Feb 2017 P&E Flashcards
Art was driving in downtown Austin, Travis County, Texas, when a taxi cab driven by Zach, a resident of SanMarcos, Hays County, Texas, collided with Art’s vehicle. Art was
seriously injured. At the time of the collision, Zach was employed by Discount Cab Company (“Discount”), a Texas corporation with its principal place of business in Waco,
McClennan County, Texas. The taxicab was owned by Discount. At the time of the collision, Zach was on duty and in the course and scope of his employment with
Discount. Art wants to file suit against Zach and Discount in state District Court.
In which counties can Art’s suit be properly filed? Explain your answer.
Art can file his lawsuit in Travis County (where accident
occurred), Hays County (where Zach resides), or McClennan County (where Discount maintains
its principal place of business).
Art files suit in Travis County against both Zach and Discount.
What pleading must Zach and Discount file if they want to challenge venue in Travis County, and when must they file it? Explain your answer.
The defendants should file a motion to transfer venue prior to or concurrently with their answers, and if they failed to do so, they waived their right to challenge venue.
After all parties have appeared in the case, the Judge issues a scheduling order and the
parties begin discovery.
List 5 forms of discovery permitted under the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
5 forms of discovery listed in Texas Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 192.1
Permissible forms of discovery are:
(a) requests for disclosure;
(b) requests for production and inspection of documents and tangible things;
(c) requests and motions for entry upon and examination of real property;
(d) interrogatories to a party;
(e) requests for admission;
(f) oral or written depositions; and
(g) motions for mental or physical examinations.
Art sends Discount a written interrogatory asking Discount to identify and describe every
collision its drivers have been involved in during Discount’s 20-year history. Discount believes that the interrogatory is improper.
What action must Discount take to bring this matter to the Court’s attention and when must Discount take that action? Explain your answer.
Discount can make a written objection to Art’s discovery
request. Discount could also file a motion for protective order. Discount must respond within 30 days of being served with the discovery request, and allege the request was irrelevant, overly broad, or imposed an unreasonable burden.
Discount wants to obtain a copy of the medical records from all health care providers who treated Art for his injuries.
What discovery tools can Discount use to obtain these records?
Discount could obtain a copy of Art’s medical records via requests for disclosure or requests for production served on Art. Discount could also obtain the records via a written deposition with a subpoena duces tecum to the health care
providers.
Art wants to discover the identity of purely consulting experts employed by Discount to assist in Discount’s defense of the case.
What discovery tools can Art use to obtain this information? Explain your answer.
Art was not entitled to discovery information about
Discount’s purely consulting experts.
Zach believes that Art is partially responsible for the collision because he was texting on his phone at the time of the collision and failed to keep a proper lookout.
Must Zach raise the issue of Art’s conduct before trial and, if so, how must Zach raise it? Explain your answer.
Zach is required to raise, in his answer or amended answer,
the affirmative defense of contributory/comparative negligence at least 7 days before trial.
Art wants to take Zach’s oral deposition.
In which county or counties may Zach’s deposition be taken? Explain your answer.
Zach’s deposition could be taken in his county of residence, Hayes County. Many examinees also knew that because Zach is a party to the lawsuit, his deposition could be taken in the county of suit, Travis County.
During Zach’s deposition, Art’s attorney questions Zach about very personal, private matters related to his political and religious beliefs. Zach’s attorney objects to the
questions, explains to Art’s attorney that the questions are abusive and harassing, and instructs Zach not to answer. Art’s attorney files a motion to compel Zach to answer the
questions, claiming that it was improper for Zach’s attorney to instruct Zach not to answer the questions.
Do the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure permit Zach’s attorney to instruct Zach not to answer the questions? Explain your answer.
Zach’s attorney can instruct him not to answer harassing or abusive questions during his deposition.
During his deposition, Zach admits that he has suffered seizures while driving in the past, but never sought medical attention. He denies that he suffered a seizure during the collision with Art.
What action can Art’s attorney take to independently verify the nature and extent of Zach’s medical condition, and when must she take it? Explain your answer.
Art could move for an order compelling Zach to submit to a physical examination. Few examinees knew the order must be requested no later than 30 days
before the end of the discovery period, or that Art’s motion had to show good cause and that
Zach’s physical condition was in controversy.
Art wants a jury trial.
What must Art do to ensure he gets a jury trial and when must he do it? Explain your answer.
Art must request a jury trial and pay the jury fee. Art should make his request by filing a written demand with the clerk a reasonable time before the date set for trial, not less than 30 days before trial.
After the end of the discovery period, Jeff, the only known eyewitness to the collision, notifies all parties that he has a conflict and cannot attend the trial. Art asks for an
agreement to delay the trial date but Zach andDiscount refuse.
What must Art do and show to avoid going to trial on the current trial setting? Explain your answer.
Art must file a motion for continuance. Few examinees
stated Art had to (1) identify the missing witness and the substance of his testimony, (2) explain why his testimony is material and not available from another source, (3) show diligence was used in attempting to secure the testimony, and (4) state the continuance is sought for justice and not
solely for delay.
The case is called to trial. Before voir dire begins, Zach and Discount are concerned that Art’s attorney may attempt to mention or introduce evidence during the trial that Zach has a history of illegal drug use. Zach and Discount believe that such evidence is highly prejudicial but not relevant to the matters in controversy given that he passed a drug test administered on the date of the collision.
What procedural step, if any, can Zach and Discount take before the trial commences to prevent Art’s attorney from making reference to Zach’s drug use in front of the jury? Explain your answer.
Zach and Discount must file a motion in limine to prevent
reference to Zach’s drug use. If the motion is granted, Art will be prohibited from referencing the drug use during voir dire or opening statement and would require Art’s attorney to approach the bench prior to attempting to introduce the evidence during trial.
During her opening statement, Art’s attorney shows the jury a gruesome photograph depicting the severe injuries Art sustained in the collision. Defendants’ attorneys object
after the conclusion of Art’s attorney’s opening statement.
How should the Court rule on Defendants’ objection to the photograph? Explain your answer.
The defendants’ objection to the photo during Art’s opening statement should be overruled. The objection should be overruled on the ground that it was untimely because the objection should have been raised as soon as the photo was displayed
After the first day of trial, Mary contacted Art’s attorney and said she was a passenger in a cab driven by Zach six months before the collision at issue. Mary said that Zach appeared to “black out” during the short trip. Neither Art, nor his attorney knew of Mary’s existence before trial. Art’s attorney notifies the Defendants and the Court the next
morning of his intent to call Mary to testify as his next witness because she is leaving the country the following day. Zach’s and Discount’s attorneys object on the basis that Mary’s identity was not disclosed in response to written discovery served in the case.
How should the Court rule on Zach and Discount’s objection? Explain your answer.
The defendants’ objection to Mary’s testimony should be overruled. The objection should be overruled if Art’s attorney showed either good cause for not disclosing Mary’s existence earlier or that the defendants would not be unfairly surprised or unfairly prejudiced by the late disclosure.