F2 - Financial Reporting and Disclosures Flashcards
When should significant estimates be disclosed in the notes to the financial statements?
When it is “reasonably possible” (not probable) that the estimate will change in the near term, AND the effect of that change will be material.
What is the summary of significant policies? Where and what?
Usually the first note (by general best practice, not be requirement). Includes components like: measurement bases, accounting principles and methods, criteria, and policies such as bases of consolidation, depreciation methods, rev rec, etc.
Difference between IFRS and US GAAP when it comes to required disclosures?
IFRS requires the following (not required by GAAP):
- Statement of compliance with applicable accounting principles
- Disclosure of judgments made in the preparation of financial statements
Where should the following be included in FS: Footnotes or MD&A?
- Info about changes in Stk Equity?
- Analysis of competitors
- Management’s estimates of sales in upcoming year
- Projection of Future Market Conditions
1) Footnotes (any info about significant asset, liability, SE accounts)
2) MD&A (may be included)
3) MD&A (may be)
4) MD&A (may be)
Two customers account for over 40% of sales each. What do we have to disclose about these customers:
- Names of the customers, or
- Amount of entity’s revenue from each
- Names: no, not necessary
- Amount of revenue: yes, necessary
Management must evaluate whether there is sub. doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern for:
- “A reasonable period of time…not to exceed…
- ONE YEAR beyond the date the financial statements are issued
Do IFRS, GAAP, or both require the following:
-Management performs the evaluation of going concern
- Both require management to perform.
- Board of Directors are NOT required to evaluate
Do IFRS, GAAP, or both require the following:
-Presentation of a supplemental schedule showing the balance sheet presented if entity loses GC status
- Neither require this.
- Both require relevant disclosures when there is doubt
Do IFRS, GAAP, or both require the following:
-Liquidation basis of accounting (guidance provided by standards)
- GAAP provides specific guidance about preparing financial statements and nec. disclosures related to liquidation basis of accounting
- IFRS provides no such guidance.
Under GAAP, if a company is not considered a going concern, what method of accounting must be used to prepare financial statements?
Liquidation basis.
-Again, IFRS does not provide guidance in the described situation.
How is IFRS guidance different from GAAP’s when it comes to footnote disclosure of going concern?
IFRS: Disclosure is required when management is aware of “material uncertainties” that may give rise to substantial doubt about ability to continue as gc
When is footnote disclosure required for a subsequent event?
“Reasonably possible loss”
-Liability estimate for a contingency: 1,250,000
-Insurance policy the company has: up to 5,000,000
-Deductible clause in policy: 250,000
What does this company need to disclose as a liability on current year financials if subsequent disclosure of contingency is required?
-Footnote disclosure: 250,000 loss. Insurance covers the entire loss besides the deductible portion.
What is the subsequent event evaluation period for an entity that does not file with the SEC?
Through the date the “financial statements are available to be issued.” Criteria: correct GAAP form and format, and all approvals obtained.
Key point: Entities that do NOT file with SEC are (yes) required to disclose both (1) the date through which sub events have been evaluated, and (2) whether that date is issuance or available to be issued date.
What is the subsequent event evaluation period for an entity that does (yes) file with the SEC?
Through the date the financial statements are issued. Criteria: correct GAAP form and format, statements have been widely distributed to financial statement users.
Key point: Entities that file with SEC are NOT required to disclose the date through which sub events are evaluated. It’s redundant.
Lawsuit was filed against a company in October. Settled in January. Financials are 12/31. What is the effect of this lawsuit on the financials?
Effects of the resolution of the suit must be taken into account to determine amount of lawsuit liability recorded. If liability is larger than original estimate / recording, there is an additional loss recorded along with the original estimated accrual liability.
-Key point: Financials are a reflection of the company’s position AS OF 12/31. If there was an ongoing suit, there would be a corresponding liability waiting to be paid off/settled AS OF 12/31. When it ends up settled, there could be an additional loss or reduction of liability.
Note payable is due 3 months after year end (current liability). 1 month after year end, and before issuance of the financials, a company decides to refinance this note - making it due long into the future with long-term bonds payable. How should the note be classified and disclosed?
Classification: long term liability. Disclosure in footnote.
-Key point: even though the bonds payable were issued after YE, the note existed at the balance sheet date, and therefore needs to be actualized. Liability should be updated and recognized as non-current, and a note disclosure should be added to explain the change in classification.
Fair Value Statements: which of the following are true?
1) FV of an asset/liability is specific to the entity making the FV measurement
2) FV is the price to acquire an asset or assume a liability
3) FV includes transportation costs but not transaction costs
4) Price in principal market = FV of asset / liability
1) False. FV is not an entity-specific measure. It is a market-specific measure.
2) False. FV is an “exit” price - the price to sell an asset or transfer a liability - not an “entrance” price.
3) Truuu. Transportation costs yes, transaction costs no.
4) Truuu. FV is a market-specific measure.
Fair Value Statements: which of the following are true?
1) Level 1 inputs are most reliable
2) Level 1 measurements are quoted prices in active markets for identical/similar assets/liabilities
3) FV measurements based on management assumptions is not acceptable according to GAAP
4) Level in FV heirarchy of one measurement is determined by level of highest level significant input.
1) True.
2) False. Level 1 measurements are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets / liabilities. Don’t get tripped up by extra language.
3) False. FV measurement based on management assumptions counts as a level 3 measurement. It is acceptable when undue cost to obtain level 1/2 inputs.
4) False. Level in FV heirarchy of a FV measurement is determined by the level of the LOWEST level significant input, not the highest one. 1 = LOW. 3 = High. GET IT.
- When there is no principal market… the price in the most (advantageous / disadvantageous) market is the FV measurement?
- Do we use transaction costs to calculate advantageous / disadvantageous?
1) Price in the most ADVANTAGEOUS market is the FV measurement. Why not? Why wouldn’t you want to sell in the most advantageous market? Duh. 74-2, or 76-5? 74-2 every time.
2) Transaction costs are used to determine which market. Not included in final FV though. 74-2 still gives you a FV of 74.
What are the acceptable methods of measuring FV per SFAS No. 157?
Easy. 1) Market approach. 2) Cost approach.
Key point: Switching between these methods is ok, its simply a change in accounting estimate. Not a change in principle. Not a correction of an error
Key point 2: EXAM HACK: Correction of an error is NOT a type of accounting change. Know this trick, will save you time.
Level 2 inputs are unique. What are some examples?
- Quoted prices for similar assets/liabilities in active markets
- Quoted prices for identical assets/liabilities in non-active markets
- Interest rates that are observable at commonly quoted intervals
Farmer Joe sells corn in 4 different “markets” (states). How does he determine the principal market for his corn?
The principal market for Farmer Joe is the market with the greatest OVERALL volume of activity for the particular asset (corn) he is measuring.
Key point: Farmer Joe can sell all the corn he wants in each of the 4 states, but if Michigan is the state with the highest volume of corn purchases in general, and as long as Farmer Joe had access to this market, it becomes his principal market.
What is the fair value of Farmer Joe’s farmland (ie. Non-Financial Asset) if it is on the “market” as two different uses (original use farmland, and alternative use shopping plaza)?
The FV of a non-financial asset is its value at its highest and best use. If that means an alternative use, so be it. Shopping plaza value = FV measurement.