Family Property Flashcards

1
Q

There is a presumption of a resulting trust when Y transfers property to X if no consideration is supplied. Which case?

A

Re Vindogradoff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

There is a presumption from Y to X mathematically equivalent to the percentage contribution of a property purchase price. Which case?

A

Burns v Burns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

There is a presumption of advancement if X is Y’s father and X voluntarily transfers property to Y. Which case?

A

Bennet v Bennit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

There is a presumption of advancement if X is Y’s husband or fiance and X voluntarily transfers property to Y. Which case?

A

Pettit v Pettit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Presumptions can easily be rebutted with evidence of intentions. Which case?

A

McGrath v Wallis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Retention of title deeds will rebut the presumption of advancement. Which case?

A

Warren v Gurney

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Only acts/statements that occurred at the time of transaction are admissible of evidence which explains intentions. Which case?

A

Shepherd v Cartright

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Evidence of fraudulent or illegal motives cannot be used to rebut presumptions. Which case?

A

Gascoigne v Gascoigne

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

An illegal purpose which has not been carried into effect may be raised in evidence, which case?

A

Tribe v Tribe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

If the illegal purpose is not needed to establish the rebuttal this will not defeat a resulting trust.

A

Tinsley v Milligan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the two types of constructive trust?

A
  1. Express common intention constructive trust

2. Implied conduct common intention constructive trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What must exist for an express common intention constructive trust?

A
  1. An agreement or understanding
  2. Supported by detrimental reliance

Lloyds Bank v Rossey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is necessary for an implied common intention constructive trust?

A

“Contribution to the purchase price or mortgage payments”. “Nothing less will do”. Lord Bridge Lloyds Bank v Rosset

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

In which case was it suggested that instead of mortgage payments, contribution to repairs might suffice

A

Le Foe v Le Foe; Stack v Dowden

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

If a common intention constructive trust is established, how should it be calculated?

A

Taking into account the implied common intentions of the parties (Baroness Hale at [69] of Stack v Dowden)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The whole course of dealings of the parties is what is significant. Which case?

A

Jones v Kernott

17
Q

What is necessary for proprietary estoppel?

A

An assurance given to that they are entitled to an interest in the property. This can be active or passive (Pascoe v Turner)

18
Q

Detrimental reliance is necessary on the assurance. Which case?

A

Gillet v Holt

19
Q

The quantification of the equity is flexible. It depends on factors in which case?

A

Jennings v Rice

20
Q

Name three factors in Jennings v Rice

A

Defendant’s practical benefit
Claimant’s detriment
Unconscionability