Fallacies Flashcards

1
Q

Your cousin is in a terrorist group, which means you’re a terrorist

A

Guilt by association

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Refers to a situation where you are not directly at fault, but rather you are associated with someone who has done something wrong

A

Guilt by association

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Assumes that one event causes another. Correlate a one-time experience for a cause-effect connection

A

Faulty cause/effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Believing that wearing your lucky jersey will help your team win

A

Fault cause/effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Certain items we genuinely don’t require for our true happiness can be sold to use by society.

A

False needs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The word gold I own, the happier I will be

A

False Needs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

People were caught smoking weed, everyone was arrested whether they smoked weed or not

A

Guilt by association

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

I only own expensive cars because they help me drive better

A

Faulty cause/effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Arguments that appear valid or convincing but are erroneous

A

Fallacies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Jumps in reasoning that leads to an unsubstantiated conclusion

A

Logical fallacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

This fallacy asserts that there are only two viable solutions or sides to a dispute when there are actually more

A

either/or

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

This type of fallacy uses binary thinking which is common in commercials, political speeches, or casual discussions.

A

Either/or

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Martina asked Nanci if she liked hawaiian pizza but she didn’t. so, martina gave her cheese.

A

Either/or fallacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

You are either a dog person or a cat person, you can’t be both

A

Either/or

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

This fallacy occurs when someone claims that since B occurred right after A, A had to be the reason behind B. Lack of evidence for a casual conclusion

A

Post Hoc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Nanci ate pizza for lunch and got a good grade on her test. She believes that the pizza caused her to get a perfect grade.

A

Post Hoc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

My computer crashed after installing the software, thus, the software made it crash.

A

Post Hoc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

The appeal to pity fallacy occurs when someone attempts to persuade others by provoking feelings of guilt or pity. Instead of presenting factual information and evidence to support an argument, one may try to play on people’s feelings.

A

Appeal to Pity

18
Q

someone telling their boss that they do not deserve to be fired for being late all the time, citing as evidence that their children will go hungry if they lose the job.

A

Appeal to pity

19
Q

an attempt to discredit someone’s argument by personally attacking them. Instead of discussing the argument itself, criticism is directed toward the opponent’s character, which is irrelevant to the discussion.

A

Ad Hominem

20
Q

A: “I did not break the glass.” B: “You can’t be trusted, you have lied 3 times before.

A

Ad Hominem

21
Q

is a statement or conclusion that does not follow logically from what preceded it. Responses that have nothing to do with the conversation or flawed conclusions “based” on what preceded them.

A

Non Sequitur

22
Q

A: “I really like the movie Barbie.”

B: “Did you know that Oppenheimer’s bomb killed more than 100 k people?”

A

Non sequitur

23
Q

Claims based on insufficient evidence. USes small samples for broader conclusions

A

Hast Generalization

24
Q

I had a bad experience with one teacher this means all teachers are bad

A

Hasty generalization

25
Q

Assumes a premise is true to justify the argument, a form of circular reasoning

A

Begging the question

26
Q

Distort’s opponent’s argument for easier refutation; doesn’t address the actual argument

A

Straw Man

27
Q

Meaning: Arguing that something must be true or good because many people believe or do it.

A

Bandwagon approach

28
Q

Everyone else is buying the latest smartphone, so you should too.”

A

Bandwagon Approach

29
Q

Suggesting that one action will lead to a chain of events with disastrous consequences, without providing evidence for this causal connection.

A

Slippery Slope

30
Q

“If we allow students to retake one test, they’ll want to retake every test, and soon the entire education system will collapse.”

A

Slippery Slope

31
Q

Using the testimony of an authority figure as evidence for a claim, even if the authority is not an expert in the relevant field or their opinion is not based on evidence.

A

Appeals to authority

32
Q

Dr. Smith says that this diet pill is effective, so it must be true.”

A

Appeals to authority

33
Q

Presenting only favorable evidence or arguments for a particular position, while ignoring or downplaying opposing evidence or arguments.

A

Card Stacking

34
Q

A commercial for a fast-food restaurant only focuses on the positive aspects of their food, while ignoring any health concerns or negative reviews.

A

Card Stacking

35
Q

Drawing a conclusion based on insufficient or biased evidence, without considering all relevant factors.

A

Hasty generalization

36
Q

“I met one rude person from that country, so everyone from that country must be rude.”

A

Hasty generalization

37
Q

Assuming the truth of the conclusion in the premise, thereby circularly arguing for a point.

A

Begging the question

38
Q

The Bible is the word of God because God says so in the Bible.”

A

Begging the question

39
Q

Misrepresenting or oversimplifying someone else’s argument in order to make it easier to attack or refute.

A

Straw MAn

40
Q

“Opponents of the new environmental policy claim that we shouldn’t protect the environment at all costs, but that’s just ridiculous.”

A

Straw MAn

41
Q

Drawing a conclusion that does not logically follow from the premises or evidence presented.

A

Non sequitur

42
Q

“All cats have fur. My dog has fur. Therefore, my dog is a cat.”

A

Non Sequitur

43
Q

“I ate sushi last night, and now I have a stomachache. Therefore, the sushi must have made me sick.”

A

Post Hoc