Fiduciary Duties Flashcards

Case law

1
Q

English v Denham Vale Properties

A

Status based list produced by Law Commission is not exhaustive, and equity can create a fiduciary relationship wherever it is needed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Tito v Waddell (purchase of trust property)

A

A trustee cannot purchase trust property in his personal capacity as he would be wearing two hats - self dealing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Wright v Morgan

A

A trustee cannot purchase trust property in his personal capacity as he would be wearing two hats, EVEN IF independent valuations are sought

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Holder v Holder

A

Dubious decision that watered down the rule that trustees cannot purchase trust property. In this case was at auction (so fair price) and had purported to renounce his role as executor (although had not). Case has since been disapproved although not entirely overturned.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Morse v Royal

A

Trustee purchasing a beneficiary’s interest is fair dealing not self dealing. In that case, beneficiary pressed a trustee to purchase, he did so, then the beneficiary regretted his decision when the property subsequently went up in price. He tried to have the decision overturned but was unsuccessful as there was no deceit by the trustee.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Tito v Waddell (purchase of beneficiary’s interest)

A

Confirmed Morse v Royal that as a right, trustee can purchase the interest of the beneficiary but he has to be clear that full disclosure has been made, there was independent advice and a fair price was paid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Re Thompson’s Settlement

A

The self dealing rule is simply an application of the wider principle that a fiduciary cannot put himself into a position of conflict - so despite there being no case law, also good law that a trustee cannot sell his personal property into the trust as it would be self dealing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Re Macadam

A

A trustee cannot become a director off the back of the trust and take director’s fees, he must account for the fees back into the trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Re Dover Coalfield

A

If a trustee was a director before he became a trustee, he does not need to account for director’s fees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Re Gee

A

If a trustee becomes a director but did not need the votes of the trust to become this director and did it entirely separately, he is entitled to keep his director’s fees.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Boardman v Phipps

A

Case of solicitor acting on information gained as trustee. Made both the trust and himself considerable monies. Was a breach, but also a rare example of court using inherent jurisdiction to pay the trustee anyway

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Keech v Sandford

A

If a lease is renewed in personal name of trustee, it is held on constructive trust for beneficiary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Re Biss

A

There is no duty owed BY beneficiary to trustee (relationship flows one way only)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Protheroe v Protheroe

A

Historic debate on whether or not trustee could purchase freehold reversion of lease but this case confirmed it is forbidden

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Re Thompson

A

Trustee cannot compete with trust (tried to set up rival yachtbroker business, beneficiaries were granted an injunction)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Williams v Barton

A

Openly earning commission by introducing new business into the trust. This commission was held on constructive trust for the trustee

17
Q

Lister v Stubbs
Attorney General for Hong Kong v Reid
Sinclair Investments v Versailles Trade Finance

A

Shows the variation in how bribes are treated. Original position in Lister v Stubbs was that had to account for bribe monies but any profit could be kept. Changed in AG for HK and trustee was liable for profit too. However is now back in the original position - trustee can keep profits

18
Q

Bray v Ford

A

Trustees cannot put himself in a position where duty and interest conflict

19
Q

IDC v Cooley

A

Mr Cooley resigned from his positio as MD to obtain work that the Eastern Gas Board said would give him as long as he stepped down. EGB would never have worked with IDC but because he gained the information due to his position as MD, the profits he made personally were due back to IDC

20
Q

Re Coomer

A

The remedy for a breach of a fiduciary duty depends on all of the facts

21
Q

Regal (Hastings) v Gulliver

A

If trustee uses info gained from being a trustee to profit personally, it does not matter if this was done in a bona fide manner - will still need to account for the profits to the trust.

22
Q

Re Luckings

A

Trustee may have duty to represent trust on board if trust is majority shareholder (but has been doubted as long as oversight sufficient)