Fallacies Flashcards

1
Q

What is a fallacy?

A

A fallacy is a bad argument which may nonetheless psychologically persuade us of the conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Formal fallacies

A

The premises taken together do not validly or inductively support the conclusion. In other words, the argument is invalid or inductively weak.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Substantive (material) fallacies

A

At least one premise, usually suppressed, is unjustified and very general.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Do false premises make an argument a fallacy?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Do true premises and a true conclusion guarantee an argument is not a fallacy?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Affirming the consequent

A

Similar to Modus Ponens, if p, then q, q, so, p

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Denying the antecedent

A

Similar to Modus Tollens, if p, then q, not q, so not p

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Equivocation

A

Shift in term meaning, slight different definition between premises/conclusions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Appeals to authority

A

Suggesting something is true based on the source it comes from, premise can be true regardless of who said it, doesn’t matter how high the authority- only if the premise can be verified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

False Dilemma

A

Leaping to a conclusion without considering alternatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

False equivilance

A

Irrelevant analogies and a false equivalence, implied that two things are the same when they are not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Slippery slope

A

Initial step will lead to a bad path, assume connections with a lack of evidence, and no good reason to assume the conditionals are true, just vaguely possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Begging the question

A

Evading the question by assuming the conclusion as a premise, asserting the conclusion in different terms without evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Straw man

A

Instead of criticising the opponent’s actual position, the arguer attacks an exaggerated, simplified, misrepresented or distorted version of that position: a straw target.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Tu quoque

A

Usually a response to a criticism of a position by pointing out that the critic’s position is vulnerable to the same criticism. Calling them a hypocrite. But just because the critic’s position is also vulnerable, it does not mean the defender’s position is invulnerable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Ad hominem

A

‘Against the man’. Criticises an argument by attacking the arguer, rather than the argument itself. The attack is irrelevant to how good their argument is.

17
Q

Ad hominem abusive

A

Attacking based on appearance, character etc

18
Q

Ad hominem circumstancial

A

Attacking someones argument because of their circumstances, insinuating that they would benefit from what they are arguing

19
Q

Post hoc ergo propter hoc

A

Post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy wrongly assumes that because event X occurred after event Y, Y caused X

20
Q

Correlation/causation

A

Correlation/Causation confusion wrongly assumes that because event X often happens along with Y, Y causes X

21
Q

Epistemic fallacy

A

Someone believes that P, so they must believe that Q as P and Q are about the same thing/person, but it is not the case that they should also believe Q