Fatal offences-Voluntary manslaughter (Loss of control) Flashcards
Where does voluntary manslaughter arise from?
Where the definition of murder appears to be satisfied (both AR and MR) but 1 of 2 defences can be successfully pleaded:
Loss of control
Diminished responsibility
If the D successfully pleads loss of control OR diminished responsibility, what will he be charged with?
Voluntary manslaughter
What is the judge allowed to pass instead of a mandatory life sentence if a person has been successfully charged with voluntary manslaughter?
Discretionary sentence
What is a discretionary life sentence?
Sentence which is available for serious offences but is not fixed by law.
Chosen by judges
Loss of control and diminished responsibility are defences only available for charges of murder.
True or false?
True.
This is why they are referred to as “special defences”.
What are these “special defences” also sometimes referred to as?
Partial defences
Why are these defences, if successful, not given the not guilty verdict?
They are only partial defences and result in reduced sentences.
What old defence does the defence of loss of control replace?
Provocation
What section and Act was the defence of loss of control introduced?
s.54 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
How many tests must be met for a defence of loss of control to be successful?
3
Where a person kills or is party to the killing of another, the defendant is not to be convicted of murder if:
What is the 1st test?
- Acts of omissions in killing resulted from loss of control
Where a person kills or is party to the killing of another, the defendant is not to be convicted of murder if:
What is the 2nd test?
- Loss of control had a qualifying trigger
Where a person kills or is party to the killing of another, the defendant is not to be convicted of murder if:
What is the 3rd test?
- A person of D’s sex and age, with a normal degree of tolerance and self-restraint, and in the circumstances of D, would have reacted in the same/similar way.
What does s.56 of the Coroners and Justice Act state?
That the “common law defence of provocation is abolished and replaced”
What does s.56 of the Coroners and Justice Act mean?
The pre-2009 cases referred to in textbooks are no longer binding in court
What does s.54 (4) state?
The defence of loss of control cannot be used if the act of killing was a “considered desire for revenge”
What question do you need to consider for the 1st test because of s.54 (4)?
Was there a loss of control or a considered desire for revenge?
Under the old defence of provocation, what did the loss of control have to be?
Sudden
How has time delay changed in the new 2009 act?
s.54 (2) states that “it does not matter whether or not the loss of control was sudden”
Why did the 2009 act introduce the change in time delay?
To better protect abused wives, who often could not access this partial defence as their actions in killing their husband were not “sudden”.
What case is used to explain why the 2009 act introduced the change in time delay?
Ahluwalia (1992)
Facts of Ahluwalia (1992).
D had been abused by her husband over many years.
One night, after a day on which she had again suffered violence, she poured petrol on him while he slept and set him alight.
The husband died from the injuries
Did the defence of provocation work in Ahluwalia (1992) and why?
No as loss of control was no “sudden”
Had the incident in Ahluwalia (1992) occurred after 2009, would a defence of loss of control worked and why?
Yes as loss of control does not have to be sudden after the 2009 Act
What was the result of Ahluwalia’s prosecution?
Was downgraded to voluntary manslaughter but based on a defence of diminished responsibility
There can be a time delay between a qualifying trigger and the murder but what is the general rule?
The longer the time delay, the more likely it is that the jury will decide there was a “considered desire for revenge” rather than a loss of control.
Case for length of time delay.
Baille (1995)
Facts of Baille (1995).
D discovered his sons had been supplied with drugs and threatened by the dealer.
Took his own sawn-off shotgun and cut-throat razor to where the dealer lived.
On the way, there was a delay caused by a road accident.
At house, there was an argument and D shot V.
Did the defence of provocation work in Baille (1995)?
Yes, on appeal.
Why did the defence of provocation work in Baille (1995)?
Although there was a short time delay between the loss of control and the AR, the D had not recovered his control in this time.