Fed Law 5 - Peace Officer’s Powers of Arrest Steps to a Lawful Arrest Flashcards

1
Q

What is Reasonable grounds?

A

“….. an arresting officer must subjectively have reasonable and probable grounds on which to base the arrest. Those grounds must, in addition, be justifiable from an objective point of view. That is to say, a reasonable person placed in the position of the
officer must be able to conclude that there were reasonable and probable grounds for the arrest.”

  • Reasonable and Probable Grounds = Reasonable Grounds
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is reasonable grounds?

A
  • Reasonable Grounds – will always be a question of fact depending on the circumstances of each case
  • Suspicious circumstances will never be enough.
  • Reasonable Grounds mean that there must be such facts as would cause a reasonable person to believe that the suspect has committed or is about to commit an offence.
  • It means that the officer’s belief must be justifiable not only from a subjective point of view, but also from an objective point of view.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What questions to ask for Reasonable Grounds?

A
  1. Is there some basis in fact as opposed to mere
    suspicion or hunch for my decision to arrest?
  2. Can I point to some fact (apart from suspicion) by
    which reasonable people would say that I had
    cause to act?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is R.C.A?

A

Recognize
Classify
Authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the reason for arrest?

A

PIC

  1. Prevent the continuation
  2. To Investigate further
  3. To ensure Court appearance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is section 495?

A

Peace Officer’s Powers

A peace officer MAY arrest without warrant
• a person who has committed an indictable offence OR
• who, on reasonable grounds, he believes has committed OR
• is about to commit an indictable offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

495 continued

A

A peace officer MAY arrest without warrant

• a person whom he finds committing a criminal offence; or

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

495 continued

A

A peace officer MAY arrest without warrant
• Reasonable grounds to believe
• Arrest warrant OR
• Committal warrant
• In force within
• Territorial jurisdiction where person found

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the most common arrest warrants? (Warrants to arrest)

A
  • Warrant in the First instance (arrest warrant)
  • Bench Warrant

If the above warrants are endorsed by a Justice under s. 507(6) C.C. a
peace officer may exercise discretion and release on an appearance notice
or an undertaking. You don’t have to release but you may.

Committal Warrant
Material Witness Warrant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When can a peace officer arrest an accused without a warrant? (S.495)

A

A peace officer who believes on reasonable grounds that an accused:
has contravened or is about to contravene a
• summons
• appearance notice
• undertaking or
• release order
that was issued or given to the accused or entered into by the accused
OR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Question 10 Continued

A
has committed an indictable offence while being subject to a
• summons
• appearance notice
• undertaking or
• release order

MAY arrest the accused without a warrant for the purpose of taking them
before a Judge or Justice to be dealt with under Section 524

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a breach of the peace?

A

S.31 C.C.
harm is actually or likely to be done to a person, or
• in his/her presence, to his/her property, or
• a person is in fear of being so harmed through an assault, affray or riot.

When we think of Breach of the Peace we think of health and safety,
people and property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When can an officer enforce “Breach of the Peace?

A

Peace Officer
• Witnesses Breach of the Peace OR
• Reasonable Grounds a person is about to join in or renew Breach of
the Peace

  • Only a procedural arrest - no offence
  • Can be used to de-escalate a situation if no other authorities exist
  • Do not use it as a catch–all - Do not misuse this authority
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the steps to a proper arrest? (6)

A
  1. Identify yourself as a Police Officer
  2. Tell the person they are under arrest (Judge’s Rule )
  3. Tell the person the reason for the arrest (S. 10 (a) of the Charter and S. 29(2) C.C.)
  4. Take Physical Control
  5. Inform them of their Rights to Counsel (S. 10 (b) of the Charter)
  6. Ensure they understand the reason for the arrest and their Rights to
    Counsel
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the primary or first caution?

A

Read the Caution (Judge’s Rule)

You (are charged, will be charged) with
______________________________
You are not obliged to say anything unless you wish to do so, but whatever you say may be given in evidence. Do you understand?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the secondary caution? (If needed)

A

Secondary Caution to Charged Person:

If you have spoken to any Police Officer or to anyone with authority or if any such person has spoken to you in connection with this case, I want it clearly understood that I do not want it to influence you in making any statement. Do you understand?

17
Q

What is the Prosper Warning? (10b, Detainee changes his mind)

A
  1. Tell detainee they have right to a reasonable opportunity to contact a lawyer
  2. Detainee isn’t to participate in any incriminating process until reasonable opportunity satisfied (e.g. statements, breath tests)
  3. Advise the investigation specific to detainee won’t continue unless their 10(b) right exercised
  4. Ensure that the accused or detainee’s decision to waive his/her right to counsel is fully informed because if it is not, all evidence subsequent could be excluded.