  1. As mental health intervention (unique unit of treatment)
    • Research links quality of intimate relationships to
    individual physical and psychological well-being
    • Negative impact of divorce on couples, families,
    children communities
    • Less community; more dependence on intimate partner
    for support/connection
    > Recognizing as functional communities of two
  2. New research in the neurobiology of relationships
  3. The emergence of concept of “adult love” (attachment)
    • Quality of closest relationship determines quality of life
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Premarital Counseling Benefits

A

Couples who participate in premarital education
and counseling have 30% lower divorce rates
Helping couples create a lasting, strong relationship
foundation
• Identify relationship strengths & growth areas
> Use strengths to improve
• Build a relationship foundation
> Strong, healthy communication skills
> Culture of connection
• Relationship with therapist
> Overcome stigma; more likely to reach for help
when trouble shows up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Premarital Counseling non-negotiables

A

• Relationship expectations can be negotiable or
non-negotiable
• Communicating about this beforehand can:
> Lead to creating shared goals
> Avoid disappointment and issues within the
marriage
> Will differ from couple to couple

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Nurturant Solace

A

We do better in relationships than out of them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Helen Fisher; anatomy of love

> More than an emotion

A

Leading expert on the biology of love and attraction
• Research on the chemistry and brain circuitry of love
> All humans have reproductive strategies in common
> Most referenced scholar in love research community

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Falling in love (stages)

A
3 stages of love1
1. Lust
• Sex hormones: testosterone, estrogen
• Evolved to motivate sexual union with almost any
semi-appropriate partner
2. Romantic Attraction
• Neurotransmitters: dopamine, norepinephrine,
serotonin
• Evolved to drive focus on one partner to conserve
courtship time/energy
3. Attachment
• Hormones: oxytocin, vasopressin3
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The Cuddle Hormone

A

Oxytocin
Released when we snuggle, hug, bond socially
• Childbirth, breast-feeding
• Empathy, trust, sexual
activity, relationshipbuilding (connection)
• Possibly related to
depression, anxiety,
intestinal problems
• Higher levels in females than males
• Even playing with your dog can release oxytocin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Rejection Stages

A
  1. Protest
    • Overcome by sadness, longing and nostalgia
    • Difficulty sleeping, changes in appetite
    • Longing loved one
    • Take measures to reconnect with partner
  2. Resignation/Despair
    • Sadness and depression
    • Gender differences in the manifestation of this
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Mirror Neurons

A

• Neurons that fire both
when an animal acts
and when the animal
observes the same action
performed by another
• Neuron is said to “mirror” the behavior of the other,
as though the animal performed the movement itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

IPNB (Interpersonal neurobiology)

A

An interdisciplinary field that brings together many areas of
science (such as anthropology, biology, linguistics,
mathematics, physics, psychology, etc.) to determine
common findings of the human experience
• Purpose to create a common definition of the human
mind and determine what it needs for maximum health

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

IPNB Relational Theory

A

Key is reciprocity
• Feeling seen and heard, and being able to feel, see,
and hear others1
Feeling as though someone is holding us in their
heart and mind (connection)2
• If we have this and if we learn to tap into it under
stress/ duress, we can regulate3
> For physiology to slow down, heal, grow, we
need that felt sense of safety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Embodied Relationality
o Interpersonal Resonance & Mutual Regulation
**SHORT ANSWER

A

Two primary facts about human beings:
• We are embodied (self) and in relationship
> To be alive, we need to be a body and we need to
relate to others
> Presents our greatest challenges and our greatest joys
• Interpersonal Resonance1
> Two or more minds align their states and become
mutually influenced by one another
• Mutual Regulation
> Bilateral influence of 2 people on each other’s
coordination and balance of internal states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

IPNB Role of Integration

A

Our capacity for internal integration initially derived from

early attachment relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Tension of Opposites

**SHORT ANSWER

A
• Key to the work of healing/growth
• Differences in how each partner responds to conflict
Two main categories
• Minimizing or Maximizing
> In general: Minimizers and Maximizers
> Imago: Turtles and Hailstorms
> EFCT: Withdrawers and Pursuers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Attachment

A

A deep and enduring emotional bond that connects one

person to another across time and space

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Attachment process

A

Responsible for the development of affective system
• Emerges from (and influences future of) relationships
• Determines whether person has general sense of security
or insecurity in the world (and in relationships)
> Security is an internal sense of being able to count on
others for healthy interdependence
> This becomes an internal working model for how one
perceives others in the world (safe or unsafe)
• First signs of attachment at 6 mos (probably in utero)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Limbic Resonance (Interpersonal Resonance)

A

Our nervous systems are affected by those closest to us
(mirror)
• Our brains synchronize with our closest relationships
> Profound implications for personality and lifelong
well-being

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Limbic Revision

A

Therapeutic intervention can modify these patterns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Primary Attachment Question

**SHORT ANSWER

A

Is there an attachment figure that is sufficiently
near, attentive, and responsive?

• If answer is generally and consistently YES
> Person feels loved, cared for, seen, confident
— Free to explore environment, interact with others
— less inhibited; interest in exploration
— generally happy, content

If answer is consistently “no”
• Continued attempts to draw attachment figure back
become exaggerated
> Hope that increasing intensity will make it happen
(like gambler and slot machine)
> Becomes preoccupied or hypervigilant with attachment
figure’s availability
• When caregiver continually fails to respond appropriately,
eventually leads to detachment
> Human mind is capable of deactivating or suppressing
its attachment system (to a degree)
> Turns to self-reliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Attachment and Human Relationships

A

What does attachment theory tell us about the
role of relationships in what it means to be human?
1. Seeking and maintaining contact with a significant other
is inherent to being human
2. Fear of isolation is inherently traumatizing
3. Life stressors automatically activate attachment
responses
4. Separation from our significant other(s) creates
predictable and automatic stress responses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Adult Attachment (Romantic) Relationships

A

Earliest caregivers don’t only feed us, etc.
> Shape how growing brain perceives reality/the world1
• Creates internalized maps (Limbic maps): beliefs about
self & the world
> Maps remarkably stable over time
> Maps shape our perception of others; our ability to
perceive relationships2
Adult Romantic Relationships
20
We enter adult relationships highly influenced
by early attachment experiences
• Adult attachment relationships determine our ability to
make sense of our adult lives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Adult Attachment types (based on childhood attachment types)

A

SECURE –> SECURE
AVOIDANT –> DISMISSIVE
AMBIVALENT/RESISTANT –> PREOCCUPIED

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Dependency Paradox

***SHORT ANSWER

A

We can be independent only when we have someone to

depend on

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Single Physiological Unit

**SHORT ANSWER

A

• In an attached adult relationship, we can control each
others’ physiology or level of arousal
> Synchronized blood pressure, breathing, heart rate,
breathing hormones
• We can teach couples to regulate themselves and each
other!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Attachment Triggers (3 main types)

A

Three main types of triggers (for attachment)
1. Conditions of self
• Fatigue, hunger, illness, pain, etc.
2. Conditions of attachment figure
• Absent (extended or emotionally), “leaving,” rejecting,
giving attention to another, etc.)
3. Conditions of the environment
• Alarming events, criticism or rejection by others, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

TBCT

A

Traditional Behavioral
Couples Therapy

• Focus on change, specifically behavior change through
communication and problem-solving
• Couples negotiate change and agree to implement
• Early research (18 studies) found TBCT to be the most
“efficacious and specific intervention for marital distress”
(Baucom et al, 1998)
> More effective than control condition (no treatment)
> About 1/3 (35%) of couples moved from distressed to
non-distressed over course of treatment

30
Q

TBCT 2 components

A

• Two common components:
1. Behavior Exchange
— Based on social exchange theory (Stuart, 1969)1
2. Communication/Problem Solving Training

31
Q

TBCT Predictors of relational distress

A

Scarcity of positive outcomes available for each
partner
• Deficits in problem-solving and communication skills
• Frequent negative or punishing exchanges by one or both

32
Q

IBCT

A

Integrated Behavioral Couple Therapy

assumes that relationship problems result
not just from the egregious actions and
inactions of partners but also in their emotional
reactivity to those behaviors. Therefore,
IBCT focuses on the emotional context between
partners and strives to achieve greater acceptance
and intimacy between partners as well as make
deliberate changes in target problems

33
Q
IBCT Paradox (and why is it a paradox?)
***SHORT ANSWER
A

The IBCT Paradox integrates
emotional acceptance and openness to change
I accept the things I can not change; I change the things I can

34
Q

IBCT Mutual Trap/Polarization Process

A

Polarization Process
• Attempts to change the other met with resistance;
fuel more efforts to change the other; more resistance
> Differences become the source of tension1
• Results in… The Mutual Trap
> Trap is based on the assumption that “I’m the one
suffering in this relationship” 2

35
Q

IBCT Key types of dysfunctional interaction (3)

A
  1. Moving against the other
  2. Moving away from the other
  3. Moving toward (hanging on) the other
    anxiously
36
Q

IBCT DEEP Formulation

A
  • Differences or incompatibilities
  • Emotional sensitivities
  • External circumstances/stressors
  • Patterns of problematic interaction
37
Q

IBCT The Missing Link

A

Acceptance!

Not all problems can be resolved with compromise
> When compromise fails, partners may begin to
respond to each other in rigid, negative, reactive ways
• “Acceptance” not meant to promote resignation to
the relationship as it is
• Addition of emotional acceptance
> Instead of negotiating behavioral change negotiate
internal choices to act in meaningful ways1

38
Q

Negative affect reciprocity

A

Increased probability that a partner’s emotions will be
negative immediately following negativity in the other1
• The extent to which you are more likely to turn negative
when your partner is negative (as opposed to when
your partner is neutral or positive)
• The most consistent correlate of marital satisfaction/
dissatisfaction regardless of culture
• Far more predictive than total amount of negative affect
in the relationship
• Remember: negative interactions are inevitable
> Consider reciprocity, frequency, intensity, repair
2

39
Q

Sentiment Override

A

What is the pervasive affect of the relationship
(positive or negative)?
• Things that happen are interpreted through
the lens of the pervasive sentiment override1
1. Positive sentiment override
2. Negative sentiment override

40
Q

Magic Ratio (during and outside of conflict)

A

5: 1 during conflict
20: 1 stable/happy couples

41
Q

(6) key predictors of divorce

A
  1. The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse
  2. Harsh Startups
  3. Flooding
  4. Body Language
  5. Failed Repair Attempts
  6. Bad Memories
42
Q

The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse

***SHORT ANSWER

A

During conflict, the presence of these 4 behaviors predicted
divorce with 85% accuracy
1. Criticism: statements that imply something is globally
wrong with the partner (always, never, etc.)
• Women more than men
2. Defensiveness: innocent victim stance
3. Stonewalling: listener withdraws from interaction
• Men more than women
27
1. The Four Horsemen…
4. Contempt: the single best predictor of divorce
• Seeing self as superior to partner (“you are an idiot”)1
• Happiest marriages had 0 incidents of contempt

43
Q

single best predictor of divorce

A

Contempt

44
Q

Problem solving/Perpetual problems

A

Another Gottman MYTH:
Couples need to improve problem-solving skills
36
Perpetual Problems
Perpetual Problems
• Both successful and unsuccessful couples argue about
the same topics 69% of the time
• Due to inherent personality differences
• 69% of marital problems perpetual; 31% solvable
Solve the Solvable
• Stable couples successfully resolve solvable problems
• Validate and repair

45
Q

Masters and disasters

A

Happy couples (Masters) vs unhappy couples (Disasters)
1. Masters are gentle, respectful of partner even when
discussing difficult issues
• Each takes responsibility for even small part of
problem
• Look for what’s right in the other and relationship
2. Disasters more likely to point finger at partner
• Stating the problem as defect in partner
• Look for what’s wrong in the other and relationship1

46
Q

o Biggest difference between masters and disasters

A

Biggest difference between the two is the

ability to repair

47
Q

Stable vs Unstable Marital styles

A

Stable couples have 5 X as many positive vs negative
interactions (5:1) during conflict
• Distressed couples may have a .08 :1 ratio

1. Hostile/Engaged Couples
• Abusive
• Sarcastic
• Insulting
2. Hostile/Detached Couples
• Disengaged
• Unspoken negativity
48
Q

Gottman Sound Relationship House (Walls and tasks)

**SHORT ANSWER

A
Successful marriages have 2 primary elements:
1. Overall sense of positive affect
2. Ability to reduce negative affect during conflict
Therapy designed to increase both
The Sound Relationship House
• This is the Gottman model
• Relational elements are within
walls of TRUST and
COMMITMENT
  1. Build love maps
  2. Share fondness and admiration
  3. Turn towards instead of away
  4. The positive perspective
  5. Manage conflict
  6. Make life dreams come true
  7. Create shared meaning
49
Q

EFT

A

Attention to the emotional communication in interaction

50
Q

Primary theoretical influences (specifically 1 important influence)

A

Client Centered and ATTACHMENT THEORY

51
Q

“Howl for connection”

A

Identify behavior that (externally) looks provocative,
negative, outrageous and maintains distress/
dysfunction
— Identify rigid patterns that block emotional
engagement
— Reframe in terms of best efforts to get needs for
connection and attachment met
— Access what is emotionally significant for each1

52
Q

What promotes healing? How does change occur?

A

• Assumption that therapeutic alliance is healing by itself
• Acceptance & validation of experience central to change
> Creates safety in the relationship
• Non-pathologizing
> Distress is an expected outcome of problematic
person/environment/situation
• Encourages examination of inner experience (emotion)
• We are transformed by our interactions with others
17
What promotes healing?
Key is creating corrective emotional experience

53
Q

Adult Attachment Injury and adult relationship distress

A

When one partner violates the expectation that they will
offer comfort and caring in times of danger or distress
> Characterized by abandonment or betrayal of trust
during a critical moment of need
> Becomes a clinically recurring theme
> Creates an impasse that blocks relationship repair
• Relationship comes to be defined as insecure
• Maintains relationship distress
> Challenges the dependability of the “offending”
partner

54
Q

Emotions at 2 levels
o EFT cycle (primary, secondary emotions and the significance)
**SHORT ANWER

A
1. Primary Emotions
• Occur at a deeper level
• Tend to be more vulnerable emotions (EX: sadness, hurt,
fear, shame, loneliness, etc.)
• Tend to draw partner closer
2. Secondary Emotions
• More reactive emotions; as reaction to vulnerability of
primary emotions
• Anger, blame, criticism, etc.
• Tend to push partners away

Cycle: Pursuer / Withdrawer

55
Q

Role of emotion (as neuroprocess)

A

If you catch a glimpse of a long black shape in the forest,
what process does your body follow?
1. Appraisal: brief, rapid, compelling, global
• Limbic area of the brain (amygdala)
• Fight or flight response; universal
2. Physiological arousal
3. Compelling action tendency
• Decision is how to save itself (fight or flight)
• Body either relaxes in relief or kicks into gear

56
Q

Narrative Couples Therapy

A

Create new meanings based on exploring stories and

as-yet-unstoried aspects of lives and relationships

57
Q

Narrative > 2-dimensional normative scales

A
• 2-Dimensional: Polarized
> Healthy vs pathological
> Well-functioning vs dysfunctional
> Too rigid, too enmeshed
> Too much sex, too little sex
> Right gender roles, wrong gender roles
• Invite thin descriptions
58
Q

> Process and Intervention (13 steps elements)

A
  1. Listen
  2. Deconstructive
    Listening
  3. Deconstructive
    Questioning
  4. Externalizing
    Conversations
  5. Naming the Problem
    and the Projects
  6. Unique Outcomes
  7. Absent But Implicit*
  8. Developing stories (from
    UO and ABI)
  9. Time: Developing a
    history of the present*
  10. Telling and Witnessing*
  11. Relational Identity*
  12. Outside Witness Groups
  13. Documenting and
    Circulating New Stories
59
Q

Solution-Focused Couples Therapy

A

Focus on what works, what is working

60
Q

Weiner-Davis: 9 Guidelines

A
  1. Notice what is different when you are getting along
  2. If you are having trouble identifying recent
    exceptions, recall what you were doing differently in
    the past that made your relationship more satisfying
  3. You don’t have to like it, you just have to do it
  4. Focus on what’s doable or possible
  5. A problem that recurs doesn’t necessarily require a
    new solution
  6. Pay attention to how your conflicts end
  7. If you can’t locate any exceptions, identify the best
    of the worst
  8. Notice what’s different about the times the problem
    occurs but something constructive comes from it
  9. Notice what’s different about the times the problem
    situation occurs but it doesn’t bother you
61
Q

Target 3 areas around the problem for change

A
  1. Changing the Viewing (Perspective)
  2. Changing the Doing
  3. Changing the Context
62
Q

Imago Relationship Therapy

A

The IMAGO: The image in our unconscious mind of all
the positive and negative traits of our parents
We enter adulthood with image of what love means to us
> We pick a partner that provides that same kind of love1
> Our romantic partner tends to have similar positive/
negative traits as our parents
> Therefore, our romantic partner has the potential to
wound us in the same way that our parents wounded us

63
Q

My Imago

***SHORT ANSWER

A

The image in our unconscious mind of all

the positive and negative traits of our parents

64
Q

Relationship Exits

A

“The Invisible Divorce”
A form of “acting out” unspoken, painful feelings by finding
satisfaction outside the relationship
• With something or someone that acts as a distraction
or self-soothing activity
> With or without intention
> What partners turn to rather than talking about feelings
occurring in the relationship
• Relationship “energy leaks”
• A relationship with an exit is like a tire with a tiny puncture;
> Slowly but steadily leaking air; eventually, it goes flat

65
Q

• Intimate Partner Violence

A

Any threatened or actual use of physical or sexual
force and/or psychological, emotional, or financial
abuse against an intimate partner which results in, or
has the potential to result in, death, injury, or harm
Any violence between intimate partners, including all
adult intimate relationship between people regardless
of sexual preference, marital status, or age of intimates

66
Q

Power and Control wheel (8 forms)

A
• Intimidation
• Emotional Abuse
• Isolation/
Exclusion
• Minimize/
Deny/Blame
• Using Children
• Dominance
• Economic Abuse
• Threats & Coercion
67
Q

Biderman’s Chart of Coercion

A

• Describes methods of torture used to break the
will or brainwash
> Specifically POWs
• Domestic violence experts believe that batterers
use these same techniques

68
Q

Cycle of Violence

*** SHORT ANSWER

A

Normal –> Tension Builds –> Explosion & Violence –> Rationalization and Repair –> Honeymoon
(And repeat)

69
Q

Why do victims stay?

***SHORT ANSWER

A

• Code for: It’s her fault because she stays
• Bottom line: Leaving the relationship often does not
end the abuse…
> Most abused partners report increased harassment
or even violence after they break off the relationship
> 75% of women who die due to IPV are killed
after leaving the relationship

• Financial
dependence
• Shame/Embarrassment
• Health problems or
disability
• Nowhere to go
(isolation)
• Fear for life or safety
based on threats
• Hope2
• Religious beliefs
• Too exhausted
• Belief that abuser
will change
• Belief that abuser
has changed
• Lack of support
(isolation)
• Children’s love/
attachment to the
abuser
• I still love him/her
• Obligation to him or
relationship
• Family disapproval
• Afraid of being
alone
• Fear of losing
custody3
• Abuser is not always
abusive
70
Q

Clinical Challenge (working with couples experiencing DV)

A

Abuse and coercion seem to exist along with love and
friendship in a uniquely painful way
• Highly contradictory messages1
• Cycles of love/hate, blame/over-responsibility,
hyperbole/minimization, remorse/cynicism2
Like the conflicting messages from the relationship itself,
Clinicians run the risk of:
• Taking sides vs never taking sides
• Exaggerating vs minimizing danger
• Reacting vs containing the pathology of splitting
• Using one clinical paradigm; rejecting all others3

71
Q

Ending Partner violence

A

Break silence, tell everyone