Files D & E Flashcards

1
Q

Grammatical (or Syntactic) Case

A

Case that carries information about an NP’s grammatical relation (especially a subject or direct object).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Semantic Case

A

Case that encodes information about thematic roles (e.g., locative, instrument, source, goal, direction, etc.).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Nominative - Accusative

A

Case that marks the subject of transitive and intransitive as nominative and direct objects as accusative.

Ex: 日本語 and English

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Scrambling

A

Considerable freedom in the ordering of a verb’s arguments due to case.

Ex: ゆみこがそのこどもをしかった。vs そのこどもをゆみこがしかった。

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Differential Object Marking (DOM)

A

Variation in how and whether case is marked on direct objects.
Two key factors are the Animacy Hierarchy and Definiteness Hierarchy.

human>animate>inanimate
personal pronoun>proper name>definite NP>indefinite specific NP >non-specific NP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Ergative - Absolutive

A

A case system that marks the subject of a transitive clause as ergative and the subject of an intransitive/direct object are marked as absolutive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Morphologically Ergative

A

A language that morphologically marks the subject of an intransitive verb and the direct object of a transitive verb in the same way.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Syntactically Ergative

A

A language is syntactically ergative if it distinguishes the subject of a transitive verb from the subject/object of an intransitive if the contrast is found in phenomena other than inflection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Split Ergativity

A

A combination of ergative-absolutive and nominative-accusative case marking.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Agentive Case Marking

A

The use of case to reflect the unergative-unabsolutive contrast by grouping together NPs bearing the agent role.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Three-way (Tripartite) System

A

A contrast among an ergative case for subjects of transitive verbs, an accusative case for direct objects, and a nominative (or intransitive) case for subjects of intransitive verbs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Dative Case

A

Marks the indirect object, which often corresponds to the goal (or ‘recipient’) with verbs of transfer. Can also be used to mark direction and/or location in languages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Genitive Case

A

A case whose principle function is to mark an NP that combines with another nominal category, typically used for marking possessor/possessed relationships.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Partitive Case

A

A case that is used for direct objects that express a partial or indefinite quantity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Instrumental Case

A

A semantic case used to mark objects that are the instrument of the action.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Comitative Case

A

A semantic case used to mark accompaniment.

17
Q

Local Cases

A

A semantic case primarily concerned with expression of location, destination, source, and path.

Examples: 
Allative - to, towards
Illative - into
Abalative - from (the exterior of)
Elative - out of
Superlative - above, to the top of
Translative - through
Perlative - through, along
Inessive - in, inside
Adessive - to, at
Superessive - above
Subessive - under, below
18
Q

Case Hierarchy

A

If a language has a case category listed on the hierarchy, it will usually have the case categories associated with each position to the left.

nom>acc>gen>dat>loc>abl/inst>others
abs>erg

19
Q

Agreement

A

The system of marking that records a noun’s inherent features (usually person, number, gender, and/or case) on another category, generally a verb, adjective, or determiner.

20
Q

Concord

A

Agreement involving adjectives and determiners.

21
Q

Indexation

Cross-referencing

A

Other names for verb agreement. This type of agreement is triggered by an NP that bears a grammatical relation to the verb, almost always a subject or object.

22
Q

Relational hierarchy for agreement

A

Subject > direct object > indirect object > other

23
Q

Subject Agreement

A

A type of verbal agreement that triggers morphological inflection to represent the subject in either number and/or gender.

24
Q

Pro Drop

A

Pro drop occurs when subject agreement is present and thus permits the omission of the subject pronoun.

25
Q

Direct Object Agreement

A

Agreement where the verb agrees with both the direct object and the subject, in compliance with the relational hierarchy.

26
Q

Indirect Object Agreement

A

Agreement where the verb agrees with a true indirect object. Relatively rare form of agreement.

27
Q

Portmanteau Agreement

A

Agreement where a single morpheme carries information about more than one agreement relation.

28
Q

Honorific Agreement

A

A special type of agreement, found in Korean and 日本語, that is characterized by the use of a special verbal inflection in patterns where the referent of the subject has high social status.

29
Q

Lateral Feature Passing

A

A form of verbal agreement where the NP following an expletive subject (i.e. ‘there’) which is neutral for number.

Ex: There is a man at the door. -vs- There are two men at the door.

30
Q

Switch Reference

A

A system of grammatical marking that indicates whether the subject of a particular clause is identical to the subject of another, usually adjacent, clause.

Ex: I sang and danced. -vs- I sang and Bonnie danced.