Facial Nerve Flashcards
Branchial motor (special visceral efferent)
Supplies the muscles of facial expression; posterior belly of digastric muscle; stylohyoid, and stapedius.
Visceral motor (general visceral efferent)
Parasympathetic innervation of the lacrimal, submandibular, and sublingual glands, as well as mucous membranes of nasopharynx, hard and soft palate.
Special sensory (special afferent)
Taste sensation from the anterior 2/3 of tongue; hard and soft palates
General sensory (general somatic afferent)
General sensation from the skin of the concha of the auricle and from a small area behind the ear.
DifferenSal for Acute Facial Nerve Paralysis
• Polyneuritis – Bell’s palsy – Herpes zoster – Guillan Barre syndrome – Autoimmune disease – Lyme disease – HIV – Kawasaki disease
• Trauma
– Temporal bone
– Barotrauma
– Birth trauma
• Otitis Media
– Acute bacterial
– Chronic bacterial
– Cholesteatoma
- Sarcoidosis
- Melkersson-‐‐Rosenthal
• Neurologic disorders
– HIV
– Cerebrovascular disorders: central or peripheral
Differential for Chronic or Progressive Facial Nerve Paralysis
• Malignancies
– Primary parotid tumor
– Metastatic tumor
• Benign tumors
– Schwannoma
– Glomus tumor
• Cholesteatoma
Examination of Patient with Facial Paresis/Paralysis
• History – Time of onset – Precipitating factors – Speed of progression – Associated symptoms • Physical Examination – House-‐‐Brackmann classifications • Topodiagnostic tests • Electrophysiologic tests • Lab tests PRN • Imaging
Grading of Facial Nerve FuncSon
House-‐‐Brackmann Scale
(Otolaryngology Head Neck Surgery, 1985)
• Grade I – Normal
• Grade II – Mild
– Gross: slight weakness noticeable on close inspection
– At rest: normal symmetry and tone
– Motion: Forehead – moderate to good; Eye – complete closure with minimum effort; Mouth – slight asymmetry
• Grade III – Moderate
– Gross: obvious but not disfiguring asymmetry; may have hemifacial spasm
– At rest: normal symmetry and tone
– Motion: Forehead – slight to moderate movement; Eye – complete closure with effort; Mouth – slightly weak with maximum effort
• Grade IV – Moderately severe
– Gross: obvious weakness and/or disfiguring asymmetry
– At rest: normal symmetry and tone
– Motion: Forehead – no movement; Eye – incomplete closure; Mouth – asymmetric with maximum effort
• Grade V – Severe
– Gross: only barely perceptible motion – At rest: asymmetry – Motion: Forehead – no movement • Eye – incomplete closure • Mouth – slight movement
• Grade VI – Total Paralysis
– No movement
Topodiagnostic Tests of Facial Nerve Function
• Schirmer’s Test of Lacrimal Function • Stapedial Reflex • Electrogustometry • Salivary Flow
Electrodiagnostic Tests of Facial Nerve Function
• Nerve excitability test
– Transcutaneous stimuli delivered over stylomastoid foramen
– Electrical pulses delivered at increasing current levels until facial twitch is noticeable
• Maximum excitability test
– Transcutanteous stimuli looking for twitch – Increase current to get maximum response
• Electromyography (EMG)
– Recording of spontaneous and voluntary muscle potentials
– Needle electrodes in facial muscle groups
– May help to predict recovery
• Electroneuronography (ENoG)
– Stimulating electrodes deliver suprathreshold electrical stimuli
– Recording electrode measures compound muscle action potential
– Reduction in response amplitude reflects number of damaged motor fibers
– Best 3 days to 3 weeks
– Prognostic value
• >90% degeneration at 3 weeks -‐‐ surgery
• <90% degeneration at 3 weeks -‐‐ chance for good recovery
Bell’s Palsy overview
• Most common acute mono‐neuropathy, or disorder affecting a single nerve
• Most common diagnosis associated with facial nerve paresis (weakness) or paralysis (complete loss of movement) of unknown cause.
• Causes partial or complete inability to voluntarily move facial muscles on the affected side of the face.
• The facial paresis/paralysis that occurs in Bell’s palsy may cause: Significant oral incompetence; Eye injury; Long term poor outcomes can occur, and can be
devastating to the patient
• Diagnosis of exclusion
• Not every patient with facial paralysis/paresis will have Bell’s Palsy
• Variations in care; controversy over best treatment options
• Numerous test available; many are of questionable benefit.
• Rapid in onset (<72 hours)
• Dx when no other medical etiology is identified as a cause of facial weakness.
• Bilateral Bell’s palsy is rare.
• Currently, the cause is unknown
• Typically, self-‐‐limiting
• Can occur in anyone, but is most common in
15-‐‐45 y/o, and those with risk factors
Bell’s Palsy Risk Factors, Epidemiology, Prognosis
• Risk Factors:
– Pregnancy – Severe preeclampsia – Obesity – Hypertension and chronic hypertension – Diabetes – Upper respiratory ailments
• Epidemiology
– 11.5-‐‐53.3 per 100,000
– 35,000 to 100,000 cases annually in the US. – 30% incomplete paralysis at presentation – 70% of cases of facial paralysis/paresis
• (30% of cases are not Bell’s Palsy)
The emotional impact of this condition should not be underestimated.
Prognosis for Bell’s Palsy
• Majority have spontaneous, good recovery at 3-‐‐6 months
• Best prognosis
– Never at grade VI – Signs of recovery at 2 months – EMG evidence of voluntary activity – Present acoustic reflex – < 90% degeneration on ENoG at 2 week point
• Worst prognosis
– Age >65 years – Diabetes – >90% degeneration on ENoG at 2 week point
Bell’s Palsy Treatment and Management
• Eye Care
– Very important for Grade III or worse
– Drying of eye 2° to ↓ eye closure and lacrimation → keratopathy and breakdown of the cornea
– Daytime: artificial tears every 2 hours
– Nightime: ophthalmic ointment and moisture chamber over eye
– Temporary tarsorrhaphy (surgery to bring eyelids closer together) or gold weight
• Medical Treatment
– Steroid Rx – should be given in 72 hrs for >16 y/o
• Prednisone -‐‐ 1mg/kg/day 7-‐‐10 days
– Antiviral therapy used in combination with oral steroid by some
Bell’s Palsy: Surgical Treatment
• Facial nerve decompression
– Transmastoid – Middle cranial fossa decompression
• No clear evidence of efficacy.
– Good outcomes for pts with incomplete paralysis
– Lack of large trials
– Diversity of patients in existing trials
– Variable surgical approaches
– Lack of efficacy compared to natural hx