Family Law Notes Flashcards
Who does the divorce/marital property act apply to?
Only legally married people
Definition of spouse under divorce act
Either of two persons who are married to each other
Definition of spouse under marital property act
Married person
Definition of cohabit under marital property act
Live together in a conjugal relationship
Marriage must be
Voluntary and lawful union of two persons to the exclusion of all others
Polygamous Marriage
- Indictable offence in the Criminal Code
- Still part of family law because Canada is so immigration heavy
What are the states a marriage can be?
Valid, void, voidable
NB Marriage Act on validity of marriage
Marriage only valid if parties were legally competent
Moss v Moss
Need voluntary consent of both parties and absence of legal incapacity to marry
Void
- Null and void from inception (as if it never took place)
- Parties in the marriage can have it void as well as third parties who have an interest
- Can be brought after death
Voidable
- Treated as valid unless and until it is annulled (not void on its face)
- Third party cannot get an order for this
- Cannot be brought after one party has died
Unsoundness of mind
- Alcohol/drug intoxication
- Voidable when to the point the person cannot understand what they are doing at the time of marriage
- Person who can do it: drunk one
Duress
- Fear for some other person
- Voidable
- Person who can do it: coerced person
Fraud
- Voidable if it is a misrepresentation as to what the ceremony is
- Not if you are misrepresented to as to character
- Person who can do it: person misrepresented to
Mistake
- Voidable
- 2 Kinds: 1) Mistake as to identity (who they are) 2) Mistake as to the ceremony
- If mistake about attributes not voidable
- Person who can do it: whoever was mistaken
Intention/Motives
- Marriage of convenience (ex: arranged marriage)
- Valid
- If have capacity to consent to marriage the courts will consider it valid
Age
- Depends on the age
- 7=void
- 7-12= voidable at option of underage party
- 12+ is okay depending on province and requires parental consent
Prohibited degrees
- Marrying close relative
- Void if linear relation
- Other lines are okay
Non-consummation of marriage
- Voidable if not able to consummate
- If you just don’t want to not voidable
- Person who can do it: either
What are the sources of family law?
1) Provincial (only applies to its specific province)
2) Federal (applies to marriages in any province)
3) Judge made law (case law)
Provincial Legislation
- Family Services Act
- Marital Property Act
Federal Legislation
- Divorce Act
- Federal Child support guidelines
Under Family Services Act what is a parent?
Mother and father and includes: a guardian and a person who the child ordinarily resides with who has demonstrated a settled intention to treat the child as family
Under Family Services Act Parent does not include
1) Foster parent
2) Prospective adopting parent
3) Natural parent/ adoptive parent whose rights to guardianship have been terminated
4) *natural father of child who is not married to the mother unless he signed birth registration or there has been statutory declaration or parent under ordinarily reside provision
Definition of Spouse under Family Services Act
A person who is married to another by virtue of a legally constituted marriage, except where otherwise defined (broadened for Support/custody/access)
Family Services Act definition of spouse under support/custody/access section
Either of 2 people who:
a) Are married
b) Marriage is voidable but has not been avoided
c) Have gone through a form of marriage in good faith that is void and are cohabitation/have cohabited within the preceding year
Support obligations of spouse, father, and persons who have lived together under the Family Services Act
1) Spouse obliged to support themselves/ other spouse in accordance with need to the extent capable
2) Father obliged to support mother of child in relation to the child in accordance with need to the extent capable
3) Unmarried persons who have lived together have the same obligation under (1) if they: a) continuously live together for no less than 3 years in which one person is substantially dependent; or b) lived with some permanence where there is a child born of whom they are natural parents
Which act deals with Domestic Contracts?
Marital property act
What are the types of domestic contract?
1) Marriage Contract
2) Domestic Contract
3) Separation agreement
Marriage Contract
Contract two people enter before or during marriage while cohabitation in which they agree to their rights and obligations under marriage or on separation including property rights and support
**cannot agree on custody/ access of children
Domestic Contract
- Contract entered into by two people cohabitating that are not married in which they agree to rights/obligations during cohabitation, its end, or death including property rights and support.
- If parties marry becomes a marriage contract
**cannot agree on custody/ access
Separation agreement
Two persons who cohabitated and are or have agreed to living separate and apart enter into this contract for rights and obligations including: property rights, support obligations, custody/access, and other matter
Execution of Domestic Contract
Domestic Contract or any agreement to amend/rescind one must be:
1) In writing
2) Signed by the parties bound to it
3) Be Witnessed
Capacity to enter a domestic contract
- A minor who has capacity to marry has capacity to contract
- Someone (who is not the spouse) can enter into a contract on behalf of mentally incompetent person
- For both of these though, a court must approve
What is paramount in domestic contracts?
Best interest of the child: court may disregard provisions about custody, access, or support if they are of the opinion it is in the best interest of the child to do so
Paramountcy of domestic contract provision
If conflict between the Marital property act and domestic contract, the domestic contract prevails (if not an exception)
When may the court disregard a provision of a domestic contract?
- Best interest of child
- If it is of the opinion that applying the provision would be inequitable because it was made before 1981 OR the spouse challenging the provision DID NOT RECIEVE INDEPENDENT LEGAL ADVICE
What is restricted for being contracted for? (what isn’t binding)
- Custody/access/support
- CPP/Child Tax Benefits (if they say they won’t touch, government not bound by this)
Where does the law for setting aside a domestic contract come from?
Case law… NB doesn’t have specific legislation for it
Hartshorne v Hartshorne
Setting aside is a high threshold– almost impossible to set aside if you got independent legal advice
Rick v Brandsema
Even though the wife had independent legal advice her mental state gave them reason to set it aside
Miglin v Miglin
2 stage test for whether to uphold separation agreement:
1) Formation of agreement: Was the agreement “unimpeachably negotiated”? (did one party take advantage)
2) Correspondence with parties original intentions: Were the current circumstances anticipated when the agreement was drafted?
*must look at agreement in totality
Levan v Levan
- Husband didn’t disclose assets
- Difference between disclosing the value of assets and disclosing that they exist
- Easy for parties to determine the value BUT if one deliberately withholds info about them then agreement set aside
Arsenault v Arsenault
- Common law setting aside (not based on legislative provisions- set aside even though ILA)
- Contract set aside at common law using Miglin test
- If not successful setting aside through legislation may be able to at common law
- Exception to being hard to set aside in NB with ILA
What is the definition of child of the marriage under the Divorce Act?
Child of two spouses or former spouses who, at the material time:
a) Is under the age of majority and has not withdrawn from their care
b) Is the age a majority or over and under their charge but unable because of illness, disability, or other cause, to withdraw from their charge/obtain necessaries of life
No fault divorce under the Divorce Act
Don’t lose access/ property because of the reason the marriage ended
Divorce Act coming into play changed grounds of divorce from ___ to ___
Just adultery to:
1) Separation for 12+ months
2) Adultery
3) Abuse
What did the implementation of divorce act do?
- No fault divorce
- Expanded grounds
- Legal equality
- Sex no longer governing consideration for spousal support (needs and means of spouses now)
- Economic self-sufficiency expected now
What are the objectives of the federal child support guidelines?
1) Establish a fair standard of support to ensure kids continue to benefit from financial means of both spouses
2) Make calculations more objective (reduces conflict/tension)
3) Improve efficiency (provides guidance on levels of support and encourages settlement)
4) Ensure consistent treatment in similar circumstances
Murdoch v Murdoch
- Pre marital property act
- Laskin’s dissent is what the law became: use constructive trust to prevent unjust enrichment
- Wives money went into property even though it was in husbands name
Which law governs property division?
Provincial- Marital property act
Application for division of property
Spouses entitled to equal division on marital property if:
a) Divorce is granted
b) Marriage annulled
c) Spouses live separate and apart and no reasonable prospect of resuming cohabitation
d) Marriage break down with no reasonable prospect of reconciliation (whether or not living separately)
Time limit to apply for property division
No later than 60 days after divorce granted/ declaration of nullity
Length of period in which they were spouses when annulled?
From solemnization to declaration of nullity
When would the court extend the limitation period for applying for property division?
If person was prevented from applying by:
1) Lack of knowledge that divorce/annulment granted/the date of it
2) Circumstances beyond their control
*increase by the amount of time and terms the court sees fit
Exclusion of specified family assets from division
May exclude family asset acquired before marriage or as a gift if it would be unfair/unreasonable to include it considering:
a) No substantial contribution by other spouse to the acquisition, management, maintenance, operation or improvement of the asset
b) Cohabitation was short duration
c) Agreement other spouse/ kids using it would not effect owners rights
Unequal division of marital property
Court may divide unequally if equal shares would be inequitable considering:
a) Any agreement other than a domestic contract
b) Duration of cohabitation under marriage
c) Duration spouses have lived separate and apart
d) Date property acquired
e) If acquired by inheritance/gift
f) Other circumstances relating to acquisition, disposition, maintenance, improvement or use of property
Division of non-marital property
Court may make division of non-marital property if:
a) The spouse unreasonably impoverished the marital property through transfer, indebtedness, mismanagement or other means
b) Division of marital property would be inequitable having regard to i) unequal division of marital property and ii) one spouse assumes joint responsibilities which enables the other spouse to improve non-marital property
Joint responsibilities of spouses
- Child care
- Household management
- Financial provision
*all equally important contributions to marital property- spouses contributing to these entitles them to equal share of marital property/debt
Division of marital debts and consideration of tax consequences
- Fair and equitable division of marital debts
- Take into account any tax consequences arising from division of property
Financial statements
- Required for application for property division
- Must file and serve other spouse with statement
- Verified by oath
- Discloses particulars of all property and debts
Grover v Ecerova
Ring is available for marital property division and divided value equally
Marital home
- Spouse may get exclusive possession of marital home or part for such a period as the court directs
- That spouse who has equal possession give periodic payments payments to other spouse for use
Sources of law for cohabitation
- Case heavy, not much legislation
- Can’t make a claim under MPA
- Can enter into cohabitation agreements now
M v H
Same sex unmarried cohabitants have the same rights and obligations as those of opposite sex because of this case
Basic definition of cohabitation
Two people who share their lives together but are not married
Factors to consider when determining what constitutes cohabitation (not exhaustive)
- Shelter
- Sexual and personal behavior
- Services
- Conduct and habits of parties
- Social
- Societal
- Support
- Children
Property division options for unmarried cohabitants
- Constructive trust
- Joint Family Venture
- Unjust enrichment
Kerr v Baranov and Vanasse v Sequin
- Authority for unjust enrichment
- Judge made doctrine of unjust enrichment where 3 conditions must be satisfied:
1) Benefit or enrichment of one party
2) Corresponding deprivation of the other party; and
3) Absence of any juristic reason or legal justification for enrichment (ex: contract or gift)
Joint Family Venture
- Symons v Symons
- A relationship where the contributions of both parties resulted in accumulation of wealth
- Not legally married have purchased items together and acting as a family together
- Efforts together as if they were married—they built this life together so entitled to rights
- Married people don’t have to prove this
Litigation
- Should be last resort, takes a long time
- Bound by legislation
Settlement conferences
- Judge who will not be in trial sits in a room trying to get you to agree
- “If you don’t agree this is what I would order” then try again
Types of negotiation
1) Hard bargaining
2) Soft bargaining
3) Principled negotiation
Hard bargaining
Competitive and adversarial approach
Soft bargaining
Excessive degree of co-operation and avoidance of confrontation
Principled negotiation
- Strives to avoid positional bargaining
- Focus on interest (why the person wants it), not position (what the person wants)
- Generate options that will be advantageous to both parties
- Result based on objective standards
ADR Options
- Mediation
- Collaborative law
- Arbitration
- Med-arb
Mediation
- Neutral third party makes a decision that you are not bound by
- Objective is final written agreement
- Parties must get ILA following mediation process
When is mediation not appropriate?
- Abuse
- Imbalance of power
- Addiction issues
- High emotion divorce
Collaborative law
- Similar to mediation with collaboratively trained lawyers and experts in the room
- Parties sign contract not to go to court and if they do they have to get new lawyers