final Flashcards
Securities generally do not include any documents evidencing corporate
ownership or debt.
False
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires companies to le
certain information electronically so that it can be posted on the SEC’s
EDGAR database.
True
All securities transactions must be registered with the Securities and
Exchange Commission—there are no exemptions.
False
Once a registration statement has been led, a waiting period begins
while the Securities and Exchange Commission reviews the statement.
True
A well-known seasoned issuer cannot le a registration statement until
after it announces a new oering.
False
Securities oerings in unlimited amounts can be exempt from the
registration requirements in certain circumstances.
True
Most securities can be resold without registration.
True
Liability can be imposed on those who are negligent in not discovering
fraud in connection with a registration statement or prospectus.
True
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 applies to companies that have
assets in excess of $5 million and ve hundred or more employees.
False
Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 apply just to corporate “insiders.”
False
The key to liability under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 is whether information omitted or
misrepresented in connection with the purchase or sale of a security is
material.
True
Corporate “outsiders” may not be held liable for insider trading under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5.
False
In the context of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
insiders include ocers, directors, and large stockholders of Section 12
corporations.
True
For civil sanctions to be imposed under Section 10(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5, the violator must not have had
an intent to defraud or knowledge of his or her misconduct.
False
The Securities and Exchange Commission does not regulate the content of
proxy statements.
False
Private parties can sue violators of Section 10(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 for rescission of a contract to
buy securities.
True
Every state has it own corporate securities laws that regulate the oer
and sale of securities within its borders.
True
Corporate accountability can be increased by imposing strict disclosure
requirements and harsh penalties for securities laws.
True
Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, chief nancial ocers must certify
the accuracy of information in corporate nancial statements and reports
that are led with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
True
The Securities and Exchange Commission does not enforce the antifraud
provisions of the securities laws in the online environment.
False
Cotton Products Corporation is a public company whose shares are
traded in the public securities markets. With respect to nancial and other
signicant information concerning its securities, the Securities Act of 1933
c. requires disclosure.
Guitar Factory Corporation les a registration statement and delivers a
prospectus to the appropriate parties. These items are intended to enable
the evaluation of certain nancial risks by
a. unsophisticated investors.
Global Trade Corporation is a public company that is poised to issue
securities that do not qualify for an exemption from registration. This
means that Global Trade must
a. file a registration statement with the SEC.
Household Products Corporation wants to make an oering of securities
to the pub lic. This oering is not exempt from registration under the Se -
curities Act of 1933. Before Household Products sells its securities, it must
provide in vestors with
a. a prospectus
Riverwalk Restaurants Corporation is a noninvestment company that
wants to is sue stock of $3 million in a twelve-month period. Riverwalk,
with less than $20 mil lion in annual sales, qualies as a small business
issuer. Before Riverwalk sells the stock, it must provide investors with
. an offering circular.
Fleet Delivery Corporation is a public company with a market
capitalization of less than $75 million. Fleet is poised to issue securities in
a transaction that, under the Securities Act of 1933, is “exempt.” This
enables Fleet to
. reduce the compliance costs by not requiring an auditor report.
As part of a stock oering for Designer Studio Corporation, the rm’s
accountant Evelyn intention ally misrepresents material facts in the pro -
spectus. Flores buys the stock unaware of the misrepresentation and suf -
fers a loss. Evelyn may be subject to
a. a fine, imprisonment, and damages.
Space Trips Inc. les a registration statement with the SEC before making
an oering to the general public. The registration contains false,
immaterial statements of which the investors are unaware. Space Trips is
charged with violating the Securities Act of 1933. Space Trips’s best
defense is
the untrue statements were not material.
Fresh Fruit Company has assets of less than $10 million and fewer than
fty shareholders. Gourmand Pastries, Inc., has assets of more than $50
mil lion and more than ve hundred shareholders. The Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 applies to
Gourmand Pastries only.
Bonds & Stocks Corporation, and its ocers, directors, and sharehold ers,
buy and sell securities. SEC Rule 10b-5 applies to the purchase or sale of
any security.
To raise capital to form Business Apps Corporation with Cris, Dona sells
bonds and stock in other companies, and plans to register an initial public
o er ing under the Securities Act of 1933. SEC Rule l0b-5 covers
just about any form of securities
Dhani, an accountant for Eureka! Inc. learns of undisclosed com pany plan -
s to market a new laptop. Dhani buys 1,000 shares of Eureka stock. He re -
veals the company plans to Fay, who tells Geo. Both Fay and Geo buy
100 shares. Geo knows that Fay got her informa tion from Dhani. When
Eureka! publicly an nounces its new laptop, Dhani, Fay, and Geo sell their
stock for a prot. Under the Securities Ex change Act of 1934, Fay is most
likely
liable for insider trading.
Rico does not work for Street Bikes Company, but wrong fully obtains
inside information concerning the rm. Based on the in forma tion, Rico
buys and sells Street Bikes stock for personal gain. The Securities and
Exchange Commission prose cutes Rico, arguing that he is liable because
he stole in formation right fully belonging to another. This argument is
the misappropriation theory.
OnSpec, Inc., and its ocers, directors, and share holders, buy and sell
securities. Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 covers
purchases and sales of securities involving
. short-swing profits
Grain Mills Corporation is required to register its securities under Section
12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Section 14(a) of the act
regulates
the solicitation of proxies from Grain Mills’s shareholders.
Cattle Ranch Company oers its stock for sale only in a single state. The
law in Cattle Ranch’s state is like the law in most states. Cattle Ranch’s
oer is sub ject to state securities statutes that include
antifraud and disclosure provisions.
Boats & Yachts Corporation is a public company, which California
regulates and in which Dorian invests. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
introduced direct federal corporate governance requirements to
public companies.
HVAC Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc., is a public company whose shares
are traded in the public securities markets. Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to ensure that HVAC’s nancial results are accurate and timely,
the rm’s senior ocers must set up and maintain
internal “disclosure controls and procedures.”
Rollo is the chief executive ocer of Specialty Magazines, Inc., which is
required to le certain nancial reports with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Rollo must
certify that the reports are complete and accurate.
The purpose of antitrust law is to reduce competition.
False
Any activity that substantially aects interstate commerce falls outside the
scope of antitrust laws.
False
Market power is the ability of a rm to enter a given market.
False
A price-xing agreement that is reasonable does not violate antitrust law
False
A horizontal restraint is any agreement that in some way restrains
competition between rival rms competing in the same market.
True
Any agreement that restricts output among competitors is a per se
violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act.
True
A concentrated industry is one in which either a single rm or a small
number of rms carry out the separate functions of the chain of
production.
False
A territorial or customer restriction is currently considered a per se
violation of antitrust law.
False
The possession of monopoly power is the only element needed to
establish the oense of monopolization.
False
A rm may be a monopolist even though it is not the sole seller in a
market.
True
The relevant product market includes only products that, although
produced by dierent rms, have identical attributes.
False
Attempted monopolization is a violation of antitrust law
True`
Predatory pricing is a legitimate marketing practice, not a form of
anticompetitive conduct
False
A seller is prohibited from charging dierent prices to competing buyers
for identical goods or services.
True
A seller is prohibited from making an exclusive-dealing contract if the
eect is to tend to create a monopoly.
True
An exclusive-dealing contract is an agreement in which a seller agrees not
to sell to a buyer’s competitors.
False
A horizontal merger occurs when a company at one stage of production
acquires a company at a higher or lower stage of production.
False
Only the U.S. Department of Justice can prosecute violations of all of the
antitrust laws.
False
A joint eort by businesspersons to obtain legislative action can be
exempt from the antitrust laws.
True
U.S. antitrust laws may be applied to protect foreign consumers and
competitors from violations committed by U.S. business rms
True
Congress enacts a statute to outlaw a specic type of anticompetitive
business agreement. Like other laws that regulate economic competition,
this law is referred to as
a. an antitrust law
Discount Retail Corporation may be engaging in conduct that vio lates the
Sherman Act. To bring an action against the rm requires that its conduct
have a sig nicant impact on
a. interstate commerce.
Soft Drink Corporation is charged with violating the Sherman Act through
conduct subject to the rule of reason. When applying the rule of reason in
this situation, a court will not consider
a. the eect of the agreement on international trade.
Natural Gas, Inc., and Olio Energy Company rene and sell natural gas. To
limit the supply of natural gas on the market and thereby raise prices,
Natural Gas and Olio Energy agree to buy “excess” supplies from dealers
and “dispose” of it. The agreement between Natural Gas and Olio Energy
is
. a horizontal restraint.
Natural Gas, Inc., and Olio Energy Company rene and sell natural gas. To
limit the supply of natural gas on the market and thereby raise prices,
Natural Gas and Olio Energy agree to buy “excess” supplies from dealers
and “dispose” of it. The Natural Gas and Olio Energy deal is
a per se violation of antitrust law.
Fine Food Company, Gourmet Cheeses, Inc., and Healthy Eats, Inc. agree
to exchange information and share advertising. This trade association is
a. subject to analysis under the rule of reason.
The Association of Organic Food Producers, which does not include all
organic farmers and ranchers, refuses to deal with any parties who do not
carry the products of its members. This group boycott is
a per se violation of antitrust law.
Oce Warehouse Inc. and Paperclips Inc. are the chief competitors in
their market. They agree that Oce Warehouse will operate only east of
the Mississippi River and Paperclips will operate only west of the
waterway. Under antitrust law, this is most likely
a per se violation.
Frictionless Lubricant Corporation and Grease, Inc., are the principal sup -
pliers of their product in their market. They agree that Frictionless will sell
exclusively to retailers and Grease will sell exclusively to wholesalers.
Under antitrust law, this is most likely
a per se violation.
Bill’s Barber Supplies, Inc., is the major distributor of barber supplies in
the state of Colorado. Bill’s closest competitor is Dona’s Beauty Products
Company, another Colorado rm. They agree that Bill’s will distribute its
products in western Colorado and Dona’s will distribute its products in the
eastern part of the state. This is
a market division
Smart Tablets, Inc., requires all distribu tors of its products to sell them at
a specied minimum price. This is a violation of antitrust law
if the anticompetitive effects outweigh the competitive benefits.
Golf & Tennis LLC makes and sells golf clubs, tennis racquets, and related
sporting goods. By selling its products at prices substantially below the
normal cost of production, Golf & Tennis hopes to drive its competitors
from the market. This is
predatory pricing.
A suit is led against DrillBits Corporation, alleging that the rm commit -
ted the oense of monopolization. To determine whether DrillBits has
monopoly power requires looking at
the relevant market
Glassworx Corporation has exclusive control over the mar ket for its
products. Under antitrust law, this is
a violation if it acquired this power through “anticompetitive means.”
Speedboat Corporation refuses to sell its products to Water World, Inc., a
recreational water products dealership. This is a violation of antitrust laws
if it
has an anticompetitive effect on a particular market.
To drive its competitors out of a certain geographic segment of its market,
Fryin’ Potatoes, Inc., sets the prices of its products below cost for the
buyers in that area. This is
price discrimination.
Disc & Shoe Brakes Corporation, a brake manufacturer, sells its products
to Eastside Motors, a retailer, at lower prices than it charges Fast Brake, a
com peti tive re tailer. This price discrimination is legal
unless its effect is to substantially lessen competition.
City Manufacturing Corporation conditions shipments of its products to
Exurb Stores, Inc., on Exurb’s agreement not to buy products from
Regional Works Company, City’s competitor. This is
an exclusive-dealing contract.
Mango Corporation believes that Melon Corporation engages in anticom -
peti tive behavior in an attempt to drive Mango and its other competitors
out of the market. Antitrust laws can be enforced against Melon by
Mango and Melon’s other competitors.
Big American Oil Company joins with a foreign cartel to control the price
of oil. If the cartel has a substantial eect on U.S. commerce, a suit for
violation of U.S. antitrust laws can be brought against
all of the choices.
An injured party may sue a business polluter in tort under the negligence
and strict liability theories.
True
A public authority, such as a state’s attorney general, can sue to stop a
“public” nuisance.
True
Businesses that engage in ultrahazardous activities are not liable for any
injuries the activities cause.
False
Only the federal government may restrict emissions from motor vehicles.
False
An environmental impact statement must analyze the impact on any
aected business of proposed environmental controls.
False
The primary responsibility for implementing air-pollution standards
established under the Clean Air Act rests with state and local
governments.
False
The Environmental Protection Agency has not concluded that greenhouse
gases, including carbon dioxide emissions, constitute a public danger.
False
There is one set of ambient standards—maximum permissible levels of
certain pollutants—and the Environmental Protection Agency formulates
plans to achieve them
False
Those who knowingly violate the Clean Air Act may be subject to criminal
liability.
True
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits can be issued
even if a discharge will violate water-quality standards.
False
The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System focuses on industrial
wastewater and storm water discharges.
True
Water-quality standards are set by the Environmental Protection Agency
False
National euent (pollution) standards are set by the Environmental Protection Agency for each industry.
True
The Clean Water Act permits the lling or dredging of wetlands without a
permit.
False
Under the Clean Water Act, criminal penalties apply whether a violation
was intentional or unintentional.
False
Public water systems operators must come as close as possible to
meeting the Environmental Protection Agency’s standards by using any
available technology that is economically and technologically feasible.
False
Any oil facility that discharges oil into navigable waters or onto an
adjoining shore may be liable for cleanup costs, as well as damages.
True