Fallacies Flashcards

1
Q

Paralogisme

A

un raisonnement faux
qui apparaît comme valide,
notamment à son auteur1,
lequel est de bonne foi

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

un raisonnement faux qui apparaît comme valide, notamment à son auteur1, lequel est de bonne foi

A

Paralogisme

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Sophisme

A

argument fallacieux
qui apparaît comme valide
mais destiné à tromper

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

argumentfallacieuxqui apparaît comme valider mais destiné à tromper

A

Sophisme

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Ad hominem

A

attempt to invalidate an opponent’s position based on a personal trait or fact about the opponent rather than through logic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

attempt to invalidate an opponent’s position based on a personal trait or fact about the opponent rather than through logic.

A

Ad hominem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Katherine is a bad choice for mayor because she didn’t grow up in this town.

A

Ad hominem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Red herring

A

attempt to shift focus from the debate at hand by introducing an irrelevant point.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

attempt to shift focus from the debate at hand by introducing an irrelevant point.

A

Red herring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Losing a tooth can be scary, but have you heard about the Tooth Fairy?

A

Red herring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Straw man

A

argumentthat argues against a hyperbolic, inaccurate version of the opposition rather than their actual argument.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

argumentthat argues against a hyperbolic, inaccurate version of the opposition rather than their actual argument.

A

Straw man

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Erin thinks we need to stop using all plastics, right now, to save the planet from climate change.

A

Straw man

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Equivocation

A

statement crafted to mislead or confuse readers or listeners by using multiple meanings or interpretations of a word or simply through unclear phrasing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

statement crafted to mislead or confuse readers or listeners by using multiple meanings or interpretations of a word or simply through unclear phrasing.

A

Equivocation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

While I have a clear plan for the campus budget that accounts for every dollar spent, my opponent simply wants to throw money at special interest projects.

A

Equivocation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Slippery slope

A

the arguer claims a specific series of events will follow one starting point, typically with no supporting evidence for this chain of events.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

the arguer claims a specific series of events will follow one starting point, typically with no supporting evidence for this chain of events.

A

Slippery slope

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

If we make an exception for Bijal’s service dog, then other people will want to bring their dogs. Then everybody will bring their dog, and before you know it, our restaurant will be overrun with dogs, their slobber, their hair, and all the noise they make, and nobody will want to eat here anymore.

A

Slippery slope

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Hasty generalization

A

statement made after considering just one or a few examples rather than relying on more extensive research to back up the claim. It’s important to keep in mind that what constitutes sufficient research depends on the issue at hand and the statement being made about it.

21
Q

statement made after considering just one or a few examples rather than relying on more extensive research to back up the claim.
(It’s important to keep in mind that what constitutes sufficient research depends on the issue at hand and the statement being made about it.)

A

Hasty generalization

22
Q

I felt nauseated both times I ate pizza from Georgio’s, so I must be allergic to something in pizza.

A

Hasty generalization

23
Q

Appeal to authority

A

the arguer claims an authority figure’s expertise to support a claim despite this expertise being irrelevant or overstated.

24
Q

the arguer claims an authority figure’s expertise to support a claim despite this expertise being irrelevant or overstated.

A

Appeal to authority

25
Q

If you want to be healthy, you need to stop drinking coffee. I read it on a fitness blog.

A

Appeal to authority

26
Q

False dilemma or false dichotomy

A

claim that there are only two options in a given situation. Often, these two options are extreme opposites of each other, failing to acknowledge that other, more reasonable, options exist.

27
Q

claim that there are only two options in a given situation. Often, these two options are extreme opposites of each other, failing to acknowledge that other, more reasonable, options exist.

A

False dilemma or false dichotomy

28
Q

If you don’t support my decision, you were never really my friend.

A

False dilemma or false dichotomy

29
Q

Bandwagon fallacy

A

the arguer claims that a certain action is the right thing to do because it’s popular.

30
Q

the arguer claims that a certain action is the right thing to do because it’s popular.

A

Bandwagon fallacy

31
Q

Of course it’s fine to wait until the last minute to write your paper. Everybody does it!

A

Bandwagon fallacy

32
Q

Appeal to ignorance

A

claim that something must be true because it hasn’t been proven false.

claim that something must be false because it hasn’t been proven true.

This is also known as the burden of proof fallacy.

33
Q

claim that something must be true because it hasn’t been proven false.

claim that something must be false because it hasn’t been proven true.

This is also known as the burden of proof fallacy.

A

Appeal to ignorance

34
Q

There must be fairies living in our attic because nobody’s ever proven that there aren’t fairies living in our attic.

A

Appeal to ignorance

35
Q

Circular argument

A

argument that uses the same statement as both the premise and the conclusion. No new information or justification is introduced.

36
Q

argument that uses the same statement as both the premise and the conclusion. No new information or justification is introduced.

A

Circular argument

37
Q

Peppers are the easiest vegetable to grow because I think peppers are the easiest vegetable to grow.

A

Circular argument

38
Q

Sunk cost fallacy

A

the arguer justifies their decision to continue a specific course of action by the amount of time or money they’ve already spent on it.

39
Q

the arguer justifies their decision to continue a specific course of action by the amount of time or money they’ve already spent on it.

A

Sunk cost fallacy

40
Q

I’m not enjoying this book, but I bought it, so I have to finish reading it.

A

Sunk cost fallacy

41
Q

Appeal to pity

A

attempt to sway a reader’s or listener’s opinion by provoking them emotionally.

42
Q

attempt to sway a reader’s or listener’s opinion by provoking them emotionally.

A

Appeal to pity

43
Q

I know I should have been on time for the interview, but I woke up late and felt really bad about it, then the stress of being late made it hard to concentrate on driving here.

A

Appeal to pity

44
Q

Causal fallacy

A

fallacy that implies a relationship between two things where one can’t actually be proven.

45
Q

fallacy that implies a relationship between two things where one can’t actually be proven.

A

Causal fallacy

46
Q

When ice cream sales are up, so are shark attacks. Therefore, buying ice cream increases your risk of being bitten by a shark.

A

Causal fallacy

47
Q

Appeal to hypocrisy

A

a rebuttal that responds to one claim with reactive criticism rather than with a response to the claim itself.

48
Q

a rebuttal that responds to one claim with reactive criticism rather than with a response to the claim itself.

A

Appeal to hypocrisy

49
Q

“You don’t have enough experience to be the new leader.” “Neither do you!”

A

Appeal to hypocrisy