Federal Regulation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

McCulloch v. Maryland

A

Congress’s powers are expanded beyond Art. I Sec. 8 under the Necessary and Proper Clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Is a congressional action allowed under the Necessary and Proper clause?

A

1) Identify a power under Art. I Sec. 8
2) Explain how the means is in furtherance of that power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What can Congress use the Commerce Clause to regulate? (Lopez)

A
  • Channels of interstate commerce (Darby)
  • Instrumentalities of interstate commerce (Shreveport Rate cases)
  • Activities having a substantial effect on interstate commerce (Jones & Laughlin)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

U.S. v. Darby

A

Congress may regulate intrastate commerce if it is necessary to effect an interstate commerce regulatory scheme, even if there is not a substantial effect (Fair Labor Standards Act)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is aggregation?

A

Congress can regulate all the small effects of individuals to find a substantial effect on interstate commerce substitution (Wickard)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is substitution?

A

Congress can regulate non-commercial activities that are a substitute for commercial activities (e.g., growing of wheat that could have been bought) (Wickard)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

United States v. Morrison

A

Congress cannot aggregate non-economic activity to determine whether they have a substantial effect on interstate commerce (Violence Against Women Act)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is meant by activities having a substantial effect on interstate commerce?

A

“Activities that may be intrastate in nature but have such a close and substantial relation to interstate commerce that their control is essential or appropriate to protect commerce from burdens and obstructions” (Jones & Laughlin)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sebelius (Commerce part)

A
  • Forcing someone into commerce is not the regulation of commerce
  • Congress gets to define the market being regulated
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

McCray v. United States

A

Congress may use tax to deter activity (Margarine case)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Gonzalez v. Raich

A

Congress may substitute non-economic activity for regulation whether or not some individuals are not going to enter a transaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the factors to determine if something is a tax and not a penalty? (Sebelius)

A
  • Most important: Does it produce at least some revenue?
  • Where is it in the statute?
  • What does Congress call it?
  • What does it look like?
  • Who collects it?
  • When do people pay it?
  • Scienter requirement?
  • Is it very high on individuals?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

United States v. Butler

A

“General welfare” spending is interpreted to limit to spending for “public purposes”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When may Congress attach conditions to States’ receipt of federal funds?

A
  • It does so unambiguously, thus enabling the States to exercise their choice knowingly, cognizant of the consequences of their participation
  • The conditions are related “to the federal interest in particular national projects or programs” (this might be a bar, is not dispositive)
  • Other constitutional provisions may provide an independent bar
  • Does not pass the point from pressure to compulsion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the “clear statement” rule on conditional spending?

A

Congress cannot surprise participating States with post-acceptance or retroactive conditions (Sebelius)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Missouri v. Holland

A

The Treaty Power expands Congress’s powers beyond those listed in Art. I Sec. 8

17
Q

Reid v. Covert

A

When the Treaty Power comes up against something that “really matters,” like a substantive right/constitutional violation, it is limited

18
Q

Bond v. United States

A

Any statute enacted to enforce treaty provisions domestically should match the purpose and justification of the treaty (Bond v. United States)