federalism Flashcards
federalism
limits on state and local government power
Preemption
Dormant Commerce Clause and P&I Clause
State taxation of interstate commerce
Full faith and credit
federalism - preemption
The Supremacy Clause of Art VI provides that the Constitution, and laws and treaties made pursuant to it, are the supreme law of the land.
express and implied preemption
federalism - preemption
express preemption
If a federal law explicitly says that federal law is exclusive, then state & local law is preempted.
federalism - preemption
implied preemption
Even if a federal law is silent, preemption can be found in 3 ways. Federal law preempts state law IF:
- federal and state laws are mutually exclusive
- state law impedes the achievement of a federal objective
- Congress evidences a clear intent to preempt state law (look to legislative history)
federalism - DCC/PI
dormant commerce clause and privilege and immunities clauses
- DCC
- P&I from Art IV
- P&I from 14th AMD (usually a wrong answer)
federalism - DCC/PI
DCC
DCC (negative implications of the commerce clause) - state/local law is unconstitutional if it places an undue burden on interstate commerce
federalism - DCC/PI
P&I from Art IV
P&I from Art IV - No state may discriminate against out of staters with privileges and immunity afforded to its own citizens.
Applies ONLY when state discriminates against out of staters.
federalism - DCC/PI
P&I from 14th AMD
P&I from 14th AMD - Only applies to right to travel
usually a wrong answer
federalism - DCC/PI
analysis
- Does the state law discriminate against out of staters?
federalism - DCC/PI
analysis if the law does not discriminate
If the law does not discriminate against out of staters:
- P&I from Art IV does not apply.
- If the law burdens interstate commerce, it violates the DCC if its burdens EXCEED its benefits
federalism - DCC/PI
analysis if the law does discriminate
If the law does discriminate against out of staters:
- If the law burdens interstate commerce, it violates the DCC UNLESS it is necessary to achieve an important government purpose
- If the law discriminates against out of staters with regard to their ability to earn their livelihood, it violates the P&I from Art IV UNLESS it is necessary to achieve an important government purpose
federalism - DCC/PI
analysis if the law does discriminate AND
burdens interstate commerce
If the law burdens interstate commerce, it violates the DCC UNLESS it is necessary to achieve an important government purpose
necessary - no less discriminatory alternative could achieve the objective
important government purpose - HEAVY burden
Two exceptions:
1. Congressional approval - once Congress acts, it is no longer dormant
2. Market participation exception. A state or local govt may prefer its own citizens in receiving benefits from government programs or in dealing with government owned businesses (i.e., in-state tuition)
federalism - DCC/PI
analysis if the law does discriminate
with regard to their ability to earn their livelihood
If the law discriminates against out of staters with regard to their ability to earn their livelihood, it violates the P&I from Art IV UNLESS it is necessary to achieve an important government purpose.
- The law must discriminate against out of staters
- The discrimination must be with regard to fundamental rights or important economic activities
- Corporations and aliens cannot use the P&I clause
- The discrimination must be necessary to achieve an important government purpose (no less discriminatory alternative could achieve the objective)
federalism - state taxation of interstate commerce
- States may not use their tax systems to help in-state businesses
- A state may only tax activities IF there is a substantial nexus to the state
- State taxation of interstate businesses must be fairly apportioned
federalism - full faith and credit
Courts in one state must give full faith and credit to judgments of courts in another state, so long as:
- The court that rendered the judgment has jdx over the parties (PJ) and the subject matter (SMJ)
- Judgment was on the merits
- Judgment was final