Family Law Flashcards
Full Faith and Credit for Child Support Orders Act
full faith and credit must be given to another court’s child support order if the court had jurisdiction over the matter and the parties, and the parties had reasonable notice and an opportunity to be heard.
The jurisdictional requirement is satisfied if one of the spouses is domiciled in the state granting the divorce.
Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (“UIFSA”)
A court of another state may serve as an initiating tribunal to request the court of the original state, which has continuing and exclusive jurisdiction over the support order, to enforce or modify the order issued in the original state.
Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act (“PKPA”)
Under this federal act a state may not modify a custody order if one of the parties continues to reside in the issuing state and under that state’s laws, the court continues to have and does not decline jurisdiction.
This act requires states to enforce a custody order of another state, but only if the state entering the custody decree had home state jurisdiction.
Constitutional Supremacy Clause
federal law prevails over contrary state law
Uniform Child Custody and Jurisdiction Enforcement Act (“UCCJEA”)
Initial Jurisdiction: Under this law a state may exercise jurisdiction if it is the home state of the child at the time the proceedings began or within six months of the proceedings and a parent still resides in the jurisdiction. *see child’s home state card
Continuing Jurisdiction: Under this law the court that made the initial custody determination has continuing, exclusive jurisdiction over the matter until that court determines that: neither the child nor the parents continue to reside in the state, or the child no longer has a significant connection with the state and substantial evidence relating to the child’s care, protection, training, and personal relationships is no longer available in the state.
Court’s considerations when establishing or modifying a custody order
(I) the parents’ wishes; (ii) the child’s wishes; (iii) the relationship of the child with each parent (also siblings and others); (iv) the child’s adjustment to home, school, and community; and (v) the mental and physical health of the parties
Child’s wishes - given little weight when young, but usually great weight when over 12.
Many courts feel it is best to keep siblings together.
Child support modification
based on substantial change of circumstances affecting the needs of the children or the ability of the parents to pay and cannot be modified retroactively
Doctrine of Divisible Divorce
Under this doctrine, an ex parte divorce generally can serve to grant only the divorce. An ex parte divorce decree has no effect on disputes over marital property, unless the property is located in the rendering state. Otheriwse, such disputes can be resolved only by a court having personal jurisdiction over both of the parties (PJ can be established through “minimum contacts” or submission by the party).
Child’s home state
A child’s home state is the state in which the child lived with a parent, or a person acting as a parent, for at least six consecutive months before commencement of the proceeding (or the child’s birth state if the child is less than six months old).
Child’s home state
A child’s home state is the state in which the child lived with a parent, or a person acting as a parent, for at least six consecutive months before commencement of the proceeding.
Are child custody and support agreements binding on the court when in a premarital agreement?
No
Validation of subsequent marriage
(1) the strong presumption that the latest marriage is valid, and (2) if the prior marriage is later terminated by divorce, annulment, or death, continued cohabitation validates the second marriage under UMDA and similar statutes.
Inability to have children as grounds for divorce
Impotence is not the inability to have children, but if the ability to have children was misrepresented, then the marriage may be annulled based on fraud.
Void Marriage Grounds
(1) bigamy, (2) consanguinity, (3) Nonage (some states)
Voidable Marriage Grounds
(1) Nonage (most states), (2) Incurable physical impotence, (3) Lack of capacity [mental incompetence, duress, fraud involving the essentials of marriage]
Void Marriage Defenses
Impediment does not exist (If impediment has been removed, continued cohabitation results in validation in some states).