Federal v. State Power Flashcards
Federal v. State (Sources of Power)
Federal government –> powers granted by Constitution
-States –> police power
Limitations on State Police Power
Include:
- Exclusive federal power –> reserves certain enumerated power exclusively for the federal government
- Individual Rights –> restricts the state governments from acting in violation of const. provisions
- Preemption –> under the supremacy clause, if Congress enacts legislation with the intention of preempting state law, the congressional regulation will control
Preemption
Can be expressed or implied.
Implied Preemption
Is present when:
- it is impossible to comply with both federal and state law
- the state law interferes too much with the accomplishment of federal law’s purposes
- federal regulation of a certain subject is so extensive that it seems that Congress must have intended to occupy the entire field and displace state law.
Immunity of Federal Government
Includes:
- Sovereign Immunity- the federal gov cannot be sued without its consent
- Supremacy Clause- federal law is supreme over state law
- Taxation of Federal Government by a State: The federal government and its agencies and instrumentalities are immune from state taxation and regulation that would interfere with their performance of federal functions.
Immunity of State Governments
Includes:
- the 11th Amendment (except for Civil Rights Amendments and Injunctive relief)
- the state is immune from federal taxation if the tax is applied to unique state activities or essential governmental functions
- Anti-Commandeering Doctrine
Anti-Commandeering Doctrine
- The federal government can’t force states to act in their sovereign capacities (e.g. legislate or enforce laws), this violates the 10th Amendment (but remember that the federal government can likely use the spending clause to practically achieve the same result).
- It does not matter if a state is happy to obey the federal government regarding legislation or enforcement of a law.
State Regulation of Commerce
Where Congress has not enacted legislation, the states are free to regulate local transactions affecting interstate commerce, subject to the limitations imposed by the dormant Commerce Clause
Dormant Commerce Clause
States cannot discriminate against out-of-state economic actors without being subject to SS. State must show:
- the regulation serves a compelling interest; and
- the regulation is necessary to achieve the compelling interest
Exceptions to the Dormant Commerce Clause
- Congress- Congress may affirmatively authorize states to legislate in areas that would violate the Dormant Commerce Clause
- Market participants- when states act as market participants, they may discriminate between in-state and out-of-state businesses
Laws that Merely Burden Interstate Commerce
- If a law violates the Dormant Commerce Clause, it is said to discriminate or unduly burden interstate commerce.
- If a law merely incidentally burdens interstate commerce, the court will apply a balancing test and the law will be upheld unless the burden imposed on interstate commerce clearly outweighs the local benefits.