Facial Views, CT & MRI Flashcards
Why is it difficult to determine whether facial fractures are present?
- there is often much bruising and swelling of the face
- this can make it difficult to determine whether fractures are present
What are the 5 specific external signs that indicate facial fractures?
- facial asymmetry
- flattened cheek
- “dish face”
- deviation of the nose / flattened nasal bridge
- pupils not level
What is “dish-face”?
- occurs when the midface appears “dished-in”
- this represents posterior and inferior displacement of the maxilla
- the face can appear elongated as a result
Why are X-rays not often performed even though fractures of the nose are common?
- X-rays are only indicated when there is an obvious deformity, such as deviation
- if there is swelling, but no obvious deformity then the patient is advised to wait until the swelling subsides
- if there is a deformity following disappearance of the swelling then imaging is performed
What does the pupils not being equal suggest?
- this indicates fracture of the orbital floor and prolapse of orbital contents (such as inferior rectus)
- the patient may have diplopia and impaired movements of the eye
When does a patient with facial injuries need a CT head or CT C-spine?
- in severe blows to the face, the skull, brain and C-spine may have also sustained injury and a CT should be performed
- an injury to the face is an injury to the head, so if any of the NICE criteria for CT scanning after head injury is met, it should be performed
- bones of the face are sturdy (especially strong bones, such as the frontal bone), so fracture to these requires high force
in these situations, there is a high chance of a corresponding intracranial complication
Why can it be difficult to examine the eye and vision after facial injuries involving the orbit?
- severe swelling and pain can make this examination impossible
- eyelids and soft tissues can be so swollen that the patient cannot open the lids or withstand a gentle attempt to force them open
- the eyes and the vision cannot be examined
- a CT orbit can be performed in this situation
When are facial X-rays requested?
Why can they be difficult to interpret?
- they are requested when the patient does not require a CT-head, but there is clinical suspicion of facial fractures
- they are difficult to interpret as the anatomy of the facial skeleton is complex and there is superimposition of the bones of the face and skull upon each other
What are the 6 different types of facial fractures that can occur?
- simple nasal fractures
- LeFort fractures (“middle-third” fractures)
- zygomatic fractures
- orbital fractures
- frontal sinus fracture
- mandibular fractures + TMJ dislocation
- in the case of mandibular fractures, there is likely to be more than one as the mandible is essentially a “ring structure”
What are the 2 views of the facial skeleton that are commonly taken?
- occipito-mental (OM)
- occipito-mental 30o (OM 30)
- a standard PA facial view or PA mandible may also be taken
- the patient details, date and technical adequacy must be assessed first
Why does a CT head not suffice for facial fractures?
- a normal CT head will NOT cover the facial bones
- the orbits and some of the maxillary sinuses may be visible
- if the facial bones are specifically required, then CT facial skeleton must be requested to ensure they are included
How is an OM view taken?
What is this good for visualising?
- the beam travels from the occiput to the jaw
- this gives a good view of:
- frontal and maxillary bones
- zygomatic bone and zygomatic arch (“elephant trunk”)
- dens of C2
- frontal, ethmoid and maxillary sinuses
When is the OM 30 view preferred and how is this performed?
- the head is tilted backwards by 30o before a beam is fired from the occiput to the jaw
- this is good for visualising:
- maxillary sinuses
- inferior orbital rims
- features of the mandible
What are the features of this PA facial X-ray?
Which part of the temporal bone is visible?
- the petrous ridge is the part of the temporal bone that can be seen through the orbits
- this is the dense / “rock-like” part of the temporal bone
Why can appearance of the mastoid differ between individuals?
What is the risk associated with the less common presentation?
- mastoid aeration / presence of air cells is highly variable
- some people have very dense mastoid processes that do not contain any air cells
- these people cannot equalise the pressure in their ears as easily as those with air cells
- they are more likely to develop retraction pockets in the ear drum and subsequent cholesteatoma
- usually, the mastoid air cells appear “bubbly” as they are filled with air
What are the features of this OM view?
What type of fracture is this good for visualising?
- the head has been tilted backwards, allowing the floor of the orbit and anterior wall of the maxillary sinus to be seen more clearly
- this view is useful for visualising fractures of the orbital floor
Why can suture lines be mistaken for fractures?
How can this be avoided?
- sutures are less dense than bone and appear as a small dark line
- the suture between the frontal and zygomatic bone is often mistaken for a fracture
- if in doubt, compare to the other side to see if they are symmetrical
What type of fracture seen in the OM view implicates 4 sutures and why?
How can this be recognised?
tripod / quadripod fracture
- the zygomatic bone is attached to many other bones:
- temporal bone
- frontal bone
- maxillary bone
- pterygoid region
- a severe fracture to the zygoma can rotate and implicate these 4 structures
- look for the intact “elephant trunk” when assessing whether a zygomatic fracture is present
What are McGregor’s lines?
What type of fracture are they important in looking for?
- in OM views of the face, it is important to systematically review the 3 sections of the face along 3 lines:
- over the upper orbits
- over the upper surface of the zygomatic arch, lower orbit and nose
- over the lower surface of the zygomatic arch and alveolar process
- these are mainly related to LeFort fractures
How is integrity of the zygomatic complex determined in an OM view?
- the integrity of the zygomatic complex is determined by tracing around the zygoma and upper and lower zygomatic arches
- this is described as looking like an elephant’s head and trunk
Why can some fractures of the zygomatic arch be difficult to spot?
- not all fractures appear dark on X-rays
- lucency only appears if the bones are separated from each other in the fracture
- the gap is less dense than the bones on either side
- if the bones are overlapping each other in the fracture, it can appear more dense with no dark region
What are the features of the OM 30 view?
What lines should be traced in an OM 30 view?
- lines should be traced over the zygomatic arches, nasal bridge and alveolar process
Describe the typical appearance of an orbital blowout fracture on facial X-ray
Why does this occur?
- a blow to the orbit causes a transient rise in intra-orbital pressure that causes fracture of the thin orbital floor
- there is a break in the cortex of the corresponding infraorbital rim
- there is a fluid level present in the maxillary sinus on the same side
- there is an opacity below the infraorbital rim, indicating prolapse of orbital contents into the maxillary sinus
What contents may herniate into the maxillary sinus following an orbital floor fracture?
Why is there a fluid level in the maxillary sinus?
- contents that may herniate are periorbital fat and the inferior rectus muscle
- a fluid level in the maxillary sinus suggests bleeding as a result of the fracture
- usually the sinuses should be radiolucent and appear dark as they are filled with air
Why might someone with a blowout fracture suffer from diplopia?
- the inferior rectus herniates into the maxillary sinus
- if the inferior rectus becomes trapped, this can stop the eye from moving properly
- the individual is unable to look up
How can an orbital blowout fracture be recognised on MRI?
“teardrop sign”
- the prolapse of orbital contents into the maxillary sinus appears as a teardrop on coronal MRI
- this is caused by the herniation of extraconal fat into the sinus
Do orbital blowout fractures always affect the inferior orbital margin?
- the lamina papyracea of the medial orbital wall can also fracture
- this leads to herniation of orbital fat and medial rectus into the ethmoidal air cells
- this is much less common
Why can a patient with an orbital floor fracture present with a numb cheek?
infra-orbital nerve injury
- this occurs when there is a fracture of the orbital floor passing through the infra-orbital canal
- this results in sensory disturbance in the region of the infra-orbital nerve (V2)
How can you look for lucency in the orbits?
What does this indicate?
- an area of radiolucency appears as a dark shadow in the upper orbit
- this is referred to as the “black eyebrow sign”
- it indicates air in the orbit and the presence of a fracture somewhere
- this is most commonly fracture of the roof of the frontal sinus, as fracture of the medial wall would cause air to be present more medially
What is shown in this image?
- there is a fluid level in the right maxillary sinus (compare to left)
- there is an area of radio-opacity below the right infra-orbital rim, suggesting blow-out fracture and prolapse of orbital contents
What are the 6 steps to interpreting facial X-rays (OM and OM 30)?
- check patient details and projection
- assess the technical adequacy of the film
- describe any obvious abnormalities in as much detail as possible:
- look for symmetry / asymmetry by comparing left / right sides
- if one fracture is seen, look very closely for others
- trace the specific “lines” along the facial bones to look for fractures
- identify and assess the sinuses
- they are air-filled so should be radiolucent
- opacity or fluid-level suggests bleeding, and hence, fracture
- look for signs of air in the orbit - “black eyebrow sign”
Why might a fluid level in the maxillary sinus not always be seen?
- presence of the fluid level depends on the injury, as well as when the patient presents
- if they present slightly later, the fluid level may not be seen
What terms are used to describe lesions within the orbit?
Extra-conal lesions:
- this is used to describe lesions occurring within the muscle cone
Intra-conal lesions:
- this is used to describe lesions occurring outside of the muscle cone
What is meant by a pre-septal and post-septal lesion in the orbit?
- the septum is a line that runs across the midline of the globe
- a post-septal lesion is more concerning
What is concerning in this image?
Why is immediate action required?
- there is a retrobulbar soft tissue lesion on the right side
- it is an extraconal lesion as it is occurring to the right of the lateral rectus
- the lesion appears quite dense so it is likely to be blood (retrobulbar haematoma)
- immediate action is required as the lesion is compressing the optic nerve
From what position are CT and MRI images viewed?
- axial CT and MRI images are viewed from a caudal position
- you are looking up from the feet towards the patient’s head
- this means that the patient’s left is your right as you look at the image
What is attenuation / density in CT?
What unit is used to measure attenuation / density?
- attenuation / density describes how bright or dark structures appear on CT
- high density tissues / regions appear bright
- low density tissues / regions are dark
- the Hounsfield unit (HU) is a “measure” of the densities of different tissues:
- air is -1000 HU (black)
- water is 0 HU (grey)
- bone is +1000 HU (white)
Why is CT able to produce more detailed images than X-ray?
- the HU scale is a measure of tissue density, represented by a number and corresponding shade of grey
- this allows production of more detailed images and allows for tissues with similar densities to be differentiated from one another