Eye Witness Testimony Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define eye-witness testimony

A

When people who have witnessed a crime report what they remember happening mg

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is post event discussion

A

When witnesses discuss the events, which may affect accuracy of EWTs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Outline research support for post-event discussion

A

Gabbert et al
2003
- pairs of ppts watched a film from 2 different angles + discussed what they saw
- 71% recalled parts they had not seen vs 0% in control
2015
- participant and confederate watch a film of a robbery
- they discuss and confederate feeds false info
- 75% of ppts gave info not in the video reported by confederate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Give a strength for post event discussion research

A

+ Real life application - can be used to create more accurate EWT by preventing PED

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Give weaknesses of research support for post-event discussion

A

Low ecological validity - setting lacks emotional intensity of real crime
Low mundane realism - watching a film is an artificial task
Lack of consequences of inaccurate recall - no chance of wrongful conviction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are leading questions?

A

Questions that are worded to suggest a particular answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Outline research support into leading questions

A

Loftus and Palmer
- 45 students watched clips of traffic accidents
- then were asked questions about it in groups
- different groups were given 5 different verbs when asked to estimate speed of cars
- those with ‘smashed’ had average estimate of 40.5 mph vs ‘contacted’ was 31.8mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Give weaknesses for research into leading questions

A

Low ecological validity - setting lacks emotional intensity of real crime
Low mundane realism - watching a video is an artificial task
Lack of consequences of inaccurate recall - no chance of wrongful conviction
population validity - students are less likely to drive so may have inaccurate estimates of speed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Give a strength for research into leading questions

A

+ Real life application - can be used to create more accurate EWT by avoiding leading questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe the two explanations for how leading questions affect EWT

A

• Response bias explanations = wording doesn’t alter memory, just how we answer questions
• Substitution explanation = wording actually changes memory - supported by Loftus and Palmer who also found ppts more likely to report broken glass when ‘smashed’ was used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Outline one research into effect of anxiety on EWT

A

Johnson & Scott
- ppts in a waiting room heard an argument in next room
-low anxiety condition = man wakes through waiting room carrying a pen with grease on hands
- high anxiety = man walked through with paper knife, covered in blood and sound of breaking glass
- found 49% identified man in low anxiety vs 33% in high

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does tunnel theory explain anxiety’s effect of EWT?

A

People narrowly focus on the source of anxiety (e.g. a weapon) , so may miss other factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Outline one real study into effect of anxiety on EWT

A

Yullie & Cutshall
- shopkeeper shot thief, 13/21 witnesses in study
- interviewed witness 4-5 months later compared to initial police interview & asked to report anxiety at the time
- found little change in accuracy, high stress= 88% vs low stress = 75%
- more anxiety may trigger fight or flight, people are more alert

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe Yerkes-Dodson Law in expalining influence of anxiety on EWT

A

States arousal increases performance up to a point before decreasing - there is an “optimal” level of anxiety for best recall before memory suffers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Give strengths for the J&S study into anxiety in EWT

A

+ high mundane realism, reflective of real crimes
+ high internal validity; control of EVs such as time man being in waiting room, other distractions, etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Give limitations for J&S study into anxiety in EWT

A

- anxiety levels were assumed based on the condition; may not reflect ppts actual anxiety
Demand characteristics; unusual situation so ppts may have realised this was the study
Ethical issues; may have caused psychological harm through distressing situation

17
Q

Give strengths for Y&C study into anxiety in EWT

A

+ High ecological validity as it was a real crime ; genuine anxiety

18
Q

Give limitations for Y&C study into anxiety in EWT

A

Quasi study means no control over EVs so we cannot ensure affect on IV is the DV (e.g. PED or proximity to crime)
Subjectivity of self rating anxiety, different for different people
Retrospective data may mean less accurate memory of anxiety at the time

19
Q

Describe the 4 parts of the cognitive interview

A

Report everything - witness asked to recall all details of an event, even if they seem irrelevant
Context reinstatement - interviewee mentally reinstates the environmental and personal context of the event
Reverse order - Interviewer tries alternative ways through the timeline of the incident (backwards)
Changed perspective - witnesses are asked to recall the event form a different point of view

20
Q

How does each part of the cognitive interview help with accurate recall?

A

Report everything - retrieval failure states irrelevant details may trigger other important pieces of info
Context reinstatement - Based on retrieval failure, context dependent cues may trigger recall
Reverse order - reduces possibility that recall is influenced by schemas
Changed perspective - reduces influence of schemas

21
Q

Give strengths of the cognitive interview

A

+ Research support (Milne & Bull) found CI produced more info than standard police interviews
+ Based on valid theories - theories of forgetting support principle of cues being useful for recall
+ Kohnken found CI produced 81% more correct info than standard; impact for justice system
however! also found 61% more false info

22
Q

Give limitations for the cognitive interview

A

Practical issues - training police interviewers in new techniques takes time & money, interviews are also longer