Falcies Flashcards
The sample size is to small
Hasty generalization
Drawing conclusions based only on evidence at hand with no proof
Circumstantial evidence
Mistakes in statistics or implications
Playing with numbers
Assuming what your trying to prove
Begging the Question
Avoiding answering a question you have no good answer do
Ignoring the question
Assuming that of two related things one causes the other
Mistaken causality
Comparing two things that shouldn’t be comapared
False analogy
Priming or predisposing an audenicne to dislike or think badly of someone
Poising the well
Using two or one words with different meanings as thought they are the same
Equivocation
Assuming history of outcomes affects the future of outcomes
Gamblers fallacy
Using evidence from an unarmed or gauge source as proof
Appeal to anybody’s authority
Claiming true because it is commonly done
“everyone’s doing it”
Appeal to common practice
Thinking something’s better because it cost more
Appeal to money
Claiming something must be false because it has not been proven true
Appeal to Ignorance
Thinking that because something sounds unbelievable it must not be true
Appeal to incredulity
Assuming something is better because it is new
Appeals to novelty
Assuming something is true because it has always been done that way or because it is older
Appeal to tradition
Assuming. Something is true because majority people believe it
Appeal to popular belief
Assuming something could be true it is true or will eventually be true
Appeal to probability
Claiming something is false or true because strongly hope it is so
Appeal to wishful thinking
Relating on an unfounded compliment to get people to accept your claim
Appeal to flattery
Purposelyfully making you opponents argument look silly
Appeal to ridicule
Assuming an argument is wrong because because the one making it does not live up to it
Appeal to hypocrisy
Associating argument with Hitler
Reduction ad Hitlerum
Introducing anirrelevant topic to divert attention from original issue
Red herring
Asking a question that if directly answered would imply shared agreement
Loaded question
Arguing that a change will result in inevibltr domino affect
Slippery slope
Twisting an opponents argument and then attacking he twisted version
Straw man
Assuming the truth must lie sowehrre between two opposing argument
Middle ground
Assuming there are only two choices when there are more
False delemia
Only using data that supports your position and ignoring data the contradicted
Cherry picking
Assuming because of fairness that something wrong is justified
Two wrongs make a right