Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Famous Court Cases > Famous Court Cases > Flashcards

Famous Court Cases Flashcards

1
Q

Marbury v Madison

A

Who: William Marbury and James Madison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Marbury v Madison

A

What: The court case was about Marbury wanting his judge job after Jefferson told Madison to hold commissions, which was declared unconstitutional.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Marbury v Madison

A

When: Argued February 11, 1803. Decided Feb 24, 1803

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Marbury v Madison

A

Where: The White House in Washington DC is where this trial took place.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Marbury v Madison

A

Why: This case is significant because it was declared unconstitutional, which established the principle of judicial review.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Marbury v Madison

A

What: Technically there was no Supreme Court ruling, although they said it was wrong of Jefferson and Madison to prevent Marbury from his justice job.\

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Dred Scott v Sanford

A

Who Dred Scott John Sanford

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Dred Scott v Sanford

A

What The case was about a slave (scott) trying to be free in a free state(Missouri)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Dred Scott v Sanford

A

When March,6 1857

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Dred Scott v Sanford

A

Where Started in Missouri and ended at the supreme court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Dred Scott v Sanford

A

Why Proved slaves aren’t really free

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Dred Scott v Sanford

A

What Scott won 7-2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Plessy v Ferguson

A

Who Southerners, Homer Adolph Plessy, John H. Ferguson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Plessy v Ferguson

A

What Law in the railways that stated that colored people had to have seperate cars to ride in on the trains.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Plessy v Ferguson

A

When June 7th 1892

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Plessy v Ferguson

A

Where Plessy bought a train ticket from New Orleans to Covington, Louisiana.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Plessy v Ferguson

A

Why This case helped with cases to come in the future. It also showed our view on colored people in this time period.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Plessy v Ferguson

A

What The Supreme court voted no and that the 14th amendment applied only to political and civil rights and not to social rights. 7-1. 1 ostaining

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Korematsu v United States

A

Who-Fred Korematsu

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Korematsu v United States

A

What-Was the military’s exclusion order justified? The court disagreed.They put forth their position that the order should have been considered as a whole, and the Court should have considered other orders, all of which, when considered together resulted in the imprisonment of U.S. citizens in what were essentially concentration camps, based only on their race.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Korematsu v United States

A

Why-They showed that the government’s legal team had intentionally suppressed or destroyed evidence from government intelligence agencies reporting that Japanese Americans posed no military threat to the U.S.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Korematsu v United States

A

Where-On May 30, 1942, about six months after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, the FBI arrested California(Oakland) Korematsu for failure to report to a relocation center.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Korematsu v United States

A

When-December 18, 1944

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Korematsu v United States

A

What- Having violated an exclusion order requiring him to submit to forced relocation during World War II.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Brown v Board of Education

A

Who Linda Brown, Oliver Brown, Thurgood Marshall, Earl Warren. There were also 4 judges that were in the case and left during it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Brown v Board of Education

A

What The Justice wanted the case to end with a unanimous vote and he rewrote the summation more than one time to have the full vote and it ended with a full vote saying separate is not equal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Brown v Board of Education

A

Why The case helped to end segregation in public schooling. It helped to show that “separate but equal” was not equal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Brown v Board of Education

A

Where This case was based in Topeka, KS then once the case was brought up it went to the Supreme court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Brown v Board of Education

A

When Arrived at Supreme Court 1952. Verdict delivered May 1954. Trial took a total of 2 years.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Brown v Board of Education

A

What This case was started because Oliver Brown’s daughter Linda Brown had to go to a school 2 miles away rather than one a couple blocks away just because of the color of her skin.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Gideon v Wainwright

A

Who: Clarence Earl Gideon was the defendant.Louie L. Wainwright was the connections director. Earl Warren was the Chief Justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Gideon v Wainwright

A

What Clarence was accused of breaking and entering and showed up to court without a lawyer and demanded the court give him one. They didnt and he was found guilty.

33
Q

Gideon v Wainwright

A

When It was argued on Jan 15, 1963 It was decided on Mar 18, 1963

34
Q

Gideon v Wainwright

A

Where Panama City Florida. Then Florida Supreme Court

35
Q

Gideon v Wainwright

A

Why it decides whether you are provided a lawyer in court or not

36
Q

Gideon v Wainwright

A

What a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Hugo L. Black, the Court held that it was consistent with the Constitution to require state courts to appoint attorneys for defendants who could not afford to retain counsel on their own.

37
Q

Mapp v Ohio

A

Who- Dollree Mapp and the state of Ohio

38
Q

Mapp v Ohio

A

What- police officers forced their way into Dollree Mapp’s house without a proper search warrant. Police believed that Mapp was harboring a suspected bomber, and demanded entry.

39
Q

Mapp v Ohio

A

When- March 29th, 1961 and decided on June 19th,1961

40
Q

Mapp v Ohio

A

Where- Cleveland, Ohio

41
Q

Mapp v Ohio

A

Why-It was a violation of the 4th Amendment

42
Q

Mapp v Ohio

A

What-6- 3 mapp won

43
Q

New York Times v Sullivan

A

Who: Petitioners - Herbert Wechsler, William P. Rogers, Samuel R. Pierce, Jr.
Respondent - M. Roland Nachman, Jr.

44
Q

New York Times v Sullivan

A

Why: It is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the freedom of speech protections in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution restrict the ability of American public officials to sue for defamation.

45
Q

New York Times v Sullivan

A

Where: New York City

46
Q

New York Times v Sullivan

A

When: August 30, 1962 Sullivan took The New York Times to the Alabama court. The Alabama Supreme Court affirmed Sullivan’s claim. The New York Times appealed to the United States Supreme court. The court decided to hear them Januaray 6, 1964, the ruling date was March 9, 1964.

47
Q

New York Times v Sullivan

A

What: The city of Montgomery, Alabama, was already under considerable civic stress when The New York Times published a full-page ad titled “Heed Their Rising Voices” on March 29, 1960. On February 25, 35 students from the all-black Alabama State College sought service in a snack bar in the basement of the Montgomery County Courthouse. Two days later, most of the 800 students at Alabama State marched to the state capitol to protest Patterson’s actions. Among the people in Alabama who read the ad was Merton Roland Nachman, the foremost libel lawyer in Montgomery and one of the best in the state. The city commissioners were easily convinced, and Nachman began proceedings on their behalf in state court.

48
Q

New York Times v Sullivan

A

(9 - 0 ) Unanimous ruling.

49
Q

Miranda v Arizona

A

Who: Eresto Miranda V. The state of Arizona, Chief Justice Earl Warren

50
Q

Miranda v Arizona

A

What: Miranda was arrested on charges of rape and kidnapping but was not read his rights and therefore was wrongfully interrogated without a lawyer, where the police managed to get a written confession.

51
Q

Miranda v Arizona

A

When: Arrested on March 13, 1963. The case lasted from Feb. 1966 to June 1966.

52
Q

Miranda v Arizona

A

Where: Phoenix, Arizona

53
Q

Miranda v Arizona

A

Why: Significant because it thenceforth required police to read rights to anyone arrested, named the “Miranda Rights”

54
Q

Miranda v Arizona

A

What: The ruling ended in favor of Miranda in a 5-4 vote.

55
Q

Loving v Virginia

A

Who: Mildred Jeter, Richard Loving, and Chief Justice Warren

56
Q

Loving v Virginia

A

What: The case began when Mildred, a black woman, and Richard, a white man, went to the District of Columbia to get married, then returned to their home in Virginia. The couple was then sentenced to a year in jail for violating the state’s antimiscegenation statute, which banned interracial marriage.

57
Q

Loving v Virginia

A

When: 1967

58
Q

Loving v Virginia

A

Where: Central Point, Virginia

59
Q

Loving v Virginia

A

Why: Made interracial marriage leagal for future cases

60
Q

Loving v Virginia

A

What: (9-0) The judges ruled in favor of the interracial couple

61
Q

Roe v Wade

A

Who- Jane Roe- This was a fictional name used to protect, Norma McCorvey. Henry Wade- The district attorney of Dallas County, Texas, where Roe resided.

62
Q

Roe v Wade

A

What-They ruled 7-2 that abortion should be legal across the U.S.

63
Q

Roe v Wade

A

When-January 22, 1937

64
Q

Roe v Wade

A

Where-Texas

65
Q

Roe v Wade

A

What-The court case was held that a womens right to an abortion was implicit in the right to privacy protected by the 14th amendment.

66
Q

Roe v Wade

A

Why-It made it legal for women to choose to have an abortion or not.

67
Q

Lawrence v Texas

A

Who- John Geddes Lawrence and Tyron Garner against the State of Texas

68
Q

Lawrence v Texas

A

What- 6-3 vote lawrence won

69
Q

Lawrence v Texas

A

Why- Because it recognized that Texas’s anti sodomy laws were unconstitutional

70
Q

Lawrence v Texas

A

Where- Houston, Texas

71
Q

Lawrence v Texas

A

When- March 26th 2003 it took 3 months to decide outcome

72
Q

Lawrence v Texas

A

What- Lawrence and Garner were arrested for having sexual relations with the same sex. A violation of Texas law

73
Q

United States v Richard Nixon

A

United States v Richard Nixon

Who: Nixon, his aides and the United States Representatives

74
Q

United States v Richard Nixon

A

What: Nixon hired aides to break into democratic offices to ensure his re-election for the next term. The aides broke into the offices twice and got caught the second time.

75
Q

United States v Richard Nixon

A

When: The agents got caught on June 17, 1972. The case reached the Supreme Court on July 8, 1974 and the final decision was made on July 24, 1974.

76
Q

United States v Richard Nixon

A

Where: The Watergate Building in Washington DC

77
Q

United States v Richard Nixon

A

Why: The President can’t keep secrets just like the people of the US can’t keep secrets

78
Q

United States v Richard Nixon

A

What: The United States won unanimously but one of the justices abstained due to having interactions with the Nixon Administration

Famous Court Cases (1 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions