FAR3 Flashcards
Intro to Business Combination to
What is the designation of the investee
in a business combination?
Subsidiary company
Define/describe a “legal merger.”
One entity acquires either a group of assets constituting a business or a controlling interest of another entity and "collapses" the acquired assets/entity into the acquiring company
Describe how income is determined at
the date of a combination.
Only the acquirer’s operating results up
to the date of combination enter into
determination of “consolidated” net
income
What may be acquired in a business
combination?
A business entity acquires either a
group of net assets that constitutes a
business or equity interest in an entity.
Define “parent company” as it relates
to business combinations.
Designation of the investor in a
business combination
List the three legal forms of business
combinations.
- Merger
- Consolidation
- Acquisition
List the primary means of
accomplishing a business combination.
The acquisition by one entity of the
common stock of another entity to gain
control of the investee
Describe how income is determined at
the end of the year for a combination.
The acquirer's operating results for the year plus the acquiree's operating results after the combination enter into the determination of consolidated income for the year of combination.
Define/describe a “legal acquisition.”
One entity acquires controlling interest
of another entity, but both continue to
exist and operate as separate legal
entities
Identify the legal forms of business
combination that will not require
preparation of consolidated financial
statements.
A legal merger or a legal consolidation will not require preparation of consolidated financial statements. Only a legal acquisition will require preparation of consolidated financial statements.
Define/describe a “legal
consolidation.”
A new entity is formed to combine
(consolidate) two or more preexisting
entities.
Describe how income is determined for
subsequent years of a combination.
The acquirer’s and the acquiree’s
operating results enter into the
determination of consolidated net
income.
In which of the following legal forms of business combination does at least one preexisting entity cease to exist?
Merger
Consolidation
Acquisition
Merger - YES
Consolidation - YES
Acquisition - NO
In a merger and a consolidation, at least one preexisting entity ceases to exist, but in an acquisition, no entity ceases to exist. In an acquisition, one preexisting entity acquires controlling interest in another preexisting entity, and both continue to exist as separate legal entities. In a legal merger, one preexisting entity is combined into another preexisting entity; one entity ceases to exist. In a legal consolidation, two or more existing entities are combined into one new entity; two or more entities cease to exist.
In which of the following legal forms of business combination are the assets and liabilities of an acquired entity or entities recorded on the books of the acquiring entity?
Merger
Acquisition
Consolidation
Merger - YES
Acquisition - NO
Consolidation - YES
n a merger and in a consolidation, the assets and liabilities of the acquired entity/entities are recorded on the books of the acquiring entity, but in an acquisition, the assets and liabilities of the acquired entity remain on the books of the acquired entity. In a merger and in a consolidation, at least one preexisting entity ceases to exist, and the assets and liabilities are recorded on the books of the surviving entity. In an acquisition, one preexisting entity acquires controlling interest in another preexisting entity, and both continue to exist as separate legal entities.
On December 1, 200X, Betaco agreed to be acquired 100% by Alphaco at a cost equal to Betaco’s book value. The combination was initiated at that time, and the closing date for the acquisition was December 31, 200X. Both firms have December 31 fiscal year-ends. There were no other transactions between the firms during 200X or 200Y. Each firm had the following net incomes for the periods shown:
Alphaco Betaco 1/1/0X–11/30/0X $20,000 $5,000 12/1/0X–12/31/0X 4,000 1,000 1/1/0Y–1/31/0Y 2,000 3,000
Which one of the following is the consolidated net income that Alphaco should recognize for 200X?
$24,000
The consolidated net income recognized by Alphaco for 200X would be its net income only. Therefore, the amount would be $20,000 for January 1 through November 30 and $4,000 for December, or a total of $24,000. Betaco’s net income before the closing of the combination (the acquisition date) would not be included in consolidated net income. Basically, Betaco’s net income for all of 200X was “paid for” by Alphaco in the consideration it transferred to acquire Betaco.
In which of the legal forms of business combination does more than one entity survive?
Merger
Consolidation
Acquisition
Merger - No
Consolidation - No
Acquisition - YES
Only in a legal acquisition does more than one entity survive. In an acquisition, one preexisting entity acquires controlling interest in another preexisting entity, and both continue to exist as separate legal entities. In a legal merger, one preexisting entity is combined into another preexisting entity; only one entity survives. In a legal consolidation, two or more existing entities are combined into one new entity; only the new entity survives.
In which of the following legal forms of business combination are two or more entities combined into one new entity?
Merger
Consolidation
Acquisition
Merger - No
Consolidation - Yes
Acquisition - No
Only a legal consolidation results from the combination of two or more existing entities into one new entity. In a merger, one preexisting entity is combined into another preexisting entity; no new entity is formed. In an acquisition, one preexisting entity acquires controlling interest in another preexisting entity, and both continue to exist as separate legal entities; no new entity is formed.
Topco owns 60% of the voting common stock of Midco and 40% of the voting common stock of Botco. Topco wishes to gain control of Botco by having Midco buy shares of Botco’s voting stock. Which one of the following minimum levels of ownership of Botco must Midco additionally need to obtain in order for Topco to have controlling interest of Botco’s voting stock?
11%
In order for Topco to gain control of Botco, it must own, either directly or indirectly, more than 50% of Botco’s voting stock. Since it directly owns 40% of Botco’s voting stock, it must acquire control over 10+% more. Also, since Topco owns 60% of Midco, it controls Midco. Therefore, if Midco acquires 11% of Botco, Topco will be able to exercise 51% of Botco’s voting stock — 40% directly and 11% indirectly through its control of Midco.
On December 1, 200X, Betaco agreed to be acquired 100% by Alphaco at a cost equal to Betaco’s book value. The combination was initiated at that time, and the closing date for the acquisition was December 31, 200X. Both firms have December 31 fiscal year-ends. There were no other transactions between the firms during 200X or 200Y. Each firm had the following net incomes for the periods shown:
Alphaco Betaco 1/1/0X–11/30/0X $20,000 $5,000 12/1/0X–12/31/0X 4,000 1,000 1/1/0Y–1/31/0Y 2,000 3,000
Which one of the following is the amount of consolidated net income that should be recognized for January 200Y?
$5,000
The correct amount is Alphaco’s net income for January 200Y ($2,000) plus Betaco’s net income for the period ($3,000), or $5,000. Income earned by the firms during 200X would not enter into 200Y income determination under any assumption.
On October 1, 200X, Parco acquired 100% controlling interest of Setco in a legal acquisition. There were no other transactions between the entities during 200X. The two companies reported the following net incomes/(losses) for the periods shown:
Parco Setco 1/1/0X - 9/30/0X $125,000 $40,000 10/1/0X - 12/31/0X 30,000 ($15,000)
Which one of the following would be the amount of income recognized by Parco in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 200X?
$140,000
Consolidated income for the year ended December 31, 200X, would consist of Parco’s net income for the full year ($125,000 + $30,000 = $155,000) plus Setco’s net loss for the period following its acquisition by Parco ($15,000 loss). Therefore, Parco’s net income for the full year would be $155,000 − $15,000 = $140,000.
What method is required to be used in
accounting for most business
combinations?
Acquisition method
List the business combinations for
which the acquisition method of
accounting does not apply.
Joint ventures
Entities under common control
Between not-for-profit
organizations
For-profit entity acquired by a
not-for-profit organization
Acquisition of assets that do not
constitute a business
List the five elements (or steps)
involved in applying the acquisition
method of accounting to a business
combination.
- Identify the acquirer.
- Determine the acquisition date
and measurement period. - Determine the cost of the
acquisition. - Recognize and measure the
identifiable assets acquired,
liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the
acquired entity. - Recognize and measure goodwill
or a gain from a bargain
purchase.
Define “acquisition date.”
The date on which the acquirer obtains
control of another business (i.e., group
of assets that constitute a business or a
separate legal entity). It usually is also
the “closing date” for the combination.
Define “measurement period.”
The period after the acquisition date during which the acquirer may adjust any provisional amounts recorded at the acquisition date. It provides the acquirer reasonable time to obtain information needed to identify and measure accounts and amounts that existed as of the acquisition date. It ends when the acquirer obtains that information or determines that no additional information is available, but in no case should it exceed one year.
When a business combination is effected through an exchange of equity interest, what are five factors to consider that indicate which entity is the acquirer?
Which combining entity/entities: 1. Issued new equity interest. 2. Owners have the larger portion of the voting rights. 3. Owners can select or remove a voting majority of the governing body. 4. Former management dominates that of the combined entity. 5. Paid a premium over the precombination fair value of the equity interest of the other combining entities.
For the purposes of applying the
acquisition method to a business
combination, what may constitute a
“business”?
A business may be: 1. A group of assets or a group of net assets (that constitute a business). 2. A separate legal entity (that is a business).
Which one of the following would be subject to the acquisition accounting requirements of ASC 805, Business Combinations?
Acquisition of a manufacturing entity by a holding company
The acquisition of a manufacturing entity by a holding company would be subject to the acquisition accounting requirements of ASC 805. The formation of a joint venture, the acquisition of assets that do not constitute a business, a combination between entities under common control, a combination between not-for-profit organizations, and the acquisition of a for-profit entity by a not-for-profit organization are the only combinations specifically excluded from the scope of ASC 805.
If a business combination is effected through an exchange of equity interests, assuming all other factors are equal, which one of the following independent circumstances would not indicate the likely acquirer in a business combination?
The combining entity whose debt-holders have the larger portion of the debt of the combined entity
Because debt-holders do not have voting rights and cannot exercise control over an investee, the combining entity whose debt-holders have the larger portion of the debt of the combined entity by itself would not indicate that the entity is an acquirer in a business combination.
The requirements of ASC 805, Business Combinations, apply to all of the following business combinations except for which one?
Combination between not-for-profit organizations
The requirements of ASC 805 do not apply to combinations between not-for-profit organizations (or to the formation of a joint venture, an acquisition of assets that do not constitute a business, a combination of entities under common control, or the acquisition of a for-profit entity by a not-for-profit organization).
At the closing date of a business combination, goodwill was recognized. During the subsequent measurement period, additional identifiable assets were properly recognized as part of the business combination. If no other changes occurred during the measurement period, which one of the following would be the effect, if any, of the additional assets recognized on the amount of goodwill recognized in the combination?
A decrease in the amount of goodwill recognized
The recognition of additional identifiable assets would result in a decrease in the amount of goodwill initially recognized in a business combination. Since goodwill is basically the difference (residual) between the investment fair value and the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired, an increase in the identifiable assets will result in a decrease in the amount of goodwill.
Which of the following statements concerning the acquisition date of a business combination is/are correct?
I. The acquisition date may be before the closing date.
II. The acquisition date may be on the closing date.
III. The acquisition date may be after the closing date.
I, II, and III.
All three statements are correct. The acquisition date may be before the closing date, on the closing date, or after the closing date, if by agreement or otherwise the acquirer gains control of the acquiree at an earlier or later date than the closing date.
When using the acquisition method of accounting for a business combination, which of the following statements concerning the measurement period is/are correct?
I. It provides time for the acquiring entity to identify assets acquired and liabilities assumed that existed as of the acquisition date.
II. It provides time for the acquiring entity to determine the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed that existed as of the acquisition date.
III. It should not exceed one year from the acquisition date.
I, II, and III.
All three statements are correct. The measurement period provides time for the acquiring entity to identify assets acquired and liabilities assumed (Statement I), to determine the fair value of those assets and liabilities (Statement II), both as of the acquisition date, and is limited to one year from the acquisition date (Statement III).
Which of the following statements concerning the nature of an acquired business in a business combination is/are correct?
I. A business may be a group of assets.
II. A business may be a group of net assets.
III. A business may be a separate legal entity.
I, II, and III.
All three statements are correct. A business may be a group of assets (that constitute a business), a group of net assets (that constitute a business), or a separate legal entity (that is a business).
Which one of the following is not a characteristic associated with the concept of a “business” for the purposes of ASC 805, Business Combinations?
Must be in the form of a separate legal entity
For the purposes of ASC 805, a business does not have to be in the form of a separate legal entity. Specifically, a business is an integrated set of activities and assets that is capable of being conducted and managed through the use of inputs and processes for the purpose of providing economic benefits to owners, members, or participants. The concept of a “business” for the purposes of ASC 805 does not have to be in the form of a separate legal entity. Under this definition, a “business” may be a group of assets (or net assets) that constitute a business (e.g., a line of business) and does not have to be in the form of a separate legal entity.
Zipco, Inc. acquired 100% of the voting stock of Narco, Inc. with an acquisition date of March 31, 2009. During the following three months, Zipco learned the following:
I. A major credit customer of Narco had declared bankruptcy on March 1, 2009, but the adverse effect on Narco’s accounts receivable had not been recognized in the amount of accounts receivable recognized in the acquisition date amounts.
II. Narco had a lawsuit against it that existed at the acquisition date of the combination but was not recognized on Narco’s books or in the liabilities recognized at the acquisition date. Analysis determined that it was more likely than not that the party that brought the lawsuit would win a material judgment against Narco/Zipco.
Which of these items of new information, if any, should be recognized in accounting for the business combination?
Both I and II.
The effects of both the reduced accounts receivable and the lawsuit liability would be recognized in accounting for the business combination. Since the effects on Narco’s accounts receivable and the lawsuit liability both occurred before the acquisition date, both items would be recognized in accounting for the business combination and would be adjustments made during the measurement period. The effects would be to reduce accounts receivable (Item I) and to increase liabilities (Item II) in the final recording of the business combination.
Which of the following are requirements of using the acquisition method of accounting for a business combination?
I. Determining the acquiring entity.
II. Determining the acquisition date of the business combination.
III. Determining the cost of the acquisition.
I, II, and III.
Determining the acquiring entity (Statement I), determining the acquisition date of the combination (Statement II), and determining the cost of the acquisition (Statement III), and other elements, are all requirements of the acquisition method of accounting for a business combination.
Which one of the following correctly describes the maximum length of the measurement period for a business combination?
One year from the acquisition date of the combination
The measurement period may extend up to one year from the acquisition (closing) date of a business combination. The measurement period is the period after the acquisition date during which the acquirer may adjust any provisional amounts recognized as part of the business combination, and it may extend for as long as one year after the acquisition date.
Company Z is formed to consolidate three preexisting entities: Companies W, X, and Y. Company Z pays cash to acquire the net assets of Company W and issues debt to acquire the net assets of Company X. Company Z acquires all of the stock of Company Y in the market for cash. Which one of the companies is most likely the acquirer in the business combination?
Company Z
Because Company Z only paid cash and issued debt to effect the combination (no new equity was issued to effect the combination), Company Z is most likely the acquirer.
Which of the following statements, if any, concerning the accounting for business combinations is/are correct?
I. All business combinations in the U.S. are subject to the acquisition accounting requirements of ASC 805, Business Combinations.
II. The acquisition accounting requirements of ASC 805, Business Combinations, are identical to those of IFRS #3, Business Combinations.
Neither I nor II.
Neither statement is correct. Not all business combinations in the U.S. are subject to the acquisition accounting requirements of ASC 805 (Statement I). That pronouncement specifically excludes certain combinations, including the formation of a joint venture, the acquisition of assets that do not constitute a business, a combination between entities under common control, a combination between not-for-profit organizations, and the acquisition of a for-profit entity by a not-for-profit organization. In addition, the requirements of ASC 805 are not identical to those of IFRS #3 (Statement II). Differences exist between the two pronouncements in the areas of scope; the definition of control; how fair value, contingencies, employee benefit obligations, noncontrolling interest, and goodwill are measured; and disclosure requirements.
In which one of the following cases is Company A most likely to be the acquirer of Company B in a business combination?
Company A owns 35% of Company B’s voting stock and 60% of Company C’s voting stock, which owns 20% of Company B’s voting stock.
Generally, to be an acquirer, an entity must own, either directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the voting stock of another entity. In this case, Company A owns 35% of Company B directly and would control 20% indirectly, or a total of 55%. (Since Company A owns 60% of Company C, it has absolute control of C and could control C’s 20% ownership of B.) Thus, Company A would control Company B and likely would be an acquirer in a business combination.
When a new entity is formed to effect a business combination, which of the following statements, if any, is/are correct?
I. A legal consolidation has occurred.
II. The new entity is always the acquirer in the business combination.
I only.
Statement I is correct; Statement II is not correct. When a new entity is formed to effect a business combination, a legal consolidation has occurred (Statement I), but the new entity is not always the acquirer in the combination (Statement II). If the new entity transfers cash or other assets or incurs liabilities to effect the combination, the new entity is likely the acquirer, but if the new entity issues equity interest to effect the business combination, one of the pre-existing combining entities must be the acquirer.
Which of the following is/are acceptable methods to account for a business combination?
Purchase Method
Acquisition Method
Pooling of Interests Method
Purchase Method - No
Acquisition Method - Yes
Pooling of Interests Method - No
Only the acquisition method is acceptable in accounting for a business combination. The purchase method and the pooling of interests method of accounting for a business combination are not acceptable methods. The pooling of interests method was eliminated in 2001 and the purchase method was changed to the acquisition method in 2008. Although the acquisition method is a variation of the purchase method, it has sufficiently different requirements that it is not identified as the “purchase method,” but rather as the “acquisition method.”
The acquisition date of a business combination is generally which one of the following?
The closing date
The acquisition date of a business combination is the date on which the acquiring entity obtains control of the acquired business; usually, it is also the closing date (of the business combination).
Under what circumstance is fair value
not used to measure assets and
liabilities transferred in a business
combination?
When the assets and liabilities are transferred to the acquiree but remain under the control of the acquirer because the acquirer obtained control of the acquiree (which holds the transferred asset or liability). In such a case, the asset or liability should be transferred at carrying value, not fair value.
How is the exchange of share-based
employee awards treated in a business
combination?
If the exchange is required:
The portion of the value of the replacement awards that relates to precombination services is part of the cost of the acquired business.
The portion of the value of the
replacement awards that relates
to postcombination services is
expensed.
If the exchange is voluntary, the value
of the replacement awards is expensed.
List the elements that make up the cost
of an acquired business.
Fair value of: Assets transferred Liabilities incurred Equity interest issued Contingent consideration obligations of the acquirer Required share-based employee awards for precombination services
Describe the nature of contingent
consideration in a business
combination.
Contingent consideration is either:
An obligation of the acquirer to transfer additional assets or equity to the former owners of the acquired business if future conditions are met; or
A right of the acquirer to a return
of previously transferred
consideration if future conditions
are met.
Contingent consideration is recognized
at fair value as of the acquisition date
as part of the cost of the acquiree.
A company acquires another company for $3,000,000 in cash, $10,000,000 in stock, and the following contingent consideration:
$1,000,000 after Year 1, $1,000,000 after Year 2, and $500,000 after year 3, if earnings of the subsidiary exceed $10,000,000 in each of the three years.
The fair value of the contingent -based consideration portion is $2,100,000. What is the total consideration transferred for this business combination?
$15,100,000
All consideration, including contingent consideration, must be measured at acquisition date fair value. The total consideration transferred is: Cash $ 3,000,000 Stock 10,000,000 Contingent consideration 2,100,000 Total $15,100,000
An obligation of an acquirer to pay contingent consideration to the former owners of an acquired entity in a business combination can be recognized as which of the following?
A Liability
An Equity Item
A Liability - Yes
An Equity Item - Yes
An obligation to pay contingent consideration in a business combination may be recognized by the acquirer as either a liability or as an equity item, depending on the nature of the obligation under the provisions of ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity.
Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration transferred in a business combination resulting from occurrences after the acquisition date should be recognized as a gain or loss in the current income when the contingent consideration is classified as
An Asset or a Liability
An Equity Item
An Asset or a Liability - Yes
An Equity Item - No
Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration resulting from occurrences that occur after the acquisition date are recognized as gains or losses when the contingent consideration is classified as an asset or a liability. Contingent considerations classified as equity are not remeasured, and no gain or loss is recognized. The change in fair value of equity items is recognized as an adjustment within equity.
Which of the following statements concerning the acquisition of a business is/are correct?
I. Most consideration transferred to effect a business combination should be measured at fair value.
II. Contingent consideration should be included in the cost of an acquired business at fair value existing on the acquisition date.
III. The cost of carrying out a business combination should be included in the cost of an acquired business.
I and II only.
Statement I and Statement II are correct; Statement III is not correct. Most consideration used to effect a business combination should be measured at fair value (Statement I). The only exception is when the consideration transferred remains under the control of the acquirer. Contingent consideration should be included in the cost of an acquired business at fair value as of the acquisition date (Statement II). The cost of carrying out a business combination should not be included in the cost of an acquired business (Statement III); most such costs should be expensed.
The terms of a business combination can provide that former shareholders of the acquired firm may receive additional compensation based on post-combination earnings or post-combination market share price. Would additional compensation based on such earnings or market price be considered an additional cost of the business combination?
Based on Earnings
Based on Share Price
Based on Earnings - No
Based on Share Price - No
Additional compensation to former shareholders of an acquired entity based on either post-combination earnings or post-combination share price would not be recognized as changes in the cost of the business combination. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration resulting from occurrences after the acquisition date, including meeting earnings targets and reaching a specified share price, are not measurement period adjustments and do not enter into the cost of a business combination.
Which one of the following, incurred by an acquiring entity in carrying out a business combination, would not be included in the cost of an acquired entity?
Cost of legal fees to carry out the combination
Cost of legal fees (and other direct costs) to carry out the combination would not be included in the cost of an acquired business but would be expensed in the period incurred.
A business combination is accounted for using the acquisition method. Which of the following should be deducted in determining the combined corporation’s net income for the current period?
Direct Costs Of Acquisition
General Expenses Related to Acquisition
Direct Costs Of Acquisition - Yes
General Expenses Related to Acquisition - Yes
Acquisition-related costs incurred to carry out a business combination, including both direct costs of acquisition (e.g., finders’ fees; legal, accounting, and consulting fees; etc.) and general expenses related to an acquisition (e.g., cost of acquisition department), are expensed when incurred and enter into the determination of income for the period.
Bale Co. incurred $100,000 of acquisition costs related to the purchase of the net assets of Dixon Co. The $100,000 should be
Expensed as incurred in the current period.
This question implies that the acquisition is a business combination. The costs associated with a business combination are expensed as incurred.
Describe the requirements of the
acquisition when a business
combination is carried out in stages (or
steps).
Equity interest in the acquiree that is acquired by the acquirer prior to the business combination is remeasured to fair value at the date of the combination (acquisition date). Any difference between the precombination carrying value and the acquisition date fair value is recognized as a gain or loss in income of the period of the combination. The fair value of the precombination investment is included as part of the cost of the investment value (i.e., cost of the investment in the acquiree) to the acquirer.
Identify at least three items acquired in a business combination for which the acquirer has to make a decision as to the classification or designation of the item.
- Debt investments, as to whether
held to maturity, held for trading,
or available for sale - Derivative instruments, as to
whether used for hedging or
speculation - Embedded derivatives, as to
whether they will be separated
from the host instrument or not - Long-term assets, as to whether
they will be used or held for sale
Identify the general acquiree-related
elements that must be recognized and
measured by the acquirer in a business
combination.
Identifiable assets acquired
Liabilities assumed
Noncontrolling interest, if any
Identify at least five items acquired in a
business combination that would be
measured at something other than fair
value.
- Income tax items: Use
Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) No. 740 and
other guidelines. - Acquiree’s employee benefit
liability/asset: Use various
related generally accepted
accounting principles. - Indemnification assets: Use the
same measurement basis as for
indemnified items. - Reacquisition rights: Use
unamortized balance. - Share-based employee awards:
Use ASC No. 718. - Long-term assets held for sale:
Use ASC No. 360.
On December 31, Year 1, Andover Co. acquired Barrelman, Inc. Before the acquisition, a product lawsuit seeking $10 million in damages was filed against Barrelman. As of the acquisition date, Andover believed that it was probable that a liability existed and that the fair value of the liability was $5 million. What amount should Andover record as a liability as of December 31, Year 1?
$5,000,000
A noncontractual liability that is more likely than not (greater than 50%) to meet the definition of a liability, should be recorded at acquisition date fair value. This lawsuit is probable to occur and should be recorded as part of the business combination at $5 million.
Which of the following kinds of intangible assets on the books of an acquired entity immediately before a business combination would be recognized by the acquiring entity?
Future benefits that derive from legal rights
Future benefits that can be separately sold
Future benefits that derive from legal rights - Yes
Future benefits that can be separately sold - Yes
Intangible assets on the books of an acquired entity immediately before a business combination would be recognized by the acquiring entity if they either have future benefits that arise from contractual or legal rights (e.g., trademarks, copyrights, franchise agreements, etc.) or are capable of being separately sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged (e.g., customer lists, databases, etc.).
On July 1, 2009, Lazer, Inc. acquired all of the assets, with a fair value of $400,000, and liabilities, with a fair value of $150,000, of Tipco, Inc. for $250,000 cash. In addition, Lazer paid $20,000 in legal and accounting fees for the combination and expects to pay $50,000 to close one of Tipco’s plants and relocate its employees. Which one of the following is the amount of liability that Lazer should recognize in recording the business combination?
$150,000
Lazer will recognize $150,000 in liabilities, the fair value of the amount acquired from Tipco. The $20,000 legal and accounting fees will be expensed as cost of carrying out the combination. The expected cost of closing one of Tipco’s plants and relocating its employees will not be recognized until there is an actual liability.
Which one of the following payments by an acquirer in a business combination is most likely to be a part of the cost in recording a business combination transaction?
Payment by the acquirer to the acquiree for a valid patent not previously recognized by the acquiree
Payment for a valid patent, even though not previously recognized by the acquiree, most likely would be a part of the business combination transaction. Since costs of developing a patentable item are expensed when incurred, the acquiree may not have recognized any asset associated with the patent, but the acquirer should record the patent acquired in a business combination at fair value.
Which one of the following items acquired in a business combination is least likely to require that the acquirer reconsider the acquiree’s classification?
A lease classified as a sales-type capital lease by the acquiree
In a business combination, an acquirer that obtains a lease contract should continue to classify the contract as established at the inception of the contract. The classification of a lease contract is established at the inception of the lease and would not change as a result of a transfer of ownership in a business combination.
Generally, which of the following items acquired in a business combination should be measured at fair value?
Identifiable Assets Acquired
Liabilities Assumed
Noncontrolling Interest
Identifiable Assets Acquired -YES
Liabilities Assumed - YES
Noncontrolling Interest - YES
Generally, identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree are measured at fair value. A few exceptions exist for selected assets and liabilities.
Which of the following contingencies that exist on the acquisition date should be recognized by the acquirer in a business combination?
I. A contractual contingency to provide warranty services to prior customers of the acquiree.
II. An outstanding lawsuit against the acquiree for which an expert legal authority believes there is a 20% probability that the suit will be successful.
I only.
Item I would be recognized; Item II would not be recognized. Contractual contingencies (contingencies related to existing contracts) are recognized by the acquirer and measured at fair value. Noncontractual contingencies (contingencies that do not result from an existing contract), including lawsuits, are recognized only if it is more likely than not that the contingency will give rise to a liability (or an asset). A probability of 20% that the suit will be lost is not more likely than not, and the lawsuit would not be recognized.
Zooco, Inc. acquired 40% of the voting stock of Stubco, Inc. on September 1, 2008, and accounted for the investment using the equity method of accounting. On May 1, 2009, Zooco acquired an additional 20% of Stubco’s voting stock to achieve a business combination. Which one of the following is the value Zooco should use to measure its original 40% investment in Stubco when recording the combination?
Fair value, May 1, 2009
When a business combination is accomplished in stages (or steps), the fair value of the investment on the date of the combination is used to value the business combination. In this case, that would be the fair value on May 1, 2009. Any difference between the carrying value and the fair value on the acquisition date would be recognized as a gain or loss for the period.
On May 1, 2017, Hico, Inc. acquired 20% of the voting securities of Lowco, Inc. for $400,000 cash. The investment did not give Hico significant influence over Lowco and was carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses recorded in earnings. On July 1, 2018, Hico acquired the remaining 80% of Lowco’s voting securities in a business combination for $1,800,000 cash. At that time, Hico’s original 20% investment in Lowco had a fair value of $450,000. At what amount should Hico record as the total fair value of Lowco as a result of the business combination?
$2,250,000
The $450,000 fair value of the original investment plus the $1,800,000 of cash paid is the total fair value of Lowco.
Which of the following statements, if any, concerning a noncontrolling interest in an acquiree is/are correct?
I. The value assigned to a noncontrolling interest in an acquiree should be based on the proportional share of that interest in the net assets of the acquiree.
II. The fair value per share of the noncontrolling interest in an acquiree must be the same as the fair value per share of the controlling (acquirer) interest.
Neither I nor II.
Neither Statement I nor Statement II is correct. The value assigned to a noncontrolling interest in an acquiree would not be based simply on the proportional share of that interest in the net assets of the acquiree (Statement I), but rather on the separately determined fair value of the noncontrolling interest. The fair value per share of the noncontrolling interest in an acquiree does not have to be the same as the fair value per share of the controlling interest (Statement II), because there is likely to be a premium in value associated with having control of an entity that the noncontrolling interest would not enjoy.
What values are compared to
determine if there is goodwill or a
bargain purchase in a business
combination?
The fair value of the total investment in the acquiree (including the acquirer's consideration transferred and the noncontrolling interest in the acquiree) and the fair value of the net assets (Assets – Liabilities) of the acquiree
Under what conditions will a bargain
purchase be recognized in a business
combination?
A bargain purchase is recognized when the fair value of the total investment in an acquiree (both the investment of the acquirer and that of any noncontrolling interest) is less than the fair value of the acquiree's net assets.
Under what conditions will goodwill be
recognized in a business combination?
Goodwill is recognized when the fair value of the total investment in an acquiree (both the investment of the acquirer and that of any noncontrolling interest) is greater than the fair value of the acquiree's net assets.
Windco, Inc. acquired 100% of the voting common stock of Trace, Inc. by transferring the following consideration to Trace’s shareholders:
Cash $100,000
5,000 new shares of
Windco’s $10 par common stock $ 50,000 (par)
(which is less than 1% of Windco’s outstanding stock)
In addition, Windco paid $12,000 direct cost of carrying out the combination.
At the date of the acquisition, Windco’s common stock was selling in an active market for $18 per share. Also, at the date of the acquisition, Trace had the following assets and liabilities with the book values and fair values shown:
Book Value Market Value Accounts Receivable $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Property and Equipment 80,000 100,000 Land 60,000 80,000 Other Assets 40,000 40,000 Total Assets $200,000 $240,000 Accounts Payable $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Other Short-term Debt 10,000 10,000 Long-term Debt 35,000 35,000 Total Liabilities $ 60,000 $ 60,000
Which one of the following is the amount that Windco should treat as its cost consideration for the acquisition of Trace?
$190,000
The total cost (consideration transferred) of acquiring Trace should be the cash paid plus the fair value of the stock issued. The cost of carrying out the combination ($12,000) should be expensed. Therefore, the cost would be $100,000 + (5,000 share × $18 market price = $90,000), or $100,000 + $90,000 = $190,000.
On July 1, Dill, Inc. exchanged 10,000 shares of its common stock for all 20,000 shares of Ledo, Inc.’s outstanding common stock. Dill’s stock is closely held and seldom traded; it has a par value of $10 per share and a book value of $12 per share. Ledo’s stock is traded in an active market and has a par value of $5 per share, a book value of $8 per share, and a market price of $11 per share. Which one of the following amounts is most likely the appropriate value of Dill’s investment in Ledo?
$220,000
Stock issued in a business combination should be measured at fair value. In some cases in which equities are exchanged, the fair value of the acquiree’s stock may be a more reliable measure of the value of the transaction than can be determined for the acquirer’s stock. In this question, that is the case. Since Dill’s stock is closely held and seldom traded, it is less likely to be the basis for determining fair value than is Ledo’s stock, which is traded in an active market. Therefore, the most likely value for the transaction would be the 20,000 shares of Ledo’s stock that were obtained multiplied by the $11 market price of those shares, or 20,000 shares × $11 = $220,000.
In which of the following circumstances of a business combination, if any, could the recognition of a gain occur at the time of the combination?
Investment Value > Fair Value of Net Assets
Investment Value < Fair Value of Net Assets
Investment Value > Fair Value of Net Assets - No
Investment Value < Fair Value of Net Assets - Yes
A gain can occur in a business combination only when the investment value in the acquired entity is less than the fair value of the entity’s net assets, and not when the investment value is greater than the fair value of those net assets. Thus, when the fair value of the investment by the acquirer and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree is less than the fair value of the net assets of the acquiree, a bargain purchase gain will be recognized.
Windco, Inc. acquired 100% of the voting common stock of Trace, Inc. by transferring the following consideration to Trace’s shareholders:
Cash $100,000
5,000 new shares of
Windco’s $10 par common stock $ 50,000 (par)
(which is less than 1% of Windco’s outstanding stock)
In addition, Windco paid $12,000 direct cost of carrying out the combination.
At the date of the acquisition, Windco’s common stock was selling in an active market for $18 per share. Also, at the date of the acquisition, Trace had the following assets and liabilities with the book values and fair values shown:
Book Value Market Value Accounts Receivable $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Property and Equipment 80,000 100,000 Land 60,000 80,000 Other Assets 40,000 40,000 Total Assets $200,000 $240,000 Accounts Payable $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Other Short-term Debt 10,000 10,000 Long-term Debt 35,000 35,000 Total Liabilities $ 60,000 $ 60,000
Which one of the following is the fair value of Trace’s net assets at the date of the business combination?
$180,000
The correct calculation would be the fair value of Trace’s assets $240,000 - the fair value of the liabilities, $60,000 = $180,000.
Windco, Inc. acquired 100% of the voting common stock of Trace, Inc. by transferring the following consideration to Trace’s shareholders:
Cash $100,000
5,000 new shares of Windco’s $10 par common stock $ 50,000 (par)
(which is less than 1% of Windco’s outstanding stock)
In addition, Windco paid $12,000 direct cost of carrying out the combination.
At the date of the acquisition, Windco’s common stock was selling in an active market for $18 per share. Also, at the date of the acquisition, Trace had the following assets and liabilities with the book values and fair values shown:
Book Value Market Value Accounts Receivable $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Property and Equipment 80,000 100,000 Land 60,000 80,000 Other Assets 40,000 40,000 Total Assets $200,000 $240,000 Accounts Payable $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Other Short-term Debt 10,000 10,000 Long-term Debt 35,000 35,000 Total Liabilities $ 60,000 $ 60,000
Which one of the following is the amount of gain Windco will recognize in connection with its acquisition of Trace?
$ - 0 - (no gain)
No gain will be recognized by Windco in connection with its acquisition of Trace. Neither the cash transferred nor the common stock issued had a carrying value less than (or different than) fair value. The carrying value and fair value of the cash are the same, $100,000. And, since the common stock was newly issued, it would be valued at the market price of the stock, with the excess over par value recognized as additional paid-in capital, not as a gain. Further, there was no bargain purchase amount to be recognized as a gain.
In which of the following circumstances will goodwill be recognized in a business combination?
The fair value of the investment by the acquiring entity and any noncontrolling interest in the acquired entity is greater than the fair value of the acquired entity’s net assets.
Goodwill is based on the excess of investment value over the fair value of net assets. Thus, an acquirer will recognize goodwill only when the fair value of its investment and that of any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree exceeds the fair value of the acquiree’s net assets.
In a business combination accounted for as an acquisition, the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired exceeds the fair value of the consideration paid by the acquirer and the fair value of the noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. The excess fair value of net assets over investment value should be reported as a:
Gain.
A gain occurs in a business combination when the investment value in the acquired entity is less than the fair value of the entity’s net assets. Thus, when the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired exceeds the fair value of the investment by the acquirer and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, a bargain purchase gain will be recognized.
On July 1, 2009, Nexto, Inc. had the following summarized balance sheet with the book values and fair values shown:
Book Value Fair Value Accounts Receivable (net) $ 40,000 $ 40,000 Inventories 80,000 80,000 Plant and Equipment (net) 160,000 200,000 Land 120,000 160,000 TOTAL ASSETS $400,000 $480,000 Accounts Payable $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Short-term Note 30,000 30,000 Bonds Payable 70,000 70,000 TOTAL LIABILITIES $120,000 $120,000
On that date, Pesto, Inc. acquired 100% of Nexto’s voting stock from its shareholders by paying the following consideration:
Cash $200,000
10,000 newly-issued shares of Pesto’s $10 par common stock 100,000 (par)
Prior to the combination, Pesto had 1,000,000 shares of voting stock outstanding trading in an active market at $15 per share. Pesto paid $25,000 for legal and accounting fees to carry out the combination.
Which one of the following is the amount of goodwill or bargain purchase gain that Pesto should recognize as a result of its acquisition of Nexto?
Goodwill
Bargain Purchase Gain
Goodwill - $ 0
Bargain Purchase Gain - $ $10,000
A bargain purchase gain is the excess of the fair value of the net assets acquired in a business combination over the fair value of the cost of the investment. The cost of investment to Pesto is $350,000, consisting of $200,000 cash and $150,000 fair value of stock issued (10,000 shares × $15 per share). The fair value of Nexto’s net assets is $360,000 ($480,000 assets − $120,000 liabilities). Therefore, the fair value of the net assets exceeds the cost of the investment by $10,000, resulting in a bargain purchase gain.
How should assets and liabilities
arising from contingencies be
measured and reported subsequent to
a business combination?
If the contingency is a liability, measure and report at the higher of: 1. Its acquisition-date fair value; or 2. The amount that would be recognized if the requirements of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) No. 450 were followed. If the contingency is an asset, measure and report at the lower of: 1. Its acquisition-date fair value; or 2. The best estimate of its future settlement amount.
How should contingent consideration
be measured and reported subsequent
to a business combination?
If changes are of fair value as it
existed at acquisition date, the
change is an adjustment to the
cost of the investment.
If changes result from events
after the acquisition date:
- Changes in contingent
assets or liabilities are
recognized in earnings in
the period of change. - Changes in contingent
equity are an adjustment
to equity accounts, not an
earnings item.
What assets or liabilities recognized in
a business combination require
“specialized” post-combination
accounting treatments?
Reacquired rights asset
Assets and liabilities arising from
contingencies
Indemnification assets
Contingent consideration as
asset or liability (or equity)
Which one of the following assets recognized in a business combination will require that the amount recognized be amortized over future periods?
A reacquired right asset
A reacquired right is a right granted by an acquirer to the acquiree prior to a business combination that is reacquired when the acquirer gains control of the acquiree or the asset in a business combination. For example, the acquiree may have acquired the right to use the acquirer’s trade name as part of a franchise agreement. A reacquired right is an intangible asset that is amortized by the acquirer over the remaining contractual period of the contract that grants the right.
Which one of the following items that was acquired in a business combination is most likely to be accounted for using post-combination accounting requirements specific for the item?
Contingency-based assets
Assets (and liabilities) arising from contingencies are likely to be accounted for using specific post-combination accounting requirements. Those requirements provide that when new information is obtained about a contingency-based asset, it will be measured at the lower of (1) its acquisition-date fair value or (2) the best estimate of its future settlement amount.
In recording its acquisition of Lambda, Inc., Omega, Inc. properly recognized a contingent consideration liability of $28,000 associated with a possible payment based on a target amount of post-combination cash flow from operations. Shortly after the combination, but during the measurement period, the national economy experienced a significant downturn which made it unlikely that the target amount would be reached. As a consequence, at the end of Omega’s fiscal period, the liability was properly revalued to a fair value of $9,000. Which one of the following is the amount of gain or loss that will be recognized in income as a result of the reevaluation of the contingent liability?
$19,000 gain
A contingent consideration liability is the obligation of an acquirer to transfer additional consideration, if specific conditions are met. Contingent consideration liabilities are initially recognized at fair value and adjusted to fair value each period until the contingency is resolved or expires. A change in fair value resulting from occurrences after the acquisition date would be recognized as a gain or loss in income in the period of the change. In this question, a $19,000 gain (reduction in liability) would be recognized ($28,000 − $9,000 = $19,000).
In recording its acquisition of Lambda, Inc., Omega, Inc. properly recognized a contingent consideration liability of $28,000 associated with a possible payment based on a target amount of post-combination cash flow from operations. Shortly after the combination, but during the measurement period, the national economy experienced a significant downturn which made it unlikely that the target amount would be reached. As a consequence, at the end of Omega’s fiscal period, the liability was properly revalued to a fair value of $9,000. Which one of the following is the amount of increase or decrease, if any, in the consideration paid to acquire Lambda that results from the change in the fair value of the contingent liability?
$ - 0 - (no increase or decrease)
A contingent consideration liability is the obligation of an acquirer to transfer additional consideration, if specific conditions are met. Contingent consideration liabilities are initially recognized at fair value and adjusted to fair value each period until the contingency is resolved or expires. A change in fair value resulting from occurrences after the acquisition date would be recognized as a gain or loss in income in the period of the change, not as an adjustment to the consideration paid to acquire the acquiree. In this question, a $19,000 gain (reduction in liability) would be recognized ($28,000 − $9,000 = $19,000) and no change in the consideration paid will be recognized.
How should the acquirer recognize a bargain purchase in a business acquisition?
As a gain in earnings at the acquisition date
A bargain purchase means that the acquirer paid less than the fair market value of the identifiable net assets. The seller must have been under some sort of duress (perhaps eminent bankruptcy) and was willing to accept a price less than the value of the net assets. In this case the acquirer recognizes that gain on the date of the acquisition.
A building suffered uninsured water and related damage. The damaged portion of the building was refurbished with upgraded materials. The cost and related accumulated depreciation of the damaged portion are identifiable.
To account for these events, the owner should:
Capitalize the cost of refurbishing and record a loss in the current period equal to the carrying amount of the damaged portion of the building.
When the portion of an asset is damaged, and that portion has identifiable costs and accumulated depreciation, the identifiable amounts associated with the damage are removed from the general ledger. The difference between the cost and accumulated depreciation is the carrying value of the damaged portion of the larger asset. In this problem there was no insurance proceeds. Therefore, the carrying value of the damaged portion of the asset is written off as a loss and the replacement of that asset is capitalized. The entries would be:
Portion removed DR: Loss DR: Accumulated Depreciation CR: Asset Cost of replacement DR: Asset CR: Cash
Identify the most significant general
information about a business
combination that must be disclosed.
Name and description of the acquired business The acquisition date The percentage voting interest acquired (if relevant) How the acquirer gained control of the acquired business The primary reason for the business combination
In which periods does an acquirer have
to disclose information about a
business combination in its financial
statements?
In the reporting period in which the
combination occurs and in each
reporting period that includes the
measurement period
What information must be disclosed
about goodwill recognized in a
business combination?
A quantitative description of the factors that make up the goodwill The amount of goodwill expected to be deductible for tax purposes The amount of goodwill assigned to each reportable segment During the measurement period, a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance in goodwill
When provisional amounts for a
business combination are reported in
financial statements, what must be
disclosed about those amounts?
Identification of the items
(assets, liabilities, equity, or
consideration) for which
accounting is not complete
The reasons why the accounting
is not finalized
The nature and amounts of any measurement-period adjustments made to the provisional amounts during the reporting period
When goodwill is recognized in a business combination, which of the following types of information about that goodwill must be disclosed?
I. A quantitative description of the factors that make up the goodwill.
II. The amount of goodwill that is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
III. The amount of goodwill allocated to each reportable segment.
I, II, and III.
Statements I, II, and III are all required. When goodwill is recognized in a business combination, a quantitative description of the factors that make up the goodwill (Statement I), the amount of goodwill that is expected to be deductible for tax purposes (Statement II), and the amount of goodwill allocated to each reportable segment (Statement III) must all be disclosed.
Which of the following occurrences in a business combination, if any, identify circumstances that require extensive disclosures in the period of the combination?
I. The existence of a noncontrolling interest.
II. Achieving control in step acquisition.
Both I and II.
Both Statements I and II identify circumstances that require extensive disclosures in the period of a combination. When there is a noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, the fair value of the noncontrolling interest at the acquisition date, and the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure that fair value, must be disclosed. When control is achieved in steps (or stages), the fair value of the equity held by the acquirer immediately before the combination, the amount of any gain or loss resulting from adjusting the interest to fair value, and the line item in the income statement where the gain or loss is reported must be disclosed.
When a bargain purchase occurs in a business combination, which of the following types of information must be disclosed in the period of the combination?
I. The amount of gain recognized.
II. The income statement line item that includes the gain.
III. A description of the basis for the bargain purchase amount.
I, II, and III.
All three statements identify required disclosures. When a bargain purchase occurs in a business combination, the amount of the gain (Statement I), the income statement line item that includes the gain (Statement II), and a description of the basis for the bargain purchase amount (Statement III) must be disclosed.
If provisional amounts are reported for items recognized in a business combination, which of the following kinds of information must be disclosed?
I. The reasons why the accounting is incomplete.
II. The amount of adjustment(s) made to the provisional amounts during the period.
III. The date at which each provisional amount is expected to be resolved.
I and II only.
Statements I and II are correct. Statement III is not correct. If provisional amounts are reported for items recognized in a business combination, the reasons why the accounting is incomplete (i.e., the amounts are provisional) (Statement I) and the amounts of adjustment(s) made to the provisional amounts during the period (Statement II) - as well as the specific items for which the amounts are provisional - must be disclosed. The date at which each provisional amount is expected to be resolved is not a required disclosure (Statement III).
An entity must disclose information about a business combination it carries out if the acquisition date occurs:
During the Reporting Period
After the Reporting Period but Before Statements are Released
During the Reporting Period - Yes
After the Reporting Period but Before Statements are Released - Yes
Financial statement disclosures that enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of a business combination must be made both when the combination occurs during the reporting period and when the combination occurs after the reporting period but before the financial statements are released.
Which of the following general types of information about a business combination must be disclosed?
I. The primary reason for a business combination.
II. How the acquirer gained control of the business.
III. The acquisition-date fair value of consideration transferred and each major class of asset acquired and liability assumed.
I, II, and III.
Statements I, II, and III are all required disclosures. The primary reason for a business combination (Statement I), how the acquirer gained control of the business (Statement II), and the acquisition date fair value of consideration transferred and each major class of asset acquired and liability assumed (Statement III) must all be disclosed.
In a business combination, what is
recognized when the cost of the
investment is less than the fair value of
the net assets acquired?
Bargain purchase.
How is a wholly owned subsidiary
reported?
Reported in consolidated statements,
unless the parent lacks effective
control
List the journal entry by the investor to
record a legal merger/consolidation
using the acquisition method.
DR: Assets acquired (at fair value)
CR: Liabilities assumed (at fair value)
CR: Cash/Other Consideration Paid
(Cost)
What accounting method is used to
record a legal merger or consolidation?
Acquisition method
In a business combination, what is
recognized when the cost of the
investment is greater than the fair
value of the net assets acquired?
Goodwill
What method is used by a parent
company to carry “investment in
subsidiary” on its books?
Cost, equity or fair value method
What is the journal entry by an investor
to record a legal acquisition?
DR: Investment in Subsidiary
CR: Cash/Other Consideration (Cost)
Seashell Corp. was organized to consolidate Sea Company and Shell Company in a business combination. Seashell issued 25,000 shares of its $10 par value common stock in exchange for all of the outstanding common stock of Sea and Shell. At the time of the consolidation, the fair market value of Sea’s and Shell’s assets and liabilities are equal to their book values. The shareholders’ equity accounts of Sea and Shell on the date of the consolidation were:
Sea Shell Total Common stock, at par $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 Additional paid-in capital 50,000 75,000 125,000 Retained Earnings 22,500 47,500 70,000 Totals $172,500 $322,500 $495,000
What is the balance in Seashell’s additional retained earnings account immediately following its issuing common stock to effect the consolidation?
$-0-
As a newly formed entity, Seashell will have no retained earnings until after an operating period. Seashell’s shareholders’ equity immediately following the consolidation will consist of the common stock issued (at par), $250,000, and additional paid-in capital, $245,000. Immediately after the consolidation, there will be no retained earnings.
Sayon Co. issues 200,000 shares of $5 par value common stock to acquire Trask Co. in an acquisition-business combination. The market value of Sayon’s common stock is $12 per share. Legal and consulting fees incurred in relation to the acquisition are $110,000 paid in cash. Registration and issuance costs for the common stock are $35,000. What should be recorded in Sayon’s additional paid-in capital account for this business combination?
$1,365,000
The calculation is:
Fair value (200,000 sh. × $12/sh.) $2,400,000
Par value (200,000 sh. × $5/sh) (1,000,000)
Gross additional paid-in capital $1,400,000
Less: Registration and issuance costs 35,000
Net additional paid-in capital $1,365,000
The legal and consulting fees ($110,000) were paid in cash and would be expensed in the period incurred. The registration and issuance costs of the common stock are properly deducted from the additional paid-in capital derived from the issuance of the stock.
Acquisition-related costs (expect as noted below) should be expensed in the period in which the costs were incurred and the services are received. These costs, in this case the $110,000 legal and consulting fees incurred in relation to the acquisition, are not included as part of the cost of an aquired business.
The cost of issuing debt and equity securities for the purposes of a business combination are not treated as cost of the acquired business, but should be accounted for generally as follows:
Debt issuance costs may be either recognized as a deferred asset and amortized over the life of the debt, or expensed when incurred. In this case, equity was issued in the acquisition, not debt.
Equity issuance costs reduce the proceeds from the securities issued and, in effect, reduce Additional Paid-in Capital. In this case, the information states $35,000 is incurred for registration and issuance costs for the stock issued.
Plant Company acquired controlling interest in Seed Company in a legal acquisition. Which one of the following could not be part of the entry to record the acquisition?
Debit: Goodwill
The entry that Plant will make to record its legal acquisition of Seed cannot include a debit to Goodwill. The entry Plant makes will debit (only) the Investment account and credit whatever form(s) of consideration is given (e.g., Cash, Bonds Payable, Common Stock, etc.). Goodwill cannot be debited at the time of the acquisition, though it may be recognized at the time of consolidation.
Seashell Corp. was organized to consolidate Sea Company and Shell Company in a business combination. Seashell issued 25,000 shares of its newly authorized $10 par value common stock in exchange for all of the outstanding common stock of Sea and Shell. At the time of the consolidation, the fair value of Sea’s and Shell’s assets and liabilities are equal to their book values. The shareholders’ equity accounts of Sea and Shell on the date of the consolidation were:
Sea Shell Total Common stock, at par $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 Additional paid-in capital 50,000 75,000 125,000 Retained Earnings 22,500 47,500 70,000 Totals $172,500 $322,500 $495,000
Which one of the following is the amount of goodwill Seashell would recognize upon issuing its common stock to effect the consolidation?
$-0-
Since Seashell’s stock is newly issued to effect the consolidation, it has no prior market value. In the absence of a market value, the fair value of Seashell’s stock is determined by the fair value of the net assets acquired in the consolidation. Therefore, the consideration given (common stock issued) is equal to the fair value of net assets acquired, and no goodwill is recognized.
On August 31, 2005, Wood Corp. issued 100,000 shares of its $20 par value common stock for the net assets of Pine, Inc. in a business combination accounted for by the acquisition method. The fair value of Wood’s common stock on August 31 was $36 per share. Wood paid a fee of $160,000 to the consultant who arranged this acquisition. Costs of registering and issuing the equity securities amounted to $80,000. No goodwill was involved in the purchase.
What should Wood capitalize as the cost of acquiring Pine’s net assets?
$3,600,000
The cost of acquiring a company includes all cash and other assets distributed, liabilities incurred, and equity shares issued, all at fair value. Direct costs of carrying out a combination (such as accounting, legal, consulting, and finders’ fees) are expensed in the period incurred; they are not included as part of the acquired entity. The cost of registering and issuing securities used to effect a business combination are charged against the fair value of the securities issued and, for equity securities, serve to reduce the amount of additional paid-in capital recognized. Thus, this correct answer ($3,600,000) was computed as 100,000 shares issued × $36 per share (fair market value) = $3,600,000. The $160,000 fees paid to a consultant would have been expensed, and the $80,000 cost of registering and issuing the common stock would have reduced the amount recognized from the sale of the stock.
Pine Company acquired all of the assets and liabilities of Straw Company for cash in a legal merger. Which one of the following would not be recognized by Pine on its books in recording the business combination?
Investment in Straw.
Pine will not recognize on its books an investment in Straw. Because the business combination is a legal merger, Pine recognizes on its books almost all of Straw’s assets and liabilities, not an investment in Straw. There can be no investment in Straw, because Straw will cease to exist.
Seashell Corp. was organized to consolidate Sea Company and Shell Company in a business combination. Seashell issued 25,000 shares of its $10 par value common stock in exchange for all of the outstanding common stock of Sea and Shell. At the time of the consolidation, the fair value of Sea’s and Shell’s assets and liabilities are equal to their book values. The shareholders’ equity accounts of Sea and Shell on the date of the consolidation were:
Sea Shell Total Common stock, at par $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 Additional paid-in capital 50,000 75,000 125,000 Retained Earnings 22,500 47,500 70,000 Totals $172,500 $322,500 $495,000
Which of the following is the balance in Seashell’s additional paid-in capital account immediately following its issuing common stock to effect the consolidation?
$245,000
Since Seashell’s stock is newly issued to effect the consolidation, it has no prior market value. In the absence of a market value, the fair value of Seashell’s stock is determined by the fair value of the net assets acquired in the consolidation. Therefore, the fair value of the stock issued is equal to the fair value (and book value) of the net assets acquired (i.e., A − L = SE), or $495,000. The par value of the stock issued is $250,000 (25,000 × $10). Therefore, additional paid-in capital is $495,000 − $250,000 = $245,000.
On September 29, Year 5, Wall Co. paid $860,000 for all of the issued and outstanding common stock of Hart Corp. On that date, the carrying amounts of Hart’s recorded assets and liabilities were $800,000 and $180,000, respectively. Hart’s recorded assets and liabilities had fair values of $840,000 and $140,000, respectively. In Wall’s September 30, Year 5, balance sheet, what amount should be reported as goodwill?
$160,000
Goodwill is measured as the amount by which the cost of an investment in an entity exceeds the fair value of the net assets acquired. In this question, the cost of the investment is $860,000, and the fair value of net assets acquired is $700,000 ($840,000 − $700,000), resulting in goodwill of $160,000.
Under which one of the following circumstances will goodwill be recognized in a business combination carried out as a legal merger?
Fair value of net assets acquired < Cost of investment
Goodwill is recognized when the cost of the investment is greater than the fair value of net assets acquired (= the fair value of net assets acquired is less than the cost of the investment). In a legal merger, the goodwill would be recognized on the books of the surviving firm at the time of the business combination.
In a business combination, are
contingent assets recognized under
U.S. GAAP or IFRS or both?
Contingent assets are recognized only
under U.S. GAAP.
Fill in the blank: Under International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS),
goodwill is allocated to _________?
Cash-generating units
Under International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS), are you
required to disclose assumptions
related to acquired contingencies?
Yes, you are required to disclose these
assumptions.
Under IFRS, the asset goodwill may be recognized
When it is acquired in a business combination.
The requirement is to identify the statement that correctly describes how goodwill may be recognized under IFRS. Goodwill can be recognized only if it is acquired in a business combination.
Per IFRS, intangible assets acquired in a business combination should be initially measured at:
Fair value at the acquisition date.
An intangible asset that is acquired in a business combination is initially measured at acquisition date fair value.
Under IFRS, which of the following would not be recognized as part of a business combination?
Contingent asset
Under IFRS, contingent assets are not recognized. Under U.S. GAAP, contingent assets are recognized if the item meets the criteria of the definition of an asset.
Identify at least five financial liabilities.
- Accounts payable
- Notes and bonds payable
- Option contracts (with
unfavorable terms) - Futures and forward contracts
(with unfavorable terms) - Swap contracts (with
unfavorable terms)
What are the basic types or categories
of financial instruments?
Cash Evidence of an ownership interest in an entity Contracts that result in an exchange of cash or ownership interest in an entity that: Imposes on one entity a contractual obligation (liability) and Conveys to a second entity a contractual right (asset)
Identify at least five financial assets.
- Cash and cash equivalents
- Accounts receivable
- Investments in debt or equity
securities - Ownership interest in a
partnership, joint venture, or
other entity - Option contracts (with favorable
terms) - Futures and forward contracts
(with favorable terms) - Swap contracts (with favorable
terms)
For financial accounting purposes, which one of the following is not a type of hedge carried out using derivatives?
Speculative.
When derivatives are used for speculative purposes, the intent is not to hedge an existing position, because there is no existing position to hedge. Rather, when used for speculative purposes, the intent is to make a profit.
Which of the following accounts would reflect the existence of a financial instrument(s)?
Investments in Debt Securities
Investments in Equity Securities
Bonds Payable
Investments in Debt Securities - Yes
Investments in Equity Securities - Yes
Bonds Payable - Yes
Which one of the following is not a characteristic of financial instruments?
All financial instruments have the same accounting requirements.
All financial instruments do not have the same accounting requirements. Because financial instruments cover a variety of assets and liabilities, and are used for different purposes, there are different accounting requirements for different financial instruments, including derivatives.
Financial instruments do include derivatives instruments. Derivatives are a special form of financial instrument with unique characteristics. Not all financial instruments are derivatives, but all derivatives are financial instruments.
Certain disclosure requirements do apply to all financial instruments. Specific disclosure requirements include the fair value of the instrument, whether the instrument is an asset or liability, and any concentrations of credit risks associated with the instruments.
Financial instruments, and especially derivative financial instruments, can be used for hedging purposes.
Which one of the following is not a characteristic of derivative instruments?
All derivative instruments have the same accounting requirements.
All derivative instruments do not have the same accounting requirements. The appropriate accounting requirements depend on the specific purpose of holding or issuing the derivative instrument.
Derivative instruments are a form of financial instrument. Derivatives are a special form of financial instrument with unique characteristics. All financial instruments are not derivatives, but all derivatives are financial instruments.
Derivative instruments can be used for hedging purposes. When used for hedging purposes, the intent is that the derivative instrument will provide an outcome that is the opposite of the item being hedged. For example, if the hedged item incurs a loss, the hedging instrument (derivative) would be expected to incur a gain.
Derivative instruments can be used to hedge foreign currency risk. Foreign currency risk derives from the possible loss resulting from adverse changes in the exchange rate between currencies. When used for foreign currency hedging purposes, the intent is that the derivative instrument will provide an outcome that is the opposite of the foreign currency being hedged. For example, if the change in exchange rate would result in a loss on the item hedged, the change in exchange rate would be expected to result in a gain on the hedging instrument (derivative).
Under International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS), how is an
impairment of a financial asset
determined and reported?
Under IFRS, an impairment loss is determined as the difference between the carrying amount of the asset and its recoverable amount. The amount of any impairment loss is recognized in current income.
What are the categories of financial
assets identified under International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)?
Financial assets measured at fair value with changes reported through profit/loss Loans and receivables Instruments held to maturity (other than loans and receivables) Instruments available for sale
How are financial assets that are classified as "loans and receivables" measured and reported under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)?
Financial assets classified as "loans and receivables" under IFRS are measured at amortized cost, with related interest and amortization recognized in current income.
What are the categories of financial
liabilities identified under International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)?
Financial liabilities measured at
fair value with changes reported
through profit/loss, including:
Liabilities held for trading.
Derivatives (that are
liabilities).
Financial liabilities for
which the fair value option
is elected.
Other liabilities
Under IFRS, which one of the following instruments is most likely to be treated in its entirety as a financial liability?
Redeemable preferred stock.
Under IFRS, redeemable preferred stock would likely be treated in its entirety as a financial liability because the stock can be redeemed (repurchased) by the issuing corporation at its discretion. Since the preferred shares can be redeemed at the discretion of the issuing corporation, it is not treated as equity, but rather as a liability.
Under IFRS, common stock with a preemptive right would not be treated as a financial liability. Common stock that contains a preemptive right grants the holder of the stock the right to acquire a proportionate share of newly issued common stock. Common stock with a preemptive right has no characteristics of debt and would not be treated as a financial liability under IFRS. Redeemable preferred stock is most likely to be treated in its entirety as a financial asset.
Under IFRS, convertible preferred stock is not likely to be treated in its entirety as a financial liability, but will be treated in its entirety as equity. Convertible preferred stock, which is convertible to common stock, has no characteristics of debt and would not be treated as a financial liability under IFRS (or under U.S. GAAP). Redeemable preferred stock is most likely to be treated in its entirety as a financial asset.
Under IFRS, convertible debt is not likely to be treated in its entirety as a financial liability, but is likely to be treated as both a financial liability, for the value of the debt element, and equity, for the value of the convertible feature. Redeemable preferred stock is most likely to be treated in its entirety as a financial asset.
Which of the following describes an “accounting mismatch” as that expression is used in IFRS?
Related assets and liabilities are valued using different measures.
An “accounting mismatch” refers to a circumstance where related assets and liabilities are valued using different measures.
As used in IFRS, an “accounting mismatch” does not describe a circumstance where the value of a hedging instrument does not equal the value of the hedged item.
As used in IFRS, an “accounting mismatch” does not describe a circumstance where liabilities exceed assets.
As used in IFRS, an “accounting mismatch” does not describe a circumstance where debts don’t equal credits.
Which of the following is the correct accounting measurement and treatment under IFRS for assets classified as “Loans and Receivables”?
Amortized cost, with interest and amortization recognized in current income.
Financial assets classified as “Loans and Receivables” are measured at amortized cost, with interest and amortization related to the instrument recognized in current income. This treatment is the same as the treatment under U.S. GAAP for investments held to maturity.
What must be disclosed about each
significant concentration of credit risk?
Information about the common
activity, region, or economic
characteristic that identifies the
concentration
The maximum (gross) amount of loss due to the credit risk The entity's policy of requiring collateral or other security to support financial instruments subject to credit risk
The entity's policy of entering into master netting arrangements to reduce the credit risk associated with financial instruments
Define “market risk.”
Market risk is the possibility of loss from changes in market values due to changes in economic circumstances, not necessarily due to the failure of another party to perform.
List the disclosure requirements for
financial instruments where it is
practicable to estimate fair value.
Fair value
Related carrying amount
Whether the instrument/amount
is an asset or liability
If it is not practicable to estimate the
fair value of a financial instrument,
what must be disclosed?
The reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value Information pertinent to estimating fair value, such as carrying amount, effective interest rate, maturity date, and so on
Define “credit risk.”
Credit risk is the possibility of loss from
the failure of another party (or parties)
to perform according to the terms of a
contract.
Disclosure of information about significant concentrations of credit risk is required for:
All financial instruments.
All entities must disclose all significant concentrations of credit risk arising from all financial instruments, whether from a single entity or a group of parties that engage in similar activities and that have similar economic characteristics.
Disclosure of information about significant concentrations of credit risk is not limited to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk of accounting loss, but must be provided for all financial instruments. Risk of accounting loss refers to the possibility of a loss being recognized for accounting purposes as a result of changes in market risk, credit risk, or other risk associated with financial instruments.
Fair value disclosure of financial instruments may be made in the:
Body of
Financial Statements
Footnotes to
Financial Statements
Financial Statements
Footnotes to - Yes
Financial Statements - Yes
Fair value disclosure of financial instruments may be made in either the body of the financial statements or in the footnotes to the financial statements. If in the footnotes, one note must show fair values and carrying amounts for all financial instruments.
When a concentration of credit risk must be disclosed and the exact amount is uncertain, which one of the following amounts must be disclosed?
Maximum amount at risk.
When a concentration of credit risk exists, the maximum amount at risk must be disclosed. The maximum amount is measured as the gross fair value of all financial instruments that would be lost if the other parties fail completely to perform according to the terms of the contract(s) and assuming any collateral was of no value.
If it is not practicable for an entity to estimate the fair value of a financial instrument, which of the following should be disclosed?
I.Information pertinent to estimating the fair value of the instrument.
II.The reasons it is not practicable to estimate fair value.
Both I and II.
When it is not practicable for an entity to estimate the fair value of a financial instrument, both information pertinent to estimating the fair value of the instrument and the reasons it is not practicable to estimate fair value must be provided.
What is an embedded derivative?
An embedded derivative is a portion of,
or term in, a contract (host contract
that is not itself a derivative) that
behaves like a derivative.
What is the “underlying” element of a
derivative instrument?
A specified price, rate, or other variable
(e.g., a stock price, interest rate,
currency exchange rate, etc.)
Define “hedging.”
Hedging is a risk management strategy
that involves using offsetting (or
counter) transactions or positions.
What are the three basic elements of a
derivative?
1. One or more underlying and one or more notional amounts 2. Requires no initial net investment 3. Terms require or permit a net settlement.
How is the value or settlement amount
of a derivative determined?
By multiplication (or other calculation)
of the notional amount and the
underlying
What is the “notional” amount element
of a derivative instrument?
A specified unit of measure (e.g.,
number of shares of stock, pounds or
bushels of a commodity, number of
foreign currency units, etc.)
A derivative financial instrument is best described as:
A contract that has its settlement value tied to an underlying notional amount.
A contract that has its settlement value tied to an underlying notional amount best describes a derivative financial instrument. The value or settlement amount of a derivative is the amount determined by the multiplication (or other arithmetical calculation) of a notional amount and an underlying. Simply put, a derivative instrument is a special class of financial instrument which derives its value from the value of some other financial instrument or variable.
Which of the following is the characteristic of a perfect hedge?
No possibility of future gain or loss.
Hedging is a risk management strategy which involves making an investment (the hedge) so as to offset (or counter) another investment (the hedged item) so that a loss on one investment (the hedged item) would be offset (at least in part) by a gain on the other investment (the hedge), and vice versa. A perfect hedge is achieved when the hedge investment has a 100% inverse correlation to the initial investment (hedged item) so that there is no possibility of future gain or loss. A perfect hedge rarely exists.
Assume Instco acquires an option to buy (a call option) 100 shares of Opco for $50 per share when the market price of Opco is $45 per share and that Instco paid a premium of $1.00 per share to acquire the options. Which one of the following is the underlying related to Instco’s options?
$50.00 per option.
Stock options are derivatives; they derive their value from the value of the stock to which the option applies. The underlying of a derivative is a specified price, rate, or other monetary variable, in this case the (strike) price of each option, $50.00.
Smythe Co. invested $200 in a call option for 100 shares of Gin Co. $.50 par common stock, when the market price was $10 per share. The option expired in three months and had an exercise price of $9 per share. What was the intrinsic value of the call option at the time of initial investment?
$100
The intrinsic value of a call option is the difference between the exercise (strike) price and the market price. This call option has an exercise price of $9 / share and the market price is $10 / share. Therefore, there is a $1 / share intrinsic value (I can buy the stock at a price less than the market). The option is to purchase 100 shares so the total intrinsic value is $100.
Which one of the following is not a characteristic of a derivative?
A derivative requires contractual satisfaction by delivery of the subject matter of the contract.
A derivative does not require contractual satisfaction by delivery of the subject matter of the contract. Specifically, the terms of a derivative require or permit the contract to be settled with cash or an asset readily convertible to cash, in lieu of physical delivery of the subject matter of the contract. In addition, a derivative includes an underlying, a notional amount, and requires no initial net investment or one that is less than normally would be required.
A derivative does identify a specific quantity or other quantitative unit of measure, called a “notional amount.” In addition, a derivative includes an underlying, requires no initial net investment or one that is less than normally would be required, and has terms that require or permit a net settlement.
A derivative does identify a specific price, rate, or other monetary measured, called an “underlying.” In addition, a derivative includes a notional amount, requires no initial net investment or one that is less than normally would be required, and has terms that require or permit a net settlement.
A derivative is a financial instrument (or similar contract) with specific characteristics, including an underlying, a notional amount, no initial net investment or one that is less than normally would be required, and terms that require or permit a net settlement.
List the four different possible uses of
derivatives.
- Derivatives not used as a hedge
- Fair value hedges
- Cash flow hedges
- Foreign currency hedges
Hedges of foreign currency risks can be the hedge of:
Fair Value
Cash Flows
Fair Value - Yes
Cash Flows - Yes
The risks associated with a foreign currency that can be hedged can be either the risk to fair value in the foreign currency or the risk to cash flows in the foreign currency.
Which of the following statements, if either, concerning accounting for derivative financial instruments is/are correct?
I. Derivative instruments can be used only for hedging purposes.
II. Derivative instruments can be used only to hedge fair value.
Neither I nor II.
Neither Statement I nor Statement II is correct. Derivative instruments can be used not only for hedging purposes (Statement I), but also for speculative purposes. In addition, derivative instruments can be used not only to hedge fair value (Statement II), but also to hedge cash flows.
Which of the following are basic kinds of risks that can be hedged for accounting purposes?
Fair Value
Cash Flows
Fair Value - Yes
Cash Flows - Yes
The two basic kinds of risks that can be hedged for accounting purposes are fair value risks and cash flow risks.
Which one of the following is an item for which risk associated with the item cannot be hedged for accounting purposes?
Fair value of an investment accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
The fair value of an investment accounted for using the equity method of accounting is specifically excluded as being eligible to be hedged for accounting purposes under U.S. GAAP.
The foreign currency risk associated with a net investment in a foreign operation (e.g., an investment in a foreign subsidiary) can be hedged for accounting purposes. The fair value of an investment accounted for using the equity method of accounting cannot be hedged for accounting purposes.
The credit risk of investments classified as held for trading can be hedged for accounting purposes. The fair value of an investment accounted for using the equity method of accounting cannot be hedged for accounting purposes.
The overall change in the fair value of a non-financial asset (e.g., inventory) can be hedged for accounting purposes. The fair value of an investment accounted for using the equity method of accounting cannot be hedged for accounting purposes.
Define a “fair value hedge.”
The hedge of exposure to changes in
fair value of a recognized asset,
recognized liability, or an unrecognized
firm commitment from a particular risk
List the conditions under which an
“unrecognized firm commitment”
exists.
When an entity enters into a contract to
buy or sell but has not yet booked the
transaction
What are the accounting requirements for a change in the fair value of a fair value hedging instrument and the asset, liability, or firm commitment being hedged?
Adjusting the carrying amount of the derivative and hedged item to fair value Recognizing gains/losses from revaluing the derivative and the hedged item in current income
What is the formal documentation
required at the inception of a fair value
hedge?
The hedging relationship
The objective and strategy for
undertaking the hedge
Identification of the hedging
instrument and hedged item
Nature of the risk being hedged
How effectiveness of the hedge
will be assessed
On October 1, 2008, Buyco entered into a legally enforceable contract to acquire raw material inventory in 180 days for $20,000. In order to mitigate the risk of a change in the value of the raw materials, Buyco also entered into a qualified 180-day forward contract to hedge the fair value of the raw materials. At December 31, 2008, the value of the raw materials had decreased by $500, and the fair value of the futures contract had increased by $480. On March 29, 2009, the date the raw materials were delivered to Buyco, they had a fair value of $19,300, and the forward contract had a fair value of $700. Which one of the following is the net gain or loss that would be recognized on the raw material and related forward contract by Buyco in its 2009 net income?
$20
Because Buyco entered into the forward contract (hedging instrument) to hedge the risk of change in the fair value of the raw materials (hedged item), the change in fair value of the forward contract during 2009 offsets the change in the fair value of the raw materials. Specifically, the decrease in the value of the raw materials, $200 ($19,500 − $19,300 = $200), was offset by the increase in the value of the forward contract of $220 ($700 − $480 = $220), so the net gain recognized in 2009 was $220 − $200 = $20, which is the correct answer.
On October 1, 2008, Buyco entered into a legally enforceable contract to acquire raw material inventory in 180 days for $20,000. In order to mitigate the risk of a change in the value of the raw materials, Buyco also entered into a qualified 180-day forward contract to hedge the fair value of the raw materials. At December 31, 2008, the value of the raw materials had decreased by $500, and the fair value of the futures contract had increased by $480. On March 29, 2009, the date the raw materials were delivered to Buyco, they had a fair value of $19,300, and the forward contract had a fair value of $700. Which one of the following is the amount by which the derivative is ineffective as a fair value hedge for 2008?
$20
Because Buyco entered into the forward contract (hedging instrument) to hedge the risk of change in the fair value of the raw materials (hedged item), the change in fair value of the forward contract offsets the change in the fair value of the raw materials. Since during 2008 the change in the value of the raw materials decreased more than the value of the forward contract increased, the difference is the amount by which the derivative is ineffective as a fair value hedge. Specifically, the decrease in the value of the raw materials, $500, was offset by the increase in the value of the forward contract of $480, so the hedge was ineffective by $500 − $480 = $20, which is the correct answer.
Which one of the following is least likely to be a characteristic of a firm commitment?
It has been recorded as an asset or liability.
A firm commitment has not been recorded (yet) as an asset or liability. A firm commitment occurs when an entity has a contractual obligation or contractual right, but no transaction has been recorded (and no asset or liability recognized) because GAAP requirements for recognition have not yet been met. Nevertheless, the subject matter of the firm commitment is at risk of change in fair value and can be hedged.
The subject matter of a firm commitment is at risk of change in fair value. A firm commitment occurs when an entity has a contractual obligation or contractual right, but no transaction has been recorded (and no asset or liability recognized) because GAAP requirements for recognition have not yet been met. Nevertheless, the subject matter of the firm commitment is at risk of change in fair value and can be hedged.
firm commitment is evidenced by a contractual obligation (or contractual right) - that is the nature of the “firm” part of the commitment. Despite the firm nature of the contract (or commitment), no transaction has been recorded (and no asset or liability recognized) because GAAP requirements for recognition have not yet been met.
On October 1, 2008, Buyco entered into a legally enforceable contract to acquire raw material inventory in 180 days for $20,000. In order to mitigate the risk of a change in the value of the raw materials, Buyco also entered into a qualified 180-day forward contract to hedge the fair value of the raw materials. At December 31, 2008, the value of the raw materials had decreased by $500, and the fair value of the futures contract had increased by $480. On March 29, 2009, the date the raw materials were delivered to Buyco, they had a fair value of $19,300, and the forward contract had a fair value of $700. Which one of the following is the amount of net gain or loss that would be recognized on the raw materials and related forward contract by Buyco in its 2008 net income?
$20
Because Buyco entered into the forward contract (hedging instrument) to hedge the risk of change in the fair value of the raw materials (hedged item), the change in fair value of the forward contract during 2008 offsets the change in the fair value of the raw materials. Specifically, the decrease in the value of the raw materials, $500, was offset by the increase in the value of the forward contract of $480, so the net loss recognized in 2008 was $500 − $480 = $20, which is the correct answer.
Define a “cash flow hedge.”
The hedge of an exposure to variability (changes) in the cash flow associated with a (recognized) asset, liability, or a forecasted transaction due to a particular risk.
Define a “forecasted transaction.”
A forecasted transaction is a planned or
expected transaction for which there is
not yet either a firm commitment or
any rights or obligations established.
What are the conditions necessary for a
forecasted transaction to be the
hedged item in a cash flow hedge?
The forecasted transaction is: Specifically identified as a single transaction or group of individual transactions with the same risk exposure; Probable of occurring; With an external party (with limited exceptions); Capable of affecting cash flows and earnings; and Not for acquisition of an asset or incurrence of a liability accounted for at fair value with the change reported in current income.
How are changes in the fair value of
derivatives used to hedge cash flows
treated?
Each period the change in fair value of the derivatives is used to: Adjust the derivative instrument to fair value. Recognize the change in value in other comprehensive income.
In a cash flow hedge, the item being hedged is measured using:
The present value of expected cash inflows or outflows.
The item being hedged in a cash flow hedge is measured using the present value of expected cash inflows or cash outflows. The item being hedged in a cash flow hedge may be associated with an asset, a liability, or a forecasted transaction. The value of such items is measured using the present value of either cash inflows (e.g., receivable) or cash outflows (e.g., payable), depending on the nature of the item being hedged.
Which one of the following is a characteristic of a forecasted transaction?
Can be a hedged item in a cash flow hedge.
A forecasted transaction can be the hedged item in a cash flow hedge. A forecasted transaction is a planned or expected transaction which has not yet been recognized, but which is subject to the risk of changes in related cash flow. As such, the cash flow (inflow or outflow) associated with forecasted transactions can be hedged.
Qualified derivatives may be used to hedge the cash flow associated with a/an:
Asset
Forecasted Transaction
Asset - Yes
Forecasted Transaction - Yes
Derivative instruments may be used to hedge the cash flows associated with assets, liabilities, or forecasted transactions.
Derivative instruments may be used not only to hedge the cash flows associated with forecasted transactions, but also with assets and liabilities.
Define “foreign currency hedge.”
The hedge of an exposure to changes in the dollar value of assets or liabilities (including certain investments) and planned transactions that are denominated (to be settled) in a foreign currency
Identify five kinds of foreign currency
exposure that may be hedged.
1. Forecasted foreign currency– denominated transactions 2. Unrecognized foreign currency– denominated firm commitments 3. Foreign currency–denominated recognized assets or liabilities 4. Investments in AFS securities 5. Net investments in foreign operations
Which one of the following is not a characteristic of a foreign currency hedge?
Are all treated as fair value hedges.
All foreign currency hedges are not treated as fair value hedges. While foreign currency hedges of unrecognized firm commitments, investments in available-for-sale securities, and net investments in foreign operations are treated as fair value hedges, foreign currency hedges of forecasted transactions are treated as cash flow hedges, and foreign currency hedges of recognized assets or liabilities may be treated either as fair value hedges or cash flow hedges, depending on management’s designation.
Which of the following statements concerning derivatives used as foreign currency hedges is/are correct?
I. Can be used to hedge the risk of exchange rate changes on planned transactions.
II. Can be used to hedge the risk of exchange rate changes on available-for-sale investments.
III. Can be used to hedge the risk of exchange rate changes on accounts receivable and accounts payable.
I, II, and III.
Foreign currency hedges can be used to hedge the risk of exchange rate changes on planned (forecasted) transactions, available-for-sale investments, and accounts receivable/accounts payable (and unrecognized firm commitments and net investments in foreign operations).
If a firm used a derivative to hedge the risk of exchange rate changes between the time a liability is recorded and the time it is settled in a foreign currency, which one of the following is being hedged?
Recognized liability.
A foreign currency hedge of a recognized liability hedges the risk of exchange rate changes on the cash flow (or fair value) of a liability between the time it is recorded (recognized) and the time it is settled in a foreign currency.
Which of the following, if any, can be the risk being hedged in a foreign currency hedge?
Fair Value
Cash Flow
Fair Value - Yes
Cash Flow - Yes
Foreign currency hedges may be either fair value or cash flow hedges. Foreign currency hedges of unrecognized firm commitments, investments in available-for-sale securities, and net investments in foreign operations are fair value hedges. Foreign currency hedges of forecasted transactions are cash flow hedges. Additionally, foreign currency hedges of recognized assets or liabilities may be treated either as fair value hedges or cash flow hedges, depending on management’s designation.
List the required disclosures for
derivatives designated as fair value
hedges.
Net gain/loss recognized in
earnings and where net gain/loss
is reported in the financial
statements
Net gain/loss recognized in
earnings from hedged firm
commitments that no longer
qualify for hedge treatment
What should disclosures for derivatives
designated as fair value hedges
distinguish between?
Fair value hedges, cash flow hedges,
hedges of investments in foreign
operations, and other derivatives
Specific disclosures are required for entities that:
Issue Derivatives
Hold Derivatives
Issue Derivatives - Yes
Hold Derivatives - Yes
Entities that either issue or hold derivatives (or other contracts used for hedging) must disclose a considerable amount of information concerning their reasons for using derivatives and the outcomes (e.g., gains/losses) of their accounting for the derivatives. Generally, these disclosures must distinguish between instruments used for different purposes (e.g., fair value hedges, cash flow hedges, etc.).
Which one of the following is not a required disclosure for derivatives used as fair value hedges?
The amount of gain or loss arising during the period that was deferred.
When derivatives are used for fair value hedges, the amount of gain or loss arising during the period that was deferred does not exist (and therefore is not required). When fair value hedges are used, any resulting gain or loss is recognized in current income, not deferred.
Derivatives used for hedging purposes that require disclosure of reclassifications of accumulated other comprehensive income are most likely related to which of the following hedging purposes, if any?
II only.
When derivatives are used as cash flow hedges, an amount of gain or loss can be deferred in other comprehensive income and subsequently become part of accumulated other comprehensive income. Amounts of accumulated other comprehensive income (on the hedging instrument) will be reclassified to income when the hedged item affects income.
Which of the following statements concerning disclosure requirements for derivatives used as cash flow hedges is/are correct?
I. The net gain or loss recognized in earnings during the period must be disclosed.
II. The amount of gain or loss deferred in other comprehensive income must be disclosed.
III. A listing of each of the derivatives used for cash flow hedges and the amount of each must be disclosed.
I and II only.
Both the net gain or loss recognized in earnings during the period (Statement I) and the amount of gain or loss deferred in other comprehensive income (Statement II) must be disclosed. Statement III is not a required disclosure.
Which U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) characteristic of a derivative is not included in the definition of a derivative under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)?
Notional amount
Are part term hedges allowed under
International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS)?
Part-term hedges are allowed.
Which of the following statements, if either, concerning differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS in accounting for hedges is/are correct?
I. IFRS permits hedging a forecasted business combination that is subject to foreign exchange risk; U.S. GAAP does not permit hedging in that case.
II. IFRS permits hedging part of the life of a hedged item; U.S. GAAP does not permit hedging of part of the life of a hedged item.
Both I and II.
Both Statement I and Statement II are correct. IFRS permits (1) hedging a forecasted business combination that is subject to foreign exchange risk, and (2) hedging part of the life of a hedged item. U.S. GAAP does not permit hedging in either case.
Which of the following concepts is not part of the definition of a derivative under IFRS?
The instrument has a notional amount.
The definition of a derivative under IFRS does not include the concept of notional amount.
The definition of a derivative under IFRS does include the concept of underlying.
The definition of a derivative under IFRS does include the concept of little or no initial net investment.
The definition of a derivative under IFRS does include the concept of net settlement.
Define “functional currency.”
The currency of the primary economic
environment in which an entity
operates and generates cash flows
Define “foreign currency transactions.”
Transactions of a domestic entity
denominated in a foreign currency but
to be recorded on the domestic entity’s
books in the domestic currency
What is the general rule for handling a
foreign currency–denominated
account that is outstanding as of a
balance sheet date?
1. Determine the dollar amount to settle the transaction at balance sheet date (# of foreign currency units × Exchange rate/Spot = $ Value). 2. Determine the difference between recorded amount and settlement amount. 3. Record the difference as an adjustment to the foreign currency–denominated account and as an exchange gain/loss for the period.
Define “forward rate.”
The exchange rate (existing now) for a
specified future date
What is the general rule for handling a
foreign currency–denominated
account at the settlement date of the
account?
1. Determine the dollar amount to settle the transaction at balance sheet date (# of foreign currency units × Exchange rate/Spot = $ Value). 2. Determine the difference between the recorded amount and the settlement amount. 3. Record the difference as an adjustment to foreign currency– denominated account and as an exchange gain/loss for the period. 4. Record settlement of the foreign currency–denominated account.
Define “indirect exchange rate.”
The foreign price of one domestic unit
of currency
Define “spot rate.”
The exchange rate at current date
Define “exchange rate.”
The price of one unit of a country’s
currency expressed in units of another
country’s currency
Define “foreign currency translation.”
Financial statements denominated in (expressed in terms of) a foreign currency but to be reported in the domestic currency (on financial statements)
What is the general rule for recording a
foreign currency operation transaction
at the date the transaction is initiated?
1. Translate transaction into dollars using current spot exchange rate (# of foreign currency units × Exchange rate/Spot = $ Value). 2. Record asset, liability, revenue, expense, loss and/or gain at dollar amount.
How do you determine the dollar
amount to settle a transaction
denominated in a foreign currency?
Multiply the number of foreign currency
units specified by the terms of the
transaction by the spot exchange rate
at the current date.
What is a foreign currency operating
transaction?
A transaction that is denominated (will
be settled) in a foreign currency (i.e.,
other than the recording entity’s
currency)
What are the general rules for
treatment of a foreign currency
operating transaction?
Measure and record the transaction on books in terms of the functional currency. Convert foreign currency units to functional currency units using the spot exchange rate. Recognize the effect of exchange rate changes as gains/losses in the period of the exchange rate change.
At what dates can a gain or loss be
recognized on a foreign currency–
denominated operating transaction
account balance?
At balance sheet date, if one occurs between the date the transaction is initiated and settled At settlement date of the foreign currency–denominated account balance
If $1.00 will buy 0.76 Euros, then how many dollars will one Euro buy (rounded)?
$1.32
If $1.00 will buy 0.76 Euro, then 0.76E = $1.00, and E = $1.00/0.76, or E = $1.32. So, one Euro will buy $1.32, the correct answer.
On October 1, 20X4, Mild Co., a U.S. company, purchased machinery from Grund, a German company, with payment due on April 1, 20X5. If Mild’s 20X4 operating income included no foreign exchange transaction gain or loss, then the transaction could have:
Been denominated in U.S. dollars.
If the transaction was denominated in U.S. dollars, there is no foreign exchange gain or loss for Mild. (There would be a gain or loss for Grund.)
Which one of the following is a direct quotation for a U.S. entity when buying Japanese Yen (JPY)?
I. 0.89 JPY per $1.00.
II. $.011 per 1.00 JPY.
I. 0.89 JPY per $1.00.
II. $.011 per 1.00 JPY.
II only.
A direct quotation, or direct exchange rate, states the domestic price of one unit of a foreign currency. In this case, each JPY costs $.011, which is a direct quotation.
On December 31, 20X8, the end of its fiscal year, Domco had a foreign currency account payable with a settlement amount greater than its previously recorded carrying amount. Which one of the following would Domco recognize for 20X8?
Exchange loss.
Since the foreign currency account payable had a settlement amount greater than its previously recorded carrying amount, Domco would have to recognize the change in settlement amounts in the period in which the settlement amount changed—20X8. Specifically, since the amount to settle the account payable increased during 20X8, Domco would have to recognize an exchange loss - it will take more dollars to acquire the foreign currency needed to settle the account.
Which of the following is not associated with the general principles of accounting for foreign currency operating transactions?
Gains and losses are deferred until transactions are settled.
Gains and losses on foreign currency operating transactions that result from changes in currency exchange rates are not deferred. Such gains and losses must be recognized in current income of the period in which the currency exchange rate changes.
If a foreign currency exchange gain results from the effects of a change in exchange rates on an account receivable, where will the exchange gain be reported in the financial statements?
As an item of income from continuing operations.
Foreign currency exchange gains (or losses) on accounts receivable are reported in current income as an item of income from continuing operations.
Soco plans to buy 100,000 Euros with U.S. dollars. The exchange rate is $1.00 = 0.75 Euro. Assuming no transaction cost, how much will Soco have to pay in dollars (rounded) for 100,000 Euros?
$133,333
If $1.00 will buy 0.75 Euro, then 0.75E = $1.00, and E = $1.00/0.75, or E = $1.33. So, one Euro will cost $1.33; therefore, 100,000 E × $1.33 = $133,333, the correct answer.
In preparing consolidated financial statements of a U.S. parent company with a foreign subsidiary, the foreign subsidiary’s functional currency is the currency:
Of the environment in which the subsidiary primarily generates and expends cash.
By definition (SFAS #52), an entity’s functional currency is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. Normally, that is the currency of the environment in which the entity primarily generates and expends cash.
RWB Co., a U.S. entity, purchased goods for resale from a Thai manufacturer. The purchase agreement provided that the U.S. entity would pay the Thai entity 500,000 baht, the Thai currency. The goods were delivered on July 1, 20X8, with payment due August 29, 20X8. The following exchange rates were determined for the number of baht to the dollar (i.e., B/$):
Spot Rate 60-day Forward Rate July 1, 20X8 35.0B/$ 36.5B/$ August 29, 20X8 37.0B/$ 38.0B/$
Which one of the following is the amount (rounded) of exchange gain or loss, if any, that RWB Co. would recognize on the purchase of goods from the Thai manufacturer?
$772
Since the exchange rate changed between the date the obligation was incurred (July 1) and the date it was settled (August 29), the effects of the exchange rate change must be recognized as an exchange gain or loss. The correct answer would be the difference between the spot rate on July 1 and the spot rate on August 29, or (500,000B/35.0B per $ = $14,286) - (500,000B/37.0B per $ = $13,514) = $772.
Toigo Co. purchased merchandise from a vendor in England on November 20 for 500,000 British pounds. Payment was due in British pounds on January 20. The spot rates to purchase one pound were as follows:
November 20 $1.25
December 31 1.20
January 20 1.17
How should the foreign currency transaction gain be reported on Toigo’s financial statements at December 31?
A gain of $25,000 in the income statement.
A gain of $25,000 should be reported in the current income statement. The gain was computed as:
November 20
$1.25 × 500,000 British pounds = $625,000
December 31
$1.20 × 500,000 British pounds = $600,000
Gain $ 25,000
And, gains (and losses) on foreign currency transactions should be reported in current income.
A December 15, 20X8, purchase of goods was denominated in a currency other than the entity’s functional currency. The transaction resulted in a payable that was fixed in terms of the amount of foreign currency and was paid on the settlement date, January 20, 20X9. The exchange rate of the currency in which the transaction was denominated changed at December 31, 20X8, resulting in a loss that should:
Be included as a component of income from continuing operations for 20X8.
The foreign currency exchange loss that occurred as a result of the exchange rate change in 20X8 should be recognized in 20X8 as a component of income from continuing operations in the income statement. Gains and losses resulting from changes in exchange rates are recognized in current earnings in the period in which the exchange rate changes.
Which one of the following is most likely a foreign currency import transaction by a U.S. company?
Purchase of goods to be paid in a foreign currency.
The purchase of goods by a U.S. entity would most likely reflect an import transaction and, since it is to be settled in a foreign currency, would be a foreign currency import transaction.
Can a gain or loss on a foreign currency import transaction be recognized if the transaction is initiated in one fiscal period and settled:
In the same fiscal period
In a later fiscal period
In the same fiscal period - Yes
In a later fiscal period - Yes
A gain or loss on a foreign currency import transaction can be recognized if the transaction is initiated in one fiscal period and settled in either the same fiscal period or a later fiscal period. The effect of exchange rate changes on accounts denominated in a foreign currency should be recognized in the period(s) in which the exchange rate changes. Therefore, if such an account (e.g., account payable) exists in more than one period, the effects of exchange rate changes in either or both periods would result in the recognition of a gain or loss in either or both periods.
Fogg Co., a U.S. company, contracted to purchase foreign goods. Payment in foreign currency was due one month after the goods were received at Fogg’s warehouse. Between the receipt of goods and the time of payment, the exchange rates changed in Fogg’s favor. The resulting gain should be included in Fogg’s financial statements as a(an):
Component of income from continuing operations.
The foreign currency exchange gain that occurred as a result of the exchange rate change should be recognized as a component of income from continuing operations in the income statement. Gains and losses resulting from changes in exchange rates are recognized in current earnings in the period in which the exchange rate changes.
Which of the following is not associated with accounting for a foreign currency import transaction?
A settlement amount greater than the recorded amount results in an exchange gain.
Because an import transaction normally results in a liability to the buyer (importer), a settlement amount (of the liability) greater than the current carrying amount of the liability will result in an exchange loss, not an exchange gain.
What amount should Yumi report as a foreign currency transaction loss in its income statement for the year ended December 31, 20X5?
$1,500
When a monetary obligation in a foreign currency exists, all gains and losses reflective of changes in exchange rates are recognized in current income.
The loss would be based on the rate at initiation and the rate at year end. (The recovery in the next period would be treated as a gain in that period.) The loss is $1,500 [($.55 – $.70)10,000], making this response correct.
On June 19, Don Co., a U.S. company, sold and delivered merchandise on a 30-day account to Cologne GmbH, a German corporation, for 200,000 euros. On July 19, Cologne paid Don in full. Relevant currency exchange rates were:
June 19 July 19 Spot rate $ .988 $ .995 30-day forward rate .990 1.000
What amount should Don record on June 19 as an account receivable for its sale to Cologne?
$197,600
At the date Don Co. entered into the transaction, June 19, and agreed to accept euros in satisfaction of its account receivable, it should record the transaction (sale and account receivable) at the (then existing or current) spot exchange rate of .988. Thus, the dollar amount of the account receivable (and sale) would be computed as 200,000 E × .988 = $197,600, which also is the dollar value that would be received if the transaction were settled at that date.
A sale of goods, denominated in a currency other than the entity’s functional currency, resulted in a receivable that was fixed in terms of the amount of foreign currency that would be received. Exchange rates between the functional currency and the currency in which the transaction was denominated changed. The resulting gain should be included as a:
Transaction gain reported as a component of income from continuing operations.
The event described is a foreign currency (FC) transaction, not FC translation, and the gain (or loss) would be reported as a component of income from continuing operations for the current period.
On November 15, 20X5, Celt Inc., a U.S. company, ordered merchandise FOB shipping point from an East German company for 200,000 marks. The merchandise was shipped and invoiced to Celt on December 10, 20X5. Celt paid the invoice on January 10, 20X6.
The spot rates for marks on the respective dates are as follows:
November 15, 20X5 $.4955
December 10, 20X5 .4875
December 31, 20X5 .4675
January 10, 20X6 .4475
In Celt’s December 31, 20X5, income statement, the foreign exchange gain is:
$4,000
December 31, 20X5 .4675
- January 10, 20X6 .4475
Equals 0.02
0.02 x 200,000 = 4000
Cash or amounts owed by or to a company that are denominated in a foreign currency should be translated at the current rate with a gain or loss being recognized. Recognition is based on the change in the spot rate between the recording of the transaction and the date of the financial statements.
The other critical date is the date at which the transaction became an amount owed by or to the company. This occurs at the transfer of title date of December 10, 20X5. Any change before that date is an adjustment in the cost of the merchandise.
This correctly picks up the gain as the change between when the debt was established and the balance sheet date.
On October 1, 20X8, RWB Co., a U.S. entity, signed a contract to provide equipment to Pronto, a Spanish entity, for 300,000 Euros. The terms of the sale provided for the equipment to be delivered FOB-Destination on December 1, 20X8, with payment by Pronto on January 30, 20X9. The following dollar cost per Euro exchange rate information was available:
Spot Forward Forward Forward Rate Rate 12/01 Rate 12/31 Rate 01/30
October 1 $1.30 $1.29 $1.28 $1.27
December 1 $1.29 - $1.28 $1.27
December 31 $1.28 - - $1.27
January 30 $1.27 - - -
Which of the following is the amount (rounded) at which RWB Co. should recognize sales as a result of its sale to Pronto?
$387,000
The correct answer is derived by multiplying the number of Euros to be received (300,000) by the dollar cost (value) per Euro at the date of the sale ($1.29), or 300,000E × $1.29 = $387,000. The amount of the sale would not be adjusted for subsequent changes in exchange rates.
On October 1, 20X8, RWB Co., a U.S. entity, signed a contract to provide equipment to Pronto, a Spanish entity, for 300,000 Euros. The terms of the sale provided for the equipment to be delivered FOB-Destination on December 1, 20X8, with payment by Pronto on January 30, 20X9. The following dollar cost per Euro exchange rate information was available:
Spot Forward Forward Forward Rate Rate 12/01 Rate 12/31 Rate 01/30
October 1 $1.30 $1.29 $1.28 $1.27
December 1 $1.29 - $1.28 $1.27
December 31 $1.28 - - $1.27
January 30 $1.27 - - -
Which of the following is the amount (rounded) of the exchange gain or loss that RWB Co. should recognize in 20X8 as a result of its sale to and receivable from Pronto?
$3,000
The correct exchange gain or loss would be calculated by multiplying the 300,000 Euros to be received by the spot exchange rates on December 1, the date of the sale, and December 31, the end of 20X8, and getting the difference. That calculation would be (300,000E × $1.29 = $387,000) – (300,000E × $1.28 = $384,000) = $3,000, the correct answer.
Which of the following is a foreign currency export transaction for a U.S. entity?
Sale of goods to be collected in a foreign currency.
The sale of goods to be collected in a foreign currency would be a foreign currency export transaction. A foreign currency transaction occurs when a U.S. entity enters into a transaction that is denominated (to be settled) in a foreign currency, not in dollars.
On October 1, 20X8, RWB Co., a U.S. entity, signed a contract to provide equipment to Pronto, a Spanish entity, for 300,000 Euros. The terms of the sale provided for the equipment to be delivered FOB-Destination on December 1, 20X8, with payment by Pronto on January 30, 20X9. The following dollar cost per Euro exchange rate information was available:
Spot Forward Forward Forward Rate Rate 12/01 Rate 12/31 Rate 01/30
October 1 $1.30 $1.29 $1.28 $1.27
December 1 $1.29 - $1.28 $1.27
December 31 $1.28 - - $1.27
January 30 $1.27 - - -
Which of the following is the amount (rounded) of the exchange gain or loss that RWB Co. should recognize in 20X9 as a result of its sale to and receivable from Pronto?
$3,000
The correct exchange gain or loss would be calculated by multiplying the 300,000 Euros to be received by the spot exchange rates on December 31, the end of 20X8, and January 30, the settlement date, and getting the difference. That calculation would be (300,000E × $1.28 = $384,000) – (300,000E × $1.27 = $381,000) = $3,000, the correct answer.
On October 1 of the current year, a U.S. company sold merchandise on account to a British company for 2,000 pounds (exchange rate, 1 pound = $1.43). At the company’s December 31 fiscal year end, the exchange rate was 1 pound = $1.45. The exchange rate was $1.50 on collection in January of the subsequent year. What amount would the company recognize as a gain (loss) from foreign currency translation when the receivable is collected?
$100
A foreign currency exchange gain will be recognized for the change in exchange rate between December 31 and the January collection date. That gain is computed as $1.45 -> $1.50 = $0.05 × 2,000 pounds = $100 gain.
A sale of goods was denominated in a currency other than the entity’s functional currency. The sale resulted in a receivable that was fixed in terms of the amount of foreign currency that would be received. Exchange rates between the functional currency and the currency in which the transaction was denominated changed so that a loss was incurred. The loss should be included as a:
Transaction loss reported as a component of income from continuing operations.
The event described is a foreign currency (FC) transaction, not FC translation, and the loss (or gain) would be reported as a component of income from continuing operations for the current period.
On September 1, 20X5, Cano & Co., a U.S. corporation, sold merchandise to a foreign firm for 250,000 francs. Terms of the sale require payment in francs on February 1, 20X6. On September 1, 20X5, the spot exchange rate was $.20 per franc. At December 31, 20X5, Cano’s year end, the spot rate was $.19, but the rate increased to $.22 by February 1, 20X6, when payment was received.
How much should Cano report as a foreign exchange gain or loss in its 20X6 income statement?
$7,500 gain
A foreign exchange gain or loss is recognized for any change in value of a monetary debt denominated in a foreign currency. This is true at balance sheet time as well as when it is realized.
Thus, a $2,500 loss would have been recognized at December 31, 20X5 (250,000 francs * [.20 - .19]). Then, in 20X6, the full difference between the $.19 and $.22 (250,000 francs * .03) would be realized for a total gain of $7,500.
Which one of the following sets correctly identifies the relationship between a recorded amount and a related settlement amount that will result in an exchange gain on an import transaction and an exchange loss on an export transaction?
Gain on Import Transaction
Loss on Export Transaction
Gain on Import Transaction - Recorded > Settlement
Loss on Export Transaction - Recorded > Settlement
A gain on an import transaction would occur when the recorded amount is greater than the settlement amount, and a loss on an export transaction would occur when the recorded amount is greater than the settlement amount. An import transaction will result in a payable. A gain on a foreign currency payable would occur when the settlement amount is less than the recorded amount. An export transaction will result in a receivable. A loss on a foreign currency receivable would occur when the recorded amount is greater than the settlement amount.
Define “foreign currency transaction.”
When a domestic entity engages in a
transaction with a foreign entity and
the transaction is denominated in (i.e.,
to be settled in) a foreign currency
What is the difference between a
foreign currency forward exchange
contract and a foreign currency option
contract?
In a foreign currency forward contract, an exchange of currencies (or comparable settlement) must occur as provided by the terms of the contract. In a foreign currency option contract, an exchange of currencies may occur at the option of the option holder. If the option is exercised, an exchange of currencies will occur; if it is not exercised, no exchange of currencies will occur.
List the two general purposes for
entering into a forward contract.
- Hedging
2. Speculation
Define “forward exchange contract.”
Agreement to exchange units of
currencies at a specified future date at
an exchange rate set now
What is a forward contract?
An agreement (contract) to buy or sell (or that give the right to buy or sell) a specified commodity in the future at a price (rate) determined at the time the forward contract is executed
What is the nature of a foreign currency
option contract?
An agreement that gives the right (option) to buy or sell a specified amount of a foreign currency at a specified (forward) rate during or at the end of a specified time period
Which of the following kinds of transactions, all denominated in a foreign currency, would be a foreign currency transaction?
Transaction Types:
Export
Lending
Investing
Export - Yes
Lending - Yes
Investing - Yes
Any transaction denominated (that is, to be settled) in a foreign currency is a foreign currency transaction, including import, export, borrowing, lending, and investing transactions.
Which of the following statements concerning foreign exchange forward contracts is/are correct?
I. A foreign currency forward exchange contract will result in the exchange of currencies.
II. All forward contracts require the exchange of currencies
I only.
A foreign currency forward exchange contract will result in the exchange of currencies (Statement I). Unlike foreign currency option contracts, which give the right (but not an obligation) to exchange currencies, foreign currency forward exchange contracts establish an obligation to exchange currencies.
Which of the following is not a characteristic associated with foreign currency transactions?
Occur only when initiated by a foreign entity.
Foreign currency transactions do not occur only when initiated by a foreign entity. A foreign currency transaction occurs when a domestic entity (e.g., U.S. entity) agrees to settle a transaction (pay, receive, exchange, etc.) in a non-domestic (e.g., non-dollar) currency, regardless of whether the transaction is initiated by the domestic entity or the foreign entity.
Forward exchange contracts may be used to:
Hedge Risk
Speculate
Hedge Risk - Yes
Speculate - Yes
Forward exchange contracts may be used both to hedge risk and to speculate. When used to hedge risk, the intent is to use the change in value of the forward exchange contract (hedging instrument) to offset, in part at least, an opposite change in value of whatever is being hedged (hedged item). When used to speculate, the forward exchange contract is entered into with the intent of making a profit on the change in its value.
When used for speculative purposes, which of the following contracts is likely to result in a foreign currency loss to the contract holder who initiated the contract?
Foreign Currency Forward Exchange Contract
Foreign Currency Option Contract
Foreign Currency Forward Exchange Contract - Yes
Foreign Currency Option Contract - No
While a foreign currency forward exchange contract entered into for speculative purposes is likely to result in a foreign currency loss (or gain) for the contract holder, a foreign currency option contract entered into for speculative purposes is not likely to result in a foreign currency loss for the contract holder.. Since the contract holder has the option of whether or not to exercise the contract option to exchange currencies, it is not likely that the option would be exercised if it would result in a loss.
For accounting purposes, which of the following are forward contracts?
Foreign Currency Forward Exchange Contracts
Foreign Currency Option Contracts
Foreign Currency Forward Exchange Contracts - Yes
Foreign Currency Option Contracts - Yes
Both foreign currency forward exchange contracts, which establish an obligation to exchange currencies, and foreign currency option contracts, which give the right (but not an obligation) to exchange currencies, are forward contracts for accounting purposes.
Which one of the following sets correctly identifies the characteristics of foreign currency transactions for a U.S. entity?
Transaction Denominated In
Transaction Measured In
Transaction Denominated In - Non-Dollars
Transaction Measured In - Dollars
For a U.S. entity, a foreign currency transaction will be denominated (settled) in non-dollars, but measured and recorded on the U.S. entity’s books in dollars.
Which of the following general types of transactions could be a foreign currency transaction?
Operating Transactions
Forward Exchange Contract Transactions
Operating Transactions - Yes
Forward Exchange Contract Transactions -Yes
Either operating transactions (export, import, lending, borrowing, investing, etc.) or forward exchange contract transactions (contracts to exchange currencies) could be foreign currency transactions. A foreign currency transaction occurs when a domestic entity (e.g., U.S. entity) agrees to settle a transaction (pay, receive, exchange, etc.) in a non-domestic (e.g., non-dollar) currency.
Which one of the following would be a foreign currency transaction for the U.S. entity?
A U.S. entity purchases goods from a British entity to be settled in pounds sterling.
If a U.S. entity purchases goods from (or sells goods to) a British entity and the U.S. entity is to settle in a currency other than the dollar (pounds sterling), it is a foreign currency transaction to the U.S. entity (but would not be to the British entity). A foreign currency transaction occurs when a domestic entity agrees to settle a transaction in a foreign currency.
What is the risk being hedged when
using a forward contract for
speculation?
There is no separate risk being hedged.
The forward contract and the resulting
loss or gain are recorded in earnings.
Even if the use of a forward contract for hedging prevents a loss (or gain) from exchange rate changes on the hedged item, which of the following may result in a cost to an entity that uses forward contracts for hedging purposes?
I. Fees imposed by the counterparty to the forward contract.
II. A difference between the spot rate and the forward rate when the forward exchange contract is executed.
Both I and II.
A firm that engages in a forward contract will both incur fees imposed by the counterparty and incur the cost of the difference between the spot rate and the forward rate at the time the forward contract is executed. The difference between the spot rate and the forward rate is the premium (or discount) on the forward contract and must be amortized over the life of the contract as a financing expense, not an exchange gain or loss.
Which one of the following sets identifies the correct relationship between a foreign currency hedged item and a hedging instrument?
When the Hedged Then the Hedging Item is Instrument is I. Receivable Receivable II. Receivable Payable
II only.
Because a hedging instrument is intended to offset changes in the hedged item, when the hedged item is a receivable, the hedging instrument would have to be a payable.
The net effect of a change in value of a hedged item and its related hedging instrument may be:
I. A gain.
II. A loss.
III. Neither a gain nor a loss.
I, II, and III.
The net effect of a change in value of a hedged item and its related hedging instrument may be a gain, a loss, or neither a gain nor a loss (a perfect hedge).
Which of the following exchange rates may be used in accounting for a forward contract hedging instrument?
Spot Rate
Forward Rate
Spot Rate - Yes
Forward Rate - Yes
Both the spot rate and the forward rate will be used in accounting for a forward contract used for hedging. The forward rate is used as the basis for determining the change in value of a forward contract. As the forward rate changes, so also will the carrying value of the forward contract, resulting in exchange gains and losses. The spot rate is used to determine the premium or discount on the forward contract. Specifically, the difference between the spot rate and the forward rate at the date of the forward contract is the premium (or discount) on the forward contract, which enters into the determination of income over the life of the contract.
Which one of the following is not a characteristic of hedging?
Assures no gain or loss on the item being hedged.
While the intent of hedging is to mitigate the risk of loss (or gain) attributable to the item being hedged, hedging does not assure that no gain or loss will be incurred on the hedged item. Only in a perfect hedge does no gain or loss occur. In order to be a perfect hedge, the hedging instrument would need to have a 100% inverse correlation to the hedged item. Such an outcome is rare.
What purpose does hedging of foreign
currency commitments serve?
Offsets the risk of exchange rate
changes on a firm commitment
denominated in a foreign currency for a
future purchase or sale
If change in the value of the hedge is ineffective in offsetting the change in the expected cash flow of the forecasted transaction, how should that loss or gain be reported?
The loss or gain should be reported in
current income.
What purpose does hedging of
forecasted transactions serve?
Offsets risk of exchange rate changes on non-firm but budgeted foreign currency transactions between the time the transaction is planned and when it becomes firm
List the criteria for designation of
hedging foreign currency
commitments.
The commitment being hedged
must be firm, be identified, and
present exposure to foreign
currency price changes.
The forward contract must be designated and effective as a hedge of a commitment and must be in an amount that does not exceed the amount of the commitment
What purpose does hedging of a
forecasted transaction serve?
Offsets the risk of exchange rate
changes on non-firm but budgeted
transactions denominated in a foreign
currency
If the change in value of the forward contract is effective in offsetting a decrease or an increase in the expected cash flow of the forecasted transaction, how should the gain or the loss be deferred and reported?
The gain or the loss should be deferred
and reported as a component of other
comprehensive income.
List the criteria for designation of
hedging forecasted transactions.
The forecasted transaction must be identified, probable of occurring, and present an exposure to foreign currency price changes; and
Use of a forward contract to
hedge must be consistent with
company risk management
policy.
What purpose does hedging of
recognized assets or liabilities serve?
Hedges exposed receivables or payables to offset the risk of exchange rate changes on already booked assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency
What purpose does hedging of
available-for-sale investments serve?
Offsets the risk of exchange rate changes on this class of investments denominated in a foreign currency
What purpose does hedging of
unrecognized firm commitments serve?
Offsets the risk of exchange rate
changes on firm commitments for a
future purchase or sale to be
denominated in a foreign currency
What kind of hedge is the hedge of a
firm commitment?
The hedge of a firm commitment can
be either a fair value hedge or a cash
flow hedge.
What kind of a hedge is the hedge of a
forecasted transaction?
A cash flow hedge
What purpose does hedging of net
investment in foreign operations serve?
Offsets risk of exchange rate changes
on an investment in a foreign operation
Which one of the following is not a characteristic associated with hedging foreign currency firm commitments?
The hedged item is for an already booked asset or liability.
A firm commitment exists when an entity has a contractual obligation or right, but has not yet recorded the obligation or right because it does not meet the requirements of GAAP. Therefore, an asset or liability has not been booked (recognized) already.
If a firm commitment denominated in a foreign currency is hedged with a forward exchange contract, which of the following statements is/are correct?
I. Even though the firm commitment is hedged, a net gain or loss can be reported.
II. As a result of hedging the firm commitment, an otherwise unrecognized asset or liability may have to be recognized.
Both I and II.
Both Statement I and Statement II are correct. Even though a firm commitment is hedged, a net gain or loss can be reported (Statement I) if the changes in value of the firm commitment (hedged item) and the forward contract (hedging instrument) are not identical. Additionally, as a result of hedging a firm commitment, an otherwise unrecognized asset or liability may have to be recognized (Statement II) to offset any gain or loss recognized on the forward contract.
Based on preliminary discussions with a foreign customer, Alcoco, a U.S. entity, budgeted a significant sale to the foreign entity denominated in its foreign currency expected in June 20X9. To hedge the risk of an adverse exchange rate change on the dollar value of the expected sale, on January 2, 20X9, Alcoco entered into a forward exchange contract to sell an amount of the foreign currency equal to the expected sale. On March 31, 20X9, the value of the expected sale amount in dollars had decreased by $3,800. The fair value of the forward contract at that date had increased by $4,000. Which one of the following is the amount that should be recognized in current income for the forward contract only (the hedging instrument) in Alcoco’s quarterly financial statements as of March 31?
$200
The ineffective portion of the (cash flow) hedge should be reported in current income. The effective portion of the hedge ($3,800) should be reported in other comprehensive income, and the ineffective portion ($200) should be reported in current income. The effective portion of the hedge is the amount of change in the forward contract (hedging instrument) equal to the change in the fair value of the expected sale amount (the hedged item) ($3,800); the ineffective portion is the difference ($200) and should be reported in current income.
A hedge to offset the risk of exchange rate changes on converting the financial statements of a foreign subsidiary to the domestic (functional) currency would be the hedge of:
A net investment in a foreign operation.
A hedge to offset the risk of exchange rate changes on converting the financial statements of a foreign subsidiary to the domestic (functional) currency would be the hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. Changes in exchange rates will result in changes in the amount of domestic (functional) currency that will result from converting (translating) financial statements from a foreign currency. Hedges of net investments in a foreign operation are intended to offset that risk.
Which of the following types of firm commitment denominated in a foreign currency can be hedged?
Firm Purchase Commitments
Firm Sales Commitments
Firm Purchase Commitments - Yes
Firm Sales Commitments - Yes
Both firm purchase commitments and firm sales commitments can be hedged. A firm commitment exists when an entity has a contractual obligation or right, but has not yet recorded the obligation or right because it does not meet the requirements of GAAP. The risk of an exchange rate change on the contract is the same as if the purchase or sale had been recognized, and such risk can be hedged.
What kind of hedge can be used to hedge a foreign currency firm commitment?
Cash Flow
Fair Value
Cash Flow - Yes
Fair Value - Yes
A forward contract used to hedge a foreign currency firm commitment can be either a cash flow hedge (as permitted by the FASB’s Derivatives Implementation Group) or a fair value hedge (as permitted by FASB #133).
Which of the following types of planned transactions to be denominated in a foreign currency can be hedged?
Planned Sale
Planned Purchase
Planned Sale - Yes
Planned Purchase - Yes
Either a planned sale or a planned purchase would be a forecasted transaction and, if denominated in a foreign currency, could be hedged.
Either a planned sale or a planned purchase would be a forecasted transaction and, if denominated in a foreign currency, could be hedged.
Which one of the following correctly reflects a set of events that may result in a sequence of related hedges?
Forecasted transaction -> firm commitment -> recognized liability.
A forecasted transaction (a planned or expected transaction) would occur before a firm commitment, which would occur before a recognized liability. A forecasted transaction is a non-firm but intended (perhaps even budgeted) transaction. A firm commitment exists when an entity has a contractual obligation or right, but has not yet recorded the obligation or right because it does not meet the requirement of GAAP. A recognized liability would be one that is already booked by the entity. Thus, the correct sequence would be forecasted transaction -> firm commitment -> recognized liability.
What purpose does hedging of a
recognized asset/liability serve?
Offsets the risk of exchange rate
changes on an existing asset or liability
What purpose does hedging of an
investment in foreign operations serve?
Offsets risk of exchange rate changes
on translation of financial statements
of foreign operation from foreign
currency to dollars
What is the purpose of a hedge of a
foreign currency–denominated
investment classified as available-for-sale?
Offsets the risk of exchange rate
changes on a foreign currency–
denominated investment in securities
classified as available for sale.
List the criteria for designation of
hedging recognized assets/liabilities.
The asset or liability is
denominated in a foreign
currency and has already been
booked.
The gain or loss on the hedged
asset or liability must be
recognized in earnings.
List the criteria for designation of
hedging investments available for sale.
The securities being hedged must
be identified and must not be
traded in the investor’s currency.
The forward contract must be designated and highly effective as a hedge of the investment, and in an amount that does not exceed the amount of the investment being hedged.
List the criteria for designation of
hedging investments in foreign
operations.
The use of a hedge instrument to hedge
net investment in foreign operations
requires that the contract:
Is designated as a hedge of net
investment and
Is highly effective.
What hedge form can a hedge of a
recognized asset or liability be
designated as?
Either a cash flow hedge or a fair value
hedge
A hedge of a net investment in a foreign
operation is what type of hedge?
A fair value hedge
What kind of hedge is a hedge of an
investment available for sale?
A fair value hedge
Hedging a recognized asset is intended to offset the risk of exchange rate changes between which of the following dates?
Between the dates an asset is recognized and when the asset is fully satisfied.
The time between when an asset is recognized and when the asset is fully satisfied would be intended to offset the risk of changes in the exchange rate on a recognized asset (or liability).
Which of the following statements concerning the hedging of an investment in a foreign operation is/are correct?
I. The hedged item is the result of translating the foreign operation’s financial statements.
II. Only forward contracts can be used to hedge an investment in a foreign operation.
I only.
Statement I is correct; Statement II is not. In the hedging of an investment in a foreign operation, the hedged item is the result of translating the foreign operation’s financial statements from a foreign currency to the functional currency (Statement I). The intent of the hedge is to offset changes in the translated results that are caused by changes in exchange rates. Statement II is not correct; either derivatives (e.g., forward contracts) or non-derivatives can be used to hedge an investment in a foreign operation. For example, borrowing in the same foreign currency would hedge the investment, but the borrowing is not necessarily a derivative (e.g., forward contract).
Which of the following actions would an entity most likely take to hedge an investment in a foreign operation?
Borrow from another foreign entity with the same foreign currency as the operation being hedged.
Borrowing from another foreign entity with the same foreign currency as the operation being hedged would hedge the (equity) investment in the foreign operation. Since the equity investment in a foreign operation is an asset and the borrowing would be a liability, both in the same foreign currency, a change in the exchange rate would have offsetting effects. Thus, if an exchange rate change caused a decrease in the value of the investment (asset), it would cause an increase in the value of the borrowing (liability).
What general kind of hedge, if any, is the hedge of a recognized asset or liability?
I. Fair value.
II. Cash flow.
Either I or II.
The hedge of a recognized asset or liability may be either a fair value hedge or a cash flow hedge, depending on management’s designation. However, the hedge of a recognized asset or liability denominated in a foreign currency generally will be a cash flow hedge.
Which of the following statements concerning the use of a forward contract to hedge a foreign currency investment held available-for-sale is/are correct?
I. The investment security must not be traded in the investor’s functional currency.
II. The forward contract used as the hedging instrument must be highly effective in hedging the investment.
Both I and II.
Both Statement I and Statement II are correct. In hedging a foreign currency investment held available-for-sale, the investment security must not be traded in the investor’s functional currency, and the forward contract used as the hedging instrument must be highly effective in hedging the investment.
On December 12, 20X8, Averseco entered into a forward exchange contract to purchase 100,000 units of a foreign currency in 90 days. The contract was designated as and qualified as a fair value hedge of a purchase of inventory made that day and payable in March 20X9. The relevant direct exchange rates between the foreign currency and the dollar are as follows:
Spot Rate Forward Rate (for March 12, 20X9) December 12, 20X8 $0.88 $0.90 December 31, 20X8 0.98 0.93
At December 31, 20X8, what amount of foreign currency transaction net gain or loss should Averseco recognize in income as a result of its foreign currency obligation and related hedge contract? (Ignore premium/discount and present value considerations.)
$7,000
The net loss will be $7,000. The gain or loss on the payable will be measured as the number of foreign currency units multiplied by the change in the spot rate between the date the liability arose, December 12, and the end of the year, December 31. Thus, the loss on the payable will be 100,000 foreign currency units × ($0.98 − $0.88 = $0.10) = $10,000. The gain or loss on the forward contract (disregarding any premium/discount at initiation of the contract and without using a present value factor) will be measured as the number of foreign currency units multiplied by the change in the forward rate between the date the contract was executed, December 12, and the end of the year, December 31. Thus, the gain on the forward contract will be 100,000 foreign currency units × ($0.93 − $0.90 = .03) = $3,000. The net will be $10,000 − $3,000 = $7,000, the correct answer.
On December 12, 20X8, Imp Co. entered into a forward exchange contract to hedge a purchase of inventory in November 2008, payable in March 20X9. The forward contract was to purchase 100,000 Euros in 90 days as a fair value hedge of the payable due in March. The relevant direct exchange rates were as follows:
Spot Rate Forward Rate (for 3/12/X9) December 12, 20X8 $1.86 $1.80 December 31, 20X8 $1.96 $1.83
At December 31, 20X8, what amount of foreign currency transaction gain should Imp include in income from this forward contract only? (Ignore discount and present value considerations.)
$3,000
The gain (or loss) recognized on the contract will be computed as the number of Euros to be purchased (100,000E) multiplied by the change in the forward exchange rate between the date the contract was executed ($1.80) and the end of the fiscal period, December 31, 20X8 (1.83). Therefore, the gain recognized will be 100,000E × ($1.83 − $1.80 = $0.03) = $3,000. It is a gain because the forward contract increased in value as of December 31. The gain on the forward contract will partially offset the loss on the inventory for the period. A complete determination of the gain on the forward contract (only) would include amortization of the difference between the spot rate and forward rate at the initiation of the contract ($6,000) and discounting the nominal gain of $3,000 for the period December 31 to the March settlement date.
What general kind of hedge, if any, is the hedge of an available-for-sale investment denominated in a foreign currency?
I. Fair value.
II. Cash flow.
I only.
The hedge of an available-for-sale investment denominated in a foreign currency is a fair value hedge. The risk hedged is the effect of exchange rate changes on the fair value in dollars of the investment.
What is the risk being hedged when
using a forward contract for
speculation?
There is no separate risk being hedged.
The forward contract and the resulting
loss or gain are recorded in earnings.
How are forward contracts entered into
for speculative purposes accounted
for?
The forward exchange contract is measured (valued) and recorded at the forward exchange rate (quoted now) for exchanges that will occur at the maturity date of the contract. Any change in value resulting from changing forward exchange rates will be recognized in current income.
What purpose does foreign currency
speculation serve?
To make a gain as a result of exchange rate changes by buying foreign currency for future delivery at a price lower than its value when delivered or by selling foreign currency for future delivery at a price higher than it can be bought at delivery date.
On November 2, 20X5, Platt Co. entered into a 90 day futures contract to purchase 50,000 Swiss francs when the contract quote was $.70. The purchase was for speculation in price movement. The following exchange rates existed during the contract period:
30 day futures Spot rate November 2, 20X5 $.62 $.63 December 31, 20X5 .65 .64 January 30, 20X6 .65 .68
What amount should Platt report as foreign currency exchange loss in its income statement for the year ended December 31, 2005?
$2,500
A futures contract entered into for speculative purposes (not to hedge) is valued using futures rates, and any gain or loss as a result of changes in futures rates is recognized in net income in the period during which the rate changed. At initiation of Platt’s contract, the 90-day futures rate was $.70, as quoted in the contract. On December 31, 20X5, 30 days before Platt’s contract was to be settled, the 30-day futures rate was $.65. Platt’s loss would be computed as follows:
November 2, 20X5, 50,000 Swiss francs × $.70 = $35,000
December 31, 20X5, 50,000 Swiss francs × $.65 = $32,500
Loss in dollar value of futures contract = $2,500
Which of the following statements concerning the use of a forward contract for speculative purposes is/are correct?
I. The forward contract is not intended to offset an existing risk.
II. Changes in the value of the forward contract are deferred until the contract matures.
I only.
When used for speculative purposes, a forward contract is not entered into to offset, or hedge, an existing risk. Rather, the purpose of entering into a speculative forward contract is to make a profit. Statement II is not correct. Changes in the value of a forward contract used for speculative purposes, measured using the forward rate, are recognized in the period in which the forward rate changes and are not deferred until the contract matures.
or forward contracts entered into for speculative purposes, which of the following exchange rates, if any, will be used to measure the contracts prior to maturity?
Spot Rate
Forward Rate
Spot Rate - No
Forward Rate - Yes
The forward rate is used, and the spot rate is not. When a forward contract is entered into for speculative purposes, the contract is measured using the forward rates as of the dates the contract is initiated and at any subsequent measurement date(s) (e.g., balance sheet date). Changes in the forward rate create gains and losses on the forward contract, which are recognized in the period in which the forward rate changes.
A hedge to offset the risk of loss on a recognized asset or liability is which of the following types of hedge?
Either a cash flow hedge or a fair value hedge, at management’s discretion.
A hedge to offset the risk of loss on a recognized asset or liability could be either a cash flow hedge or a fair value hedge, at management’s discretion. If the risk of loss on the recognized asset or liability being hedged is from changes in exchange rates, the hedge would be classified as a cash flow hedge.
A hedge to offset the risk of loss on a recognized asset or liability is which of the following types of hedge?
Either a cash flow hedge or a fair value hedge, at management’s discretion.
A hedge to offset the risk of loss on a recognized asset or liability could be either a cash flow hedge or a fair value hedge, at management’s discretion
In which of the following hedges using a forward contract will at least a portion of any currency exchange gain or loss on the hedging instrument be reported as a translation adjustment in other comprehensive income?
Net investment in foreign operations hedge.
The hedge of a net investment in foreign operations is a fair value hedge, but changes in the fair value of the forward contract (hedging instrument) that are equal to or less than the change in the translated value of the financial statements of the foreign operation are reported as a translation adjustment in other comprehensive income. The change in the forward contract reported as a translation adjustment offsets the change in the value of the translated financial statements of the foreign operation, which also are reported as a translation adjustment.
In which of the following hedges will at least a portion of any currency exchange gain or loss on the hedging instrument be reported as a translation adjustment in other comprehensive income?
Net investment in foreign operations hedge.
The hedge of a net investment in foreign operations offsets the change in the value of the translated financial statements of the foreign operation, which also are reported as a translation adjustment.
On December 12, Year 1, Imp Co. entered into three forward exchange contracts, each to purchase 100,000 francs in 90 days. The relevant exchange rates are as follows:
Spot rate Forward rate (for March 12, Year 2) December 12, Year 1 $.88 $.90 December 31, Year 1 .98 .93
Imp entered into the third forward contract for speculation. At December 31, Year 1, what amount of foreign currency gain should Imp include in income from this forward contract?
$3,000
All gains and losses in a speculative forward foreign exchange contract are included in income of the period in which the forward exchange rate changes. Gains and losses are measured based on the purchase price of the contract and its current settlement value using forward rates.
In this case, those rates are the $.90 purchase price (forward rate December 12) and the $.93 settlement price (forward rate December 31). Thus, this $3,000 amount is correct [($.93-$.90)100,000].
In September 1, 2004, Brady Corp. entered into a foreign exchange contract for speculative purposes by purchasing 50,000 Euros for delivery in 60 days. The rates to exchange $1 for 1 Euro follow:
9/1/04 9/30/04 Spot rate .75 .70 30-day forward rate .73 .72 60-day forward rate .74 .73
In its September 30, 2004, income statement, what amount should Brady report as foreign exchange loss?
$1,000
The correct answer is the difference between the 60-day forward rate on September 1 of $0.74 and the 30-day forward rate on September 30 of $0.72, or $0.02 × 50,000 Euros = $1,000, the correct amount of the loss.
On November 1, year 2, Kir Co. signed a contract to purchase 10,000 British pounds on February 2, year 3. The relevant exchange rates are as follows:
Spot rate Forward rate November 1, year 2 $1.98 $2.05 December 31, year 2 2.00 2.06
Kir accounts for the forward contract as a speculative transaction. What amount of gain, if any, should Kir report from this forward contract in its income statement for the year ended December 31, year 2?
$100
Forward contracts are derivatives, and all derivatives are recorded at fair value with unrealized gains and losses recorded in earnings. (The only exception is for certain derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting.) The forward contract price is at $2.05 on November 1, and the forward price increased to $2.06 on December 31. Kir is in a gain position because the November forward contract to buy (Kir’s strike price) is less than the December forward price. The 10,000 British pounds times $.01 is $100 gain.
When does Functional currency =
Another foreign currency?
When a foreign entity generates most of its cash flows in the currency of another foreign country or when it is required to use another currency by law or contract.
What is a functional currency?
It is the currency of the primary economic environment in which an entity operates and generates net cash flows. It can be the recording currency, an affiliate's reporting currency, or another currency.
When does Functional currency = Reporting currency ($)?
The functional currency would be the
reporting currency:
When the foreign entity is a direct
and integral component or
extension of a U.S. entity’s
operations; or
When the local economy of the
foreign entity is highly
inflationary.
What is a recording currency?
It is the currency in which an entity maintains its books of accounts. Normally, the recording currency is the local currency of the country in which an entity is located.
When does Functional currency =
(Local, foreign) Recording currency?
When operations of the foreign entity are relatively self-contained and integrated within the country in which it is located, and the economy of that country is not in hyperinflation.
What is foreign currency translation?
It is the conversion (translation) of financial statements expressed in one currency into comparable financial statements expressed in another currency.
What is a reporting currency?
It is the currency in which final financial
statements are expressed.