False Prelim Statements Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

The primary test for determining whether a statement is a term or a representation is the…

A

…common intention of the parties when they entered the contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

If the maker of the statement has the greater skill or knowledge, as in Dick Bentley Productions Ltd v Harold Smith (Motors) Ltd, then the statement is more likely to be a….

A

…term.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

If the statement is repeated in the written contract, it will usually be a…

A

…term.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

If the recipient of the statement did make it clear that it was important - the statement is more likely to be a term as in (which case?)

A

Bannerman v White

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

If it is the recipient of the statement who has the greater skill or knowledge, as in Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams, then the statement is more likely to be only a ..

A

…representation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

If an oral statement is not repeated in a written contract. then it is more likely to be a representation as in the case of…

A

….Routledge v McKay.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

If the maker of the statement asks the other to verify it, then the statement is more likely to be a…

A

…representation. (Ecay v Godfrey).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

If the maker of the statement tells the other not to bother checking it out, this points to the statement being a..

A

..term (Schawel v Reade ).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The longer the time lapse then the more likely it is that the statement is..

A

…just a representation (Routledge v McKay)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

If the statement is a TERM of the contract, the maker of the statement will be in..

A

…breach of contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

If the court decides that the term is a condition, and the contract has not been fully performed, the innocent party will usually have the option of..

A

…terminating the future performance of the contract, as well as obtaining damages for any additional loss suffered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

If the court decides the term is a warranty, the innocent party..

A

…cannot terminate the contract but can only sue for damages for loss suffered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Some terms should be classified as innominate or intermediate terms, in which case it is necessary to wait until..

A

..the breach of contract has occurred to decide whether the innocent party should be allowed to terminate the future performance of the contract. If the breach deprives him of substantially the whole benefit of the contract he can terminate, but not otherwise. Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd [1962]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Termination is only viable if the performance of the contract is..

A

..ongoing.

If the contract has already been discharged by performance - termination is no longer an option.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

As it is a common law remedy, it is subject to the common law bar of..

A

…affirmation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

To recover damages, the claimant must prove that he has suffered loss or damage as a result of the defendant’s breach, and the loss or damage must not be too..

A

…remote a consequence of the breach.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Two limbs of Hadley v Baxendale are normal loss and ..

A

….unusual loss which should have been in the contemplation of the defendant as being a likely possibility of breach bearing in mind what he knew at the time of the contract.

18
Q

The rule at common law when assessing damages is that where a party sustains loss by reason of a breach of contract, he is so far as money can do it,…

A

…to be placed in the same situation with respect to damages as if the contract had been performed. (Robinson v Harman) .

19
Q

When claiming for expectation loss, the claimant can claim for…

A

…any harm to the person or property of the claimant and any injury to his economic position. This means that the claimant can recover for personal injury, damage to property and also loss of profit.

20
Q

If the false preliminary statement is a mis-description of goods, it may amount to breach of the statutory implied condition that goods sold by description should match that description (Sale of Goods Act 1979, s 13; Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982, s 3; Consumer Rights Act 2015, s 11), in which case you would need to consider…

A

…damages.

21
Q

A misrepresentation may be defined as a…..*** statement of fact made by one party to a contract to the other party before the contract was made and which was one of the factors which….

A
  • ** false

* ** induced the other party to enter into the contract.

22
Q

The general rule is that silence will…

A

…not amount to misrep.

23
Q

What are the four exceptions to the rule that silence does not amount to misrep?

A

(a) where there is a fiduciary relationship between the parties, eg solicitor and client or trustee and beneficiary;
(b) where the contract is one of the utmost good faith, eg an insurance contract;
(c) where there has been a half truth (Curtis v Chemical Cleaning and Dyeing);
(d) where a statement of fact is true when made but a change of circumstances occurs before the contract is formed which makes the statement untrue. Failure to disclose the change in circumstances may amount to a misrepresentation (With v O’Flanagan).

24
Q

To amount to a misrepresentation, the statement must be one of *** and not **.

A
  • **fact

* **opinion

25
Q

In Smith v Land and House Corporation, it was found that a statement that might look like an opinion may well be likely to be branded by the court as a statement of fact if the statement maker…

A

…is taken to be warranting they know facts that justify their opinion.

26
Q

A statement of intention will not amount to a misrepresentation unless it can be shown that the intention….

A

…was never held. Edgington v Fitzmaurice

27
Q

The statement does not have to be the only reason why a party enters into a contract provided it ..

A

..did encourage that party to do so.

28
Q

There is not misrep if the buyer had relied solely on his own expert’s report and not..

A

…on the seller’s statement. This principle was decided in the case of Attwood v Small.

29
Q

If the buyer relies partly on an expert’s report and partly on a false statement of fact made by the seller, the buyer can claim…

A

…that the seller has made a misrepresentation. The seller’s statement will have been an inducement to enter into the contract even though it was not the only inducement.

30
Q

A person does not lose the right to claim that a misrepresentation has been made just because he is given the opportunity to discover the truth but..

A

…fails to do so. Redgrave v Hurd.

31
Q

You can’t claim misrep if the true position was set out in the contract and you..

A

…didn’t read it.

Peekay Intermark Ltd v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [

32
Q

Recission is available whether the misrepresentation is..

A

…fraudulent or non fraudulent.

33
Q

The effect of any misrepresentation is to make the contract..

A

…voidable. ie the contract is valid until the innocent party rescinds it.

34
Q

In order to rescind the contract, the innocent party must..

A

..notify the other party so that he is aware that this is what the innocent party has decided to do. (Car and Universal Finance Co Ltd v Caldwell).

35
Q

The aim of rescission is to….

A

…restore both parties as far as possible to their precontract positions. So if a contract is rescinded, each party should return to the other money or property transferred under the contract, and neither party need perform any future obligations.

36
Q

What are the bars to rescission?

A

▪ where an innocent purchaser acquired an interest in the subject matter of the contract before purported recission of the contract
▪ affirmation
▪ undue delay
▪ where it is impossible substantially to restore goods or property.

37
Q

If the innocent party can prove that the misrepresentation was made fraudulently then he can sue for damages in the tort of…

A

…deceit.

38
Q

In the tort of deceit, it is all consequential losses so there are no issues with…

A

…remoteness.

39
Q

Once the claimant establishes that a misrepresentation has been made which has caused him a loss, the defendant will be liable to pay damages under s 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 unless he proves…

A

…unless he proves that he had reasonable grounds to believe, and did believe, up to the time the contract was made, that the facts represented were true.

The burden of proof is on the party making the misrepresentation.

40
Q

All the claimant has to do is prove a misrep which has caused him loss; then, if the defendant cannot prove that he has honestly and reasonably believed what he said to be true, he will be liable to pay…

A

…damages.

41
Q

It may be possible for a person to sue for damages in the tort of negligence if there has been a negligent..

A

..mis-statement.

Generally, pure economic loss is not recoverable in tort. However, in the case of Hedley Byrne & Co v Heller [1964]AC 465, the House of Lords recognised an exception to this rule in the case of a negligent misstatement which caused economic loss.

42
Q

In Hedley Byrne, the House of Lords said, obiter, that a duty of care can extend to careless statements where a..

A

…‘special relationship’ exists between the parties.

Briefly, it means the statement was relied on, the maker knew it was being relied on, and it was reasonable to rely on it.