Family Law Flashcards
Extent to which a state must extend full faith and credit to the ex parte divorce decree of a sister state court
courts will give full faith and credit to divorce decrees of the courts of sister states if the sister state had proper jurisdiction and the decree is valid in the sister state. The jurisdictional requirement will be satisfied if one of the spouses is domiciled in the state granting the divorce (e.g., in an ex parte divorce). There is a rebuttable presumption that the state granting the divorce is the bona fide domicile of the plaintiff
the right of a court exercising jurisdiction over an ex parte divorce to order the division of marital property which is located either in the state exercising jurisdiction or in a sister state.
Under the doctrine of divisible divorce, an ex parte divorce generally can serve to grant only the divorce. An ex parte divorce decree has no effect on disputes over marital property, unless the property is located within the rendering state. Otherwise, such disputes can be resolved only by a court having personal jurisdiction over both of the parties.
the right of a court exercising jurisdiction over an ex parte divorce to resolve custody matters
Under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (“UCCJEA”), a state may exercise jurisdiction if it is the home state of the child at the time the proceedings began or within six months of the proceedings and a parent still resides in the jurisdiction. A child’s home state is the state in which the child lived with a parent (or a person acting as a parent) for at least six consecutive months prior to commencement of the proceeding
whether a custody order of a court exercising jurisdiction in an ex parte divorce is entitled to full faith and credit when the facts of the case suggest that a parent has wrongfully taken the children from another state.
The federal Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act (“PKPA”) requires states to enforce a custody order of another state, but only if the state entering the custody decree had home state jurisdic- tion. The jurisdictional standards are substantially similar to those in the UCCJEA
Factors to be considered in determining to whom custody should be awarded:
The standard to be applied in awarding custody is the best interests of the child. Generally, the factors to be considered in making this determination include: the wishes of the parents; the wishes of the child; the interrelationship of the child with his parents, siblings, and others; the child’s adjustment to home, school, and community; and the mental and physical health of all individuals involved.
whether a state may grant a divorce when it lacks jurisdiction over one spouse
To establish jurisdiction over a divorce action, one of the parties must be a bona fide resident of the jurisdiction where the action is brought. States may set a minimum durational residency requirement, such as 90 days or one year, before the action can be filed. The plaintiff’s residence alone may
be the basis for a state’s granting a divorce, regardless of whether there is personal jurisdiction over the defendant
whether a court may divide marital property if it does not have jurisdiction
over both spouses or property.
Generally, a court cannot determine out-of-state property rights or rights to support unless it has jurisdiction over both parties. Thus, in an ex parte divorce (i.e., one where only the plaintiff is before the court), the court can grant the divorce, but cannot award spousal support or divide out-of-state property. There is a limited exception for marital property located within the state.
whether both spouses’ consent is required for a divorce to be granted
Most states now offer “no-fault” divorces that provide for the dissolution of a marriage without regard to marital fault, generally upon a showing that the marriage is irretrievably broken and that the parties have been living separate and apart for a specified period of time. The fact that one spouse thinks the marriage should be saved and does not agree that it has broken down is generally insufficient to prevent a divorce judgment if the other spouse believes the marriage cannot be saved and is not interested in continuing the marriage.
whether property titled in one spouse’s name is subject to division at divorce
As a general rule, the courts have the authority to order an equitable distribution of all marital property, no matter how title is held. All assets acquired during marriage are deemed marital property, unless acquired through gift, bequest, devise, or descent. If property is acquired before the marriage, but paid for after marriage with marital funds, most courts will apportion the property between separate and marital interests in proportion to the contribution of separate and marital funds used to pay for the property.
Limitations on who may marry
(1) minimum age
(2) not be too closely related
(3) have capacity to consent
(4) not have a prior undissolved marriage to a prior spouse
Marriage state of mind
understand their actions and voluntarily agree
under the influence of alcohol or drugs may lack mental capacity
Common law marriage
(1) exchange of consents between 2 people with capacity
(2) cohabitation
(3) holding out publicly of living together as spouses
Premarital Ks enforcement by courts
(1) agreement entered into voluntarily
(2) K must be in writing & signed by the party to be charged
(3) bother parties make full and fair disclosure of their financial worth; and
(4) economic provisions must be fair and reasonable
Distributing assets
A court must have personal jurisdiction over both parties to distribute assets
Requirements of a common law marriage
(1) capacity to enter into a marriage,
(2) an exchange of consent, cohabitation, and
(3) a holding out publicly of living together as spouses