Family Law Flashcards

1
Q

Controversies Arising in Anticipation of Marriage

A

Fraudulent Inducement to Marry
Premarital Gifts Conditioned on Marriage
Contracts Restraining or Promoting Marriage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Fraudulent Inducement to Marry.

A

If the consent of either party to a marriage was fraudulently obtained, the marriage will be void from the time its invalidity is declared by a court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Premarital Gifts Conditioned on Marriage

A

Under the traditional rule, a gift conditioned on marriage (e.g., the engagement ring) was returned to the donor if the donor was NOT at “fault” for the break-up.

Under the modern view, such gifts are returned to the donor regardless of fault.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Contracts Restraining or Promoting Marriage

A

Contracts that restrain or promote marriage are disfavored because the right to marry is a fundamental right.

Complete restraints on the right to marry are invalid; however, partial restraints may be valid if they are reasonable under the circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Bigamous Marriage

A

NO state recognizes the validity of a bigamous marriage (being married to more than one person at the same time). However, there are two marriage saving doctrines that apply to bigamous marriages:

Removal of Impediment

Presumption of Validity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Removal of Impediment for bigamous marriages

A

Under the Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act (UDMA), an invalid marriage (e.g., a bigamous marriage) may be validated upon the removal of the impediment (e.g., an earlier marriage). The marriage becomes valid as of the date that the impediment is removed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Presumption of Validity for bigamous marriage

A

Under the presumption of validity, the last of several marriages will be presumed to be valid. This presumption may only be rebutted with strong evidence that the prior marriage still persists.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Same-Sex Marriage

A

The Supreme Court has determined that same-sex marriage is a constitutional right. Therefore, same-sex marriage is permitted in every state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Incestuous Marriage.

A

Marriages determined to be incestuous (marriages between relatives) are treated as void. Jurisdictions are fairly evenly split regarding whether cousins may marry.

Under the UDMA, persons may NOT marry their: (1) Ancestors or descendants; (2) Siblings (regardless of whether whole/half blood or adoption); OR (3) Uncles, aunts, nieces, or nephews.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Minors and marriage

A

In nearly every state, persons must be 18 years of age to marry. However, some states allow 16 or 17 year olds to marry with parental consent or judicial approval.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Physical Incapacity

A

A marriage is voidable if one party is physically unable to consummate the marriage and the other party was unaware of the problem at the time of solemnization.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Fraudulent Marriage

A

A marriage is voidable for fraud if a party makes a material misrepresentation that affects the essentials of the marriage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Marriage Requirements

A

A valid marriage requires that:

(1) The parties obtain a marriage license prior to the solemnization ceremony;
(2) The marriage is solemnized by a ceremony that is conducted by an authorized clergyman or judge; AND
(3) Both parties consent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

define consent in terms of marriage requirements (traditional versus modern approach)

A

Under the traditional approach, courts will find consent if the parties participated in a valid ceremony and sought to obtain at least some of the benefits of marriage.

Under the modern approach, courts will find consent if the parties intended to take on the usual obligations of marriage (slightly higher standard).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

common law marriage

A

Most states have abolished common law marriage. In jurisdictions that recognize common law marriage, the proponent of the marriage must prove that the parties:

(1) Cohabitated (i.e., lived together) for the statutory period;
(2) Held themselves out as married; AND
(3) Intended to be married.

Most states will recognize a common law marriage if it was validly obtained in a jurisdiction that permits common law marriages UNLESS doing so contradicts a powerful public policy of the jurisdiction with the greatest interest in the marriage of the parties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Premarital Contracts

A

Most states will enforce a premarital agreement as a valid contract if it is:

in writing and signed by both parties
executed after full disclosure of the property and financial obligations off both parties AND
voluntary (determined by factors like presence of independent legal counsel, length of time, sophistication AND presence of other pressing reasons to proceed with marriage like a pregnancy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Under the Uniform Premarital Agreement Act (UPAA), the party against whom enforcement is sought must prove that the agreement was:

A

(1) NOT voluntary; OR
(2) Unconscionable when it was executed AND that he or she did not receive or waive fair and reasonable disclosure AND did not have, or reasonably could not have had, an adequate knowledge of the other’s assets and obligations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Child Custody and Support in Premarital Contracts

A

Child Custody. Most courts decide custody according to the best interests of the child at the time of the custody hearing, regardless of any premarital agreements.

Child Support. Parents have an absolute obligation to support their children. A premarital contract CANNOT adversely affect a child’s right to support under any circumstance. Such agreements are NOT binding on the court and are unenforceable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Spousal Support in Premarital Contracts (during the marriage versus after)

A

During the Marriage. Premarital agreements that limit a spouse’s support during marriage are generally void as against public policy.

After the Marriage. In some jurisdictions, premarital agreements that limit a spouse’s support after the marriage ends are void as against public policy. Under the Uniform Premarital Agreement Act (UPAA), modification or elimination of spousal support is permitted so long as such provisions do not make the former spouse eligible for public support (e.g., welfare).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

property rights of spouses

A

Under the common law’s unity theory of marriage, the legal identity of the wife disappeared and the husband controlled virtually all of the property.

Today, both spouses retain full rights to their own property during and after marriage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Necessaries Doctrine

A

Under the necessaries doctrine, the wife could purchase necessaries (e.g., food, clothing, shelter, etc.) on credit and charge them to her husband. The creditor who furnished the necessaries to the wife could then recover fair market value for the goods or services even though the husband did not enter into the contract.

Today, most states have modified the necessaries doctrine holding both spouses liable to creditors for necessaries purchased by the other spouse.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Annulment definition and grounds

A

Annulment is a judicial declaration that a marriage never existed and was invalid from when the parties entered into it.

A marriage can be annulled if it is void or voidable. Common grounds for an annulment include: lack of capacity to consent at the time of the marriage, lack of capacity to physically consummate the marriage, underage minors without parental consent/judicial approval and marriages prohibited by law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

defense to annulment

A

Ratification may be a defense to an annulment action involving voidable marriages because a void marriage can never be ratified

Generally, ratification occurs when the party seeking annulment fails to bring the annulment action within a reasonable amount of time after discovering the defect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Divorce

A

Traditionally, divorce was only permitted if one party was determined to be at fault (e.g., cruelty, adultery, abandonment, incapacity, substance addiction, felony
convictions).

Today, some states have completely abolished fault as a ground for divorce; however, every state has adopted a form of no-fault divorce. Common grounds for a no-fault divorce are: minimum duration of separation (6 months to 1 year) AND irreconcilable differences

Some states require both a separation and irreconcilable differences, while others only require one or the other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Marital Action Jurisdiction

A

Jurisdiction over marital actions is vested solely in the state courts (federal courts do not have subject matter jurisdiction over domestic relation matters).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

annulment for jurisdiction

A

Under the majority view, a state where either party is domiciled has jurisdiction to enter an annulment decree.

Ex parte annulments (an annulment action where only one party is appearing before the court) are allowed in the state where either party is domiciled.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

jurisdiction for divorce

A

Under the Full Faith and Credit Clause, a divorce validly granted in one state is entitled to full faith and credit in other states.

Generally, a divorce is valid and must be recognized by other states if the petitioning party:

Was domiciled in the state that granted the divorce (regardless of whether that court had personal jurisdiction over the other spouse); AND provided adequate notice of the proceeding to the other spouse.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Divisible divorce

A

Under the concept of divisible divorce, a distinction is made between the marriage and the marital property.

A state does NOT have jurisdiction to divide marital property that is located in another state in the absence of personal jurisdiction over the defendant spouse.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Property Division at Divorce

A

At divorce, courts divide marital property between spouses pursuant to state law.

Some states follow the community property approach however, most states have adopted the equitable distribution approach for division of property at divorce. The analysis is relatively similar under both approaches:

Categorize the property as separate or marital; THEN determine an equitable distribution of the marital property between the
spouses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

separate property

A

Separate property generally includes:

(a) All property acquired by either spouse BEFORE marriage;
(b) All property acquired by a spouse during marriage by gift, bequest, devise, or descent;
(c) All property either spouse acquires with the proceeds of the spouse’s separate property; AND
(d) All passive appreciation of separate property (appreciation in value due to the passage of time rather than the efforts of either spouse).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Marital property

A

Marital property generally includes all property acquired during marriage (regardless of who holds title) that is NOT separate property.

Active appreciation (appreciation in value due to the efforts of either spouse) of separate property is usually categorized as marital property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

are professional degrees and licenses separate or marital property?

A

In almost every state, professional degrees and licenses are considered separate property not subject to distribution at divorce. However, reimbursement may be available for any support provided by a spouse that contributed to the other spouse’s degree or license.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

distribution after categorization of property

A

Once the court categorizes the property as either separate or marital, the court will then equitably distribute the marital property between both spouses.

Courts are afforded significant discretion in determining the equitable distribution of martial property at divorce.

General factors include: income, property, and liabilities of each party, duration of marriage, obligations for support arising out of a prior marriage, lifestyle each spouse is accustomed to, and contributions made by each spouse toward the accumulation of marital
property

NOT a factor - “fault” of either spouse

34
Q

Modification of Property Division

A

Generally, courts may NOT modify a property division award (whether it results from a divorce settlement agreement or judicial determination) UNLESS exceptional circumstances exist (e.g., fraud).

35
Q

when is spousal support awarded

A

spousal support (sometimes called maintenance or alimony) is awarded if a spouse’s separate property is insufficient for their maintenance

36
Q

Courts are afforded _______________ in making this determination and usually examine a spouse’s needs under the _______________

A

significant discretion

totality of circumstances

37
Q

Under the UDMA, a spouse is eligible for spousal support if the spouse seeking support:

A

(1) Lacks property sufficient for his or her reasonable needs and is unable to
support himself through appropriate gainful employment; OR
(2) Is the custodian of a child such that it would be inappropriate for him to work.

38
Q

general factors courts look to when determining the appropriate amount to award:

A

The financial resources of the party seeking maintenance;
The time necessary for the spouse seeking support to obtain an appropriate job (includes time needed for education or training);
The duration of the marriage;
The standard of living established during the marriage;
The age and physical/emotional condition of the spouse seeking maintenance;
The ability of the spouse paying support to meet her own needs while meeting those of the spouse seeking support.
NOTE. In most states, the marital “fault” of either spouse (e.g., adultery) is NOT a factor considered in determining the amount of spousal support to be awarded.

39
Q

modification of spousal support

A

in most states - can only be modified when there is a substantial change in circumstances of either party making the prior order unreasonable

UDMA - a modification of spousal support is allowed only upon a showing of changed circumstances so substantial and continuing to make the terms unconscionable

Some courts will NOT permit a modification of spousal support if the change in circumstances was anticipated or voluntary.

40
Q

child support

A

Parents have an absolute obligation to support their children.

Federal law requires every state to provide guidelines to determine the proper amount of child support owed by a non-custodial parent.

These guidelines must:

(1) Consider the income of the non-custodial parent;
(2) Provide for the child’s healthcare needs; AND
(3) Be based on specifically descriptive numeric criteria (i.e., a formula).

41
Q

Education Expenses and child support

A

Some states require support for the child’s continuing education. In such states, a child may lose their support if the child fails to follow the obligor parent’s reasonable instructions.

42
Q

Rebuttable Presumption and child support

A

In all states, there is a rebuttable presumption that the amount of support produced by the state’s formula is proper.

43
Q

child support and duration

A

Child support obligations generally last until the child reaches the age of majority or is otherwise emancipated (e.g., becomes married, enters the military, etc.).

44
Q

modification of child support

A

In most states, a child support order can only be modified when there is a substantial change in circumstances of either party making the prior order unreasonable.

Under the UDMA, a modification of child support is allowed only upon a showing of changed circumstances so substantial and continuing to make the terms unconscionable.

45
Q

Some courts will NOT permit a modification of child support if the change in circumstances was __________________

A

anticipated or voluntary.

If the obligor voluntarily made this change, courts usually require that the obligor prove the change occurred in good faith, rather than to punish obligee or deprive the child of support.

46
Q

The state that originally issued the child support order has __________________ to modify the order so long as that state remains the residence of the obligee, child, or obligor.

A

Continuing exclusive jurisdiction

47
Q

federal law and child support

A

Federal law:

Bars courts from retroactively modifying child support orders; AND

Requires states to give full faith and credit to child support awards from other states.

48
Q

standard for child custody

A

best interests standard

Generally, courts determine child custody based on the best interests of the child. A parent’s misconduct (e.g., adultery) generally may NOT be considered unless it causes significant harm to the child. Courts consider multiple factors to determine what custody order will serve the child’s best interests.

49
Q

General factors for best interest standard include:

A

(1) The needs of the child for a meaningful relationship with both parents;
(2) The ability and willingness of the parents to actively perform their functions as mother and father for the child’s needs;
(3) The interaction and interrelationship of the child with parents, siblings, and any other person who may affect the child’s best interests;
(4) The child’s adjustment to the child’s home, school, and community;
(5) The mental and physical health of all involved individuals;
(6) The intention of either parent to relocate the principal residence of the child;
(7) The wishes of the child’s parents as to custody; AND
(8) The wishes of the child as to the child’s custodian - In some states, if a child has reached sufficient age, the court must award custody as the child wishes. However, most courts consider a child’s wishes as a factor, and, as the age and maturity of the child increases, the wishes are given greater weight

50
Q

When determining child custody between a parent and a third party, it is ________ that custody with the parent is in the best interest of the child.

A

presumed

51
Q

Parental Visitation Rights

A

When one parent is granted custody of a child, the other parent is usually always entitled to visitation rights UNLESS the court determines that visitation would seriously endanger the child’s wellbeing (e.g., the parent has been convicted of violent crimes).

52
Q

Third Party Visitation Rights

A

In a minority of states, courts may order visitation for a nonparent if:

The nonparent has a substantial relationship with the child; AND the visitation is in the child’s best interests.

In order to be constitutional, great weight must be given to the parent’s wishes in regard to the nonparent when determining the best interests of the child.

53
Q

Joint Custody definition

A

When parents are awarded joint custody, they BOTH participate in decision-making regarding the upbringing of the child.

Generally, a court must determine that joint custody is in the child’s best interests in order to award the parents joint custody. Thus, joint custody is usually only an option for cooperative parents, as it may be harmful to the child if the parents are hostile toward each other.

54
Q

Modification of Child Custody

A

In order to modify a child custody order, the parent must show that:
Circumstances have substantially changed; AND the modification would be in the child’s best interests.

55
Q

jurisdiction for child custody modification

A

The state that issued the child custody order has continuing exclusive jurisdiction to modify the order so long as that state remains the residence of any party involved.

56
Q

moving the child

A

Most courts will permit a custodial parent to move with the child if:

(1) The motives for moving are NOT vindictive; AND
(2) The move is in the child’s best interests.

Some courts balance the impact on the noncustodial parent’s visitation rights against the benefits of the move to the child and the custodial parent.

57
Q

Mediation and Mediator’s Role

A

In some states, a court has authority to order mediation of custody disputes. In others, mediation is mandated by statute under certain circumstances.

The mediator must attempt to reach a settlement that is in the best interests of the child. However, a settlement agreement may be set aside for mediator misconduct (failure to be impartial for example)

58
Q

economic sharing for unmarried cohabitants through express contracts

A

In most states, an express agreement (written or oral) between unmarried cohabitants to share property or otherwise engage in forms of economic sharing is enforceable, so long as the economic sharing is NOT intended as payment for sexual services.

However, some states refuse to recognize such contracts between unmarried cohabitants as against public policy.

59
Q

economic sharing for unmarried cohabitants through implied in fact contracts

A

Some states also allow unmarried cohabitants to seek
a remedy based on an implied-in-fact contract theory. An implied-in-fact contract is formed by the conduct of the parties rather than express statements (e.g., commingling funds).

60
Q

equitable remedies for economic sharing between rights of unmarried conhabitants

A

Some states also allow unmarried cohabitants to seek equitable remedies based on the following theories: resulting trust, constructive trust, and quantum meruit.

61
Q

resulting trust as an equitable remedies

A

To make a claim to property titled in another’s name, the party seeking the resulting trust must have paid money to acquire the property with the intent to retain an ownership interest, rather than making a gift.

62
Q

constructive trust as an equitable remedy

A

A constructive trust is imposed to prevent a party from being unjustly enriched by obtaining title to property through wrongful conduct.

63
Q

quantum meruit as an equitable remedy

A

A quantum meruit claim requires another to pay the fair market value of services rendered to avoid unjust enrichment.

64
Q

establishing paternity in an unmarried parenting situation

A

Under the Uniform Parentage Act (UPA), the father-child relationship is established between a man and a child by:

(1) An effective acknowledgement of paternity by the man UNLESS the acknowledgement has been rescinded or successfully challenged;
(2) A valid adoption of the child by the man; OR
(3) An adjudication of the man’s paternity.

65
Q

Under the Uniform parentage act, a man is presumed to be the father of the child if:

A

He and the child’s mother are or have been married to each other and the child is born during the marriage, or within 300 days after the marriage is terminated;

Before the child’s birth, he and the child’s mother attempted to marry in apparent compliance with law, although the attempted marriage is or could be declared invalid, and the child is born during the invalid marriage or within 300 days after its termination; OR

While the child is under the age of majority, he receives the child into his home and openly holds out the child as his own.

A presumption of paternity under the UPA may only be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence.

66
Q

equitable estoppel and paternity

A

Under equitable estoppel, a man who is not the biological father will be estopped from denying paternity if:

(1) He has held himself out as the father; AND
(2) Paid support.

67
Q

Legitimation

A

by petition or by marriage

68
Q

Legitimation by Petition

A

n contrast to a paternity action, legitimation is a legal action brought by a biological father to establish his rights concerning his child born out of wedlock.

To establish his rights, the father may file a petition seeking to legitimate his child. Generally, the father must show that he has:
assumed parental responsibilities and established a substantial parent child relationship

69
Q

Legitimation by Marriage

A

The marriage of the mother and biological father renders the nonmarital child legitimate so long as the father recognizes the child as his child.

Upon valid legitimation (by petition or marriage), the father stands in the same position as any other parent regarding parental and custodial rights with respect to the child.

70
Q

Parental Consent for Child’s Medical Procedures

A

A doctor who performs surgery on a minor child without a parent’s consent is liable in tort, UNLESS any of the following exceptions apply: emergency, public health concerns, age of child (Some states make an exception to the parental consent requirement for children near the age of majority undergoing relatively minor medical procedures.)

71
Q

Parens Patriae

A

Under the parens patriae authority of the state, a state can intervene to protect children when their parents deny them needed medical care (usually based on abuse or neglect grounds).

However, the concept of need is interpreted narrowly. In order to decide whether the medical care is needed, courts will:

examine whether a condition is life threatening or whether it can be postponed until child reaches the age of the majority AND risks/benefits of treatment

If a parent denies their child needed medical care based on religious beliefs, many states will still order the needed medical care but exempt the parents from criminal liability.

72
Q

Inter-Spousal Immunity

A

Historically, spouses could not sue each other in tort. Today, most jurisdictions have abolished inter-spousal immunity.

73
Q

Parent-Child Immunity

A

Historically, minor children could not sue their parents in tort.

Today, most jurisdictions have abolished parent-child immunity. In jurisdictions that still have parent-child immunity, there is usually an exception for willful or wanton conduct as opposed to mere negligence.

74
Q

Loss of Consortium Claims

A

Loss of consortium is a claim in damages intended to compensate a spouse for loss of companionship, sexual relations, or affection. Damages for loss of consortium are typically only available to the legally recognized spouse of the injured party.

75
Q

Parental Right to Direct Child’s Upbringing

A

Parents have a fundamental right to direct their child’s upbringing, which includes a right to control their child’s religious education.

Generally, courts will not interfere with parental decisions regarding their child’s upbringing and education UNLESS the child’s wellbeing is endangered.

76
Q

adoption

A

Adoption is a statutory procedure that terminates the rights of the biological parents and establishes the rights of the adoptive parents.

In most states, the biological parents lose the right to visit their child after the adoption. However, some states will permit visitation if it is in the child’s best interests.

77
Q

Parental consent in adoption

A

Generally, the consent of BOTH parents is required to place a child up for adoption. However, if the child is born out of wedlock, consent of the father is only required when he has assumed parental responsibility.

Moreover, an unwed father who knew of his child’s pending birth is NOT entitled to notice of the adoption if he did not take steps to establish a parent-child relationship with the child.

78
Q

Challenge to Validity of Consent in adoption

A

A biological parent may challenge the validity of his/her consent to an adoption on the ground that his/her consent:

Was procured by fraud or duress (mere stress is insufficient, the duress must be extreme); OR

Failed to comply with statutory formalities. (Some states require two witnesses to consent to an adoption. Most states declare pre-birth adoptions invalid (e.g., a mother cannot give consent for an adoption until 72 hours after birth in some states).

79
Q

Revocation of Valid Consent in adoption

A

Generally, there are three different statutory approaches to a biological parent’s revocation of valid consent to an adoption:

Consent is revocable until the final adoption decree is entered with the court;

Consent is revocable at the court’s discretion up to a specified amount of time so long as the revocation is in the child’s best interests; OR

Absent fraud or duress, consent is NOT revocable.

80
Q

Artificial Insemination

A

Generally, if a mother is married, the mother’s husband is presumed to be the father of a child born from artificial insemination if:

He consented in writing; AND (or implied oral consent in some courts)

A medical doctor performed the procedure.

Most states extinguish any parental rights the sperm donor may have as the biological father of the child upon successful artificial insemination.

81
Q

Surrogacy

A

In a surrogacy contract, the surrogate mother, generally in return for financial compensation, agrees to bear and give birth to another party’s child (usually through artificial insemination or in vitro fertilization) permitting the other party to raise the child.

82
Q

treatment of surrogacy by courts

A

Some states hold parties that enter into a surrogacy contract criminally liable.

Other states treat surrogacy contracts as void against public policy without imposing criminal liability.

Still, other states permit surrogacy contracts so long as the birth mother is given a period of time to change her mind after the child is born.