Federalism Flashcards
The 10th A reserves power to the states which creates _____________ power to regulate health, safety, welfare of their ppl
Police powers
The ability for states to regulate health, safety, welfare of their ppl falls under:
Police powers
Police powers allows:
States to regulate health, safety, welfare of their ppl
Congress can subject states and local govt to regulation or taxation if:
Regulation or taxation apply BOTH to private and public sector (i.e. min wage)
State regulations regarding health, safety, and welfare will be upheld if they are?
(iow: what test)
Rational
State regulations regarding a fundamental right or involve suspect/quasi-suspect class will be upheld if
pass strict scrutiny test
Is this valid? why or why not?
Congress requiring states to enact enviro regulations
NO - Congress requiring states to act in a certain way
Is this valid? why or why not?
Congress banning states from legalizing sports gambling
NO - Congress requiring states to act in a certain way
Is this valid? why or why not?
Congress requiring local law enforcement to conduct background checks for a federal handgun law
NO - Congress requiring states to act in a certain way
Implied preemption
law preempted impliedly instead of explicity
How are express preemption clauses construed?
narrowly construed
List (3)
Ways state laws may be preempted
- Direct Conflict Preemption - conflict makes it impossible to follow state or fed law
-
Indirect Conflict Preemption - State law frustrates achievement of federal objective
- i.e., state law says driver’s license is suspended if individual fails to pay accident judgement, even if person is discharged from duty because declared bankruptcy
- Field preemption - Congressional intent to occupy the entire field which leaves no room for state involvement
The Privileges and Immunities Clause prohibits discrimination by a state against:
nonresidents (but ppl who are still US citzens)
Although nonresidents are protected under PAI clause, who is NOT protected?
Corporations and aliens
The Interstate PAI Clause prohibits discrimination by a state against nonresidents when the discrimination concerns:
Clause only applies if the discrimination is intentionally protectionist for
- Commercial activities (i.e., ability to earn a living) -OR-
- Fundamental rights
Intentionally protectionist discrimination by a state against nonresidents concerning commercial or fundamental rights is prohibited under the:
Interstate PAI clause
List (2)
If a state does burden an important commercial activity or fundamental right it is invalid
UNLESS:
- Law is necessary to achieve an important government purpose -AND-
- No less restrictive means available
basically state has to show that nonresidents cause or are part of the problem that state is trying to solve
If a states burdens an important economic commercial activity or fundamental right, it is valid if
- Law is necessary to achieve an important government purpose -AND-
- No less restrictive means available
- basically state has to show that nonresidents cause or are part of the problem that state is trying to solve*
- answer same as card 17, Q on front side is just worded differently*
Dormant Commerce Clause
Even when Congress has not acted, Commerce Clause still restricts state regulation of interstate commerce
list (2)
Under the Dormant Commerce Clause states cannot:
- favor local economic interests -OR-
- unduly burden interstate commerce
Are state/local regulations which discriminate against interstate commerce valid?
Generally NO
List (2)
When are state/local regulations which discriminate against interstate commerce valid?
- Necessary to achieve important, noneconomic state interest
- No reasonable nondiscriminatory alternatives available
- ex: prohibit import of live bait fish bc of parasite problem; cannot prohibit export of live bait fish if no major state interests*
- same as 17, 18*
Balancing test
If a nondiscriminatory state law burdens interstate commerce it is valid
UNLESS:
burden on interstate commerce OUTWEIGHS promotion of legit state interest
**court will consider if less restrictive alternatives apply**
“State as a market participant”
A state can prefer its citizens in receiving govt benefits (ie state tuition) …. BUT
….but cannot control what happens to state resources once sold
(ie Alaska violated CC when imposed requirement that timber be processed in Alaska before being shipped out)
not covered in lecs
Nondiscriminatory taxes upheld if:
One of the following:
- Substantial nexus - tax applies to activity with a substantial nexus in the state
- Fair apportionment - apportioned according to rational formula
- Fair relationship - tax fairly related to services or benefits provided by state