False Prelim Statements Flashcards
The primary test for determining whether a statement is a term or a representation is the…
…common intention of the parties when they entered the contract.
If the maker of the statement has the greater skill or knowledge, as in Dick Bentley Productions Ltd v Harold Smith (Motors) Ltd, then the statement is more likely to be a….
…term.
If the statement is repeated in the written contract, it will usually be a…
…term.
If the recipient of the statement did make it clear that it was important - the statement is more likely to be a term as in (which case?)
Bannerman v White
If it is the recipient of the statement who has the greater skill or knowledge, as in Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams, then the statement is more likely to be only a ..
…representation.
If an oral statement is not repeated in a written contract. then it is more likely to be a representation as in the case of…
….Routledge v McKay.
If the maker of the statement asks the other to verify it, then the statement is more likely to be a…
…representation. (Ecay v Godfrey).
If the maker of the statement tells the other not to bother checking it out, this points to the statement being a..
..term (Schawel v Reade ).
The longer the time lapse then the more likely it is that the statement is..
…just a representation (Routledge v McKay)
If the statement is a TERM of the contract, the maker of the statement will be in..
…breach of contract.
If the court decides that the term is a condition, and the contract has not been fully performed, the innocent party will usually have the option of..
…terminating the future performance of the contract, as well as obtaining damages for any additional loss suffered.
If the court decides the term is a warranty, the innocent party..
…cannot terminate the contract but can only sue for damages for loss suffered.
Some terms should be classified as innominate or intermediate terms, in which case it is necessary to wait until..
..the breach of contract has occurred to decide whether the innocent party should be allowed to terminate the future performance of the contract. If the breach deprives him of substantially the whole benefit of the contract he can terminate, but not otherwise. Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd [1962]
Termination is only viable if the performance of the contract is..
..ongoing.
If the contract has already been discharged by performance - termination is no longer an option.
As it is a common law remedy, it is subject to the common law bar of..
…affirmation.
To recover damages, the claimant must prove that he has suffered loss or damage as a result of the defendant’s breach, and the loss or damage must not be too..
…remote a consequence of the breach.