Family Law Essay Questions Flashcards
(38 cards)
A premarital agreement is enforceable if:
there has been full disclosure, the agreement is fair and reasonable, and it is voluntary
Under the UPAA, the party against who enforcement of a premarital agreement is sought must:
prove (1) involuntariness or (2) both unconscionability at the time of execution and lack of disclosure and adequate knowledge of the other’s assets and obligations
Full disclosure requires:
disclosure of all income, assets, and liabilities of both parties
Entering into a contract voluntarily:
generally means there was no fraud, duress, or misrepresentation; courts will consider factors such as time-pressure, the parties’ previous business experience, and the opportunity to be represented by independent counsel
The objective of equitable distribution (majority):
is to order fair distribution of marital property, taking into consideration all of the circumstances between the parties
Marital property is:
all property acquired during the marriage and is subject to equitable distribution
Whether appreciation in the nonmarital property will be subject to equitable distribution:
will depend on whether the appreciation can be attributable to spousal labor
Some factors courts consider in determining equitable distribution of marital property include:
length of the marriage; the age, health, earning potential, and needs of both spouses; the value of separate property; the spouses’ standard of living and economic circumstances of each spouse at time of divorce
When can separation agreements be invalidated, in whole or in part?
If the court makes a finding of fraud or unconscionability; the contract or party of the contract at issue must have been offensive at the time it was made
When is a contract unconscionable?
When it is so unfair to one party that no reasonable person in the position of the parties would have agreed to it; also may be applied to prevent unfair suprise
When can a property division award be modified after a divorce decree?
Never
When can spousal support awards be modified?
Based upon a significant change in a party’s circumstances.
Courts have traditionally been loath to:
modify an established parent-child relationship, citing the child’s best interest as a reason to deny admission of evidence of non-paternity or to deny a motion to disestablish paternity
Some states have recently recognized:
the interests of erroneously identified fathers
What is modification of a child support order governed by?
The Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA)
Pursuant to UIFSA, a state court:
does not have jurisdiction to modify an order of child support rendered by a court of another state IF the original state has continuing, exclusive jurisdiction
The original state no longer has continuing, exclusive jurisdiction when:
the parties, including the child, no longer reside in that state or the parties expressly agree to another state’s jurisdiction
Uniform Interstate Family Support Act does not apply to:
divorce-related property disputes
State courts have subject matter jurisdiction over:
domestic relations issues; a petition to modify a property settlement related to divorce is a domestic relations issue
The court may exercise personal jurisdiction over an individual:
if that person is voluntarily present in the state AND served with process while there
Modification of child support:
may be made for the period while the cause of action is pending, but states cannot retroactively modify child support before the date of service of process
When may a state prospectively modify a child support order?
When there is a substantial change in circumstances regarding the child’s needs or the parents financial situation
Who has the burden of showing a substantial change in circumstances?
The parent requesting the child support modification
When a parent voluntarily changes his employment:
Reduction in income along is not sufficient proof of substantial changes in circumstances