Fallacies

Question 1

value claim

Answer 1

Is a claim that something is right or wrong, good or bad, beautiful or ugly, better or worse’s important or trivial, and so on.

Question 2

Fallacies

Answer 2

Making bad arguments look good

Question 3

Formal fallacy

Answer 3

Fallacies found in the form or structure an argument. Only deductive arguments can be formally fallacious

Question 4

Informal fallacy

Answer 4

These fallacies are more subtle and can only be detected by examining an arguments content

Question 5

Appeal to force (argument ad bacculum)

Answer 5

This fallacy always involves a threat by the arguer to the physical or psychological well-being of the listener, whether an individual or group of people

Question 6

Appeal to pity

Answer 6

The argue attempt to support theirargument by attempting to evoke pity from the listener

Question 7

Argumentum Ad popusum (argument to the people)

Answer 7

Argue uses the listener’s desire to be loved, recognized, and accepted by a group to get the listener to accept a conclusion.

Question 8

Direct ad populum

Answer 8

A rouse a mob mentality of a large group of people to win acceptance for a conclusion.

Question 9

Indiret ad popular

Answer 9

Argument is aimed directly at an individuals relationship with the crowd

Question 10

Direct ad populum forms

Answer 10

Appeal to fear,- fear mongering

Question 11

Indirect ad populum forms

Answer 11

Bandwagon-everybody believes it, so you should too
Appeal to vanity- connect the love of the crowd with the attributes or activities of a famous person
Appeal to shobbery- appeal to a small group that is supposed to be superior in some way
Appeal to tradition -argues that because summoning nas always been one way it should continue to be that way.

Question 12

Argumentum ad hominem argument against the person

Answer 12

A refufutional fallen. Refutational fallacies always involves arguers, one responds to the claims of the other by attacking the person herself and not the argument
Ad hominem abusive - the argner verbally abusesth first
Ad hominem circumstantial - respondent attempts to discredit the opponent by sewing that their circumstances predispose them argue to a certain-way
Tu quote (‘you too’) or E pointing to Th other wrongly-secoundargner attends is a hypo route in someway
Exception when an attach is used to call into question the character or tussworthiness of and another its surpeopa

Question 13

Straws man