Extrajudicial Admissions and Confessions (10) Flashcards
Forgive me, I have Sinned
what is the concept of an ADMISSION?
An admission refers to a voluntary acknowledgment, in express terms or by implication, by a party- in-interest or by another by whose statement he is legally bound, against his interest, of the existence or truth of a fact in dispute material to the issue.
It is an acknowledgment of fact/s opposite or contrary to the fact/s raised or positions taken by a party in court.
what is the reason for the rule that an act, declaration, or omission of a party as to a relevant fact may be given in evidence against him?
The admissibility of a party admission does not rest upon the fact that it is against the interest of the party/admitter but upon the adversary theory of litigation. A party declarant can hardly object that he had no opportunity to cross-examine himself or that he is unworthy of credence save when speaking under the sanction of an oath
Requisites for EXTRAJUDICIAL admission
- Involve matters of fact, and not of law;
- Categorical and definite;
- Be knowingly and voluntarily made;
- Adverse to the admitter’s interests (need not be adverse at the time the declaration was made; it is enough that it is adverse to the present position taken by the declarant);
- Made out of court or made in court during the proceedings of a case other than the case under consideration
Two (2) Ways to Introduce an Admission as Evidence:
- as independent evidence
- as impeaching evidence
what are self-serving declarations?
Statements made by the declarant out of court advocating his own interest/ favorable to his/her interests. They are inadmissible on the ground of hearsay. But if made in open court, they are admissible as the witness-declarant can be cross-examined.
Admission against interest (AIA sec 26)
vs
Declaration against interest (DAI sec 38)
AIA 26
- declarant doesn’t need to die
- admission is admissible against the declarant only
DAI 38
- declarant must be dead [or] unable to testify
- declaration is binding not only against the declarant but also declarant’s successor-in-interest, even 3rd parties
Kinds of Implied Admission
- offer of compromise
- plea of forgiveness
- offer of marriage
- offer to pay money
implied admission > 1 offer of compromise
Rule on COMPROMISE and its in/admissibility
[NOT admissible] as implied admission of liability in civil cases (it is in fact encouraged)
compromise in criminal case [admissible]
implied admission > 1 offer of compromise
GR
offer of compromise, if rejected, can be used as evidence of guilt
Implied Admission > Offer of Compromise > GR
XPNs
- Quasi-offenses committed through negligence under Art. 369 of RPC
- Where the law allows compromise in criminal cases
- Offer to plea of guilt to a lesser offense
- When the Good Samaritan Rule applies
Implied Admission > Offer of Compromise > GR > XPNs
Quasi-offenses committed through negligence under Art. 369 of RPC
a. Reckless Imprudence resulting in homicide
b. Reckless Imprudence resulting in physical injuries
c. Reckless Imprudence resulting in damage in property
Implied Admission > Offer of Compromise > GR > XPNs
where law allows compromise in criminal cases
tax evasion to the effect that if the offer of compromise is rejected, it CANNOT be used to prove liability
Implied Admission > Offer of Compromise > GR > XPNs
offer to plea of guilt to a lesser offense
What happens if your client makes an offer that is rejected by the prosecutor and the private offended party?
That offer to plead guilty to a lesser offense is not admissible to prove implied admission of guilt.
improvident plea of guilt withdrawn cannot be used as evidence for implied admission
Implied Admission > Offer of Compromise > GR > XPNs
scenarios where a Good samaritan rule applies
An offer to pay or the actual payment of money for medical, hospital, or other related expenses occasioned by an injury is NOT admissible as an implied admission or evidence of civil or criminal liability.
page 20 of 2019 notes with table of contents
requisites to invoke DAI
- Declarant is dead/unable to testify 2. 3. 4. 5. 2 Declaration relates to the pedigree of another relative
- Declarant is related by birth or by marriage to the person whose pedigree is in question
- Act or declaration was made prior to the controversy
5 Such relationship is shown by evidence other than such act or declaration*