Fill in the Blank Quiz Flashcards
Personal jurisdiction requires that the defendant be _______ to the forum state’s jurisdiction and that the defendant be ________
amenable
served with proper notice
Amenability to personal jurisdiction is governed by _________ subject to ___________ of the United States Constitution
forum state’s law
Due process clause
Pennoyer v. Neff described three bases for state jurisdiction over persons and
things. They are…
——- jurisdiction over the person
_____ jurisdiction over interests in property
____ jurisdiction over seized property, where plaintiff’s claim is
unrelated to the seized property
1) In personam
2) In rem
3) Quasi in rem
Pennoyer based its jurisdictional formula on __________ over persons and property
within its borders
State power
Under Pennoyer’s in personam jurisdiction, a judgment in plaintiff’s favor….three things
would be ____ in all states
for the ____ amount of damages
may be _____ until fully collected
binding
full
enforced repeatedly
Under Pennoyer’s in rem jurisdiction, a judgment in favor of plaintiff….three things
affects ______ in a res (both ____ and _____ to the lawsuit)
does not result in ______
does not require _____ outside the forum
everyone’s issue
parties and non parties
money damages
enforcement
Under Pennoyer’s quasi in rem jurisdiction, a judgment in plaintiff’s favor…five things
entitles plaintiff to ____
Is not ____
is not ____
may not be enforced ______
may not be enforced
the property attached for jurisdiction
a personal judgement
enforceable against any other property
more than once
outside the forum
Another type of jurisdiction discussed in Pennoyer is _______, which involves the
state’s authority to adjudicate such matters as divorce, adoption, citizenship and
mental competence
status
_________ altered Pennoyer’s rule for personal
jurisdiction, replacing the concept of ______ with the new standards of
_________ and ______ provided by the “minimum contacts test.
International shoe v. Washington
state power
reasonableness and fairness
The current test for amenability, following International Shoe and other cases,
does not require the minimum contacts test if the defendant satisfies any one of the
four “traditional” bases for in personam jurisdiction. Those bases are:
_____ in the forum state
______ to jurisidiction
_______ of objection to jurisdiction
________ in the forum when served
residence
waiver
physical presence
Consent
Consent to jurisdiction has two forms, ________ and ________. ____________ are an example of express consent, and __________are an example of implied consent
expressed
implied
forum selection clauses
non-resident motorists statutes
If none of the traditional bases are present, a state may only exercise in personam
jurisdiction over defendants who have minimum contacts with the state. The two
categories of minimum contacts are ______ and ______
specific jurisidiction
general jurisdiction
____________ is where the lawsuit arises from or relates to the nonresident
defendant’s contacts with the forum state. _________ is where the lawsuit
is unrelated to the nonresident defendant’s contacts with the forum state
Specific jurisdiction
General jurisdiction
Specific jurisdiction has four contacts tests, which are that the defendant….
________ itself of the benefits and protections of forum law;
should have _____ that its activity would subject it to jurisdiction in the
forum state;
could ________ being haled into court in the forum state
placed its product in the _______ and could foresee that it
would be used in the forum state
1) purposefully availed
foreseen
3) reasonably anticipate
4) stream of commerce
General jurisdiction has one contact test, which is that defendant’s contacts are so _______ as to render it ________ in the forum state
continuous and systematic
essentially at home
If the defendant has no contacts with the forum (and does not meet one of the four
traditional bases of jurisdiction), then there is ____ over that
defendant. If, on the other hand, defendant does have specific or general contacts,
then the court must consider the _______ This is a
______ test with five factors, which are:
________ interest in convenient and effective relief
__________
the _______ in furthering fundamental social policies
the ______ in effective resolution of controversies
no personal jurisdiction
fair play and substantial justice test
balancing
1) burden on the defendant
2) plaintiff’s
3) the forum state’s interest
4) shared interests of several states
5) judicial system’s interest
The due process requirement for notice to defendant is stated in Mullane v. Central
Hanover. Notice is constitutionally sufficient if it is ____ under
all circumstances, to apprise ______ parties of the pendency of the action, and
afford them an _______ and _______
reasonably calculated
interested
opportunity to appear
present objections
An abbreviated version of the Mullane notice rule is that _______ requires
______ and _______
due process
notice
an opportunity to be heard
Which rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure deals with initially notifying
the defendant of the lawsuit?
Rule 4
Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e), in addition to service under state law, the means of
service on a competent adult are:
a._______ to defendant;
b. leaving copies at ____ with a person of _______
c. serving defendant’s ______
1) personal delivery
2) l defendant’s dwelling
suitable age and discretion
appointed agent
In most cases, the federal method of service on defendants outside the district is by
the _____ statute of the state in which the federal court sits
long arm
The purposes of venue rules are:
_______ to defendant
_______ of caseload within the forum state
fairness
geographic allocation
The federal statute for general venue provisions
28 U.S.C. 1391
The purpose of forum non conveniens is to ______
based on fairness and convenience
move cases from one forum to another
Subject matter jurisdiction refers to the court’s authority to adjudicate based on the
______ and in some cases, ________
type of case
the dollar amount in controversy
Under Article III, federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction over two primary
types of cases
Federal question and diversity of citizenship
The statute dealing with general federal question jurisdiction is ____
It provides that federal courts have jurisdiction over any civil action _______ of the United States
28 U.S.C. 1331
arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties
In addition to the general federal question provisions in 28 U.S.C. § 1331, there are
specific statutes on federal question jurisdiction, including actions against (name
three):
foreign states, admiralty, patents, civil rights, consuls, internal revenue, and
United States as plaintiff or defendant
Diversity jurisdiction is covered by ________ That statute provides that
federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction over claims between _______ or between ______and ______ where the amount in
controversy ________
28 U.S.C. 1332
citizens of different states
state citizens
foreign citizens
exceeds $75,000
Although the Constitution requires only _______, 28 U.S.C. § 1332 requires________. This means that all plaintiffs must have different citizenship than all defendants.
partial diversity
complete diversity
For diversity purposes, a corporation has two citizenships, which are
state of incorporation and principal place of business
A corporation’s principal place of business is defined as its
nerve center
For diversity purposes, partnerships have the citizenship of
all the partners
Under the St. Paul Mercury test, the amount in controversy is determined by plaintiff’s _______
good faith pleading
In achieving the amount in controversy, may Plaintiff aggregate (answer “yes” or
“no”):
a. all of Plaintiff’s claims against one defendant?
b. alternate theories of recovery for the same wrong?
c. claims of different plaintiffs?
d. claims against different defendants?
a. Yes
b. No
c. No
d. No
In some cases, a related claim that lacks diversity or federal question jurisdiction may be included. This is called _____
Supplemental jurisdiction
Federal courts traditionally abstain from _______, _______, and ______
family law, probate, and state criminal proceedings
If plaintiff has filed his action in state court, and jurisdiction is proper in federal court, defendant may remove the case to federal court. This is done by filing a_______ in federal court, attaching a copy of _______
and _______to the state court and all parties
Notice of removal
all state pleadings
giving notice
If there is a ________ defect in the removal, the case must be remanded to state
court no matter when the objection is made
jurisdictional
If there is a ______ defect in the removal, the case must be remanded to state court if a
procedural
proper and timely objection is filed
State court subject matter jurisdiction is governed by
State law
In state courts, subject matter jurisdiction is designated by _____ and/or ______
type of case
dollar amount
Federal courts have _____ jurisdiction over patent claims. Federal and state court share _____ jurisdiction over _____
exclusive
concurrent
federal civil rights actions
A court has ______ jurisdiction if it is the required forum at the beginning of the
case. A court has ______ jurisdiction if it may adjudicate a case only after it has
been heard in a lower court
original
appellate
A federal district court has ______ jurisdiction over a dispute filed there and
raising a federal question, and ______ jurisdiction over appeals from Texas state agency decisions.
Original
appellate
A federal district (trial) court has _______ jurisdiction over appeals from federal administrative agency decisions
appellate
The United States Supreme Court has ______ jurisdiction over disputes between states.
original
The Rules of Decision Act provides that ________ except where the Constitution or treaties of the United States or Acts of Congress
otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as ________ in civil actions in the courts of the United States, in cases where they apply.
the laws of the several states
rules of decision
________ interpreted the Rules of Decision Act to require federal courts to apply the _______ in cases where state law applied.
Swift v. Tyson
general American common law
Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins reversed Swift v. Tyson, holding that when state law applies in federal court, the federal court must apply ________
the law of the state in which that federal court sits
_________ coined the _________ which provides
that the ______ Doctrine mandates state law only where it affects substantive rights
that are potentially outcome determinative
Guaranty Trust v. York
outcome determinative test
Erie
_______ modified the ________ holding that the court
should _________ in the case to determine which interests
were stronger. ______ further held that one factor of the balancing test is whether the
state law in question is _______ outcome determinative. Thus,
Byrd gives more importance to ________ that absolutely change the outcome of the
case.
Byrd v. Blue Ridge
outcome determinative test
balance state and federal interests
Byrd
absolutely or definitively
To determine the content of state law in federal court, the Erie Doctrine directs that
the court give binding authority to ________ and ____________. Persuasive (but not binding) authority is found in _________ and ______ Erie also allows courts to
make ______ as to state law
state statutes
decisions from the state’s highest court
Lower state appellate courts
federal court opinions on state law
an educated guess
The Rules Enabling Act (28 U.S.C. § 2072) provides the United States Supreme
Court may enact the __________ provided that no rule may
__________ any substantive right
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
abridge, enlarge, or modify