Federal Jurisdiction/Civil Procedure Flashcards
Federal Court needs what to have proper jurisdiction?
Personal Jurisdiction, SMJ, Venue
Federal Jurisdiction: PJ what’s needed?
Must have a statutory basis and a constitutional basis
General Jurisdiction vs. Specific
General =Juris not relating to the events giving rise to the claim
Specific = Valid juries must relate to the events giving rise to the claim
What are the constitutional basis for PJ?
- Minimum Contacts: “such minimum contacts with the forum such that the exercise of juris does not offend the traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice”
- Contacts: 1) describe it —> do the contacts show a) purposeful availment (purposeful, voluntary act towards forum) and 2) foreseeability (could D foresee getting sued in forum)
- Fairness and Resolution: relatedness (claim arise from D’s contact with the forum), convenience and state interest
How do we establish SMJ?
1) Diversity – P and D are completely diverse (diff citizenships) >75,000
- Note – if plaintiff wins less than 75,000 may have to pay D’s court costs NOT attorney’s fees
2) FQ: Complaint must show a right or interest founded substantially on a federal law
Citizenship requirements for SMJ
Domicile – two factors 1) presence in the state and 2) intent to make it permanent home, e.g., paying in state tuition, registering to vote etc.
Corporation – two domiciles – state incorporated in and wherever principal place of business
Unincorporated business/partnerships, LLC – citizenship of all members
Decedents, minors, incompetents – use their citizenship not their representative
Amt in Controversy for SMJ: Can we aggregate claims?
Yes, we can use Aggregation of claims to create amount in controversy
Must have only One P and one D – can aggregate all claims no limit – claims can be unrelated
If joint tortfeasors can use the total value of claim –
Equitable relief use either P or D’s point of view, e.g., homeowner’s blocked view causing her decrease in property value or defendant’s cost to comply would be more than 75k
Even if diversity is established, federal courts will not hear what cases
Issuance of divorce, alimony or child custody, or probate an estate cases
Well Pleaded Complaint Rule
Applies in FQ cases. is it not enough that some federal issue is raised by the complaint. The claim itself must arise under federal law.
Is P enforcing a federal right?
- if yes, FQ can be used
- if no, FQ cannot be used
Once in federal court, if there are additional claims in the case, SMJ must exist for each of those claims. What happens if diversity and FQ cannot be established on those additional claims.
Try supplemental jurisdiction.
Cannot be used my itself to get into federal court, MUST have a claim already there
TEST – common nucleus of operative fact – always met by claims that arise from the same transaction or occurrence T/O
What are the limitations with supplemental jurisdiction?
Limitations on Plaintiff – in a DIVERSITY CASE – P cannot use supplemental jurisdiction to overcome a lack of diversity
However, P- can use it when the original case is in federal court under FQ AND to overcome a lack of amount in controversy
Court’s Discretion to hear a supplemental claim when?
FQ dismissed early, state law claim is complex, or state law issues would predominate
Removal: process and exceptions
State to Fed – one way
All Ds that have been served with process must join in removal
Within 30 days- time starts anew after on each D
P can never remove
Exceptions to removal when removing on the basis of diversity, doesn’t apply in FQ
No Removal if any D is a citizen of the forum AND
No removal more than one year after the case was filed in state court
Erie Doctrine
Only in diversity cases – must apply state substantive law
Steps:
1) is there a federal law on point? If yes, Supremacy clause = apply federal law
2) If no federal law on point is it either: elements of a claim or defense; statute of limitations, rules for tolling statutes of limitations; conflict or choice of law rules = substantive =apply state law
3) issue not easy then plug into three tests – (outcome determinative, balance of interests, or avoid forum shopping)
Venue…definition? Choices in federal ct?
Tells us which court to sue in.
Basic choices – P may lay venue in any district where: 1) ALL Ds reside OR 2) a substantial part of the claim arose
If Ds in different district of same state P can choose whichever
Citizenship for Venue
human Ds reside where they are DOMICILED; Corporations reside wherever they are subject to PJ
Transfer of Venue: rule, exception, factors, choice of law and improper venue remedy.
Can only transfer to a district where the case could have been filed, i.e. PJ over D
Exception – can transfer to improper venue if all parties consent
Court’s discretion – to transfer venue – must consider: public factors – what law applies, what community should be burdened, private factors – convenience – where are the witnesses and the evidence,
The transferee court applies the choice of law rules of the original court
If venue in original district is improper – Court can transfer or dismiss
Forum Non Convenions
dismisses or stays the case
Why? B/c transferring is impossible
Must consider: public factors – what law applies, what community should be burdened, private factors – convenience – where are the witnesses and the evidence?
Other convenient court must be available and adequate. Lower sums of recovery does not make another court inadequate.
Service of Process: purpose, timing and eligibility to serve.
(purpose is notice to D) – must deliver 1) a summons and 2) a copy of the complaint
Must serve within 120 days or dismissed without prejudice Unless P can show good cause for delay
Who can serve – any nonparty at least 18
Mechanics of Service of Process: How can we serve?
personal service, i.e., hand it to them anywhere
substituted service – left at D’s usual abode (common sense) and served someone of suitable age who lives there.
D’s agent
State law methods ok
Waiver by mail – mail D a copy of the complaint with two copies of the waiver form with a prepaid means of returning – IF D mails within 30 days D waives formal service NOT any defenses – Effective after receipt by P and filed with the court
D fails to return form – D will pay costs of service
Pleadings
Rule 11 – signing documents – certifying that 1) the paper is not for an improper purpose; 2) the legal contentions are warranted by law (non-frivolous arg for law change); 3) the factual contentions/ denials have evidentiary support (or are likely to after further investigation)
Every time you present a position to the court – continuing certification
Sanctions under Rule 11 – deter NOT punish – can be non-monetary – must give a chance to be heard – safe harbor of 21 days to fix problem (motion for sanction can be served not filed until after safe harbor)
Complaint
filing a complaint commences the action
Requirements: 1) statement of grounds for subject matter jurisdiction; 2) short and plain statement of the claim, showing entitled to relief; 3) demand for relief sought.
Standard – MUST plead facts supporting a plausible claim, Bell Atlantic vs. Twombly
THREE MATTERs require pleading with particularity : 1) fraud, 2) mistake, 3) special damages
D’s Responses: Rule 12
Rule 12 – requires response by either: 1) motion or 2) answer – AVOID default must respond 21 days after service of process
If service was waived you get 60 days
Motions – Issues of form (any party can bring): 1) motion for more definite statement; 2) motion to strike which is aimed at immaterial things
Rule 12(b) Defenses: D’s Response
Can be raised by motion or answer – waivable defenses (2,3,4,5)must be put in first rule 12 response be it motion or answer or else waived
1) lack of SMJ – never waived
2) Lack of personal jurisdiction – waivable
3) improper venue - waivable
4) insufficiency of process (paper problems) - waivable
5) insufficient service of process - waivable
6) failure to state a claim – raised at any time through trial
7) failure to join indispensable party – raised at any time through trial