Film and Law Flashcards
(38 cards)
What is the central preoccupation of legal film criticism?
Realism and fear of effects
Legal theorists are concerned about how legal films portray lawyers and the law.
What is the primary complaint regarding legal film portrayals?
They are unrealistic
This criticism focuses on the misleading nature of these portrayals.
What is the ‘Effects Hypothesis’ in legal film criticism?
The fear that unrealistic depictions will undermine public belief in the legal profession and negatively influence jurors and lawyers
This hypothesis suggests that popular culture education about law can have detrimental effects.
What are the two main camps of critics in legal film criticism?
The Fearful and the Celebratory
Critics either focus on the negative impacts or the positive potential of legal films.
What characterizes the Fearful approach to legal film criticism?
Concerns about the negative impact of unrealistic representations
Critics in this camp fear the effects of distorted portrayals on public perception.
What is the author’s skepticism regarding the critique of realism in films?
The lasting value of criticizing films for not being realistic is questioned
The author believes this critique does not necessarily reflect the overall impact of popular culture education about law.
How does the author view the influence of individual jurors and clients?
They acknowledge potential negative influence but question the justification for widespread fear
The author compares this influence to other cultural factors.
What does the Celebratory approach emphasize in legal film criticism?
The positive potential of legal films without significant fear of the effects hypothesis
Critics in this camp focus on how films can positively portray lawyers and legal institutions.
What core beliefs do critics of the Celebratory approach hold?
- Legal films rely on negative stereotypes
- Films fail to show real lawyer work
- Films depict unethical actions no real lawyer would take
These beliefs suggest that such portrayals misinform the public and damage legal perception.
What is the plea of critics from the Celebratory approach?
They want Hollywood to produce films that show the good lawyers do and reinforce the legitimacy of legal institutions
This includes portraying lawyers positively.
What underlying issue does the author frame the debate over legal film portrayals as?
A battle over the control of law’s iconography. What’s truly at stake is the meaning and image of law itself.
This relates to the images and symbols that define law’s virtues and vices.
What practical problem did the author encounter when teaching lawyer films?
Existing resources were lacking
The author found it difficult to translate critical essays into effective teaching tools.
What critique does the author have of early legal film literature?
It mainly identified relevant films without providing practical teaching methods
Even nuanced essays were challenging to use in classroom discussions.
What was the author’s experience when turning to film studies for teaching methods?
The field focused on technical/formal aspects and theoretical interpretation, which were unhelpful for the author’s goals
The author preferred a practical approach to teaching about lawyers.
What conclusion did the author reach about existing legal film criticism and film studies?
Neither provided practical tools for using films to help law students learn about themselves and the profession of lawyering
The author sought effective methods for teaching with films.
What is the author’s view on claims about what we learn from popular culture about law?
They are often speculative and involve more mystery than science.
What method does the author propose for engaging with depictions of law in popular culture?
Analyze the work of legal film critics as if you were a student in their course.
What are some guiding questions for analyzing legal film critics?
- What methods do critics use when discussing legal films?
- Why do they choose specific films?
- How do they ask viewers to interpret these films?
- What questions about meaning do they raise, and how do they help answer them?
- Who is the critic, what values do they assign to lawyer films, and how can legal educators apply their insights in teaching?
What term does Papke use to describe the critique of popular culture’s lack of realism?
Reality aesthetic.
What does Papke acknowledge about the critique of realism in popular culture?
It has some degree of validity and is troubling when it influences actual trials.
How does the author interpret Papke’s stance on the reality aesthetic?
Papke displays significant ambivalence regarding the critique.
What does Papke say about complaints regarding inaccuracies in legal films?
He states that they are well taken and merit underscoring.
What typical difference does Papke list regarding jurors’ expectations in trials?
Jurors expect lawyers to perform magic, like pulling rabbits out of hats.