fatal offences Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what is the definition of murder

A

the unlawful killing of a reasonable person in being under the kings peace with malice aforethought express or implied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the men’s rea of murder

A

intention to kill
intention to cause gbh

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is the actus reus of murder

A

unlawful killing via act or omission of a reasonable creature in being

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

r v gibbins and proctor

A

ommision leading to death can form the actus reus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what case shows an ommision can form the actus reus

A

r v gibbins and proctor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is meant by a reasonable creature in being

A

a human being that is not a foetus
brain dead is a grey area

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is meant by under the kings peace

A

war killings are an exception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is meant by an unlawful killing

A

not in self defence or in prevention of crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is express intention

A

a clear intention to end the life of a victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is oblique intention

A

no direct intent but is aware of the consequence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is the serious harm rule

A

you only need to intend to cause gbh to form the mens rea of murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what case established the serious harm rule

A

dpp v smith

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how do you establish oblique intent

A

using foresight of consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are the foresight of consequences

A

was the consequence natural and probable
did the defendant foresee this
does the jury find d had this level of intention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is transferred malice

A

d intents to kill or harm one person but ends up killing another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

which case shows transferred malice

A

r v gnango

17
Q

r v gnango

A

transferred malice

18
Q

what is the statute for attempted murder

A

the criminal attempts act 1981

19
Q

what is the mens rea of attempted murder

A

an intention to kill

20
Q

what is the actus reus of attempted murder

A

person does an act more than merely preparatory

21
Q

r v whybrow

A

there just be an intention to kill in attempted murder

22
Q

what case shows there must be an intention to kill in attempted murder

A

r v whybrow

23
Q

what are the elements needed for diminished responsibility

A

abnormality of mental functioning
medical condition
impaired ability
explains act or ommision

24
Q

what is meant by an abnormality of mental functioning

A

a state of mind so different from that of an ordinary human being that the reasonable man would call it abnormal

25
Q

what case shows an abnormality of mental functioning

A

r v byrne

26
Q

r v byrne

A

abnormality of mental functioning is what a reasonable man would term as abnormal

27
Q

what is a recognised medical condition

A

a physical mental or psychological condition which can be evidenced under the WHO database which can be evolved

28
Q

what is meant by substantially impair

A

a degree, and is up to the jury

29
Q

what must be substantially impaired to prove diminished responsibility

A

understand nature of his conduct
form a rational judgement
exercise self control

30
Q

what is meant by diminished responsibility providing an explanation

A

the medical condition must lead to abnormality which leads to impaired ability and this must be the reason for killing

31
Q

what kind of defence is diminished responsibility

A

partial and special

32
Q

is intoxication enough to create dr

A

no

33
Q

what case shows intoxication can’t create diminished responsibility

A

r v dowds

34
Q

r v dowds

A

intoxication can’t be the only factor behind diminished responsibility