Extra Final Exam Study Stuff Flashcards
Interference with a contract
someone who has knowledge of an existing contract and who intentionally interferes into that contract by inducing a party to breach. the defendant is liable to the other contracting party for any resulting consequential damages.
What are the elements court usually considers in determining whether an activity is ultrahazardous?
(i) if the activity involves a risk of serious harm to persons or property;
(ii) if the activity is one that cannot be performed without risk of serious harm no matter how much care is taken; and
(iii) if the activity is not one commonly engaged in by the persons in the community.
Elements of Negligent Misrepresentation?
- False Representation
- Negligence - about the info
- Intended to Induce Reliance
- Justifiable Reliance
- Damages
Products Liability - MUST PROVE:
- Duty: owed from all sellers to foreseeable Plaintiff’s
- Breach: look for carelessness in design, manufacturing, warning, packaging, shipping, inspection, testing, etc.
- Causation: factual & proximate cause
- Damages: physical injury and property damage, but NOT pure economic loss
- Defenses (4)
Manufacturing defect:
Product not as intended
1. Product must differ from most others made; more dangerous that those that
conform
Design Defect:
Product is as intended, but design is flawed or poorly designed
1. Occurs when intended design of the product is inadequate and needlessly
dangerous
Tests for Unreasonably Dangerous Design Defects
- Consumer Expectation: Whether product is more dangerous than would be contemplated by the ordinary consumer with ordinary common knowledge about its dangers. (what the consumer reasonably expects)
- Risk v. Utility (6 factors)
(a) usefulness and desireabiliyt
(b) likelihood and severity of injury
(c) availability of alternatives
(d) users ability to avoid danger
(e) users expectations
(f) feasibility of manufacturer spreading the risk of loss
–> Safer Alternative Test: P must prove- a safer, practical, alternative deign was available to manufacturing
WARNING DEFECT ISSUES: No duty to warn when…
- (obvious hazard doctrine) danger open and obvious
- (learned intermediary rule) when warnings & instructions may be directed to the physician rather than to the patient
R2sd §402(A) ELEMENTS
- Commercial Seller who sells a product with a defective condition that is unreasonably dangerous due to
(a) manufacturing defects
(b) design defects
(c) warning + instruction defects - Is liable for physical HARM or property damages to user/consumer
- If the product is expected to + does reach consumer WITHOUT substantial CHANGE from the condition in which its sold.
WARRANTIES (2)
- Express Warranty: P may recover if the seller misrepresents a product quality. An assertion of fact- a material representation about products composition, durability, performance, safety, etc. MORE THAN OPINION OR PUFFING
- Implied Warranty: P may recover if the seller’s product has a defect that makes it unfit for its ordinary intended purposes. (affects merchantability)
MISREPRESENTATION
Misrepresentation is a false representation of a material fact intended to induce reliance in the plaintiff and on which plaintiff justifiable relies and damages result
FALSE REPRESENTATION OF MATERIAL FACT…..example sentences
- The false representation occurred when…
2. The fact is material because…
RULE Elements Misappropriation
- Used Name or Likeness
- The Use of P’s Name or Likeness was for the Def’s
own purposes or benefit commercially - P Suffered Damages
- Defendant caused the damaged
Privacy Torts Defenses
Public Concern / Newsworthy or Privilege - 1st Amendment]
RULE Elements Intrusion Upon Seclusion
- Intrusion into a Private place, conversation, or matter
2. In a manner that is Highly Offensive to a reasonable person