FE Readings Flashcards
How does a target’s asset beta affect the bidder’s cumulative abnormal return (CAR) around the bid announcement in CAPM-based valuations? (CAPM-Based Company (Mis)valuations)
The bidder’s cumulative abnormal return (CAR) around the bid announcement increases with the target’s asset beta.
How does the relative size of a bid compared to the bidder’s market capitalization influence the relationship between the bidder’s CAR and the target’s asset beta? (CAPM-Based Company (Mis)valuations)
The positive relation between the bidder’s CAR and the target’s asset beta is stronger if the relative size of the bid vis-à-vis the bidder’s market capitalization is larger.
What strengthens the positive relationship between the bidder’s CAR and the target’s asset beta in CAPM-based valuations? (CAPM-Based Company (Mis)valuations)
The positive relation between the bidder’s CAR and the target’s asset beta is stronger if the growth rate of the target’s expected operating free cash flows on a stand-alone basis is larger
What are the two pillars or Siamese twins of asset pricing in financial theory? (Two Pillars of Asset Pricing)
The two pillars of asset pricing are efficient capital markets and the development and testing of asset pricing models.
What is the first formal model of market equilibrium in asset pricing, and what is its key risk measure?(Two Pillars of Asset Pricing)
The first formal model of market equilibrium in asset pricing is the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) developed by Sharpe (1964) and Lintner (1965). In this model, market beta (β), which is the slope in the regression of an asset’s return on the market return, is the only relevant measure of an asset’s risk.
What is the title of section C in the “Two Pillars of Asset Pricing” reading?
The title of section C in the “Two Pillars of Asset Pricing” reading is “The Three-Factor Model”.
How do investor opinions expressed on social media platforms impact financial markets? (Wisdom of Crowds)
Investor opinions transmitted through social media platforms have been found to predict future stock returns and earnings surprises. This includes both the views expressed in articles and the commentaries written in response to these articles on popular social media platforms for investors.
What role do peer opinions play in financial markets, and what is the study’s goal in assessing these opinions? (Wisdom of Crowds)
Peer opinions are increasingly influencing financial markets, with nearly one in four adults in the U.S. relying on investment advice from social media as of 2008. The study aims to assess the performance of investors who act as advisors and determine if peer-provided investment advice is genuinely useful, rather than being random chatter or intentionally misleading information.
What specific findings did the study observe regarding the predictability of stock returns based on social media content? (Wisdom of Crowds)
The study found that both the fraction of negative words in articles and comments on a social media platform (SA) negatively predicted stock returns over the following three months. This predictability was particularly evident when a higher number of comments were analyzed. The results remained robust even when controlling for factors like analyst recommendation changes and earnings surprises.
What is the fundamental difference between an Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) and a mutual fund?(Exchange-traded funds 101 for economists)
Unlike mutual funds, ETFs do not interact directly with capital markets. Instead, ETFs are managed by ETF sponsors who enter into contracts with Authorized Participants (APs), typically large financial institutions or specialized market-makers, who interact with the markets. This structure allows ETFs to be traded like stocks on exchanges, offering intraday trading opportunities and greater flexibility.
How are transaction costs handled differently in ETFs compared to mutual funds?(Exchange-traded funds 101 for economists)
In ETFs, transaction costs are “externalized,” meaning they are borne by the individual trading the ETF shares rather than being shared by all investors in the fund. This is in contrast to mutual funds, where transaction costs are shared by all investors, including those who did not engage in the trading causing these costs.
What are the potential risks and concerns associated with ETFs? (Exchange-traded funds 101 for economists)
Some concerns include investors’ potential lack of financial sophistication to understand different types of ETFs, the possibility of excessive trading due to intraday liquidity, and challenges with custom or concentrated indices. There are also systemic risks, such as those related to “flash events” in the markets and liquidity mismatches, which could impact financial stability.
How did the US Federal Reserve’s actions during the COVID-19 pandemic impact the stock markets?(Free markets to Fed markets)
The US Federal Reserve’s aggressive unconventional monetary policy, including doubling its balance sheet, explained at least one-third of the stock market rebound during the COVID-19 pandemic. This impact was predominantly through bond yields (discount rates) and expectations of future macroeconomic conditions (future cash flows).
What was the perceived disconnect between stock markets and the real economy during the COVID-19 pandemic?(Free markets to Fed markets)
Despite deteriorating economic conditions and setbacks in controlling the pandemic, stock markets, such as the US S&P 500 index, saw significant increases. This led many market observers to conclude that stock markets were disconnected from the real economy, a phenomenon attributed to strong intervention in markets by central banks through asset purchases and balance sheet expansion.
What is the relationship between the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet and stock markets, according to the reading?(Free markets to Fed markets)
There is a strong symbiotic relation between the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet and stock markets. The Fed typically responds to stock market declines or a deteriorating economic outlook with a lag of 2–5 weeks by expanding its balance sheet through asset purchases. Subsequently, stock markets respond positively to the Fed’s balance sheet expansion within 1–4 weeks following the Fed’s actions.
How has the participation of sovereign issuers in the GSS bond market changed since the pandemic? (Sovereigns and sustainable bonds)
Since the pandemic, sovereign issuance in the GSS bond market has notably increased. By end-June 2022, the share of sovereign issuers in total outstanding GSS bonds rose from 4.2% at the end of 2019 to 7.5%, with 38 sovereigns from five continents issuing debut GSS bonds.
What challenges do sovereign issuers face when issuing green bonds, and how do sustainability-linked bonds (SLBs) offer a solution? (Sovereigns and sustainable bonds)
Sovereign issuers face challenges with the fungibility of fiscal revenues, which makes it difficult for them to commit legally to using bond proceeds for specific green purposes. Sustainability-linked bonds (SLBs) offer more flexibility in the use of proceeds, as they are based on pre-defined sustainability performance targets and are not limited by the fungibility requirements of public debt.
What is the difference between conventional green bonds and sustainability-linked bonds (SLBs) in terms of use of proceeds and incentives? (Sovereigns and sustainable bonds)
Unlike conventional green bonds, which don’t guarantee new green investments and can be used to refinance past expenditures, SLBs have pre-defined sustainability performance targets. If these targets are not met, the issuer is subject to a penalty. This penalty mechanism, absent in conventional green bonds, provides more freedom for issuers to use the proceeds and aligns their incentives with sustainability objectives.
What are some key themes observed in corporate finance decision-making processes? (Corporate Finance and Reality)
Corporate finance decision-making processes often exhibit several unifying themes: they are near-term focused, based on miscalibrated forecasts, conservative (valuing flexibility), sticky, simple, and often involve attempts to time the market.
How do current corporate decision rules compare to those from 20 years ago? (Corporate Finance and Reality)
Current corporate decision rules are generally conservative, sticky, and geared towards timing the market. They rely on internal forecasts that are considered reliable only for about two years and focus increasingly on stakeholders and revenues.
In what ways can the practice of corporate finance inform academic models? (Corporate Finance and Reality)
The practice of corporate finance, with its emphasis on specific decision-making processes and economic decision rules, can help in developing academic models that better explain real-world outcomes. This includes considering models of satisfying decision-making or costly managerial biases.