eyewitness tesitmony Flashcards

1
Q

leading question

A

questions that imply a specific answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

eyewitness testimony

A

evidence given by witnesses in a crime/accident

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

post-event discussion

A

when recall of an event is influenced by a second-party opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what did loftus and palmer do to test misleading information?

A

showed 45 ppts of a film of a car accident and asked “how fast was the car going before it hit each other?”. using different verbs for each group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what was the verb with the highest and lowest speed?

A

contacted with 32mph and smashed with 41 mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what did gabbert et al do to test post event discussion?

A

videos of crimes shot in different perspectives where shown to pairs of ppts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

the results for gabbert et al?

A

71% of the ppts who were allowed to discuss the events said things that were not shown in the video. compared to 0%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what did gabber et al find?

A

witnesses will change their statement to match other witnesses to gain social approval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

weapon focus effect

A

witnesses are distracted by the weapon held by the criminal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what did johson and scott do?

A

tested effect of anxiety on EWT by placing naive ppts outside a lab exposed to two types of conversations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what was the two conversations?

A
  1. normal convo about a equipment failure, man walks out with greasy hands and a pen
  2. breaking glass and furniture knocking over, man walks out with a knife covered in blood
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

results for johnson and scott?

A

asked to identify the man from 50 pictures
1. 49% accuracy with man with pen
2. 33% accuracy with man with knife

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

strengths of effect on EWT

A

research led to real life applications, development of cognitive interview

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

weakenesses of effect on EWT

A
  1. most studies are unethical
  2. lab studies - ppts aware that there is a lack of consequences in the evidence they give
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

4 steps to cognitive interview

A
  1. context reinstatement
  2. recall everything
  3. change perspective
  4. reverse order
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

context reinstatement

A

mentally returning to the scene - triggers contextual cues

17
Q

recall everything

A

recalling even the irrelavant details

18
Q

changed perspective

A

recalling the events again but from a different pov - disrupts schemas

19
Q

reverse order

A

disrupts schemas again

20
Q

strengths of CI

A

kohken et al. combined data from 55 studies comparing CI and standard interview
- 41% increased in accuracy

21
Q

weaknesses of CI

A

kohken et al. found that there was an increase in the amount of inaccurate info presented for CI
- quantity over qulity

22
Q

weakness of CI

A

takes longer time and is expensive to set up the CI
- training the officers
- not realistic