Fallacys and Validity Flashcards

1
Q

Formal Fallacy

A

A fallacy pertaining to the structure of the argument.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Informal Fallacy

A

A fallacy pertaining to the content of the argument.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

If I am in New York, then I am in the United States.
I am in the United States.
Therefore, I am in New York.

A

Affirming the Consequent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

If X, then Y
Y
Therefore, X

A

Affirming the Consequent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

If I am in New York, then I am in the United States.

I am not in New York.

Therefore, I am not in the United States.

A

Denying the antecedent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

If X, then Y
Not X
Therefore, not Y

A

Denying the antecedent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Modus Ponens

A

If X, then Y
X
Therefore, Y

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Modus Tollens

A

If X, then Y
Not Y
Therefore, not X

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

If I set a world speed record, then I will win the race. I won the race. So, I must have set a world speed record.

A

Affirming the consequent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

If the light is red, then you should stop. The light is not red. Therefore, you should not stop.

A

Denying the antecedent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Antecedent

A

The ‘cause’ of the argument, or first proposition

The simple proposition that immediately follows the word “if”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Consequent

A

The ‘because’ of the argument, or the second proposition

the simple proposition that immediately follows the word “then”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Red Herring

A

Changing the subject to something irrelevant to the original topic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is an accurate characterization of “fallacy” as that term is used in logic?

A

A fallacy is a common mistake made in arguments or reasoning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

If it is the hottest day of the year, then the ice will melt. The ice melted. Therefore, it must have been the hottest day of the year.

A

Affirming the consequent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Jamie’s argument against the conspiracy theorist commits the straw figure fallacy. So, clearly Jamie is wrong, and the conspiracy is real.

A

Fallacy fallacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

It must be true if she said it. She did not say it. Consequently, it must not be true.

A

Denying the antecedent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Frida Kahlo is the greatest artist because no other artist is as good as her.

A

Begging the question. Because the argument is redundant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Arguments where the premises guarantee or necessitate the conclusion
— mathematical arguments, logical arguments, arguments from definition

A

Deduction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Arguments where the premises make the conclusion probable
— analogies, authority, causal inferences, scientific reasoning, extrapolations, etc.

A

Induction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

All rabbits have long ears. Bugs is a rabbit. Consequently, Bugs has long ears. Deductive or Inductive?

A

Deductive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Because most tigers are from areas with hot climates, it is probable that the tiger you saw at the zoo was from an area with a hot climate. Deductive or Inductive?

A

Inductive

23
Q

argument structure where the truth of the premises would guarantee the truth of the conclusion

A

Valid

24
Q

What makes an argument/reasoning sound?

A

Being both valid in structure and true.

25
Q

Property of argument structure.

A

Validity

26
Q

Property of argument content.

A

Truth

27
Q

All pigs can fly.
Snowball is a pig.
Therefore, Snowball can fly.

Valid, Invalid, Sound, or Unsound

A

Valid. Not sound.

28
Q

All planets in our solar system orbit the Sun.
Mars is a planet in our solar system.
Therefore, Mars orbits the Sun.

Valid, Invalid, Sound, or Unsound.

A

Valid, Sound.

29
Q

All True Premises + Strong Inductive Support =

A

Cogent Argument

30
Q

Some arguments are such that the premises of the argument entail its conclusion, which means that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true.

A

Valid arguments.

31
Q

Everyone who lives in Los Angeles lives in California. Everyone who lives in California lives in the United States. Therefore, everyone who lives in Los Angeles lives in the United States.

Valid, Not Valid, Sound, or Unsound

A

Valid, sound.

32
Q

Strong or weak: I saw a black cat; therefore all cats are probably black.

A

Weak

33
Q

Strong or weak: I saw the sun rise in the east every day of my life, and everyone I know reports the same, and history books and ancient astronomers report the same, so the sun probably will rise in the east tomorrow.

A

Strong

34
Q

Smith inspected 990 jellybeans in the jar. Each of the beans Smith inspected is red. Therefore, all 1000 of the beans in the jar are red.

Strong, Deductive, Weak, or Valid

A

Strong

35
Q

Genetic Fallacy

A

A critique on the origin of the claim instead of the content of the claim.

36
Q

When someone misinterprets someone else’s argument or position. The opponent’s argument or position is characterized uncharitably so as to make it seem ridiculous or indefensible.

A

Straw Man

37
Q

Any kind of appeal to a factor, consideration, or reason that isn’t relevant to the argument at hand (but is used as a reason rather than as a mere distraction).

A

Irrelevant Appeals

38
Q

Any kind of appeal to a factor, consideration, or reason that isn’t relevant to the argument at hand.

A

Irrelevant Appeals

39
Q

A fallacy where the same word is being used in two different senses

A

Equivocation

40
Q

The logical fallacy of claiming that a statement must be true because there’s no evidence against it

A

Appeal to Ignorance

41
Q

One event is said to lead to some other (usually disastrous) event via a chain of intermediary events.

A

Slippery Slope

42
Q

If A, then eventually Z

A

Slippery Slope

43
Q

When someone already knows which conclusion they’d like to prove and then selects evidence which supports that conclusion.

A

Texas Sharpshooter

44
Q

Texas Sharpshooter

A

Using specific selected evidence that only supports your conclusion.

45
Q

Another term for the Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy

A

Cherry-picking

46
Q

X occurred before Y
Therefore: X caused Y.

A

Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc

46
Q

Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc

A

A fallacy claiming that just because something happened before something else, means it CAUSED the result.

47
Q

A certain individual was born just before astronauts landed on the moon. Therefore, astronauts were able to land on the moon because this individual was born. Name the fallacy.

A

Post Hoc (Ergo Propter Hoc)

48
Q

When one generalizes about a group of people or things or events, but one does so too quickly and without enough evidence or with too small of a sample from that group.

A

Hasty Generalization

49
Q

You are shopping and pick up two rotten apples. You assume all of the apples are rotten. What fallacy is this?

A

Hasty Generalization

50
Q

Either raising taxes on the wealthy will hurt the economy or it will help it.
Raising taxes on the wealthy won’t help the economy.
Therefore, raising taxes on the wealthy will hurt the economy.

A

false dilemma, false dichotomy, or black or white fallacy

51
Q

False Dilemma or Black and White Fallacy

A

Presents only two options or sides when there are many options or sides.

52
Q

Burden Shifting

A

When one decides that someone else must prove them wrong

53
Q

Person A: Ghosts exist
Person B: How do you know they exist?
Person A: How do you know they don’t exist?

A

Burden of Proof Fallacy