Fill in the blank Final Fall 2023 Flashcards
Personal jurisdiction requires that the defendant be ___________ to the forum state’s jurisdiction, and that the defendant be _________________________________.
amenable, served with proper notice.
Amenability to personal jurisdiction is governed by the ______________________, subject to the limits of the ______________________ of the United States Constitution.
forum state’s law, due process clause.
Pennoyer v. Neff described three bases for state jurisdiction over persons and things. They are:
a. ___________: jurisdiction over the person.
b. ___________: jurisdiction over interests in property.
c. ___________: jurisdiction over seized property, where plaintiff’s claim is unrelated to the seized property.
a. In personam
b. In rem
c. Quasi in rem
Note that quasi in rem is arguably unconstitutional after Shaffer v. Heitner.
Pennoyer based its jurisdictional formula on ___________ over persons and property within its borders.
state power.
Under Pennoyer’s in personam jurisdiction, a judgment in plaintiff’s favor:
- would be ___________ in all states
- for the ___________ of damages
- may be ______________________ until fully collected.
-binding
-full amount
-enforced repeatedly
Under Pennoyer’s in rem jurisdiction, a judgment in favor of the plaintiff:
- affects ______________________ in a res (both ___________ and ___________ to the lawsuit)
- does not result in a __________________
- does not require ___________ outside the forum
- everyone’s interests, parties, nonparties
- money judgment
- enforcement
Under Pennoyer’s quasi in rem jurisdiction, a judgment in plaintiff’s favor:
- entitles plaintiff to the _________________________________
- is not a ______________________
- is not _________________________________
- may not be enforced ______________________
- may not be enforced ______________________
- property attached for jurisdiction
- personal judgment
- enforceable against any other property
- more than once
- outside the forum
Another type of jurisdiction discussed in Pennoyer is ___________, which involves the state’s authority to adjudicate such matters as divorce, adoption, citizenship and mental competence.
status.
_________________________________ altered Pennoyer’s rule for personal jurisdiction, replacing the concept of __________________ with the new standards of ___________ and ___________ provided by the “minimum contacts test.”
International Shoe Co v. Washington, state power, reasonableness, fairness.
The current test for amenability, following International Shoe and other cases, does not require minimum contacts test if the defendant satisfies any one of the four “traditional” bases for in personam jurisdiction. Those bases are:
- ___________ in the forum state
- ___________ to jurisdiction
- ___________ of objection to jurisdiction
- __________________ in the forum when served.
- Residence
- Consent
- Waiver
- Physical presence
Consent to jurisdiction has two forms, ___________ consent and ___________ consent. ______________________ are an example of express consent, and ______________________________ are an example of implied consent.
express, implied, Forum selection clauses, non-resident motorists statutes.
If none of the traditional bases are present, a state may only exercise in personam jurisdiction over defendants who have minimum contacts with the state. The two categories of minimum contacts are _________________ and __________________.
specific jurisdiction, general jurisdiction.
____________________ is where the lawsuit arises from or relates to the nonresident defendant’s contacts with the forum state. ____________________ is where the lawsuit is unrelated to the nonresident defendant’s contacts with the forum state.
Specific jurisdiction, General jurisdiction.
Specific jurisdiction has four contacts tests, which are that the defendant:
a. ______________________ itself of the benefits and protections of forum law;
b. should have ___________ that its activity would subject it to jurisdiction in the forum state;
c. could ______________________ being haled into court in the forum state;
d. placed its product in the ______________________ and could foresee that it would be used in the forum state.
a. purposefully availed
b. foreseen
c. reasonably anticipate
d. stream of commerce
General jurisdiction has one contact test, which is that defendant’s contacts are so ______________________ as to render it ______________________ in the forum state.
continuous and systematic, essentially at home.
If the defendant has no contacts with the forum (and does not meet one of the four traditional bases of jurisdiction), then there is ______________________ over that defendant. If, on the other hand, defendant does have specific or general contacts, then the court must consider the ________________________________ test. This is a ___________ test with five factors which are:
- ______________________
- ___________ interest in convenient and effective relief
- ______________________
-the _________________________________ in furthering fundamental social policies
- the ______________________________ in effective resolution of controversies.
no personal jurisdiction, fair play and substantial justice test, balancing
- burden on the defendant
- plaintiff’s
- the forum state’s interest
- shared interests of several states
- judicial system’s interest
The due process requirement for notice to defendant is stated in Mullane v. Central Hanover. Notice is constitutionally sufficient if it is “___________________, under all circumstances, to apprise ___________ parties of the pendency of the action, and afford them an ___________________ and __________________.”
reasonably calculated, interested, opportunity to appear, present objections
An abbreviated version of the Mullane notice ruling is that ___________ requires ___________ and an ___________________.
due process, notice, opportunity to be heard.
Which rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure deals with initially notifying the defendant of the lawsuit?
Rule 4
Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e), in addition to service under state law, the means of service on a competent adult are:
a. ___________________ to defendant;
b. leaving copies at ______________________ with a person of _____________________________;
c. serving defendant’s ____________________.
a. personal delivery
b. defendant’s dwelling, suitable age and discretion
c. appointed agent.
In most cases, the federal method of service on defendants outside the district is by the ___________ statue of the state in which the federal court sits.
long arm
The purpose of venue rules are:
a. ___________ to defendant
b. ______________________ of caseload within the forum state
a. fairness
b. geographic allocation
The federal statue for general venue provisions is ___________________.
28 U.S.C. Section 1391.
The purpose of forum non conveniens is to move ________________________________ based on fairness and convenience.
cases from one forum to another
Subject matter jurisdiction refers to the court authority to adjudicates based on the _________________ and in some cases, ____________________________.
type of case, dollar amount in controversy.
Under Article III, federal court have subject matter jurisdiction over two primary types of cases:
- __________________
- ____________________
- federal question
- diversity of citizenship
The statute dealing with general federal question jurisdictions is ______________. It provides that federal courts have jurisdiction over any civil action _________________________________________ of the United States.
28 U.S.C. Section 1331; arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties
In addition to the general federal question provisions in 28 U.S.C. Section 1331, there are specific statutes on federal question jurisdiction, including actions against (name three):
foreign states, admiralty, patents, civil rights, consuls, internal revenue, and United States as plaintiff or defendant
Diversity jurisdiction is covered by __________________. That statute provides that federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction over claims between _____________________, or between ___________ and ___________, where the amount in controversy _________________.
28 U.S.C. Section 1332, citizens of different states, state citizens, foreign citizens, exceeds $75,000.
Although the Constitution requires only ___________ diversity, 28 U.S.C. Section 1332 requires ___________ diversity. This means that all plaintiffs must have different citizenship than all defendants.
partial, complete
For diversity purposes, a corporation has two citizenships, which are:
a. state of incorporation
b. principal place of business
A corporation’s principal place of business is defined as its _______________.
nerve center
For diversity purposes, partnerships have the citizenship of __________________.
all the partners
Under the St. Paul Mercury test, the amount in controversy is determined by plaintiff’s ____________________.
good faith pleading
In achieving the amount in controversy, may Plaintiff aggregates (answer “yes” or “no”):
a. all of the plaintiff’s claim against one defendant?
b. alternate theories of recovery for the same wrong?
c. claims of different plaintiffs?
d. claims against different defendants?
a. yes
b. no
c. no
d. no
In some cases, a related claim that lacks diversity or federal question jurisdiction may be included, This is called _____________________________.
supplemental jurisdiction
Federal courts traditionally abstain from ___________, ___________ and _____________________.
family law, probate, state criminal proceedings.
If plaintiff has filed his action in state court, and jurisdiction is proper in federal court, defendant may remove the case to federal court. This is done by filing the ___________________ in federal court, attaching a copy of ______________________________ and __________________ to the state court and all parties.
Notice of Removal, all state court pleadings, giving notice
If there is a __________________ defect in the removal, the case must be remanded to state court no matter when the objection is made.
jurisdictional
If there is a _____________ defect in the removal, the case must be remanded to state court if a _____________________________.
procedural, proper and timely objection is filed
State court subject matter jurisdiction is governed by ___________.
state law
In state courts subject matter jurisdiction is designated by _______________ and/or ________________.
type of case, dollar amount
Federal courts have ___________ jurisdiction over patent claims. Federal and state court share ___________ jurisdiction over ______________________.
exclusive, concurrent, federal civil rights actions
A court has ___________ jurisdiction if it is the required forum at the beginning of the case. A court has ___________ jurisdiction if it may adjudicate a case only after it has been heard in a lower court.
original, appellate
A federal district court has ___________ jurisdiction over a dispute filed there and raising a federal question, and ___________ jurisdiction over appeals from Texas state agency decisions.
original, appellate
A federal district (trial) court has ___________ jurisdiction over appeals from federal administrative agency decisions.
appellate
The United States Supreme Court has ___________ jurisdiction over disputes between states.
original
The Rules of Decision Act provides that “the _____________________, except where the Constitution or treaties of the United States or Acts of Congress otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as ____________________ in civil actions in the courts of the United States, in cases where they apply.”
laws of the several states, rules of decision
_________________ interpreted the Rules of Decision Act to require federal courts to apply the _________________________________ in cases where state law applied.
Swift v. Tyson, general American common law
Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins reversed Swift v. Tyson, holding that when state law applies in federal court, the federal court must apply _________________________________________.
the law of the state in which that federal court sits
______________________ coined the “____________________________,” which provides that the _______ Doctrine mandates state law only where it affects substantive rights that are potentially outcome determinative.
Guaranty Trust v. York, outcome determinative test, Erie
______________________ modified the ___________________________, holding that the court should _________________________________ in the case to determine which interests were stronger. ______ further held that one factor of the balancing test is whether the state law in question is ______________________ outcome determinative. Thus, Byrd gives more importance to ___________ that absolutely change the outcome of the case.
Byrd v. Blue Ridge, outcome determinative test, balance state and federal interests, Byrd, absolutely or definitively, state laws
To determine the content of state law in federal court, the Erie Doctrine directs that the court give binding authority to ______________ and _________________________________. Persuasive (but not binding) authority is found in ______________________________ and _________________________________. Erie also allows courts to make an ___________________ as to state law.
state statutes, decisions from the state’s highest court, lower state appellate courts, federal court opinions on state law, educated guess
The Rules Enabling Act (28 U.S.C. Section 2072) provides the United States Supreme Court may enact the ________________________________, provided that no rule may ______________________ any substantive right.
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; abridge, enlarge, or modify