False Imprisonment Flashcards
What are the elements of false imprisonment?
- Direct act by the defendant
- Total restraint of the plaintiff’s liberty (no reasonable means of escape)
- Intentional conduct
- Without lawful justification
What case shows restraint must be total?
Bird v Jones - Blocking part of a bridge does not mean total restrain -> no false imprisonment
What case confirms psychological coercion may amount to total restraint?
Symes v Mahon – Plaintiff reasonably believed they had no choice but to comply.
Must the plaintiff be aware of being imprisoned at the time?
Murray v Ministry of Defence - No. Awareness is not required.
Who bears the burden of proof once imprisonment is established?
Myer Stores v Soo - The defendant must prove lawful justification.
What case shows store personnel can be liable even when police make the arrest?
Webster – Defendant fabricated story; police acted on it = defendant caused imprisonment.
What case involved imprisonment beyond the lawful period?
Cowell v Corrective Services Commission – Detaining beyond prison sentence = false imprisonment.
What case dealt with a store falsely accusing a customer, leading to police detention?
Myer Stores v Soo – Police relied on store detective’s false information; coercive setting = false imprisonment.
Can restraint be brief and still amount to false imprisonment?
Yes. In Myer Stores Ltd v Soo [1991] 2 VR 597 held duration does not matter — any unlawful restraint is actionable per se.
What statutory defence might a store or security staff rely on?
Criminal Code (Qld) s 546(c)–(d) – Citizen’s arrest where an offence has occurred.
Is false imprisonment actionable per se?
Yes — the plaintiff does not need to prove damage.
When can a third party (like a store employee) be liable for imprisonment by police?
Coles Myer Ltd v Webster Yes When they are active in promoting and causing the imprisonment — not merely providing info.
What are the main defences for false imprisonment?
- Consent
- Lawful Authority (Police Powers and Responsibilities Act 2000)
Can someone withdraw consent after consenting to limited detention?
Herd v Weardale Steel Coal & Coke Co Ltd Not always. A miner who consented to remain underground for a shift could not demand early exit.
What case confirms FI where imprisoned improperly with respect to law
TD